
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
If there were fewer of us, would the amount of greenhouse gasses we emit reduce? It’s a question that often creeps up in discussions about climate change. Studies show that the global population will decline eventually and populations in many rich nations are already declining. However, 11,000 scientists signed a paper warning of “untold suffering due to the climate crisis” unless society transforms, including the reversal of population growth. But an analysis by the United Nations found that affluence has a greater impact on the climate than population. When we talk about overpopulation, what are we really saying and where does the conversation go from here?
This episode was first broadcast on 13th December 2021.
Presenters Neal Razzell and Kate Lamble are joined by:
Producer: Darin Graham
4.4
158158 ratings
If there were fewer of us, would the amount of greenhouse gasses we emit reduce? It’s a question that often creeps up in discussions about climate change. Studies show that the global population will decline eventually and populations in many rich nations are already declining. However, 11,000 scientists signed a paper warning of “untold suffering due to the climate crisis” unless society transforms, including the reversal of population growth. But an analysis by the United Nations found that affluence has a greater impact on the climate than population. When we talk about overpopulation, what are we really saying and where does the conversation go from here?
This episode was first broadcast on 13th December 2021.
Presenters Neal Razzell and Kate Lamble are joined by:
Producer: Darin Graham
5,400 Listeners
1,853 Listeners
7,827 Listeners
407 Listeners
4,329 Listeners
1,754 Listeners
1,065 Listeners
560 Listeners
1,984 Listeners
1,064 Listeners
399 Listeners
752 Listeners
791 Listeners
472 Listeners
244 Listeners
460 Listeners
99 Listeners
775 Listeners
58 Listeners
3,024 Listeners
76 Listeners
205 Listeners
198 Listeners
9 Listeners