The Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report examining the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) granted to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida. The report found serious missteps and poor judgment by federal prosecutors, particularly then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who ultimately approved the deal. The OIG concluded that while there was no evidence of criminal misconduct or corruption, prosecutors displayed a stunning lack of urgency, failed to properly notify Epstein’s victims as required by the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, and sidelined a 53-page federal indictment in favor of a lenient plea deal that shielded Epstein and his unnamed co-conspirators from federal prosecution. The report criticized the secretive nature of the NPA and found that Acosta gave “too much deference” to Epstein’s high-powered legal team.

The report also exposed the government’s unusual willingness to cooperate with Epstein’s lawyers, including allowing them to essentially dictate the terms of the deal, such as minimizing public exposure and avoiding victim input. Despite mounting evidence of Epstein’s exploitation of dozens of underage girls, the U.S. Attorney’s Office prioritized avoiding litigation risks and potential political fallout over pursuing justice. Although the OIG did not recommend criminal charges against any of the involved officials, the findings fueled renewed calls for accountability and transparency in cases involving wealthy, well-connected defendants. The report paints a picture of a justice system that buckled under pressure from power and influence, enabling Epstein’s abuse to continue for years.

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

dl (justice.gov)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report examining the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) granted to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida. The report found serious missteps and poor judgment by federal prosecutors, particularly then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who ultimately approved the deal. The OIG concluded that while there was no evidence of criminal misconduct or corruption, prosecutors displayed a stunning lack of urgency, failed to properly notify Epstein’s victims as required by the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, and sidelined a 53-page federal indictment in favor of a lenient plea deal that shielded Epstein and his unnamed co-conspirators from federal prosecution. The report criticized the secretive nature of the NPA and found that Acosta gave “too much deference” to Epstein’s high-powered legal team.

The report also exposed the government’s unusual willingness to cooperate with Epstein’s lawyers, including allowing them to essentially dictate the terms of the deal, such as minimizing public exposure and avoiding victim input. Despite mounting evidence of Epstein’s exploitation of dozens of underage girls, the U.S. Attorney’s Office prioritized avoiding litigation risks and potential political fallout over pursuing justice. Although the OIG did not recommend criminal charges against any of the involved officials, the findings fueled renewed calls for accountability and transparency in cases involving wealthy, well-connected defendants. The report paints a picture of a justice system that buckled under pressure from power and influence, enabling Epstein’s abuse to continue for years.

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

dl (justice.gov)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report examining the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) granted to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida. The report found serious missteps and poor judgment by federal prosecutors, particularly then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who ultimately approved the deal. The OIG concluded that while there was no evidence of criminal misconduct or corruption, prosecutors displayed a stunning lack of urgency, failed to properly notify Epstein’s victims as required by the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, and sidelined a 53-page federal indictment in favor of a lenient plea deal that shielded Epstein and his unnamed co-conspirators from federal prosecution. The report criticized the secretive nature of the NPA and found that Acosta gave “too much deference” to Epstein’s high-powered legal team.

The report also exposed the government’s unusual willingness to cooperate with Epstein’s lawyers, including allowing them to essentially dictate the terms of the deal, such as minimizing public exposure and avoiding victim input. Despite mounting evidence of Epstein’s exploitation of dozens of underage girls, the U.S. Attorney’s Office prioritized avoiding litigation risks and potential political fallout over pursuing justice. Although the OIG did not recommend criminal charges against any of the involved officials, the findings fueled renewed calls for accountability and transparency in cases involving wealthy, well-connected defendants. The report paints a picture of a justice system that buckled under pressure from power and influence, enabling Epstein’s abuse to continue for years.

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

dl (justice.gov)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The amount of money that has been spent by The University of Idaho in the wake of the murders in Moscow is eye popping. With the total number coming in at over 1.4 million dollars so far with more costs sure to be on the way. The University was given a 1 million dollar boost by the state of Idaho previously, but they have already have spent much more than that.

In this episode, we take a look at the bill so far and also get an update about Kohberger's court appearance tomorrow.

(commercial at 7:56)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Cost of security prompted by Idaho college killings tops $1.2M for university - ABC News (go.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this episode, we dive back into the court filings and take a look at the warrant for twitter.



to contact me:

[email protected]


(commercial at 11:18)

source:


032423+Order+to+Seal+and+Redact+-+Twitter.pdf (amazonaws.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the Bryan Kohberger trial, an expert report on survey research was prepared by Veronica Dahir. This report focuses on the methodologies and findings from surveys conducted to assess public opinion and awareness related to the case. The purpose of the report is to provide insights into how pre-trial publicity and public perceptions might impact the jury selection process and the defendant's right to a fair trial.Key Points of the Expert Report:

1. Survey Methodology: Veronica Dahir outlines the survey design, sampling methods, and data collection procedures used to gather public opinion about the Bryan Kohberger case. This includes the selection of a representative sample, the framing of questions, and the statistical techniques employed to ensure reliability and validity.
2. Public Awareness: The report examines the level of public awareness regarding the case. It assesses how widely the case has been reported in the media and the extent to which potential jurors might be exposed to information about the case.
3. Pre-Trial Publicity: The report analyzes the nature and impact of pre-trial publicity on public opinion. It considers whether the media coverage has been neutral, biased, or sensationalized, and how this might influence potential jurors' perceptions of the defendant.
4. Juror Impartiality: One of the key concerns addressed in the report is whether the pre-trial publicity has compromised the ability to select an impartial jury. The survey results are used to evaluate the potential biases and preconceived notions held by the public that could affect juror impartiality.
5. Impact on Fair Trial: The report discusses the implications of the survey findings for ensuring a fair trial. It highlights the challenges of mitigating the effects of widespread media coverage and suggests strategies for addressing these issues during the jury selection process.
6. Recommendations: Based on the survey findings, Veronica Dahir may provide recommendations for the court. These could include measures such as careful vetting of potential jurors, the use of detailed questionnaires during voir dire, and possible changes of venue to ensure a fair and unbiased jury.

(commercial at 10:23)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this episode we dive into the court documents and take a look at Gabriella Vargas declaration in support of Bryan Kohberger.



(commercial 5:40)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

081723-Notice-of-Filing-Declaration-of-Gabriella-Vargas.pdf (amazonaws.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​Asa Ellerup, estranged wife of accused Gilgo Beach serial killer Rex Heuermann, has decided to vacate their longtime Massapequa Park residence. The decision follows extensive police searches that left the home significantly damaged and a loss of emotional attachment to the property. Ellerup and her two adult children plan to relocate to South Carolina, seeking a fresh start away from the intense media scrutiny and the painful associations tied to their former home.

During the investigation, authorities seized over 280 firearms from Heuermann's residence, comprising a collection of antique and modern weapons, including items from the Civil War and World Wars I and II. Valued at approximately $300,000, the collection is now the subject of legal proceedings. Ellerup has petitioned for the firearms to be sold, aiming to alleviate financial hardships resulting from her husband's arrest and the subsequent loss of income and health insurance.


to contact me:

[email protected]




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​Jennifer Lopez may become involved in Sean "Diddy" Combs' upcoming federal trial as prosecutors consider introducing evidence from a 1999 nightclub shooting in which both were present. The incident occurred at Club New York, where Combs and Lopez were attending when gunfire erupted, injuring three bystanders. While Lopez was arrested alongside Combs, charges against her were dropped, and Combs was later acquitted. Prosecutors now argue that this past event demonstrates a pattern of behavior relevant to the current charges against Combs, which include racketeering and sex trafficking.

Lopez's team is reportedly on "high alert" due to the potential resurfacing of this decades-old incident during the trial. Sources indicate that there have been internal discussions about how to respond if the nightclub shooting is brought up in court. The renewed focus on this event adds another layer of complexity to Combs' legal challenges and places additional scrutiny on Lopez's past association with him.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

JLo faces court grilling in Diddy trial as his legal team fights to dismiss evidence from infamous 1999 New York club shooting | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has filed a motion to exclude a 2016 surveillance video from his upcoming federal trial, arguing that the footage—released by CNN in 2024—has been altered and is not a reliable representation of events. The video depicts Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles. Combs, who has previously apologized for his actions in the video, is currently facing charges including racketeering, sex trafficking, and coercion. His lawyers claim that the video was manipulated, with distortions and speed alterations that exaggerate his actions, and that the original tape was destroyed, making it inadmissible as evidence. ​


The defense has requested a hearing to allow expert testimony on the video's alleged inaccuracies. They argue that the government's inability to authenticate the footage, due to the destruction of the original and the presence of technical inconsistencies, renders it inadmissible. Prosecutors have previously used the video to argue for Combs' detention, citing the threat he poses to women. Combs remains in custody at MDC-Brooklyn, with his trial scheduled to begin on May 5, 2025.


to  contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Diddy requests 'distorted' Cassie videos not be shown at trial

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.