
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
This conversation starts with Quentin Anstee complimenting Stephen Harrison for his observation that when we analyze NASH Biomarkers, we should consider the value of sustained response separate from early OR late response.
From here, the group moves to the concept of "stacked" tests -- confirmatory results from different NITs as a way to assess efficacy in an individual clinical trial subject. The conversation takes some twists and turns, but the core concept is unique, challenging and a significant step forward in the broader discussion of how to analyze biomarkers.
By SurfingNASH.com3.9
2424 ratings
Send us a text
This conversation starts with Quentin Anstee complimenting Stephen Harrison for his observation that when we analyze NASH Biomarkers, we should consider the value of sustained response separate from early OR late response.
From here, the group moves to the concept of "stacked" tests -- confirmatory results from different NITs as a way to assess efficacy in an individual clinical trial subject. The conversation takes some twists and turns, but the core concept is unique, challenging and a significant step forward in the broader discussion of how to analyze biomarkers.

32,332 Listeners

30,839 Listeners

9,745 Listeners

105 Listeners

21,254 Listeners

3,379 Listeners

113,406 Listeners

57,066 Listeners

9,584 Listeners

8,746 Listeners

10,277 Listeners

6,473 Listeners

0 Listeners

419 Listeners

679 Listeners