Don and Tom expose the seductive illusion of “wealth without risk” by dissecting the explosion of equity-hedged ETFs and mutual funds. They tear into the high fees, low returns, and false promises sold by funds claiming to protect investors from market drops while capturing the upside. With support from recent Wall Street Journal coverage and AQR data, they explain how these “hedging” strategies—especially options-based ones—often underperform simple stock/bond portfolios. Listener questions tackle Roth conversions, AVGE vs. GLOV, and the myth of magical investing pills.

0:04 Investing dreams and chocolate dreams: both come with a price

1:31 Wall Street sells “protection” from volatility—Americans are buying

2:37 Hedged funds as “stock insurance”? More like expensive illusions

3:57 Comparing VOO to PHDG: 13% vs. 4.3% returns

4:54 Downside protection claims fall apart under scrutiny

6:18 Lower volatility, far lower returns—does it help you sleep or retire?

7:34 How these funds work: options-based “protection” explained

8:48 Options decay and premium costs crush performance

9:56 Simpler is better: most “safety” funds fail to beat basic stock/bond mix

11:03 5-year S&P 500 returns: mostly up, and up a lot

11:50 Hedged funds underperform in up years—and still lose in down ones

12:22 Hidden costs in options-based funds aren’t in the expense ratio

13:30 Bottom line: no panacea, no magic. Just smart allocation

14:05 Investor responsibility: no one will protect your money but you

14:12 Listener Q&A intro and apology for delay

15:05 Backdoor Roth vs. regular Roth when income is uncertain

16:59 AVGE vs. GLOV: performance vs. philosophy

17:55 GLOV’s returns look good—but it’s far less diversified

19:21 Passive label vs. reality: GLOV is focused, possibly active

20:38 Short track record makes comparisons tricky

22:04 Don and Tom favor massive diversification over short-term wins

23:42 Set expectations low and you’ll be pleasantly surprised

24:49 Ask us anything—and yes, crypto guy left another bad review

26:02 Crypto is “generational”? Maybe, but Don still won’t use money he can’t spend
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!

CORRECTION: During the 13:45 caller, I gave erroneous advice on the withdrawal rules for an inherited IRA. Given that this was his father’s IRA, he is not eligible to wait until the end of the 10-year period. So he will need to distributions and, then, make a charitable gifts. -Don

Don tackles a stack of listener questions in this rapid-fire Friday Q&A, covering what a financial plan should cost, how tipping might work in a cashless future, and how to fine-tune a retirement portfolio with Avantis funds. He also addresses important estate planning steps after a death, how to use QCDs with inherited IRAs, and whether AUM fees are worth it compared to hourly planners. Along the way, he reflects on why he still manages his own money—and maybe shouldn’t.

0:04 Intro to Friday Q&A and how listener questions are selected

2:12 What should a detailed retirement plan cost? Median price range explained

4:33 How will we tip in a cashless society? From bellboys to Bitcoin to Apple Pay

7:39 Listener portfolio check: 85% AVGE, 10% AVUV, 5% AVDV—too tilted?

11:36 Credit after death: Should an executor notify the credit bureaus? Yes—and how

13:45 Inherited IRA RMD workaround: Can QCDs help avoid taxes before age 70½?

17:02 AUM fees vs. flat-fee advisors: Is paying more for more assets fair?

25:51 Why Don still manages his own money (for now)—inertia, taxes, and habits
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!

Don and Tom dive into the human obsession with prediction—especially in finance—and why models fail us more than they help. They dissect the CAPE ratio, Fama vs. Shiller, and why “knowing” the market is a fool’s errand. Listeners also get lessons on ETF pricing myths, market cap misunderstandings, SEP Roth IRAs (spoiler: they’re basically unicorns), and whether dad deserves a gift or just more responsibilities.

0:04 We crave certainty—even though our money brains are terrible at prediction.

1:01 Wall Street’s models exist to soothe our fear of the unknown.

1:34 “All models are wrong, but some are useful” — CAPE ratio vs. the real world.

2:39 Shiller vs. Fama: You can’t time the market, even with a Nobel.

4:51 Why diversification, risk-based equity premiums, and low fees beat predictions.

5:24 Models work… until they don’t (hello, Phillips Curve).

7:02 Why the inflation-unemployment link broke after 2000: China changed the game.

8:26 Let’s admit it: You cannot accurately and consistently predict the future.

9:14 Call from Catherine: Why Schwab ETF prices are “low” (spoiler: stock splits).

11:31 Price per share means nothing. Market cap is what matters.

13:04 Berkshire never split its stock—why it’s $731K a share.

14:24 Apple vs. Berkshire vs. Microsoft: Market cap is the real metric.

16:32 Why the Dow is dumb (and would be even dumber with Berkshire in it).

17:49 Listener Q: Where to park $450K before a home purchase? (Hint: not bonds.)

18:29 High-yield savings accounts are still the best move.

19:53 Father’s Day preview: Don rants about dumb gifts and ungrateful kids.

21:19 Kiplinger’s list: 5 ways dads can teach money lessons (cue sarcasm).

24:06 Allowances, budgeting, and tax talks with kids—realistic or fantasy?

25:28 Roth IRAs and investing lessons for teens: what actually works.

27:45 Why teaching kids to pick stocks is a dangerous myth.

29:38 “Graduation fund” idea: simple global ETFs like AVGE or DFAW.

30:43 Yes, your kids might move back in. Yes, it’s happening again.

32:13 Listener Q: Can you open a Roth SEP IRA? (Short answer: not really yet.)

33:54 One firm offers it… but it’ll cost you $500/year and it’s shady.

35:20 Final caller: Are there any annuities we do like? (Answer: the shortest show ever.)

36:34 Program note: Tom gone for 2 weeks, Don wants your calls (or sympathy).
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!

Don and Tom tackle the behavioral trap of “home bias” in investing—why U.S. investors tend to overinvest domestically and why it’s dangerous. They compare global fund allocations across countries, poke fun at nationalist investing instincts, and explain why international diversification is essential. Listener calls cover early Social Security regret, 72(t) withdrawals, covered calls on Palantir, and what happens to target date funds after they “expire.”

1:52 Home bias explained: Americans (and Australians) overweight U.S. stocks

2:58 U.S. vs global stock market value debate

3:42 Fund companies pander to investor bias

4:14 Vanguard Australia fund: 42% Aussie stocks?!

5:25 Why home bias hurts—Australia’s 25% bank exposure

6:26 Dimensional and Avantis global tilt: 70% U.S.

7:52 Long-term global diversification reduces volatility

8:17 The 2000s: Global funds outperformed U.S. funds

9:21 Call: Donna in AZ – Regret over early Social Security filing

11:29 Don confesses he took his at 69: “I’m weak”

12:02 Donna’s still in great shape—no panic needed

13:04 Timing Social Security: Only critical if it’s most of your income

14:45 Emotional investing vs logic—why home bias persists

15:51 Japan: Home bias disaster, zero returns since 1990

16:07 Call: Kyle in TX – 72(t) withdrawals and bond reluctance

18:21 Tom explains why bonds matter when pulling from a shrinking stock portfolio

19:51 Call: Jason the Tesla Bull – Covered calls on Palantir

21:15 Covered call mechanics explained

23:14 Don’s 1980s crash story: When covered calls fail

24:14 Covered calls appeal to greed, often backfire

25:20 Palantir’s PE ratio? Try 1,058—yikes

26:30 Meme stocks vs megacaps: Palantir’s government dependency

27:05 Call: John in OH – Fidelity fee confusion update

28:16 John’s advisor can’t see the same statements—sus?

30:32 Make sure to bring statements and get written answers

31:29 Don’s birthday, Father’s Day gripes, and Twain wisdom

32:22 Call: Elizabeth in SC – What happens to a 2010 target date fund?

33:37 Vanguard 2010 funds merge into 70/30 “retirement income” fund

35:14 Performance? ~5% annualized—above inflation


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!

In this episode of Talking Real Money, Don and Tom take aim at one of the most persistent investing mistakes: owning individual stocks. With humor and sharp skepticism, they explore why investors—even those who say they follow the show’s advice—still concentrate wealth in a few companies like Apple, NVIDIA, or their employer’s stock. Referencing Jason Zweig’s Wall Street Journal column and legendary research from Bessembinder, they show how dangerous, emotional, and often delusional this strategy really is. From Washington Mutual to VF Corp, the history of single-stock implosions is long and painful. Plus, they field smart listener questions on business loans, Roth conversions, and hummingbird beak evolution. Yes, really.

0:04 Why owning individual stocks is more like gambling than investing

0:58 Zweig’s column and stories of extreme stock concentration

1:42 Real investors with 30%+ in just a few stocks

3:00 “I only own Apple”—the emotional traps of stock picking

5:02 Washington Mutual: faith in the familiar turns to loss

6:44 The VF Corp disaster and foundations behaving badly

8:43 No one rings a bell before your stock collapses

9:49 Stock picking risks: underperformance and default

10:22 Don’s infamous four-stock “diversified” portfolio (spoiler: zeroed out)

11:48 Emotional attachment to companies vs. logic

12:27 Top justifications for owning individual stocks—and why they’re bogus

13:40 “It’s money I can afford to lose” (No, it’s not.)

14:51 Owning your own business ≠ owning a stock

15:20 Risk in entrepreneurship is different—but still real

16:18 Listener question: Pay cash or borrow to buy a high-return business asset?

18:02 Don and Tom strongly favor using business cash over loans

19:11 Why even 40% returns are no guarantee

20:39 Hummingbirds evolve to match human feeders (seriously!)

21:34 Listener Q: Convert old 401(k) from Mutual of America to Roth IRA?

23:20 Why you should probably roll that 401(k) out—fast

23:33 Joke time: The silent P in pterodactyl

24:32 Don’s mental age… remains in the single digits
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!

Tom and Roxy dive into listener questions with sharp advice and sharper metaphors—like why a 1,000-point drop in the Dow is more like a slight temperature dip than a financial catastrophe. They cover smart asset location (where to put what), consolidation tips for retirement accounts, the often-overlooked costs of rental real estate, and the emotional tug-of-war between risk tolerance and capacity as retirement nears. Plus: a gentle roast of Robert Kiyosaki, a Parisian travel tip, and a few digs at over-diversified portfolios.

0:05 Tom’s intro rant: fear headlines and market timing

1:39 Denominator blindness: why scary drops sound worse than they are

2:52 2.4% drop = sweater weather, not financial panic

3:55 Listener Q1 (Jeff): Where to hold stocks vs. bonds—taxable vs. IRA

4:17 Asset location strategy: not just S&P and short-term bonds

5:35 Duration, muni bonds, and why not all income is equal

6:24 One custodian, fewer accounts: simplify to win

7:41 Start with overall allocation, not tax location

9:16 Managing drawdowns, RMDs, and legacy with tax planning

10:54 Listener Q2 (Jason): Should I just let my equities grow?

11:40 Risk capacity vs. risk tolerance: don’t drive 90 if 65 gets you there

13:08 Why 90/10 in retirement rarely makes sense

14:27 Distributions and downturns: another case for bonds

15:28 Listener Q3 (Justin): Real estate vs. market income

16:22 Landlord reality check: equity ≠ cash flow

17:47 The tax myths of rental income vs. investments

19:40 How investors really generate income (total return strategy)

21:01 Time to develop a real estate exit plan?

21:38 Final thoughts, free reviews, and Roxy’s Parisian wisdom
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!

This episode explores the psychological and financial side of retirement planning through the lens of entropy. Don and Tom dive into an article from Kiplinger that cleverly compares retirement to the second law of thermodynamics: left unmanaged, both money and purpose tend toward chaos. Only 4% of retirees say they're "living the dream"—and the duo explores why that number is so shockingly low. From maintaining routine and finding meaning to avoiding common money traps like over- or under-spending, this episode is packed with practical insights and sardonic banter. Plus, listener questions on Roth conversions for low-income parents and generating sustainable income in retirement portfolios.

0:04 Why we're talking thermodynamics on a money show1:40 The "Second Law" of Retirement: Life drifts toward chaos2:15 Only 4% of retirees say they're "living the dream"3:06 Why retirement can be scary—even for us4:44 Do something in retirement... but get paid for it?6:09 Volunteering vs. purposeful work (and airplane nostalgia)7:03 Retirement spending traps: splurging or hoarding8:09 The danger of financially supporting adult children9:43 Composer John Williams and the myth of retirement11:24 Three keys to a better retirement: social, purpose, activity12:04 Paul Merriman, semi-retirement, and finding meaning13:23 It all still comes down to money—and the freedom it brings14:42 Steve Martin's quote on money and dumb stuff15:30 Listener question: Tax-efficient Roth conversions for elderly parents20:07 Listener question: Income generation with ETFs vs. income funds22:51 Junk bonds, Franklin Income Fund risk, and total return25:48 Strategy tip: Keeping a year of cash to smooth out volatility26:11 Upcoming events and Apollo's July 9th appearance27:37 Free portfolio review offer and purpose in helping others28:51 Tom's boat motor saga and 1-star review nightmares
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!

Don and Tom dig into America’s $1.7 trillion in forgotten retirement accounts—29 million of them! They walk listeners through how to search for their own missing funds and share their own finds (or lack thereof). They answer questions about where to park $100K in short-term savings, when (or if) to convert to a Roth in your 70s, the pros and cons of ETFs versus mutual funds in taxable accounts, and the murky territory of backdoor Roth timing and the pro-rata rule. A listener also calls in with praise—and a gentle challenge—to donate or support the show, leading to reflections on how to really help Talking Real Money thrive.

0:05 Welcome back—same truth, new week: invest simply, diversify, and stop overthinking

1:24 Financial complexity is mostly unnecessary—simple portfolios work best

2:37 Listeners have lost $1.7 trillion in forgotten 401(k)s—here’s how to find yours

4:34 Don checks the retirement lost & found—comes up empty

6:33 Tom finds $29 from Starbucks—through a different database

7:36 Sites to check: National Registry, Lost & Found DB, MissingMoney.com

9:15 Caller Alan: What should I do with $100K in liquid, short-term funds?

11:30 Don’s “Three Easy Pieces” ladder strategy: savings + 1-year + 2-year CDs

14:13 Alan’s happy—Bread Savings gets a shout-out

15:43 Talking Real Money Friday Q&A is the listener favorite

17:00 Caller Joel: Should I switch my Vanguard mutual funds to ETFs?

19:14 Yes—especially in taxable accounts, for better tax efficiency

20:44 Caller Sue: At 77, is it too late to convert $100K from IRA to Roth?

27:05 Probably not worth it—tax impact likely the same or worse

29:51 Rethinking retirement tax math—it’s not “your” money until it’s taxed

33:19 Don checks reviews—guess who’s back with a grudge?

33:49 Caller Ray: Can I move IRA to 457 to avoid pro-rata on backdoor Roth?

36:40 Caller Jim: Mom’s advisor switched to LPL—should I worry?

38:59 Jim’s suggestion: listeners donate to a favorite charity in TRM’s name

40:04 Victory Capital funds: Don’s not a fan of their approach

42:41 Why broad diversification beats thematic ETFs with 100 holdings

44:12 Wrap-up: Where to listen, how to submit questions, and why reviews matter
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!

Don and Tom salute high-schoolers who tackled the National Personal Finance Challenge, then test listeners (and each other) with the same nine-question quiz—covering basics like principal vs. balance, Roth RMD rules, CDs, vesting, inflation risk, callable bonds, and limit orders. Call-in segments dig into real-world money puzzles: whether to sink home-sale proceeds into a new mortgage at today’s 7 % rates, how (and whether) to value a military pension, rolling a TSP, and a head-scratcher about wildly swinging “management” fees inside a Fidelity IRA. A quick detour touches on Don’s upcoming birthday before they wrap with practical takeaways: know your income gap first, keep fees transparent, and remember—it’s “losing money safely” if cash just languishes.

0:04 Why everyone needs a working knowledge of money

1:22 National Personal Finance Challenge shout-out & why only 0.1 % of high-schoolers compete

2:04 Quiz Q1 — defining principal

4:01 Quiz Q2 — Roth vs. traditional IRA RMD rules

5:10 Invitation for listeners to tackle the quiz live on air

7:38 Quiz Q4 — why CDs pay more (funds locked for a term)

8:57 Quiz Q5 — what “vesting” really means

9:59 Quiz Q7 — parking cash in a sock = inflation risk

12:33 Quiz Q8 — callable bonds explained

13:51 Caller Hillary — use equity to pay down a 7 % mortgage or invest instead?

16:33 Liquidity vs. rate trade-off and psychological comfort of a lower payment

18:43 Model-airplane museum banter & show phone line reminder

20:46 Caller Justin — valuing a pension and TSP rollover strategy

23:45 Start with income needs, then size savings; why keeping TSP is fine if it’s your only IRA

28:13 Caller John — Fidelity “management fee” swings; how to pin your advisor down

33:25 Caller Will — cosmic birthday musings & the age of the universe

36:51 Quiz Q9 — limit orders, and Tom flunks Series 7 trivia

40:35 How few teens get real money education & resources to close the gap
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!

Don and Tom explore the evolution, promise, and pitfalls of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). While ETFs have become the dominant investment vehicle, boasting $8 trillion in assets and more than 4,000 choices, the duo cautions against the “novelty trap” that lures investors into trendy, high-cost, low-diversification funds. They advocate sticking with time-tested providers like Vanguard, Schwab, and Avantis, and urge listeners to focus on strategy over hype. The episode also covers listener questions on Facet Wealth’s alternative investments and Roth IRA income limits, ending with a light jab at Portland’s real estate collapse and Don’s growing jet lag.

0:04 Opening banter and the rise of ETFs as mutual fund successors

1:28 ETF history from SPY to the $8 trillion juggernaut

2:21 Why ETFs caught on: low cost, tax efficiency, index focus

3:45 When Wall Street noticed: strategic beta and rule-based funds emerge

4:59 The novelty problem: gimmicky single-stock and crypto ETFs

6:57 How to filter the 4,000 ETFs to a trustworthy handful

7:34 Which fund families to consider—and which to avoid

8:58 Active vs. passive: the murky middle and the “passively active” dilemma

10:01 Conflicts of interest in ETF endorsements and advertising bias

11:19 ETF investing principles: keep it simple, diversified, and strategic

12:09 Why the industry lumps Dimensional and Avantis with active managers

14:09 Brief detour into Austin, Silicon Valley, and Portland real estate

15:22 Final ETF takeaway: old, boring, and proven beats shiny and new

17:01 Listener Q1: Is Facet Wealth’s alternative income strategy a red flag?

22:01 Listener Q2: Roth IRA income limits, backdoor Roths, and best next moves
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!