The Moscow Murders and More

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.

​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

According to a source who is familiar with the investigation, Bryan Kohberger was stalking his victim(s) for weeks before the actual murders. He also was very, very careful about leaving traces of his DNA whenever he was out in public in Pennsylvania, even going so far as to wear gloves while going out to cover his tracks. The source also says that Kohberger is not stupid and has taken steps to cover his tracks.



Let's check it out!

(commercial at 6:38)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:


Idaho suspect stalked victims for WEEKS and wore GLOVES | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The document is a filing from prosecutors objecting to Bryan Kohberger’s motion to compel disclosure of alleged I.C.R. 16(b)(7) materials and to impose sanctions for what his defense claims is a failure to produce exculpatory evidence. Prosecutors argue that the defense is mischaracterizing both the nature of the materials requested and the State’s obligations under Idaho Criminal Rule 16. They assert that the materials Kohberger seeks — including investigative leads, interviews, and certain law enforcement notes — either do not exist, are not in the State’s possession, or are not subject to mandatory disclosure because they do not fall under Rule 16(b)(7)'s scope. The prosecution maintains that they have complied fully with discovery requirements, including the timely disclosure of expert reports, digital evidence, and witness lists.

The State also criticizes the defense’s demand for sanctions, calling it procedurally improper and legally unsupported. Prosecutors argue that Kohberger’s team has not shown any evidence of bad faith, willful withholding, or prejudice resulting from any alleged non-disclosure. They emphasize that the defense is attempting to convert discovery disputes into grounds for punitive sanctions — an approach the State characterizes as baseless and aimed at delaying proceedings. The filing closes with a request for the court to deny the motion in full, stating that the State has upheld its legal obligations and that the defense’s accusations are speculative and unfounded.








to  contact me:

[email protected]


source:

123124-Objection-Defendants-MtC-ICR16b7-Material-Sanctions.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The document is a filing from prosecutors objecting to Bryan Kohberger’s motion to compel disclosure of alleged I.C.R. 16(b)(7) materials and to impose sanctions for what his defense claims is a failure to produce exculpatory evidence. Prosecutors argue that the defense is mischaracterizing both the nature of the materials requested and the State’s obligations under Idaho Criminal Rule 16. They assert that the materials Kohberger seeks — including investigative leads, interviews, and certain law enforcement notes — either do not exist, are not in the State’s possession, or are not subject to mandatory disclosure because they do not fall under Rule 16(b)(7)'s scope. The prosecution maintains that they have complied fully with discovery requirements, including the timely disclosure of expert reports, digital evidence, and witness lists.

The State also criticizes the defense’s demand for sanctions, calling it procedurally improper and legally unsupported. Prosecutors argue that Kohberger’s team has not shown any evidence of bad faith, willful withholding, or prejudice resulting from any alleged non-disclosure. They emphasize that the defense is attempting to convert discovery disputes into grounds for punitive sanctions — an approach the State characterizes as baseless and aimed at delaying proceedings. The filing closes with a request for the court to deny the motion in full, stating that the State has upheld its legal obligations and that the defense’s accusations are speculative and unfounded.








to  contact me:

[email protected]


source:

123124-Objection-Defendants-MtC-ICR16b7-Material-Sanctions.pdf



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​On April 18, 2025, the Idaho District Court issued a ruling on the State's motion in limine concerning the admissibility of neuropsychological and psychiatric evidence in the case of State v. Bryan C. Kohberger. The State sought to exclude testimony from defense experts Dr. Rachel Orr and Dr. Eileen Ryan regarding Kohberger's diagnoses, including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). The defense argued that this evidence was not intended to establish a mental condition defense under Idaho Code § 18-207 but rather to provide context for Kohberger's courtroom demeanor and to assist the jury in understanding the physical implications of his diagnoses. The court determined that if Kohberger does not testify, such evidence explaining his demeanor is irrelevant and inadmissible under Idaho Rule of Evidence 403. However, the court reserved ruling on certain behaviors that might become relevant in rebuttal, except for expert testimony asserting that Kohberger was physically incapable of committing the crimes, for which no opinion had been disclosed


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

041825+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Rylene+Nowlin+and+Touch+and+Contact+DNA.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​On April 18, 2025, the Idaho District Court issued a ruling on the State's motion in limine concerning the admissibility of neuropsychological and psychiatric evidence in the case of State v. Bryan C. Kohberger. The State sought to exclude testimony from defense experts Dr. Rachel Orr and Dr. Eileen Ryan regarding Kohberger's diagnoses, including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). The defense argued that this evidence was not intended to establish a mental condition defense under Idaho Code § 18-207 but rather to provide context for Kohberger's courtroom demeanor and to assist the jury in understanding the physical implications of his diagnoses. The court determined that if Kohberger does not testify, such evidence explaining his demeanor is irrelevant and inadmissible under Idaho Rule of Evidence 403. However, the court reserved ruling on certain behaviors that might become relevant in rebuttal, except for expert testimony asserting that Kohberger was physically incapable of committing the crimes, for which no opinion had been disclosed


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

041825+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Rylene+Nowlin+and+Touch+and+Contact+DNA.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The defense submitted a letter to Judge Subramanian in response to a government filing made early that morning regarding the anticipated testimony of Ms. Bongolan. The defense argues that the government is making a last-ditch effort to admit evidence that is both inadmissible and irrelevant hearsay. They assert that this attempt amounts to a "second bite at the apple," seeking to reintroduce material that should not be allowed under the rules of evidence.

Additionally, the defense contends that the government's letter is not only legally baseless but also misleading in its presentation of both the facts and applicable law. They accuse the prosecution of mischaracterizing the situation in an effort to sway the court, and they urge Judge Subramanian to reject the government's latest arguments and prevent the introduction of the contested testimony.


The defense submitted a second letter to Judge Subramanian responding to the government’s objections regarding certain exhibits the defense plans to introduce during the cross-examination of government witness Bryana ("Bana") Bongolan. The defense also used the letter to object to two exhibits they understand the government intends to introduce through this same witness. They argue that their proposed exhibits and topics of cross-examination are relevant and permissible.

Specifically, the defense seeks to introduce a series of photographs intended to counter the government’s narrative that Sean Combs controlled or inhibited Cassie Ventura’s professional career. According to the defense, these photographs serve as physical evidence showing that Ventura actively worked on her music and pursued various business activities independently of Combs, including projects she undertook while collaborating with Ms. Bongolan.


to contact me:

[email protected]


Source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.400.0.pdf


gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.386.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Chelsea Lovelace alleges in her civil suit that during her relationship with Sean "Diddy" Combs, he subjected her to repeated acts of coercion, abuse, and sexual assault. According to the complaint, Combs lured her into traveling to see him, administered drugs to her without her consent, and physically assaulted her—including slapping her during violent encounters. Lovelace further claims that she became pregnant during this period and that Combs pressured her into having an abortion; she ultimately suffered a miscarriage. She also alleges that Combs systematically isolated her from friends and family, manipulated her emotionally, and used financial control to keep her dependent—providing an allowance while discouraging her from seeking employment.


The suit contends that Combs maintained this coercive dynamic through a pattern of drugging, physical violence, emotional abuse, and economic manipulation, leaving Lovelace trapped in a situation where she was unable to freely make decisions about her own life or body. She claims that Combs employed his staff and associates to further control and monitor her, ensuring compliance with his demands. Lovelace is seeking damages on multiple grounds, including sexual assault, battery, and negligent infliction of emotional distress, asserting that the experience left her with lasting psychological and emotional harm.



to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Diddy accuser reveals her identity in shocking lawsuit detailing her 'bitten feet' and freak-off fears | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

After lunch on June 13th, 2025, Jonathan Perez resumed his testimony in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, offering damning details that reinforced the government’s racketeering and sex trafficking allegations. Perez, a former Combs security employee turned cooperating witness, testified about a specific 2016 incident in Miami where he claimed he witnessed Combs physically assault a woman at a private party and later direct staff to “clean it up” and “get her quiet.” He stated that money was exchanged afterward and that Combs instructed him never to speak of the incident. The prosecution used Perez’s recollection to suggest a pattern of coercion, witness silencing, and obstruction of justice — aligning it with earlier testimony from female accusers who alleged that payouts and intimidation were standard after violent encounters.


Perez also told the court that Combs maintained a private surveillance system on his properties, allegedly used to record and archive footage of parties, including potential incriminating material. He said that some of these recordings were stored in a “vault room” accessible only to a small group of trusted insiders, further fueling the prosecution's theory that Combs operated a tightly controlled criminal enterprise. Under cross-examination, the defense sought to discredit Perez by pointing to past drug use and his motivation for cooperating with prosecutors, implying he was seeking leniency for unrelated charges. Still, Perez remained composed and firm in his answers, drawing a clear picture of systemic abuse and calculated coverups under Combs’ direction.



to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

June 13, 2025 - Day 23 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNN



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

First, the morning opened with testimony from a Homeland Security Investigations agent, Andre Lamon. He told the jury that during the March 2024 raid on Combs’s Los Angeles home, agents located a “security room” where firearms, armor-piercing ammunition, and sixteen boxes of AstroGlide lubricant—alongside hundreds of bottles of baby oil—were stored. When questioned by defense attorney Marc Agnifilo, he confirmed this was the only trafficking case in which he had seized lubricant in such quantities.   The agent clarified that none of the weapons were scattered around the mansion—they were all contained within that secure area .


After the agent’s testimony, the prosecution called Jonathan Perez, Combs’s former personal assistant, to the stand. Perez detailed his long shifts (initially $85K, later $100K per year) preparing Combs’s “king nights”—the so-called “freak-offs”—which involved organizing overnight sex events often featuring sheets, oils, massages, and IV drips. He recounted discovering explicit videos of “Jane” and another man, which he reported to Combs and his chief of staff, Kristina Khorram. Perez also described how Combs began paying Jane’s $10,000 monthly rent in 2023 after she resisted attending more of these events—reinforcing the prosecution’s narrative of coercion.   As the testimony wrapped, the judge moved into a sidebar discussing naming a “very successful rapper” tied to a trip Jane mentioned, and shortly thereafter, the jury was dismissed for a lunch break.


to contact me:


[email protected]




source:

(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ trial continues as Kanye West shows up at court | CNN

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.