The Moscow Murders and More

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.

Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.


source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger and his "I was out for a gander at the stars" routine isn't sitting well with the Goncalves family and they had no  problem calling it absurd and a delay.


In this episode, we hear from the Goncalves family in the wake of the alibi claimed by Bryan Kohberger and what we might expect as the process continues to grind forward.


An alibi in a criminal trial is a defense strategy where the accused presents evidence to show that they were somewhere else at the time the crime was committed, thereby making it impossible for them to have committed the crime. It's essentially a form of proof of innocence by demonstrating that the accused couldn't have been at the scene of the crime.Corroborating an alibi using digital evidence involves gathering electronic records or data that can confirm the accused's presence elsewhere. Here's how it can be done:

1. Surveillance footage: If there are surveillance cameras in the area where the accused claims to have been at the time of the crime, the footage can be reviewed to verify their presence.
2. Cell phone records: Mobile phone records can show the location of the accused at the time of the crime, either through cell tower pings or GPS data if enabled. This can be corroborated with witness testimonies or other evidence.
3. Social media or online activity: Posts, check-ins, or messages on social media platforms or other online services can provide a digital footprint of the accused's whereabouts. However, these can sometimes be manipulated, so additional evidence may be needed to corroborate them.
4. Credit card transactions: Credit card transactions or ATM withdrawals can provide evidence of the accused's whereabouts if they made purchases or withdrew money around the time of the crime.
5. Email or electronic communication: Emails, text messages, or other forms of electronic communication can provide timestamps that establish the accused's location or activities at a particular time.
6. Digital photos or videos: If the accused or someone else took photos or videos at the time in question, these can serve as evidence of their presence elsewhere.

(commercial at 9:17)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Family of Idaho murders victim Kaylee Goncalves bite back at Bryan Kohberger's 'moon and stargazing' alibi, saying 'if it had weight, it would have been submitted months ago' | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger's defense team has filed a motion to change the venue for his upcoming trial from Latah County, Idaho, citing concerns that an unbiased jury cannot be found locally due to extensive pretrial publicity. Kohberger is accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in November 2022, a case that has garnered significant media attention both nationally and internationally

Kohberger's attorneys argue that the small size and interconnectedness of the Latah County community, combined with the pervasive and often inflammatory media coverage, make it impossible to select an impartial jury. They propose moving the trial to Ada County, approximately 300 miles away, which has a larger population and may offer a better chance of finding unbiased jurors.

The prosecution, however, contends that the high-profile nature of the case would make it difficult to find an impartial jury anywhere, suggesting that moving the trial might not address the issue of pretrial publicity. They argue that efforts should be made to seat a jury in Latah County, as the local community deserves the attempt to seek closure.

A hearing on the motion for a venue change is scheduled for August 29, 2024, where both sides will present their arguments. The trial itself is currently set for June 2025.


(commercial at 11:42)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Bryan Kohberger Defense Reveals 6 Shocking Rumors Tainting Possible Jurors - Newsweek

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger and his legal team have been attempting to have the indictment against Kohberger thrown out for months now and they have run up against a wall known as Judge John Judge each time.


In this episode, we dive into Kohberger's latest attempt to get the charges against him tossed and we get an update on where things currently stand and where things might be headed in the coming months.

(commercial at 7:06)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Bryan Kohberger Tries Last-Ditch Effort to Get Case Thrown Out (newsweek.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​Recent court documents have revealed that DNA from three different individuals was discovered under the fingernails of Madison Mogen, one of the four University of Idaho students tragically murdered in November 2022. This finding suggests that Mogen may have struggled with her assailant, potentially collecting crucial forensic evidence during the attack. However, defense attorneys for the primary suspect, Bryan Kohberger, contend that the DNA tests were inconclusive and have filed motions to exclude this evidence from the upcoming trial..

Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, is accused of fatally stabbing Mogen and her three housemates. Prosecutors have presented additional evidence linking Kohberger to the crime, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the scene, surveillance footage of a vehicle resembling his, and cell phone records placing him near the victims' residence before and after the murders. The defense is challenging the admissibility of much of this evidence, arguing that certain investigative methods and the breadth of search warrants could mislead the jury or infringe upon Kohberger's rights


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Idaho murders trial rocked by curveball DNA evidence found under victim's fingernails | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger keeps to himself and doesn't talk to anyone in the lock up that he is currently in. According to sources, he is constantly watching the news about the murders in moscow and when he's not doing that, he's sitting down with a pastor exploring his new found faith in god.







We also get a look at how much money it cost Pennsylvania to fly Bryan Kohberger from Pennsylvania to Idaho after Kohberger was extradited.


(commercial at 6:26)

to contact me:
[email protected]



source:

Bryan Kohberger's Secluded Life Inside Jail: Reports (newsweek.com)



source:

How much did it cost to fly Bryan Kohberger across the country? | ktvb.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In her reply supporting the petition for a writ of certiorari, Ghislaine Maxwell—referred to as Sealed Defendant 1—argues that the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying her appeal and that the Supreme Court must intervene to correct what she claims are fundamental constitutional violations. Maxwell’s legal team contends that the trial was tainted by extensive pretrial publicity, juror misconduct, and decisions that unfairly limited her ability to present a full defense. Central to her argument is the assertion that the lower courts failed to safeguard her Sixth Amendment rights to an impartial jury and effective counsel, especially given the media firestorm surrounding her case and her association with Jeffrey Epstein.

Maxwell also challenges the handling of jury selection and post-trial revelations regarding a juror who failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse during voir dire, which her attorneys argue should have triggered a new trial. Her legal team insists that the appellate court’s deference to the district court’s findings undermines the integrity of the judicial process, especially in a case involving such serious allegations and public scrutiny. The reply urges the Supreme Court to take up the case to ensure that high-profile defendants are not denied due process and to reaffirm standards that protect the fairness of criminal trials nationwide.

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

20250728111721067_24-1073ReplyInSupportOfPetitionForWritOfCertiorari.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell is currently serving her 20-year sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, a low-security prison that has come under scrutiny for serious issues including overcrowding, malfunctioning surveillance equipment, and understaffing. Concerns have been raised about her safety, with family members warning that the conditions resemble those that preceded Jeffrey Epstein's death. Despite official assurances that her well-being is being safeguarded, critics argue that the prison’s systemic failures could still leave her vulnerable to harm, especially given the high-profile nature of her case and her potential cooperation with authorities.

Investigative journalist Julie K. Brown, whose reporting was instrumental in exposing Epstein's crimes, has publicly expressed grave concern for Maxwell's safety. She has pointed out that prisons like FCI Tallahassee are often plagued by lax oversight, broken cameras, and corrupt or negligent staff—conditions that make it easy for misconduct or even violence to occur without accountability. Brown also questioned whether the federal government’s interest in speaking with Maxwell could involve coercive tactics, drawing parallels to the controversial deals struck with Epstein in the past. According to Brown, the risks Maxwell faces behind bars are very real, and the public should not assume she is secure just because she’s in federal custody.


to contact me:


[email protected]



source:

Ghislaine Maxwell's life could be in danger in Florida prison after she met with Justice Department to reveal new Jeffrey Epstein details, top investigative reporter warns | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

If Donald Trump were to issue a presidential pardon to Ghislaine Maxwell for her federal crimes, the doctrine of dual sovereignty could allow the state of New York to pursue separate charges against her without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. This legal principle recognizes that the federal government and state governments are distinct sovereigns, each with the authority to enforce their own laws. Therefore, a pardon at the federal level does not immunize a person from state prosecution for conduct that also violates state law. If Maxwell’s actions—such as recruiting and trafficking minors—also violated New York state statutes, she could face a new, independent indictment from the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office or New York Attorney General, regardless of the federal pardon.

New York has already demonstrated its willingness to pursue high-profile sex trafficking and abuse cases, particularly when federal accountability fails or falters. The state has broad human trafficking, sexual abuse, and child endangerment laws that overlap with Maxwell’s federally convicted conduct. If prosecutors believe there is sufficient evidence that Maxwell’s crimes occurred within New York’s jurisdiction or harmed residents of the state, they could initiate charges anew under state law. In fact, the political and public appetite for state-level accountability could intensify following a federal pardon, as it would be seen by many as a miscarriage of justice. In that case, dual sovereignty becomes not just a legal tool—but a last-resort mechanism to ensure that Maxwell still faces consequences.



to contact me:

[email protected]

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

If Donald Trump were to issue a presidential pardon to Ghislaine Maxwell for her federal crimes, the doctrine of dual sovereignty could allow the state of New York to pursue separate charges against her without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. This legal principle recognizes that the federal government and state governments are distinct sovereigns, each with the authority to enforce their own laws. Therefore, a pardon at the federal level does not immunize a person from state prosecution for conduct that also violates state law. If Maxwell’s actions—such as recruiting and trafficking minors—also violated New York state statutes, she could face a new, independent indictment from the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office or New York Attorney General, regardless of the federal pardon.

New York has already demonstrated its willingness to pursue high-profile sex trafficking and abuse cases, particularly when federal accountability fails or falters. The state has broad human trafficking, sexual abuse, and child endangerment laws that overlap with Maxwell’s federally convicted conduct. If prosecutors believe there is sufficient evidence that Maxwell’s crimes occurred within New York’s jurisdiction or harmed residents of the state, they could initiate charges anew under state law. In fact, the political and public appetite for state-level accountability could intensify following a federal pardon, as it would be seen by many as a miscarriage of justice. In that case, dual sovereignty becomes not just a legal tool—but a last-resort mechanism to ensure that Maxwell still faces consequences.



to contact me:

[email protected]

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.