
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


One question is beginning to dominate Jackie Henderson's legal battle with ARN.
Who actually made the decision to sack her?
According to court documents, Jackie's legal team says they still don't know who the decision-makers were after she told the company she could no longer work with Kyle Sandilands.
Why does that matter? Could identifying the people behind the decision become one of the most important issues in the entire case?
Michael Byrnes joins us to explain why this seemingly simple question could have significant legal consequences, what the court-ordered independent medical examination means, why Jackie is determined to keep the October hearing dates, and what signals we should be watching for if settlement discussions are happening behind closed doors.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Game Changers: Radio4.7
33 ratings
One question is beginning to dominate Jackie Henderson's legal battle with ARN.
Who actually made the decision to sack her?
According to court documents, Jackie's legal team says they still don't know who the decision-makers were after she told the company she could no longer work with Kyle Sandilands.
Why does that matter? Could identifying the people behind the decision become one of the most important issues in the entire case?
Michael Byrnes joins us to explain why this seemingly simple question could have significant legal consequences, what the court-ordered independent medical examination means, why Jackie is determined to keep the October hearing dates, and what signals we should be watching for if settlement discussions are happening behind closed doors.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

1,074 Listeners

74 Listeners

113 Listeners

138 Listeners

341 Listeners

66 Listeners

3 Listeners

17 Listeners

29 Listeners

10 Listeners

47 Listeners

64 Listeners

45 Listeners

232 Listeners

26 Listeners

8 Listeners

35 Listeners

5 Listeners