Should we be allowed to sell our organs on the open market? Would the poor be exploited under such a system? And does organ donation impose an unfair burden on the relatives of those that need a transplant?
Check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/

Eric Sampson and Rebecca Tuvel explore the contested issue of academic freedom. They discuss the tensions that emerge when universities try to balance the promotion of diverse intellectual perspectives with concerns over potential harm to community members, as seen in controversies involving figures like philosopher Peter Singer. 

Drawing on debates about gender, race, and ethics, they analyze the institutional challenges of fostering open inquiry while ensuring a safe and respectful academic environment. 

Join this conversation to reflect on the evolving landscape of higher education and the fundamental questions at stake in preserving academic freedom.

[00:00] Introduction

[00:09] Thought Experiment: The Peter Singer Controversy

[02:30] Academic Freedom vs. Harm and Danger

[07:36] The Role of Universities in Handling Controversial Topics

[11:46] Institutional Model of Academic Philosophy

[17:25] Historical Shifts in Moral and Scientific Views

[31:29] Debates on Harm in High-Stakes Moral Topics

[34:02] Mischaracterization of Controversial Views

[38:05] Protests and Speech Restrictions on Campus

[50:20] Viewpoint Diversity and Government Enforcement

[55:33] Donor Influence on Academic Freedom

[58:31] Boycotts and Freedom of Research

[01:02:01] Concerns of Indoctrination and Institutional Reforms

[01:06:59] Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/

Connor examines involuntary commitment, substance abuse disorders, and the ethical dilemmas surrounding parenting and children's welfare.

Should children be allowed to transition genders? When is the state justified in removing children from harmful environments? And what is the role of non-parental caregivers in a child's life?

Join us for this thought-provoking episode that pushes the boundaries of our intuitions and ethical considerations around children's rights.

[00:00] Introduction and Guest Introduction

[00:18] Thought Experiments on Involuntary Commitment

[05:11] Parenting and Authority

[06:19] Sufficiency vs. Maximality in Child Upbringing

[10:33] Children's Rights and Associational Rights

[20:56] Cultural and Parental Interests

[24:49] Gender Identity and Child Welfare

[36:55] Defensive Kidnapping and Ethical Dilemmas

[01:01:34] Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/

Jared Millson delves into the intriguing world of conspiracy theories, exploring well-known cases like Pizzagate and lesser-known but historically significant events such as the COINTELPRO. The discussion spans the definitions and philosophical debates about what constitutes a conspiracy theory, the criteria for evaluating these theories, and the psychological and sociopolitical impacts they have on society.

Tune in to understand why some conspiracy theories should not be immediately dismissed and the role they play in democratic accountability.

[00:00] Introduction and Special Guests

[00:34] The Pizzagate Conspiracy Theory

[02:37] The Police State Conspiracy Theory

[06:37] Defining Conspiracy Theories

[15:54] Evaluating Conspiracy Theories

[29:35] The Unfalsifiability of Conspiracy Theories

[31:54] The Role of Renegade Scientists

[38:22] The Longevity of Conspiracy Theories

[48:27] The Psychological Appeal of Conspiracy Theories

[57:24] Final Thoughts

Check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/

Peter Singer delves into difficult ethical questions regarding animal rights, the morality of factory farming, and difficult human-related ethical dilemmas.

Singer discusses his views as a consequentialist, examining the impact of our choices on animal suffering, the ethical considerations around organ donation from anencephalic children, and the broader implications of such decisions.

What are the moral implications of eating meat from factory farms versus ethically raised animals, and cannibalism under hypothetical scenarios with no harm to others?

Singer emphasizes the need for considering the consequences of our actions, shedding light on the pressing need to reform our food production systems and make more ethical choices in our daily lives.

Peter Singer’s Substack: https://substack.com/profile/4270932-peter-singer

Peter Singer’s YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@peter_singer

Peter Singer’s book, ‘Animal Liberation Now’: https://www.amazon.com/Animal-Liberation-Now-Definitive-Classic/dp/0063226707

[00:00] A Philosophical Dive into Animal Rights with Peter Singer

[00:12] Exploring the Ethical Dilemmas of Human and Animal Lives

[01:59] The Complexities of Organ Donation from Anencephalic Children

[03:57] Comparing Human and Animal Rights in Medical Contexts

[06:08] Consequentialism and Individual Case Analysis in Ethics0

[7:42] The Ethical Quandaries of Parental Consent and Medical Decisions

[15:54] Navigating the Slippery Slope of Euthanasia and Assisted Dying

[25:41] The Ethical Considerations of Eating Meat and Factory Farming

[33:29] The Harsh Realities of Factory Farming

[34:45] Ethical Considerations and the Nature of Animal Suffering

[36:50] Addressing Common Objections to Animal Rights

[41:12] The Impact of Individual Choices on Animal Suffering

[43:43] The Role of Vegetarianism and Veganism in Reducing Demand for Meat

[01:00:46] Exploring the Ethical Implications of Consuming Expired or Discarded Meat

[01:04:50] Concluding Thoughts and Reflections

Check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/

Jess Flanigan argues that personal income tax is illegitimate. But is the state ever justified in extracting money from its population to pay for public goods? Are property taxes and privatization of state functions better options? And if taxes are illegitimate, are we permitted, or even obligated, to stop paying our taxes?

[00:00] Introduction and Thought Experiment

[02:40] Justifying Taxes for Public Goods

[03:40] Alternative Tax Systems

[07:27] The Egalitarian Distribution Debate

[13:15] The Alienation of Labor in Capitalism

[17:49] Privatization and the Role of the State

[21:45] The Debate on Tariffs

[27:56] Economic Impact of Industrialization and Labor

[32:15] Debating Defensive Tariffs

[38:49] Funding Public Goods: Challenges and Solutions

[51:36] Libertarian Views on Government and Personal Freedom

Check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/

If most voters are misinformed, is democracy legitimate? What sort of voting system should we have in its place? And should some votes count more than others?

[00:00] Introduction to the Problems of Democracy

[00:17] Brexit: A Case Study in Misinformed Voting

[05:33] Voter Behavior: Social Benefits and Signaling

[18:29] The Legitimacy of Democratic Systems

[30:32] The Challenge of Political Incentives

[33:02] The Abortion Debate and Judicial Power

[36:41] Depoliticizing Social Life

[43:10] Proposals for Enlightened Preference Voting

[55:10] Global Voting and Democratic Legitimacy

[58:28] Philosophical Reflections on Democratic Theory

Check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/

Does our common understanding of mass shootings help us to prevent them?

Blankschaen argues that our common beliefs and media narratives around gun ownership, mental illness, and school policies are unhelpful in preventing future mass shootings.

Can we even provide an adequate definition of mass shootings?

Should we give up the concept of mass shootings altogether, and focus instead on the particular shooters and victims in each circumstance?

Read Kurt’s paper here: https://philpapers.org/rec/BLAAMS

[00:00] Introduction and Thought Experiment

[01:35 ] Exploring the Concept of Mass Shooters

[06:56] Challenges in Profiling and Predicting

[12:06] Defining Mass Shootings and Intent

[24:10] Policy Implications and Conceptual Concerns

[28:09] Terrorist Attacks vs. Mass Shootings

[29:31] Tailoring Solutions to Different Types of Violence

[35:54] Farm Murders in South Africa: A Case Study

[40:14] The Role of Guns in Mass Shootings

[42:53] Media Influence and Moral Panic

[55:18] International Comparisons and Cultural Context

[57:55] Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/

Through comparisons to consequentialism and deontological ethics, Travis dissects the core principles and critiques of virtue ethics. Along the way, we discuss moral dilemmas, the application of virtues, and the real-world implications of ethical theories. Whether you're a student of philosophy or just curious about moral reasoning, this discussion provides deep insights into the essence of virtuous behavior and its place in ethical discourse.

[00:00] Introduction and Welcome

[00:14] The Drowning Child Thought Experiment

[03:53] The Virtuous Agent Problem

[04:45] Virtue Ethics vs. Other Ethical Theories

[13:48] Virtue Ethics and Practical Advice

[21:52] Challenges in Virtue Ethics

[29:42] The Moral Theory Bug

[33:26] Moral Rationalism and Obligations

[44:54] Virtue Ethics as a Theory of Good Character

[52:19] Eating Meat: Ethical Dilemmas

[57:39] Concluding Thoughts

You can also check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/[00:00] Introduction and Welcome

What is the underlying logic of woke ideology? Is it consistent, and can it justify the pursuit of equality of outcome, such as redistributing wealth and land?

Cofnas discusses the origins and evolution of wokeism, the moral and empirical premises underlying it, and the political dynamics between conservatives and liberals.

Tune in to gain a deeper understanding of the ongoing debates around equity, discrimination, and social justice.

You can also check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/[00:00] Introduction and Welcome

[00:16] Thought Experiment: Redheads and Slavery

[08:16] Applying the Analogy to Race

[17:00] Moral Responsibility and Social Justice

[32:20] Reparations and Environmental Factors

[37:17] Statistical Chance and Job Market Inequality

[48:43] Conservative Resistance to Wokeism

[54:59] The Long March Through Institutions

[58:02] Trump's Impact on Wokeism

[01:01:45] The Future of Wokeism and Conservative Strategy

[01:05:21] Philosophical Foundations of Equality

[01:10:47] Conclusion and Final Thoughts