This episode is brought to you by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Oberle Risk Strategies⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠: Insurance Broker and Insurance Due Diligence Provider for Search Funds and Other Small-to-Medium-Sized Businesses⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

*

This episode is brought to you by ⁠⁠⁠B⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠oulay, the industry standard for Quality of Earnings, tax, and audit services, serving search fund entrepreneurs for 20+ years⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

*

Chris Smith is the Managing Partner of Spellbound Partners, a a company that helps acquirors with technical due diligence, fractional CTO services, and outsourced development services, among other things. Chris has over 25 years of experience building software platforms, and is an expert in cloud computing and software as a service (SaaS). He has been a part of numerous founding startup teams and has led multiple teams through high-growth transitions.

Much of what we discuss today is intended to uncover how much “technical debt” any given target company may possess within its code base. Though substantially every software company has some amount of technical debt, those that are weighed down by an asymmetric burden of it tend to experience very real business problems that non-technical acquirors and CEOs may not fully appreciate.

As a result, prospective acquirors would be well served to thoroughly diligence the amount of technical debt possessed by any given target company, and proceed very carefully (or perhaps not proceed at all) with those companies who seem to possess much more than their fair share of it.