
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Thank you to Justis Millis for providing feedback and proofreading on this post. This post is also available on my Substack.
TL/DR: Contrary to the theory that neurological sex differences and autism both involve the same tradeoff of systemic versus empathic thinking, I found complex differences. It turned out that men were more interested in technology and more disagreeable, whereas autistic people had a narrower focus on details, were more introverted, more socially challenged, and had stronger sensory sensitivity.
I asked people on Prolific a bunch of questions that are supposed to be related to autism, systemizing and empathy. As a preview before I get into the details, the overall results can be seen here:
If there was only a single underlying tradeoff that all of these scales were measuring, then we would expect all of the group differences to be highly correlated, with the items just varying [...]
---
Outline:
(01:21) Background
(03:01) Data
(04:03) Principal component analysis
(06:43) Measurement invariance
(10:22) Improving interpretability
(15:58) Appendix: Item list
(23:19) Appendix: Score distributions
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
The original text contained 29 images which were described by AI.
---
First published:
Source:
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
By LessWrongThank you to Justis Millis for providing feedback and proofreading on this post. This post is also available on my Substack.
TL/DR: Contrary to the theory that neurological sex differences and autism both involve the same tradeoff of systemic versus empathic thinking, I found complex differences. It turned out that men were more interested in technology and more disagreeable, whereas autistic people had a narrower focus on details, were more introverted, more socially challenged, and had stronger sensory sensitivity.
I asked people on Prolific a bunch of questions that are supposed to be related to autism, systemizing and empathy. As a preview before I get into the details, the overall results can be seen here:
If there was only a single underlying tradeoff that all of these scales were measuring, then we would expect all of the group differences to be highly correlated, with the items just varying [...]
---
Outline:
(01:21) Background
(03:01) Data
(04:03) Principal component analysis
(06:43) Measurement invariance
(10:22) Improving interpretability
(15:58) Appendix: Item list
(23:19) Appendix: Score distributions
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
The original text contained 29 images which were described by AI.
---
First published:
Source:
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

112,909 Listeners

130 Listeners

7,215 Listeners

532 Listeners

16,221 Listeners

4 Listeners

14 Listeners

2 Listeners