
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Socially responsible investing hasn't changed anything while handing investors subpar returns. The envisioned benefits of ESG investing—owning companies that follow responsible environmental, social, and governance policies—have failed to materialize. Instead, the blind acceptance of ESG precepts has resulted in trillions of dollars being misallocated and zero progress toward its principle target: climate change. Terrence Keeley, author of Sustainable: Moving Beyond ESG to Impact Investing, shows how ESG got the ideology right and the methodology wrong.
By Mauldin Economics5
1111 ratings
Socially responsible investing hasn't changed anything while handing investors subpar returns. The envisioned benefits of ESG investing—owning companies that follow responsible environmental, social, and governance policies—have failed to materialize. Instead, the blind acceptance of ESG precepts has resulted in trillions of dollars being misallocated and zero progress toward its principle target: climate change. Terrence Keeley, author of Sustainable: Moving Beyond ESG to Impact Investing, shows how ESG got the ideology right and the methodology wrong.

3,060 Listeners

585 Listeners

173 Listeners

1,463 Listeners

356 Listeners

465 Listeners

1,348 Listeners

377 Listeners

272 Listeners

218 Listeners

418 Listeners

78 Listeners

45 Listeners

154 Listeners

79 Listeners