Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

    

 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

    

 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

    

 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

    

 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

John O’Keefe didn’t die instantly. That’s the key takeaway from neurosurgeon Dr. Aizik Wolf’s testimony—and it could have seismic consequences for Karen Read’s defense.

In this premiere breakdown from Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski is joined by Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor, to explore what it means when a medical expert tells the jury there was a window of time—a chance to act, to save a life, to call for help. If Karen Read was responsible for hitting O’Keefe, then her decision to leave the scene could represent not just moral failure, but criminal negligence.

Was it second-degree murder—or fatal inaction? Faddis unpacks the legal duty to render aid, how it factors into jury instructions, and whether the timeline now favors the prosecution. This is where law, medicine, and morality collide.

#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DutyToAct #FailureToHelp #EricFaddis #FallTheory #TrueCrimeDebate #HiddenKillersPodcast #KarenReadTrial #ForensicLaw

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Day 23 of the Karen Read trial may go down as a defining moment. After weeks of forensic testimony, digital data, and a parade of witnesses, the prosecution rested its case—but not before leaving the jury with a gut-punch final act: a 50-second clip of Karen Read herself, captured in 2024, questioning whether she may have accidentally hit Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. “What if I clipped him in the knee?” she asked, describing a conversation with her lawyer, who allegedly responded, “Then you’d have some culpability.” The courtroom didn’t erupt—but the silence said everything. Jurors reportedly remained fixated on the blank screen long after the video ended.

But that moment wasn’t the only blow to the defense. Before that, defense attorney Robert Alessi attempted a full-scale takedown of the prosecution’s final expert witness, Dr. Judson Welcher, a crash reconstructionist hired by the state. What followed was a long, tense, and ultimately unconvincing cross-examination. Alessi challenged Welcher on the reverse throttle data (74% acceleration, 23.9 mph), questioned the accuracy of surveillance video reconstructions, and grilled him on the origins of glass fragments. Welcher held his ground. Calm, consistent, and data-driven, he even pushed back with a line that will likely echo: “Are you calling pieces of taillight found around the body circumstantial?”

The defense also tried to cast Welcher as a “hired gun,” noting the $369,000 his firm had been paid. But he calmly stated that he began his analysis under the assumption that Read hadn’t hit O’Keefe—and changed his conclusion only when the evidence demanded it.

This video breaks down the 10 most critical moments from the day the prosecution closed strong, the defense stumbled, and the jury was left with Karen Read’s own words ringing in their ears.

#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #CrashReconstruction #CourtroomDrama #ExpertWitness #ReverseThrottle #ForensicAnalysis #JusticeForJohn #HiddenKillers

On May 29, 2025, the prosecution rested its case against Karen Read — and not with a whimper, but with a sledgehammer. After weeks of building forensic, digital, and testimonial evidence linking Read to the death of Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, the Commonwealth ended with a one-two punch: a bulletproof expert and Read’s own words.

Defense attorney Robert Alessi attempted to dismantle the testimony of crash reconstructionist Dr. Judson Welcher — and failed spectacularly. Welcher, who detailed how Read’s Lexus reversed at 74% throttle and left taillight fragments and DNA near O’Keefe’s body, stood unshaken as Alessi tried (and floundered) to poke holes in the data.

Alessi’s aggressive tone did nothing but irritate the court and highlight his lack of traction. His cross-examination was littered with grasping hypotheticals and unsupported accusations. He tried to cast doubt on the tech data, the 3D scans, and even camera angles — only to be reminded that science doesn’t bend to bad theater.

Then, the prosecution dropped the final blow: a 50-second clip of Karen Read herself, questioning aloud if she hit O’Keefe. “What if I clipped him in the knee?” she asks. “Then you’d have some culpability,” her lawyer reportedly told her.

The courtroom fell silent. The jury stared at the screen long after it went black.

This video covers the top 10 moments from Day 23 — and why May 29 may go down as the day this case turned for good. With expert testimony that held firm and the defendant’s own voice suggesting guilt, the prosecution ended on a note that may echo all the way into deliberations.

#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #JusticeForJohn #ForensicEvidence #CrashReconstruction #DefenseFail #ProsecutionRested #ExpertWitness #CourtroomDrama

In this episode of Hidden Killers, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott takes us deep inside the emotional undercurrents of the Karen Read trial — not the legal motions, but the behavioral and psychological breadcrumbs that might say more than any piece of evidence ever could.

We explore the psychology of guilt through the lens of Read’s alleged statements like “Could I have hit him?” before O’Keefe’s body was even found — and ask, is that the voice of panic, or pre-loaded guilt? Shavaun breaks down the power of gaslighting in reverse, where the defendant isn’t just defending themselves, but turning the entire legal system into the supposed perpetrator.

From the emotional volatility in court, to Karen Read’s carefully curated public image, to the unraveling moments where concern seems to shift into self-preservation, this is a raw and revealing psychological profile of a woman at the center of a murder case — and a movement.

If you've been watching the trial unfold and wondering: Is this grief? Is this guilt? Or is this manipulation at the highest level? — this episode will give you the clinical language to understand the difference.

#KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #Gaslighting #ShavaunScott #TrueCrimePsychology #JohnOKeefe #EmotionalManipulation #NarcissisticInjury #CourtroomDrama #HiddenKillers

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Forensic science took center stage this week in the Karen Read trial—and Eric Faddis is here to break down the quiet but damning testimony jurors just heard.

On Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski and Eric dissect forensic expert Christina Hanley’s detailed breakdown of trace evidence: red and clear plastic fragments found on O’Keefe’s clothing, consistent with the tail light from Read’s Lexus SUV. Hanley also testified about the “jigsaw match” of glass shards found near the body and how several fragments were traced back to a broken cocktail glass at the scene.

This episode explores how circumstantial science stacks up in court, why “consistent with” is not the same as “conclusive,” and how the defense may respond to the mounting forensic narrative. In a case with no eyewitnesses, will these fragments be enough to persuade a jury?

#KarenReadTrial #ForensicScience #TraceEvidence #LexusTailLight #GlassEvidence #EricFaddis #TrueCrimePodcast #CrimeSceneAnalysis #HiddenKillers #ExpertWitness

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Science vs. Spin The Defense Pushes Conspiracy, But the Timeline Doesn’t Lie

On Day 22 of the Karen Read trial, the defense launched what looked more like a desperate PR offensive than a credible legal cross-examination. Their target? Crash reconstruction expert Judson Welcher—the man who clearly laid out how Read’s Lexus SUV, in reverse at 74% throttle and 23.9 mph, aligned perfectly with the injuries found on John O’Keefe’s body.

The defense didn’t challenge the data. They couldn’t. Instead, they went after Welcher’s paycheck—suggesting his $325,000 compensation somehow invalidated the scientific conclusions. But forensic experts cost money—especially when they laser-scan the scene, replicate impact scenarios, and map injuries to vehicle geometry with precision.

Welcher testified that O’Keefe’s wounds—on his arm, hip, and head—were consistent with being struck by an SUV and falling to the frozen ground. The defense, meanwhile, continues to float its baseless conspiracy theory that O’Keefe was beaten inside the house, dumped in the snow, and that the entire Canton police and Massachusetts State Police are complicit in framing Karen Read.

Even Judge Cannone saw through the smoke. She allowed Welcher to state that the damage to the SUV and the injuries were consistent with a collision—but reminded the jury that only they can decide what happened. Which is exactly what prosecutors want: let the facts speak louder than the fiction.

The real question isn’t whether the defense can poke at Welcher’s resume. It’s whether they can explain why everything—timeline, data, injuries, and forensic logic—points to one person: Karen Read.

#KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #ForensicTruth #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcher #DefenseDesperation #TrueCrimeUpdate #HiddenKillersPod #ProsecutionCase #KarenReadFacts

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial Day 22 Full Recap: Defense vs. Physics: A Masterclass in Desperation

In this in-depth breakdown of the May 28, 2025 courtroom testimony, we dissect forensic crash expert Judson Welcher’s compelling appearance in the Karen Read trial—where science met high-stakes cross-examination. With a forensic eye on biomechanics, vehicle telemetry, and injury patterns, Welcher walked the jury through data from Karen Read’s Lexus SUV, including an alarming reverse acceleration at 24 mph with 74% throttle at exactly 12:32:14 a.m.—the same second John O’Keefe’s phone went dark.

This video explores the physical and digital evidence presented by Welcher, including the now-viral paint transfer experiment showing how blue dye from a Lexus taillight landed exactly where O’Keefe had injuries on his forearm. We also unpack his calm dismantling of the “no broken bones, no collision” myth—citing real-world fatalities from glancing blows that left bones intact but caused fatal head trauma.

But it wasn’t just about evidence—it was about courtroom tension. The defense tried to undercut Welcher with a sarcastic jab about his remark that “a car could shoot into space”—twisting a scientific metaphor into a courtroom punchline. Welcher stood his ground. No theatrics. Just facts.

We’ll also take a closer look at the $325K paid to his firm, Aperture LLC, and whether that undermines or enhances the credibility of an expert who went as far as purchasing a Lexus RX350 to recreate the conditions of the alleged strike.

If you're following the Karen Read trial for the forensic truth, legal strategy, or psychological breakdown of the arguments, this is the analysis you can’t miss.

#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #Forensics #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcher #CourtroomDrama #LexusRX350 #InjuryAnalysis #HiddenKillersPodcast

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872