Friday 5/17/19: University of MD professor Dr. Jason Nichols, White House's Theo Wold, Corey Lewandowski, MoCo Fire & Rescue's Pete Piringer and Fox's Bret Baier
5am – A/B/CCollege Board to Include ‘Adversity Score’ on SAT Exams to Calculate Students’ Background. “We can’t sit on our hands and ignore the disparities of wealth reflected in the SAT,” said College Board chief executive David Coleman. (People) – For some students, the SAT exam is getting a slight change to reflect not only students’ educational accomplishments, but also the adversity they have faced outside of school. According to a report from the Wall Street Journal, the College Board — the New York nonprofit that oversees the SAT exam, a test that plays a crucial role in college applications — will be including an “adversity score” in the exam this fall. Reflecting students’ family income, educational differences and social backgrounds, the score will be calculated using 15 components, including the poverty levels and crime rate of the students’ high school and neighborhood, CNN reported. After completing a beta test that saw 50 colleges participate last year, the Board will now roll out the program to a total of 150 schools this fall. While colleges will be able to see the score and take it into account when reviewing applications, students won’t be able to review it. The addition to the exam comes amid the highly publicized college cheating scandal, which has seen high-profile parents accused of fraud after trying to get their children into prominent schools through various means, including expensive bribes and cheating on the SAT. According to the Journal, the Board has long been concerned about income inequality affecting the SAT results of black and Hispanic students, who often score lower than their white and Asian counterparts. Students whose parents are wealthy and college-educated frequently scored better than teenagers whose parents are not. The adversity score may help give many deserving students a chance to attend the college of their dreams, despite not getting a high score on the SAT. “There are a number of amazing students who may have scored less (on the SAT) but have accomplished more,” College Board chief executive David Coleman told the Journal, according to CNN. “We can’t sit on our hands and ignore the disparities of wealth reflected in the SAT.”
5am – D STEELE IDENTIFIED RUSSIAN DOSSIER SOURCES, NOTES REVEAL. (Chuck Ross | Daily Caller) – Christopher Steele told a State Department official a former Russian spy chief and a top Kremlin adviser were involved in an operation to collect compromising information on Donald Trump. The State Department official’s notes also indicate Steele claimed the Russians, Vyacheslav Trubnikov and Vladislav Surkov, were “sources” for the dossier. There is no evidence the compromising material mentioned in the dossier actually exists, raising questions about whether Steele was given disinformation. Trubnikov, the former head of the SVR, also has links to Stefan Halper, an FBI informant who had contact with the Trump campaign. Dossier author Christopher Steele identified a former Russian spy chief and a top adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin as being involved in handling potentially compromising information about President Donald Trump, State Department notes show. In her notes, State Department official Kathleen Kavalec also referred to the two Russians — former Russian foreign intelligence chief Vyacheslav Trubnikov and Putin aide Vladislav Surkov — as “sources.” The references to Trubnikov and Surkov, which have not previously been reported, are not definitive proof that either were sources for Steele’s dossier or that they were involved in an effort to collect blackmail material on Trump. But the notes are significant because they are the first government documents that show Steele discussing potential sources for the information in his dossier, which the former MI6 officer provided to the FBI. Trubnikov also has links to Stefan Halper, an FBI informant who collected information from Trump campaign aides George Papadopoulos and Carter Page. Halper arranged for Trubnikov to visit intelligence seminars at the University of Cambridge in 2012 and 2015. He also tapped Trubnikov to contribute to a Pentagon study published in 2015. Kavalec took the notes during an Oct. 11, 2016, meeting with Steele at State Department headquarters. The documents, which were released earlier in May by Citizens United and first reported on by The Hill, show Steele laid out many of the same allegations about Trump and his advisers that are found in the infamous dossier. The notes contain several inaccuracies, including that Russia was running operations out of its consulate in Miami. As Kavalec pointed out, Russia does not have a consulate in Miami.
Nellie Ohr deleted emails sent from husband’s DOJ account. Nellie Ohr, the wife of Justice Department official Bruce Ohr, told her husband she was deleting emails sent from his government account. The revelation comes as both Ohrs remain under intense scrutiny for their ties to Fusion GPS and British ex-spy Christopher Steele, the author of the anti-Trump dossier that was used to obtain warrants to wiretap a member of President Trump’s 2016 campaign. Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch obtained a series of April 2016 emails from a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Justice Department that show a correspondence between the Ohrs, an aide to Bruce Ohr named Lisa Holtyn, and Stefan Bress, a first secretary at the German Embassy. They discussed setting up a dinner for the German delegation as well as a meeting to discuss Russian organized crime. Included in a proposed agenda is the “Impact of Russian influence operations in Europe (‘PsyOps/InfoWar’).” On April 20, responding to the email thread with the subject line, “Analyst Russian Organized Crime – April 2016,” came the email from Nellie Ohr about deleting the emails. “Thanks! I’m deleting these emails now,” she said. Bruce Ohr was an associate deputy attorney general and director of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force while his wife Nellie was an independent contractor and Russia specialist. Emails previously released by Judicial Watch show Bruce Ohr acting as an unofficial back channel between the FBI and Steele. He was demoted when it was revealed he met with Steele and Glenn Simpson, the co-founder of the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which commissioned Steele’s work. Ohr also told lawmakers his wife shared a thumb drive with him to hand over to the FBI.
5am – E FBI Officials Who Worked On Clinton Email Case Never Suspected Strzok-Page Affair Under Their Noses. (Luke Rosiak | Daily Caller) — Two FBI officials who worked in counterintelligence and described themselves as friends with either Peter Strzok or Lisa Page said they did not pick up that their colleagues were having an extramarital affair, according to transcripts of testimony obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. These friends both worked on the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server. A former undercover federal agent said such seeming obliviousness reflects poorly on the work on that Clinton case and also that Strzok might have weaponized his FBI training in the art of deception for nefarious purposes. Two FBI officials who worked closely with Peter Strzok and Lisa Page had no idea about the pair’s extramarital affair, they testified to a congressional committee, even though they work for an investigative agency and considered themselves friends. The two who did not pick up on any signs of an affair played key roles in the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private server use, which did not result in any criminal charges after FBI head James Comey drafted an exoneration speech before the investigation had concluded. FBI personnel are trained to look for activity that could lead to an agent being blackmailed, which could include an extramarital affair. A former undercover federal agent, Wayne Black, told The Daily Caller News Foundation the officials’ blindness to the affair says something about the Clinton probe, in which important leads were allegedly not followed.