Direct-to-consumer is finally out of the shadows. Eight public studios just revealed how much revenue they drive through D2C — and the numbers make the case better than any pitch could. But there's a window closing, and the studios moving now are the ones who'll win.

We are joined by Chip Thurston (FastSpring) for a D2C deep-dive built around the Pocket Gamer report aggregating publicly disclosed D2C revenue. They break down the three cohorts (social casino, mid-core, casual) and what each tells us, the standout data points (Playtika at 39% of revenue, Fishing Clash at 33%, Double Down at 44%), the difference between direct-checkout links and web stores and why you need both, Google's new External Content Links policy, the still-unapproved Epic v. Google settlement and its 20% linked-payment fee, where Apple's appeals stand after the Supreme Court declined to hear them, and the single most actionable takeaway: maximize US D2C traffic today, while you can still steer without fees.

⏱️ TIMESTAMPS

00:00 Cold open — maximize US D2C traffic today

01:35 The Pocket Gamer D2C report and why it matters

05:35 The three cohorts — social casino, mid-core, casual

11:50 Direct checkout vs web store — the frictionless path

16:00 Google's External Content Links policy explained

21:20 The Epic v. Google settlement and the 20% fee

30:10 Where Apple stands after the Supreme Court

36:20 Casual works too — Playtika and the playbook

📌 KEY TAKEAWAYS

— D2C is out of the shadows. A Pocket Gamer report (by Craig Chappell) aggregates publicly disclosed D2C revenue from eight studios — Playtika, MTG, Stillfront, SciPlay, PlayStudios, Tensquare, Huuuge, G5, Take-Two. For the first time, studios are openly reporting D2C as a positive earnings story rather than treating it as a cloak-and-dagger tactic.

— Three cohorts, all winning. Social casino (SciPlay, PlayStudios, Huuuge, Double Down at 44%) leads because revenue is VIP-concentrated — shift a few whales and you shift a big share of revenue. Mid-core (MTG, Stillfront, Tensquare) ranges up to 44%.

— Direct checkout vs web store is the key strategic choice. Direct-checkout links (skip the store, go straight to a hosted checkout page, bounce back to the game) are the most frictionless path available today and can push you over 50% D2C. But every direct-checkout link is a "linked payment" that would incur the 20% fee under the coming settlement — so the durable play is habituating players to your web store as a destination they'll return to regardless.

— Google's External Content Links policy is the first salvo. In effect since January 28, 2026 (US only for now), it requires enrolling via an API to link to external content — or your app updates get disapproved. No fees yet (they legally can't), but it lays the groundwork for the 20% linked-payment fee with a 24-hour attribution window once the settlement is approved.

— The Epic v. Google settlement is still unapproved and the dates are slipping. Google intended its new fee structure to take effect June 30, 2026 (US and Europe), but the court is skeptical and hasn't approved it. The structure decouples the old 30% into a 5% Google Play billing fee plus a 20-25% platform fee (varying by install date), with carve-outs for first $1M (10%) and subscriptions (10% + 5%). The cosmetic-vs-power-item distinction was dropped entirely.

— The actionable playbook: maximize US D2C today with a mix of direct-checkout and web-store links (to habituate players for the fee future). Learn from the disclosed studios (Raid Shadow Legends' web-store points flywheel is a great model). And treat Japan — which already allows steering with fees under its Mobile Software Competition Act — as a soft launch for the fee-based future of D2C.

🎙️ HOSTS

Matej Lančarič — User Acquisition consultant

Jakub Remiar — Game Design consultant

Felix Braberg — Ad Monetization consultant

🎤 GUEST

Chip Thurston — FastSpring