FBI Unscripted | Real Agents On Real Crime

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

    

 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

    

 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke delves into the potential for a second trial in the Alex Murdaugh case, exploring the dynamics that might unfold if the case is retried. Dreeke and Brueski discuss the various elements that could resurface, including Murdaugh’s behavior in the courtroom during the first trial, which was marked by what appeared to be forced acting and emotional outbursts potentially linked to drug withdrawal symptoms. The conversation also touches on the possibility of introducing a third-party suspect, a theory that wasn’t fully explored in the initial trial. Dreeke considers the idea that Murdaugh, a known narcissist and admitted drug addict, might have orchestrated the murders of his wife and son as a twisted bid for pity to divert attention from his financial crimes. The discussion raises questions about the role of addiction in Murdaugh's actions and how it may have influenced his decision-making processes, ultimately leading to the tragic events. Dreeke points out that while alternative theories are plausible, they often lack substantial evidence, making it unlikely that they would hold up in court. The conversation concludes with a reflection on the nature of conspiracy theories and the challenges they present in high-profile cases like this one.

**Main Points:**

- Discussion on the potential second trial for Alex Murdaugh and what might change.

- Murdaugh's courtroom behavior during the first trial, possibly influenced by drug withdrawal.

- Consideration of introducing a third-party suspect in a retrial.

- Analysis of Murdaugh's narcissism and drug addiction as factors in the murders.

- Exploration of alternative theories and their likelihood of holding up in court.

- Reflection on conspiracy theories and their impact on high-profile cases.

- Emphasis on the influence of addiction in Murdaugh’s decision-making processes.

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #JuryTampering #CourtroomBehavior #Narcissism #DrugAddiction #LegalAnalysis

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the latest developments in the Alex Murdaugh case, focusing on the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision to review allegations of jury tampering involving court clerk Becky Hill. Coffindaffer emphasizes the critical role that a court clerk plays during a trial and notes that even the perception of bias or improper influence on just one juror could justify a retrial. She also reflects on Murdaugh's disastrous testimony during his first trial, which significantly contributed to his guilty verdict. If granted a retrial, Coffindaffer believes the prosecution may face challenges, especially if Murdaugh avoids testifying. The conversation also explores the potential repercussions for Becky Hill, whose career and reputation have been severely damaged. Coffindaffer doubts that Hill will face criminal charges, suggesting that her actions were likely not criminal in intent but rather poor judgment. The episode concludes with uncertainty about whether the Supreme Court will grant Murdaugh a new trial, predicting a split decision.

**Main Points:**

- The South Carolina Supreme Court is reviewing jury tampering allegations in the Alex Murdaugh case.

- The role of the court clerk, Becky Hill, and her influence on the jury is under scrutiny.

- Murdaugh’s testimony in his first trial contributed to his conviction; avoiding it in a retrial could pose challenges for the prosecution.

- Becky Hill’s career and reputation are damaged, but criminal charges are unlikely.

- The outcome of the Supreme Court's decision remains uncertain, with a split decision possible.

#Hashtags:

#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #SupremeCourt #Retrial #LegalDrama #TrueCrime

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke discusses the latest developments in the Alex Murdaugh case, focusing on the South Carolina Supreme Court’s decision to hear Murdaugh’s appeal based on allegations of jury tampering. The conversation highlights the complexities of the case, particularly the role of court clerk Becky Hill, who allegedly made inappropriate comments that may have influenced the jury's decision. Dreeke emphasizes the significance of the Supreme Court's involvement, noting that their ruling could set a crucial precedent regarding the handling of jury tampering allegations in future cases. He also discusses the potential consequences for Hill, including possible legal repercussions and liability for the costs of a retrial if the court finds that tampering occurred. The discussion raises concerns about the integrity of the judicial system and the importance of maintaining public trust, especially in high-profile cases like Murdaugh’s. Dreeke also touches on the broader implications of the case, suggesting that a ruling against a retrial despite proven tampering could set a dangerous precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future.

**Main Points:**

- The South Carolina Supreme Court will hear Alex Murdaugh’s appeal based on jury tampering allegations.

- Court clerk Becky Hill is accused of making inappropriate comments that may have influenced the jury.

- The Supreme Court’s decision could set a significant legal precedent regarding jury tampering.

- Becky Hill may face legal repercussions and financial liability if tampering is confirmed.

- The case underscores the importance of maintaining public trust in the judicial system.

- A ruling against a retrial despite evidence of tampering could have dangerous implications for future cases.

- The conversation explores the broader impact of the case on the legal system’s integrity.

#AlexMurdaugh #JuryTampering #BeckyHill #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #LegalPrecedent #CourtroomIntegrity #PublicTrust

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the ongoing trial of Robert Telles, the former Clark County Public Administrator accused of murdering investigative journalist Jeff German. The evidence against Telles appears overwhelming, particularly the DNA found under Jeff's fingernails, which strongly suggests a struggle before the murder. Coffindaffer highlights the significance of this type of evidence, noting that it is nearly impossible to plant. The discussion also touches on Telles' erratic behavior, including wearing a conspicuous outfit and failing to properly dispose of the evidence, which Coffindaffer attributes to his narcissistic belief that he could outsmart investigators. The conversation delves into the psychological aspects of Telles' actions, suggesting that his behavior may reflect a need to keep trophies as a reminder of his revenge. The episode also critiques Telles' re-election campaign, which appeared inauthentic and further revealed his narcissistic traits. Coffindaffer concludes by questioning Telles' competency, noting the hostile work environment he created and his delusional self-perception of being in control.

**Main Points:**

- Robert Telles is on trial for the murder of investigative journalist Jeff German.

- DNA evidence found under Jeff German's fingernails strongly implicates Telles.

- Telles' erratic behavior and poor evidence disposal reflect a narcissistic mindset.

- Telles may have kept trophies as a reminder of his actions.

- His inauthentic re-election campaign video further highlights his narcissistic traits.

- Telles created a hostile work environment, revealing his delusional sense of control.

#Hashtags:

#RobertTelles #JeffGerman #DNAAEvidence #Narcissism #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrialAnalysis

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke delves into the perplexing case of Robert Tellis, the former Clark County Public Administrator accused of murdering investigative reporter Jeff German. The discussion focuses on the bizarre and sloppy nature of the crime, particularly Tellis' alleged actions and the evidence found in his home. Dreeke examines the behavior patterns leading up to the murder, suggesting that the crime was likely driven by a fit of rage rather than meticulous planning. He points out that first-time murderers often act impulsively and without thought, leading to sloppy and easily detectable actions. The conversation also touches on the defense's attempt to argue a conspiracy theory, claiming that the evidence was planted by law enforcement due to bias against Tellis. However, Dreeke emphasizes that the overwhelming evidence, including surveillance footage and the odd behavior of Tellis, makes this defense strategy weak. He concludes that Tellis' history of rage and retaliation likely culminated in this violent act, reflecting a deeper pattern of uncontrolled anger.

**Main Points:**

- Robert Tellis is accused of murdering Jeff German, an investigative reporter.

- The crime appears to have been committed in a fit of rage rather than through meticulous planning.

- Tellis’ sloppy actions, such as cutting up evidence and wearing a conspicuous outfit, indicate his lack of experience as a murderer.

- The defense’s claim of a conspiracy by law enforcement is weak in light of the overwhelming evidence against Tellis.

- Dreeke discusses the psychological aspects of first-time murderers, emphasizing the impulsive and chaotic nature of such crimes.

- Surveillance footage and evidence found in Tellis’ home strongly implicate him.

- The crime is part of a broader pattern of rage and retaliation seen in Tellis’ behavior.

#RobertTellis #JeffGerman #MurderCase #BehavioralAnalysis #CrimeSceneInvestigation #RageCrimes #LawEnforcement

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the renewed attention on Scott Peterson's case, fueled by two contrasting docuseries on Netflix and Peacock. The conversation centers around new DNA evidence found on duct tape, which could potentially open the door for a new trial, despite the overwhelming evidence of guilt from the original trial. Coffindaffer explains the complexities of DNA analysis, emphasizing that the identity of the DNA donor will be critical. If the DNA belongs to someone other than Scott or Laci Peterson, it could lead to further investigation and possibly the reexamination of other evidence, like the van with the mattress that has also been mentioned in the case. However, Coffindaffer remains skeptical, suggesting that the DNA is likely to belong to either Scott or Laci, and if so, it would close the door on any new trial. The discussion also touches on the advancements in DNA technology since the original trial and how it might play a role in this case's outcome.

**Main Points:**

- New DNA evidence on duct tape in Scott Peterson's case is gaining attention due to recent docuseries.

- The identity of the DNA donor will be crucial in determining if a new trial is warranted.

- If the DNA belongs to someone else, it could lead to further investigations, including reexamining other evidence.

- Coffindaffer doubts that the DNA will belong to anyone other than Scott or Laci Peterson.

- Advances in DNA technology could impact the case's future.

#Hashtags:

#ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #DNAEvidence #TrueCrime #Docuseries #NewTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke discusses the case of Robert Tellis, the former Clark County Public Administrator accused of murdering investigative reporter Jeff German. Dreeke analyzes the behavioral patterns that could have led Tellis to such an extreme act of violence, emphasizing that individuals don't typically escalate to murder without a history of anger and aggression. The discussion highlights how Tellis' alleged actions are consistent with someone who has experienced escalating rage, possibly culminating in the murder of German, who had written extensively about turmoil and allegations of bullying within Tellis' office. Dreeke points out that DNA evidence found under German’s fingernails is a critical piece of evidence that strongly implicates Tellis. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of Tellis' behavior, suggesting that his defensiveness and history of retaliatory actions may reveal deeper, unresolved issues. Dreeke reflects on how Tellis' reaction to criticism and his failure to remain silent in the face of accusations could be indicative of guilt, making his defense more challenging.

**Main Points:**

- Robert Tellis is accused of murdering investigative reporter Jeff German.

- Dreeke examines the behavioral patterns that could have led to this violent act.

- Escalating rage and a history of aggression are often precursors to such crimes.

- DNA evidence under the victim’s fingernails strongly implicates Tellis.

- German's reporting on turmoil and bullying in Tellis’ office may have triggered the crime.

- Tellis' defensiveness and reaction to criticism suggest deeper issues and possible guilt.

- Dreeke emphasizes the importance of understanding behavioral arcs in criminal cases.

#RobertTellis #JeffGerman #MurderInvestigation #BehavioralAnalysis #DNAEvidence #CrimeandPunishment #LasVegasNews

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the potential developments if Alex Murdaugh faces a retrial. The conversation explores whether new defense strategies will emerge, including the possibility of introducing a third-party culprit, though Coffindaffer dismisses this due to a lack of evidence. She emphasizes that the first trial’s outcome was heavily influenced by Murdaugh’s poor performance on the stand, suggesting that if a retrial occurs, the defense may be more cautious about allowing him to testify again. The discussion also touches on the financial aspects of Murdaugh's defense, questioning how his legal team will fund expert witnesses and representation, given his apparent lack of accessible funds. Coffindaffer speculates that the Murdaugh family's wealth might still be used to support his defense. Additionally, the conversation highlights the tight-knit nature of the Murdaugh family and their likely continued support for Alex despite the legal challenges. The episode ends with Coffindaffer noting that Becky Hill’s actions may have inadvertently given Murdaugh a chance at a retrial, further complicating the legal saga.

**Main Points:**

- Speculation on new defense strategies if Alex Murdaugh faces a retrial, though introducing a third-party culprit seems unlikely.

- The first trial's guilty verdict was influenced by Murdaugh’s poor testimony; defense may avoid this mistake in a retrial.

- Questions arise about how Murdaugh’s defense will be funded, with speculation about hidden funds or family support.

- The Murdaugh family's close bonds suggest they will continue supporting Alex through his legal battles.

- Becky Hill’s actions might have inadvertently set the stage for a retrial, complicating the case further.

#Hashtags:

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #Retrial #BeckyHill #LegalDrama #FamilySupport #TrueCrime

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In the podcast episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke delves into the ongoing controversy surrounding Scott Peterson’s potential new trial. The conversation begins with a discussion of recent Netflix and Peacock documentaries that revisit the case, raising questions about Peterson's guilt. Central to the debate is a piece of duct tape with DNA from someone other than Scott, which has prompted the Los Angeles Innocence Project to take up the case. Dreeke acknowledges the importance of projects that ensure justice is served, but he expresses skepticism about the duct tape’s relevance, pointing out that DNA on such common items could easily come from multiple sources. He highlights the overwhelming evidence against Peterson, including his wife’s body being found where he was fishing, and his suspicious behavior. Dreeke also compares Peterson's manipulative nature to that of other notorious criminals like Alex Murdaugh, suggesting that Peterson's conviction was justified. The conversation also touches on the tendency of the legal system to protect the guilty, often at the expense of the victims and their families, which Dreeke finds troubling. He concludes by emphasizing that reopening this case could cause undue suffering for the victims' families without new compelling evidence.

**Main Points:**

- Discussion of Scott Peterson’s case, including new documentaries and the potential for a new trial.

- The Los Angeles Innocence Project’s involvement due to DNA found on duct tape.

- Skepticism about the duct tape's significance and the overall evidence against Peterson.

- Comparison of Scott Peterson’s manipulative behavior to other criminals like Alex Murdaugh.

- Critique of the legal system’s focus on protecting the guilty rather than victims.

- Concerns about the impact of retrying the case on the victims' families.

- Mention of Robin Dreeke's upcoming book "Unbreakable Alliances."

#ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #DNAEvidence #LosAngelesInnocenceProject #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #LegalSystem

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com