Send us a text

In this episode, Shawn, Matt, & Marc engage in a lively discussion covering various topics. They dive headfirst into the murky waters of corruption, questioning if all forms are equally damaging, sparked by AOC's critique of fellow Democrats and the broader issue of politicians profiting in office. The conversation then shifts to a chilling look at a Trump advisor's pre-election promise to make civil servants "miserable," examining ProPublica's prophetic reporting and its implications. The hosts also grapple with a disturbing case where the US government seemingly lost track of an individual the Supreme Court ordered to be returned to the country. Finally, they tackle a deeply profound and ethically complex situation arising from an IVF clinic's devastating embryo mix-up, forcing a re-evaluation of the very definition of parenthood.

The Thought Provoker:

Topic 1: Lots of people who are worried about corruption, insider trading, and oligarchy support politicians who get rich while they are in office. Shawn sometimes talks like they are all the same thing. Are they all equally bad?

Topic 2: In late October, ProPublica published one of its most prophetic stories in their history. They explained how a key Trump adviser said a Trump administration will seek to make civil servants miserable in their jobs. Before the election, many Trump voters dismissed this as hyperbole from the left. Do you agree that ProPublica was prophetic? Should we all pay more attention to their reporting?

Topic 3: The Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration had to help a man, wrongly deported to a dangerous El Salvador prison, return to the U.S. Despite the Supreme Court ordering his return, a U.S. government lawyercouldn't tell a judge where Kilmar Abrego Garcia was. The judge found it deeply concerning that the government didn't know the location of someone they were supposed to bring back. What should the Trump Administration do?

The Big Question: A shocking case in Australia raises a profound question about parenthood: after an IVF clinic mistakenly implanted the wrong embryo, a woman gave birth to a child genetically belonging to another couple. The discovery, made when the clinic found an extra embryo, leaves everyone involved in a deeply challenging situation. This unprecedented event forces us to consider: in such circumstances, who are the true parents of the child? Is parenthood defined by genetics, or by the experience of carrying and giving birth?

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Listener Mailbag
03:03 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Employment
06:08 Government Obligations and College Funding
09:00 Corruption and Insider Trading in Politics
12:01 Oligarchy vs. Democracy: A Political Debate
15:00 The Role of Wealth in Politics
18:01 Prophetic Reporting and Government Transparency
24:19 Navigating Employment Challenges in Government
30:10 The Role of Media in Government Accountability
38:24 Defining Parenthood: Genetics vs. Experience
48:30 Agency and Decision-Making in Complex Situations