For centuries, we have told ourselves that intelligence is what sets us apart—that our ability to think, reason, and create makes us unique, even indispensable. But what if this was always a comforting illusion? What if intelligence was never the measure of significance, and what happens when minds far superior to our own emerge—minds that do not conquer us, but simply leave us behind?

In this episode of The Deeper Thinking Podcast, we confront a profound and unsettling idea: humanity may not be the pinnacle of intelligence, but merely a passing phase in its evolution.

Gardner Dozois’ novella Chains of the Sea presents a vision of human obsolescence—not through war, not through destruction, but through irrelevance. The aliens do not invade. The artificial intelligences do not seek domination. They move on, indifferent to us, as though we are an evolutionary dead end. What if superintelligent AI does the same? If intelligence itself is evolving beyond us, then perhaps the real question is not whether we will survive—but whether we are even meant to.

For centuries, thinkers from Aristotle to Descartes framed intelligence as the defining feature of human existence. But modern neuroscience challenges this assumption, with research showing that intelligence is neither uniquely human nor the only form of cognition.

At the same time, the rise of artificial intelligence has redefined the very meaning of thought. AI systems do not "think" like us, yet they are already outperforming human experts in fields ranging from medicine to finance. If machine learning algorithms continue to improve at exponential rates, what happens when human intelligence is no longer needed at all?

The real terror is not destruction, but dismissal. Cosmic horror—a genre pioneered by H.P. Lovecraft—is often framed around the idea that the universe does not care about us. We are insignificant in the grander cosmic order, much like insects oblivious to the workings of human civilization.

Now, AI may be replicating this very dynamic. If intelligence does not require self-awareness, then superior minds might emerge that do not perceive us as we perceive them. We assume that consciousness and intelligence must coexist, but what if this is simply a human bias?

If the next step in intelligence is non-human, and it has no need for us, what does that mean for the future of humanity?

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

📚 Gardner Dozois – Chains of the Sea

📚 Nick Bostrom – Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies

📚 Thomas Kuhn – The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

📚 Isaac Asimov – I, Robot

YouTube

☕ Buy Me a Coffee

We have always assumed that intelligence was our greatest strength. But what if the true measure of survival was something else entirely?