The Moscow Murders and More

From the archives: 5-9-23




News surrounding the trial of Bryan Kohberger has been sparse due to the gag order but the court filings made by both sides have given us a bit of a glimpse of what is happening behind the scenes.


In this episode, we are taking a dive into Bryan Kohberger's new discovery request and what it could tell us about the strategy he hopes to deploy in his defense come trial time.


(commercial at 7:41)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Bryan Kohberger Claims State Withholding Evidence of His Innocence | Inside Edition

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The so-called “Jeffrey Epstein client list” was never meant to be found—because it never truly existed in the way the public was led to believe. From the beginning, the myth of a tidy, centralized list of elite names was allowed to flourish as a form of narrative control. It redirected attention away from the actual operational infrastructure Epstein had—hundreds of hours of surveillance footage, financial records, logs, communications, and coercive systems of recruitment and entrapment. By hyping the existence of a list while ensuring none would ever surface, investigators and media handlers created a perfect decoy: people kept searching for a ghost document while the real evidence—often compartmentalized, hidden across agencies, or buried under privileged redactions—slipped quietly out of public focus. The obsession with “the list” became the conspiracy, while the operation remained untouched.

Social media influencers played a key role in amplifying this misdirection, whether they knew it or not. Some were likely given material or talking points through informal backchannels, while others jumped in out of clout-chasing instinct, chasing virality without verifying facts. The result was a flood of content that kept audiences locked onto the illusion that a single document would unlock everything, rather than asking who funded Epstein, who protected him, and who is still pulling strings to this day. Influencers—both grifters and the genuinely misled—ended up serving the same purpose: they diluted public pressure, created echo chambers of false hope, and helped intelligence-linked interests steer the narrative away from its dangerous truths. The “client list” was never the target. It was the trap.









to contact  me:

[email protected]




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

President Trump abruptly cut off a reporter during a Cabinet meeting when asked about a new Justice Department and FBI memo on Epstein, calling questions about "this creep" a "desecration" of the ongoing Texas flood response. His dismissive tone—“Are people still talking about this guy?”—and his characterization of Epstein-related attention as a waste of time drew widespread criticism, with many viewing it as inappropriate and insensitive, particularly in light of serious child‑sex trafficking allegation


The backlash was immediate and widespread, cutting across political lines. Influencers, commentators, and longtime supporters alike criticized the President’s tone, accusing him of minimizing a subject that demands accountability, not dismissal. Many saw his reaction as a disturbing attempt to shut down public inquiry into Epstein’s enablers and associates. The timing of his comment—coming amid renewed scrutiny from the DOJ memo and public demands for transparency—only fueled the outrage. What was intended as a brush-off quickly turned into a flashpoint, reigniting questions about who is still being protected and why the Epstein story refuses to die.


to contact me:

[email protected]




source:


Trump defends Bondi in face of growing criticism over Jeffrey Epstein files | AP News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Diddy scored a significant partial win in April Lampros’s civil suit after a judge dismissed most of her claims—covering alleged rape, battery, and emotional distress from the 1990s—as time-barred by New York’s statute of limitations and lacking sufficient factual detail. Additionally, any claims against Bad Boy Records and Sony Music were dropped, narrowing the legal firestorm to focus almost exclusively on Combs himself.

What’s left is a single active allegation under New York’s Gender‑Motivated Violence Protection Law. Lampros claims that in late 2000 or early 2001, Combs physically grabbed her and tried to force himself on her—a moment she says she resisted. With that as the only surviving allegation, both parties are now entering discovery. Diddy’s legal team sees the much narrower case as a major strategic win, while Lampros’s attorney emphasizes that the remaining claim keeps her pursuit of accountability alive.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Diddy team claims legal win in April Lampros' sexual assault lawsuit

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Sean “Diddy” Combs is now set to be sentenced on October 3, 2025, following a split verdict in his federal trial. After months of legal maneuvering and nearly a year behind bars awaiting trial, the sentencing date was locked in during a pre-sentencing hearing in federal court. Although Diddy was acquitted of the most serious charges—racketeering and sex trafficking—he was convicted on two federal prostitution-related counts involving the transportation of adults across state lines. Each of those counts carries a maximum sentence of 10 years, though actual sentencing will depend on federal guidelines and the judge’s discretion. Combs will receive credit for time served since his initial detention.

The court has ordered both sides to file their sentencing memos in September—first the defense, then the prosecution. The defense is pushing for a lighter sentence in the 21–27 month range, arguing that Combs poses no future threat and has already endured public humiliation. Meanwhile, prosecutors are calling for at least four years, citing the seriousness of the offenses and Combs’ pattern of abuse. A pre-sentence interview with probation officers is expected to help shape Judge Arun Subramanian’s final decision. Until then, Combs remains in federal custody without bail as the court prepares to determine the final consequences of his long-running legal saga.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sentencing set for October after prostitution convictions | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

A newly released Department of Justice memo has confirmed that no additional prosecutions will be pursued in connection with the Jeffrey Epstein case, beyond those already charged. The memo concludes that after years of investigation, there is insufficient evidence to bring charges against any new individuals linked to Epstein’s criminal activities. The announcement has drawn strong reactions from across the political spectrum, particularly from individuals and groups who have long believed that the case involved a wider network of co-conspirators.


Within political circles, including those surrounding former President Donald Trump, there is an awareness that the DOJ’s decision may provoke backlash among constituents who expected further accountability. Some advisers have reportedly expressed concern that the decision could be perceived as a failure to fully uncover the extent of Epstein’s network. The Justice Department has stood by the findings, emphasizing the legal limits of the available evidence, even as public frustration persists over unanswered questions and the lack of broader criminal charges.


to contact me:

[email protected]




source:

Trump Conspiracists Furious at Justice Department Over Epstein Memo

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.

Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.


to contact me:


[email protected]



source:


dl (justice.gov)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.

Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.


to contact me:


[email protected]



source:


dl (justice.gov)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this episode we once again dive into the court filings and this time we are taking a look at the Ethan Chapin Facebook warrant.



(commercial at 9:18)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

030723 Order to Seal Redact - Meta Platforms Inc 2.pdf (idaho.gov)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 7-1-23






The family of Kaylee Goncalves are happy that the death penalty for Bryan Kohberger has been announced, but they are not so happy about the fact that the scene of the crime is set to be demolished before the trial begins. They fear that the house might come into play at some point during the trial and they want to avoid it becoming an issue.

The University of Idaho, who owns the rights to the house now, have said their plans remain unchanged and they will go ahead with the demolition of the home as soon as they are prepared.



(commercial at 7:38)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Kohberger crime scene: Goncalveses family wants jury visit (lawandcrime.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.