The Moscow Murders and More

​In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense has filed an objection to the State's motion in limine regarding the self-authentication of records. The State seeks to admit a substantial volume of evidence—including terabytes of video footage and thousands of pages of documents—without traditional authentication, relying instead on exceptions to the hearsay rule. The defense contends that the State has not provided specific certifications or affidavits for these records, nor adequately demonstrated their relevance or authenticity. They argue that admitting such extensive evidence without proper authentication infringes upon Mr. Kohberger's constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial.

Furthermore, the defense highlights discrepancies in the State's evidence collection methods, noting that some records were obtained through various means such as police canvassing, search warrants, and federal grand jury subpoenas. They point out inconsistencies in the records produced by different methods, emphasizing the necessity for the State to specify the relevance and authenticity of each piece of evidence. The defense urges the court to require the State to provide detailed justifications and proper certifications for the evidence it intends to use, asserting that the current approach hampers the defense's ability to effectively confront the evidence and violates Mr. Kohberger's constitutional protections.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

031725-Defendants-Obj-States-MiL-RE-Self-Authentication-Records.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense has filed an objection to the State's motion in limine regarding the self-authentication of records. The State seeks to admit a substantial volume of evidence—including terabytes of video footage and thousands of pages of documents—without traditional authentication, relying instead on exceptions to the hearsay rule. The defense contends that the State has not provided specific certifications or affidavits for these records, nor adequately demonstrated their relevance or authenticity. They argue that admitting such extensive evidence without proper authentication infringes upon Mr. Kohberger's constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial.

Furthermore, the defense highlights discrepancies in the State's evidence collection methods, noting that some records were obtained through various means such as police canvassing, search warrants, and federal grand jury subpoenas. They point out inconsistencies in the records produced by different methods, emphasizing the necessity for the State to specify the relevance and authenticity of each piece of evidence. The defense urges the court to require the State to provide detailed justifications and proper certifications for the evidence it intends to use, asserting that the current approach hampers the defense's ability to effectively confront the evidence and violates Mr. Kohberger's constitutional protections.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

031725-Defendants-Obj-States-MiL-RE-Self-Authentication-Records.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ever since the arrest of Bryan Kohberger, we have not heard much from his family. Now however, we are hearing from his aunt who lives in Las Vegas and she has some very interesting things to say about Bryan Kohberger.


In this episode, we hear from his aunt about his behavior as a younger man and what she thinks about the allegations being made against him.



(commercial at 7:18)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger's aunt breaks silence and reveals whether she thinks he'll be found guilty | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 3-3-23





The raid of Bryan Kohberger's family home in Pennsylvania unleashed a treasure trove of goods into the hands of the authorities. Those items included a knife, a gun, black face masks as well as several other pieces of evidence that could be damning for Bryan Kohberger.


In this episode, we take a look at the full list of items seized and what signifigance they might play in the future trial of Bryan Kohberger.



(commercial at 7:04)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Bryan Kohberger Search Reveals 'Most Incriminating' Items in Case Against Him (newsweek.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On June 20, 2025, a Colorado grand jury indicted Barry Morphew for the first-degree murder of his wife, Suzanne Morphew, who disappeared on Mother's Day 2020. Her remains were discovered in September 2023 in a shallow grave near Moffat, Colorado, approximately 40 miles from their home. An autopsy revealed the presence of a powerful animal tranquilizer cocktail known as BAM (butorphanol, azaperone, and medetomidine) in Suzanne's system. Investigators determined that Barry Morphew was the only private citizen in the area with access to BAM, a drug he had used in his previous deer farming activities in Indiana. Additionally, tranquilizer equipment was found in the couple's home, and records showed no other individuals or businesses in the region had obtained BAM prescriptions between 2017 and 2020.

On June 20, 2025, a Colorado grand jury indicted Barry Morphew for the first-degree murder of his wife, Suzanne Morphew, who disappeared on Mother's Day 2020. Her remains were discovered in September 2023 in a shallow grave near Moffat, Colorado, approximately 40 miles from their home. An autopsy revealed the presence of a powerful animal tranquilizer cocktail known as BAM (butorphanol, azaperone, and medetomidine) in Suzanne's system. Investigators determined that Barry Morphew was the only private citizen in the area with access to BAM, a drug he had used in his previous deer farming activities in Indiana. Additionally, tranquilizer equipment was found in the couple's home, and records showed no other individuals or businesses in the region had obtained BAM prescriptions between 2017 and 2020.


to contact me:


[email protected]


source:

Grand Jury Indictment_0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On June 20, 2025, a Colorado grand jury indicted Barry Morphew for the first-degree murder of his wife, Suzanne Morphew, who disappeared on Mother's Day 2020. Her remains were discovered in September 2023 in a shallow grave near Moffat, Colorado, approximately 40 miles from their home. An autopsy revealed the presence of a powerful animal tranquilizer cocktail known as BAM (butorphanol, azaperone, and medetomidine) in Suzanne's system. Investigators determined that Barry Morphew was the only private citizen in the area with access to BAM, a drug he had used in his previous deer farming activities in Indiana. Additionally, tranquilizer equipment was found in the couple's home, and records showed no other individuals or businesses in the region had obtained BAM prescriptions between 2017 and 2020.

On June 20, 2025, a Colorado grand jury indicted Barry Morphew for the first-degree murder of his wife, Suzanne Morphew, who disappeared on Mother's Day 2020. Her remains were discovered in September 2023 in a shallow grave near Moffat, Colorado, approximately 40 miles from their home. An autopsy revealed the presence of a powerful animal tranquilizer cocktail known as BAM (butorphanol, azaperone, and medetomidine) in Suzanne's system. Investigators determined that Barry Morphew was the only private citizen in the area with access to BAM, a drug he had used in his previous deer farming activities in Indiana. Additionally, tranquilizer equipment was found in the couple's home, and records showed no other individuals or businesses in the region had obtained BAM prescriptions between 2017 and 2020.


to contact me:


[email protected]


source:

Grand Jury Indictment_0.pdf



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The prosecution’s decision not to call Victim 3 to testify in the Sean “Diddy” Combs RICO trial significantly weakened their case by leaving a critical firsthand account absent from the courtroom. Victim 3 was repeatedly referenced throughout the trial as a key figure whose experiences could have directly corroborated the government’s allegations of a pattern of criminal conduct within the alleged enterprise. Without her testimony, the prosecution lost an opportunity to vividly illustrate the systemic nature of the trafficking scheme, undermining the emotional and evidentiary impact on the jury. Her firsthand narrative could have filled gaps in the timeline and reinforced the credibility of other witnesses, thereby strengthening the connective tissue needed to prove the racketeering conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.


Moreover, the absence of Victim 3 deprived the prosecution of a chance to counter defense attacks on witness credibility and to directly confront contradictions or defenses raised by Combs’s legal team. Her testimony would have likely addressed key elements such as coercion, control, and the involvement of multiple participants in the alleged criminal enterprise—crucial to establishing the RICO predicate acts. The failure to bring her to the stand allowed the defense to exploit this void, sowing doubt about the prosecution’s narrative and weakening the cohesive story required for a complex RICO conviction. Ultimately, not having Victim 3 testify created a noticeable evidentiary gap that hindered the government’s ability to fully connect the dots and secure a unanimous verdict on the RICO count.


to contact me:

[email protected]

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In one of the most high-profile federal trials in recent memory, Sean “Diddy” Combs was acquitted on two counts of sex trafficking after the government failed to meet the heavy burden of proof required under federal law. Prosecutors had attempted to portray Combs as the mastermind of a sprawling criminal enterprise, relying heavily on emotionally charged testimony, salacious details, and a sweeping RICO framework. But the defense dismantled the case piece by piece—pointing out inconsistencies in witness accounts, highlighting the absence of hard evidence, and emphasizing that even if Diddy’s behavior was morally questionable, it didn’t meet the strict legal definition of sex trafficking. The jury agreed, delivering not-guilty verdicts that underscored the government’s overreach and the defense’s calculated legal strategy.

But while the criminal case is over, Diddy’s legal troubles are far from resolved. A wave of civil lawsuits remains active—each alleging abuse, coercion, and assault. In these proceedings, the burden of proof is lower, and the risks are different: discovery, depositions, and the public release of damning information. These cases threaten not just financial damage but reputational annihilation, especially in an industry that thrives on perception. As the walls of legal scrutiny continue to close in, the courtroom saga of Sean Combs is still very much unfolding—and we’ll be tracking every motion, every development, and every verdict until the final gavel falls.

to contact me:

[email protected]



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a letter submitted to Judge Arun Subramanian of the Southern District of New York, federal prosecutors addressed the status of Sean Combs following the conclusion of his jury trial. After a seven-week proceeding, Combs was found guilty on two counts of interstate transportation for the purpose of prostitution, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2421(a). In light of the conviction, Combs’ legal team filed a motion requesting that he be released on bail while awaiting sentencing.

However, the Government argues that under the Bail Reform Act, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2), detention is mandatory for a defendant who has been convicted of certain offenses—including the ones Combs was found guilty of. Because of this, prosecutors assert that Combs is not legally entitled to release and must remain in custody pending sentencing.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.433.0_2.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In 2023, prosecutors assembled a highly detailed and damning body of evidence against Brian Walshe in support of the charge that he murdered his wife, Ana Walshe. The centerpiece of the case was a chilling series of internet searches conducted on his son’s iPad, including queries like “how to dispose of a body,” “how long before a body starts to smell,” “how to clean blood from a wooden floor,” and “dismemberment and best ways to dispose of a body.” These searches were conducted around the time Ana went missing and suggested not only forethought, but a deliberate attempt to plan and execute a cover-up. Brian Walshe initially told police that Ana had left early for a business trip, but his search history painted a vastly different picture—one of someone actively researching how to eliminate a human body just hours after his wife was last seen.

Beyond the digital trail, the forensic and physical evidence added serious weight to the case. Trash bags recovered from a transfer station contained blood-stained items such as towels, rags, a Tyvek suit, rubber gloves, a hacksaw, a hatchet, and a necklace believed to belong to Ana. DNA testing confirmed the presence of both Ana’s and Brian’s DNA on multiple items. Surveillance footage captured a man resembling Walshe discarding trash bags into dumpsters, and cellphone data placed him near the locations where those items were dumped. Investigators also discovered blood in the basement of the family’s home, along with a damaged knife and cleaning supplies. A trip to Home Depot, where Brian purchased mops, buckets, tarps, and other cleaning materials shortly after Ana’s disappearance, further bolstered the prosecution’s theory of premeditated murder and attempted evidence destruction. Taken together, the evidence formed a coherent and devastating narrative that Ana Walshe was murdered in her home, dismembered, and disposed of in a calculated attempt to erase all traces of the crime.



(commercial at 8:46)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Brian Walshe: Prosecutors detail extensive evidence in killing of Ana Walshe. Here's what we know | CNN


source:

Brian Walshe and the surprising conviction rate of 'no-body' murder cases (nypost.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.