
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Socially responsible investing hasn't changed anything while handing investors subpar returns. The envisioned benefits of ESG investing—owning companies that follow responsible environmental, social, and governance policies—have failed to materialize. Instead, the blind acceptance of ESG precepts has resulted in trillions of dollars being misallocated and zero progress toward its principle target: climate change. Terrence Keeley, author of Sustainable: Moving Beyond ESG to Impact Investing, shows how ESG got the ideology right and the methodology wrong.
By Mauldin Economics5
1111 ratings
Socially responsible investing hasn't changed anything while handing investors subpar returns. The envisioned benefits of ESG investing—owning companies that follow responsible environmental, social, and governance policies—have failed to materialize. Instead, the blind acceptance of ESG precepts has resulted in trillions of dollars being misallocated and zero progress toward its principle target: climate change. Terrence Keeley, author of Sustainable: Moving Beyond ESG to Impact Investing, shows how ESG got the ideology right and the methodology wrong.

3,072 Listeners

592 Listeners

178 Listeners

1,448 Listeners

361 Listeners

459 Listeners

1,342 Listeners

372 Listeners

273 Listeners

218 Listeners

417 Listeners

86 Listeners

44 Listeners

155 Listeners

80 Listeners