In this episode of The Brainstorm, Sam and Brett unpack Tesla’s Cybercab launch, a two-seat vehicle with no steering wheel and no pedals that Brett believes can operate at roughly 25 cents a mile, a level at which Waymo may not be able to stay gross profitable. They settle the debate over why Tesla would sell Cybercabs at all instead of owning the fleet outright, and what a 4.5x jump in robotaxi app users on the back of a deliberately low key event says about demand at half the price of an Uber. Then the team turns to OpenAI’s Astra, the model release behind a solution to Navier-Stokes, and why Brett thinks the closed frontier labs eating their own caviar are pulling away from open weight models rather than converging with them. Plus Apple’s folding iPhone Duo, which neither host is buying, and why they believe the Apple Watch is the more interesting announcement.Key Points From This Episode:<ul><li>Why the Cybercab could run at 25 cents a mile, and what that price does to Waymo’s economics</li><li>Why Tesla is selling Cybercabs to third party owners instead of keeping every mile for itself</li><li>Why we believe closed frontier models are pulling away from open weight models, and why Apple’s walled garden becomes a liability in an agent driven world</li></ul>If you know ARK, you know we focus on long-term innovation. But that doesn’t mean we ignore breaking news. Every day, we debate the latest developments in tech and markets. Now, we’re bringing those conversations to you in “The Brainstorm,” a co-production from ARK, WOLF, and Public. Tune in weekly for our quick takes on what’s shaping innovation right now.Learn more about WOLF: <a href="https://wolf.financial/">https://wolf.financial</a>Learn more about Public: <a href="https://public.com/">https://public.com/</a>Disclosure: <a href="http://arkinv.st/39rzF94" style="color:rgb(150,96,125);">http://arkinv.st/39rzF94</a>

In this episode of The Brainstorm, Sam and Brett unpack Tesla’s Cybercab launch, a two-seat vehicle with no steering wheel and no pedals that Brett believes can operate at roughly 25 cents a mile, a level at which Waymo may not be able to stay gross profitable. They settle the debate over why Tesla would sell Cybercabs at all instead of owning the fleet outright, and what a 4.5x jump in robotaxi app users on the back of a deliberately low key event says about demand at half the price of an Uber. Then the team turns to OpenAI’s Astra, the model release behind a solution to Navier-Stokes, and why Brett thinks the closed frontier labs eating their own caviar are pulling away from open weight models rather than converging with them. Plus Apple’s folding iPhone Duo, which neither host is buying, and why they believe the Apple Watch is the more interesting announcement. Key Points From This Episode:Why the Cybercab could run at 25 cents a mile, and what that price does to Waymo’s economicsWhy Tesla is selling Cybercabs to third party owners instead of keeping every mile for itselfWhy we believe closed frontier models are pulling away from open weight models, and why Apple’s walled garden becomes a liability in an agent driven world If you know ARK, you know we focus on long-term innovation. But that doesn’t mean we ignore breaking news. Every day, we debate the latest developments in tech and markets. Now, we’re bringing those conversations to you in “The Brainstorm,” a co-production from ARK, WOLF, and Public. Tune in weekly for our quick takes on what’s shaping innovation right now. Learn more about WOLF: https://wolf.financial Learn more about Public: https://public.com/ Disclosure: http://arkinv.st/39rzF94

In this episode of The Brainstorm, Sam and Brett unpack Tesla’s Cybercab launch, a two-seat vehicle with no steering wheel and no pedals that Brett believes can operate at roughly 25 cents a mile, a level at which Waymo may not be able to stay gross profitable. They settle the debate over why Tesla would sell Cybercabs at all instead of owning the fleet outright, and what a 4.5x jump in robotaxi app users on the back of a deliberately low key event says about demand at half the price of an Uber. Then the team turns to OpenAI’s Astra, the model release behind a solution to Navier-Stokes, and why Brett thinks the closed frontier labs eating their own caviar are pulling away from open weight models rather than converging with them. Plus Apple’s folding iPhone Duo, which neither host is buying, and why they believe the Apple Watch is the more interesting announcement.Key Points From This Episode:<ul><li>Why the Cybercab could run at 25 cents a mile, and what that price does to Waymo’s economics</li><li>Why Tesla is selling Cybercabs to third party owners instead of keeping every mile for itself</li><li>Why we believe closed frontier models are pulling away from open weight models, and why Apple’s walled garden becomes a liability in an agent driven world</li></ul>If you know ARK, you know we focus on long-term innovation. But that doesn’t mean we ignore breaking news. Every day, we debate the latest developments in tech and markets. Now, we’re bringing those conversations to you in “The Brainstorm,” a co-production from ARK, WOLF, and Public. Tune in weekly for our quick takes on what’s shaping innovation right now.Learn more about WOLF: <a href="https://wolf.financial/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://wolf.financial</a>Learn more about Public: <a href="https://public.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://public.com/</a>Disclosure:&nbsp;<a href="http://arkinv.st/39rzF94" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://arkinv.st/39rzF94</a>

Elon Musk’s Event Almost Nobody Was Invited To | The Brainstorm 148

In this episode of The Brainstorm, Sam, Nick, and Brett unpack Meta Connect, where Muse quietly replaced the metaverse as Zuckerberg’s vision for the company. Nick walks through the hardware spread, from audio-only Ray-Bans with no camera, to a 100 gram VR headset at $1,300 that outspecs the Vision Pro at a third of the price, to the Muse Charm, a Tamagotchi-style agent device shipping for the holidays. Brett argues the real target was never virtual reality (VR) but Apple, and that loosening the smartphone’s grip is worth more to Meta than any single device. Nick counters that the three things people actually do on their phones are untouched by any of it, and that Meta should just build a phone. Plus whether consumer agents arrived a graphical processing unit (GPU) generation too early, and why owning the consumer may be the best dollar Meta can spend and the one Wall Street would hate most.Key Points From This Episode:<ul><li>Why Meta’s $1,300 headset outspecs the Vision Pro, and why that may not matter if nobody wants VR</li><li>How agent devices erode Apple’s ecosystem lock-in without ever replacing the smartphone</li><li>Why consumer agents may take five years to monetize, and which balance sheets can fund the gap</li></ul>If you know ARK, you know we focus on long-term innovation. But that doesn’t mean we ignore breaking news. Every day, we debate the latest developments in tech and markets. Now, we’re bringing those conversations to you in “The Brainstorm,” a co-production from ARK, WOLF, and Public. Tune in weekly for our quick takes on what’s shaping innovation right now.Learn more about WOLF: <a href="https://wolf.financial/">https://wolf.financial</a>Learn more about Public: <a href="https://public.com/">https://public.com/</a>Disclosure: <a href="http://arkinv.st/39rzF94" style="color:rgb(150,96,125);">http://arkinv.st/39rzF94</a>

In this episode of The Brainstorm, Sam, Nick, and Brett unpack Meta Connect, where Muse quietly replaced the metaverse as Zuckerberg’s vision for the company. Nick walks through the hardware spread, from audio-only Ray-Bans with no camera, to a 100 gram VR headset at $1,300 that outspecs the Vision Pro at a third of the price, to the Muse Charm, a Tamagotchi-style agent device shipping for the holidays. Brett argues the real target was never virtual reality (VR) but Apple, and that loosening the smartphone’s grip is worth more to Meta than any single device. Nick counters that the three things people actually do on their phones are untouched by any of it, and that Meta should just build a phone. Plus whether consumer agents arrived a graphical processing unit (GPU) generation too early, and why owning the consumer may be the best dollar Meta can spend and the one Wall Street would hate most. Key Points From This Episode:Why Meta’s $1,300 headset outspecs the Vision Pro, and why that may not matter if nobody wants VRHow agent devices erode Apple’s ecosystem lock-in without ever replacing the smartphoneWhy consumer agents may take five years to monetize, and which balance sheets can fund the gap If you know ARK, you know we focus on long-term innovation. But that doesn’t mean we ignore breaking news. Every day, we debate the latest developments in tech and markets. Now, we’re bringing those conversations to you in “The Brainstorm,” a co-production from ARK, WOLF, and Public. Tune in weekly for our quick takes on what’s shaping innovation right now. Learn more about WOLF: https://wolf.financial Learn more about Public: https://public.com/ Disclosure: http://arkinv.st/39rzF94

In this episode of The Brainstorm, Sam, Nick, and Brett unpack Meta Connect, where Muse quietly replaced the metaverse as Zuckerberg’s vision for the company. Nick walks through the hardware spread, from audio-only Ray-Bans with no camera, to a 100 gram VR headset at $1,300 that outspecs the Vision Pro at a third of the price, to the Muse Charm, a Tamagotchi-style agent device shipping for the holidays. Brett argues the real target was never virtual reality (VR) but Apple, and that loosening the smartphone’s grip is worth more to Meta than any single device. Nick counters that the three things people actually do on their phones are untouched by any of it, and that Meta should just build a phone. Plus whether consumer agents arrived a graphical processing unit (GPU) generation too early, and why owning the consumer may be the best dollar Meta can spend and the one Wall Street would hate most.Key Points From This Episode:<ul><li>Why Meta’s $1,300 headset outspecs the Vision Pro, and why that may not matter if nobody wants VR</li><li>How agent devices erode Apple’s ecosystem lock-in without ever replacing the smartphone</li><li>Why consumer agents may take five years to monetize, and which balance sheets can fund the gap</li></ul>If you know ARK, you know we focus on long-term innovation. But that doesn’t mean we ignore breaking news. Every day, we debate the latest developments in tech and markets. Now, we’re bringing those conversations to you in “The Brainstorm,” a co-production from ARK, WOLF, and Public. Tune in weekly for our quick takes on what’s shaping innovation right now.Learn more about WOLF: <a href="https://wolf.financial/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://wolf.financial</a>Learn more about Public: <a href="https://public.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://public.com/</a>Disclosure:&nbsp;<a href="http://arkinv.st/39rzF94" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://arkinv.st/39rzF94</a>

Zuckerberg Admits He Got It Wrong | The Brainstorm 151

In this episode of The Brainstorm, Sam, Nick, and Brett work through OpenAI DevDay, where one of the most interesting announcements was the one that never shipped. Ultra Ultra Fast did not reach public availability because the inventory was reportedly sold out to Jane Street, which is paying something like $200 billion per gigawatt for it, several times what Anthropic pays to rent capacity from SpaceX AI. Brett argues speed is becoming its own axis of competition alongside intelligence, and that the pull of enterprise money keeps starving consumer agents of compute. Nick covers Robinhood’s Hood Summit, where retail traders got agentic accounts, paid data connectors, and backtesting, and asks whether that is democratization or lambs walking into a Goliath. Then Starship reaches orbit carrying commercial satellites, and the team sizes up a launch business that could add a billion dollars of annual revenue per flight.Key Points From This Episode:<ul><li>Why Jane Street is paying roughly $200 billion per gigawatt, and what speed as a competitive edge potentially does to AI pricing</li><li>Whether Robinhood handing agentic trading to retail is democratization or fodder for high frequency traders</li><li>Why full Starship reusability could take launch costs below $100 per kilogram, and what that could mean for revenue per launch</li></ul>If you know ARK, you know we focus on long-term innovation. But that doesn’t mean we ignore breaking news. Every day, we debate the latest developments in tech and markets. Now, we’re bringing those conversations to you in “The Brainstorm,” a co-production from ARK, WOLF, and Public. Tune in weekly for our quick takes on what’s shaping innovation right now.Learn more about WOLF: <a href="https://wolf.financial/">https://wolf.financial</a>Learn more about Public: <a href="https://public.com/">https://public.com/</a>Disclosure: <a href="http://arkinv.st/39rzF94" style="color:rgb(150,96,125);">http://arkinv.st/39rzF94</a>

In this episode of The Brainstorm, Sam, Nick, and Brett work through OpenAI DevDay, where one of the most interesting announcements was the one that never shipped. Ultra Ultra Fast did not reach public availability because the inventory was reportedly sold out to Jane Street, which is paying something like $200 billion per gigawatt for it, several times what Anthropic pays to rent capacity from SpaceX AI. Brett argues speed is becoming its own axis of competition alongside intelligence, and that the pull of enterprise money keeps starving consumer agents of compute. Nick covers Robinhood’s Hood Summit, where retail traders got agentic accounts, paid data connectors, and backtesting, and asks whether that is democratization or lambs walking into a Goliath. Then Starship reaches orbit carrying commercial satellites, and the team sizes up a launch business that could add a billion dollars of annual revenue per flight. Key Points From This Episode:Why Jane Street is paying roughly $200 billion per gigawatt, and what speed as a competitive edge potentially does to AI pricingWhether Robinhood handing agentic trading to retail is democratization or fodder for high frequency tradersWhy full Starship reusability could take launch costs below $100 per kilogram, and what that could mean for revenue per launch If you know ARK, you know we focus on long-term innovation. But that doesn’t mean we ignore breaking news. Every day, we debate the latest developments in tech and markets. Now, we’re bringing those conversations to you in “The Brainstorm,” a co-production from ARK, WOLF, and Public. Tune in weekly for our quick takes on what’s shaping innovation right now. Learn more about WOLF: https://wolf.financial Learn more about Public: https://public.com/ Disclosure: http://arkinv.st/39rzF94

In this episode of The Brainstorm, Sam, Nick, and Brett work through OpenAI DevDay, where one of the most interesting announcements was the one that never shipped. Ultra Ultra Fast did not reach public availability because the inventory was reportedly sold out to Jane Street, which is paying something like $200 billion per gigawatt for it, several times what Anthropic pays to rent capacity from SpaceX AI. Brett argues speed is becoming its own axis of competition alongside intelligence, and that the pull of enterprise money keeps starving consumer agents of compute. Nick covers Robinhood’s Hood Summit, where retail traders got agentic accounts, paid data connectors, and backtesting, and asks whether that is democratization or lambs walking into a Goliath. Then Starship reaches orbit carrying commercial satellites, and the team sizes up a launch business that could add a billion dollars of annual revenue per flight.Key Points From This Episode:<ul><li>Why Jane Street is paying roughly $200 billion per gigawatt, and what speed as a competitive edge potentially does to AI pricing</li><li>Whether Robinhood handing agentic trading to retail is democratization or fodder for high frequency traders</li><li>Why full Starship reusability could take launch costs below $100 per kilogram, and what that could mean for revenue per launch</li></ul>If you know ARK, you know we focus on long-term innovation. But that doesn’t mean we ignore breaking news. Every day, we debate the latest developments in tech and markets. Now, we’re bringing those conversations to you in “The Brainstorm,” a co-production from ARK, WOLF, and Public. Tune in weekly for our quick takes on what’s shaping innovation right now.Learn more about WOLF: <a href="https://wolf.financial/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://wolf.financial</a>Learn more about Public: <a href="https://public.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://public.com/</a>Disclosure:&nbsp;<a href="http://arkinv.st/39rzF94" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://arkinv.st/39rzF94</a>

Starship Reached Orbit. Here's the $1B-Revenue-Per-Launch Math | The Brainstorm 152

In this episode of Bitcoin Brainstorm, Rod Roudi, Cathie Wood, and Lorenzo Valente are joined by Rob Hamilton, Seth For Privacy, and Dhruv Bansal to discuss how rapidly advancing AI models are changing cybersecurity and Bitcoin security. The group examines the Coldcard vulnerability, the growing capabilities of open-weight models, and the resulting shift in the balance between attackers and defenders. They discuss AI-powered code auditing, self-custody and hardware wallet risks, the importance of domain expertise, and how teams can build continuous security systems around their software. The conversation also explores quantum computing threats, Bitcoin’s resilience, and why AI could ultimately strengthen software security.Guests on this month’s Bitcoin Brainstorm include:<ul><li>Cathie Wood: Founder, CEO and CIO, ARK Invest </li><li>Lorenzo Valente: Director of Research, Digital Assets, ARK Invest</li><li>Rod Roudi: Founder, Bitcoin Park</li><li>Rob Hamilton: Co-Founder And CEO, AnchorWatch</li><li>Dhruv Bansal: Co-Founder And CSO, Unchained</li><li>Seth For Privacy: COO, Cake Wallet And Radar</li></ul>Key Points From This Episode:<ul><li>How falling inference costs, rapid model advancement, and open-weight models have unlocked a new level of capability in software vulnerability research.</li><li>The Coldcard weak-entropy vulnerability, and why we believe it represented a software and vendor problem rather than a failure of the Bitcoin protocol.</li><li>The trade-offs between self-custody, third-party custodians, ETFs, hardware wallets, and multi-vendor multisig—and why security demands ongoing vigilance rather than a "set it and forget it" approach.</li><li>Why we expect AI to benefit defenders more than attackers, from continuous repository scanning and faster audits to preparing Bitcoin for potential quantum computing threats.</li></ul>Learn more about Bitcoin Park: <a href="https://bitcoinpark.com/">bitcoinpark.com</a>Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com)For more updates, follow us on:X: <a href="https://arkinv.st/3corDiY">https://arkinv.st/3corDiY</a>LinkedIn: <a href="http://arkinv.st/1f7AiVX">http://arkinv.st/1f7AiVX</a>Facebook: <a href="http://arkinv.st/3r4EDOU">http://arkinv.st/3r4EDOU</a>Instagram: <a href="http://arkinv.st/39td8bO">http://arkinv.st/39td8bO</a>Disclosure: <a href="http://arkinv.st/39rzF94f">http://arkinv.st/39rzF94f</a>

In this episode of Bitcoin Brainstorm, Rod Roudi, Cathie Wood, and Lorenzo Valente are joined by Rob Hamilton, Seth For Privacy, and Dhruv Bansal to discuss how rapidly advancing AI models are changing cybersecurity and Bitcoin security. The group examines the Coldcard vulnerability, the growing capabilities of open-weight models, and the resulting shift in the balance between attackers and defenders. They discuss AI-powered code auditing, self-custody and hardware wallet risks, the importance of domain expertise, and how teams can build continuous security systems around their software. The conversation also explores quantum computing threats, Bitcoin’s resilience, and why AI could ultimately strengthen software security. Guests on this month’s Bitcoin Brainstorm include:Cathie Wood: Founder, CEO and CIO, ARK Invest Lorenzo Valente: Director of Research, Digital Assets, ARK InvestRod Roudi: Founder, Bitcoin ParkRob Hamilton: Co-Founder And CEO, AnchorWatchDhruv Bansal: Co-Founder And CSO, UnchainedSeth For Privacy: COO, Cake Wallet And Radar Key Points From This Episode:How falling inference costs, rapid model advancement, and open-weight models have unlocked a new level of capability in software vulnerability research.The Coldcard weak-entropy vulnerability, and why we believe it represented a software and vendor problem rather than a failure of the Bitcoin protocol.The trade-offs between self-custody, third-party custodians, ETFs, hardware wallets, and multi-vendor multisig—and why security demands ongoing vigilance rather than a "set it and forget it" approach.Why we expect AI to benefit defenders more than attackers, from continuous repository scanning and faster audits to preparing Bitcoin for potential quantum computing threats. Learn more about Bitcoin Park: bitcoinpark.com Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com) For more updates, follow us on: X: https://arkinv.st/3corDiY LinkedIn: http://arkinv.st/1f7AiVX Facebook: http://arkinv.st/3r4EDOU Instagram: http://arkinv.st/39td8bO Disclosure: http://arkinv.st/39rzF94f

In this episode of Bitcoin Brainstorm, Rod Roudi, Cathie Wood, and Lorenzo Valente are joined by Rob Hamilton, Seth For Privacy, and Dhruv Bansal to discuss how rapidly advancing AI models are changing cybersecurity and Bitcoin security. The group examines the Coldcard vulnerability, the growing capabilities of open-weight models, and the resulting shift in the balance between attackers and defenders. They discuss AI-powered code auditing, self-custody and hardware wallet risks, the importance of domain expertise, and how teams can build continuous security systems around their software. The conversation also explores quantum computing threats, Bitcoin’s resilience, and why AI could ultimately strengthen software security.Guests on this month’s Bitcoin Brainstorm include:<ul><li>Cathie Wood: Founder, CEO and CIO, ARK Invest&nbsp;</li><li>Lorenzo Valente: Director of Research, Digital Assets, ARK Invest</li><li>Rod Roudi: Founder, Bitcoin Park</li><li>Rob Hamilton: Co-Founder And CEO, AnchorWatch</li><li>Dhruv Bansal: Co-Founder And CSO, Unchained</li><li>Seth For Privacy: COO, Cake Wallet And Radar</li></ul>Key Points From This Episode:<ul><li>How falling inference costs, rapid model advancement, and open-weight models have unlocked a new level of capability in software vulnerability research.</li><li>The Coldcard weak-entropy vulnerability, and why we believe it represented a software and vendor problem rather than a failure of the Bitcoin protocol.</li><li>The trade-offs between self-custody, third-party custodians, ETFs, hardware wallets, and multi-vendor multisig—and why security demands ongoing vigilance rather than a "set it and forget it" approach.</li><li>Why we expect AI to benefit defenders more than attackers, from continuous repository scanning and faster audits to preparing Bitcoin for potential quantum computing threats.</li></ul>Learn more about Bitcoin Park: <a href="https://bitcoinpark.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">bitcoinpark.com</a>Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com)For more updates, follow us on:X: <a href="https://arkinv.st/3corDiY" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://arkinv.st/3corDiY</a>LinkedIn: <a href="http://arkinv.st/1f7AiVX" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://arkinv.st/1f7AiVX</a>Facebook: <a href="http://arkinv.st/3r4EDOU" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://arkinv.st/3r4EDOU</a>Instagram: <a href="http://arkinv.st/39td8bO" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://arkinv.st/39td8bO</a>Disclosure: <a href="http://arkinv.st/39rzF94f" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://arkinv.st/39rzF94f</a>

Bitcoin’s Biggest AI Test Has Arrived

Gautam Narang built India’s first customized humanoid robot as a teenager — then walked away from humanoids because they were nowhere near commercial. Today his company, Gatik, runs fully driverless trucks 24/7 across Texas, Arkansas, and Arizona for PepsiCo, Kroger, and Loblaw: dock to dock, no safety driver, no observer, no required remote monitoring. He tells Tasha Keeney and Daniel Maguire why Gatik took the contrarian bet on the middle mile while the rest of the industry chased long haul, how a $200,000-per-truck take-or-pay contract moves utilization risk off Gatik’s books, and why he believes autonomous trucking has moved from a technology challenge to an execution story.Key Points From This Episode:<ul><li>00:00:00 Meet Gautam Narang, CEO and Co-founder of Gatik</li><li>00:05:49 The contrarian bet: why Gatik started with the middle mile</li><li>00:08:12 Dock to dock, and the interface problem nobody talks about</li><li>00:12:56 $200,000 per truck, take-or-pay: the business model explained</li><li>00:18:15 Inside the PepsiCo partnership: Frito, beverage, and dynamic routing</li><li>00:20:48 From 10-mile routes to 400-mile routes</li><li>00:32:12 A $300B market, and why the tech is platform agnostic</li><li>00:36:58 The $200M Series D and putting strategic partners on the capitalization table</li><li>00:39:17 Why ARK doubled down: what we believe the proof actually looks like</li><li>00:46:07 The 3x utilization assumption underpinning everyone else’s margins</li><li>00:48:25 Isuzu, NVIDIA, South Carolina, and 50,000 units a year by 2030</li></ul>Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (<a href="https://thepodcastconsultant.com/">https://thepodcastconsultant.com</a>)

Gautam Narang built India’s first customized humanoid robot as a teenager — then walked away from humanoids because they were nowhere near commercial. Today his company, Gatik, runs fully driverless trucks 24/7 across Texas, Arkansas, and Arizona for PepsiCo, Kroger, and Loblaw: dock to dock, no safety driver, no observer, no required remote monitoring. He tells Tasha Keeney and Daniel Maguire why Gatik took the contrarian bet on the middle mile while the rest of the industry chased long haul, how a $200,000-per-truck take-or-pay contract moves utilization risk off Gatik’s books, and why he believes autonomous trucking has moved from a technology challenge to an execution story. Key Points From This Episode:00:00:00 Meet Gautam Narang, CEO and Co-founder of Gatik00:05:49 The contrarian bet: why Gatik started with the middle mile00:08:12 Dock to dock, and the interface problem nobody talks about00:12:56 $200,000 per truck, take-or-pay: the business model explained00:18:15 Inside the PepsiCo partnership: Frito, beverage, and dynamic routing00:20:48 From 10-mile routes to 400-mile routes00:32:12 A $300B market, and why the tech is platform agnostic00:36:58 The $200M Series D and putting strategic partners on the capitalization table00:39:17 Why ARK doubled down: what we believe the proof actually looks like00:46:07 The 3x utilization assumption underpinning everyone else’s margins00:48:25 Isuzu, NVIDIA, South Carolina, and 50,000 units a year by 2030 Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com)

Gautam Narang built India’s first customized humanoid robot as a teenager — then walked away from humanoids because they were nowhere near commercial. Today his company, Gatik, runs fully driverless trucks 24/7 across Texas, Arkansas, and Arizona for PepsiCo, Kroger, and Loblaw: dock to dock, no safety driver, no observer, no required remote monitoring. He tells Tasha Keeney and Daniel Maguire why Gatik took the contrarian bet on the middle mile while the rest of the industry chased long haul, how a $200,000-per-truck take-or-pay contract moves utilization risk off Gatik’s books, and why he believes autonomous trucking has moved from a technology challenge to an execution story.Key Points From This Episode:<ul><li>00:00:00 Meet Gautam Narang, CEO and Co-founder of Gatik</li><li>00:05:49 The contrarian bet: why Gatik started with the middle mile</li><li>00:08:12 Dock to dock, and the interface problem nobody talks about</li><li>00:12:56 $200,000 per truck, take-or-pay: the business model explained</li><li>00:18:15 Inside the PepsiCo partnership: Frito, beverage, and dynamic routing</li><li>00:20:48 From 10-mile routes to 400-mile routes</li><li>00:32:12 A $300B market, and why the tech is platform agnostic</li><li>00:36:58 The $200M Series D and putting strategic partners on the capitalization table</li><li>00:39:17 Why ARK doubled down: what we believe the proof actually looks like</li><li>00:46:07 The 3x utilization assumption underpinning everyone else’s margins</li><li>00:48:25 Isuzu, NVIDIA, South Carolina, and 50,000 units a year by 2030</li></ul>Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (<a href="https://thepodcastconsultant.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://thepodcastconsultant.com</a>)

Why Some Of America’s Biggest Brands Are Going Driverless

Augmented Reality with Paul Travers

Big Ideas 2021

How Online Education Prepares Us For the Future of Work with Mitch Daniels

When Mobile Payments Become Infrastructural with Hong Shen

Life Science Product Development and Personalized Medicine with SC Moatti

Autonomous Vehicles Powered By End-To-End Deep Learning with Alex Kendall, Wayve.ai

Understanding mRNA. Conversations with Moderna and Arcturus Therapeutics

Best of 2020 — FYI Podcast Compilation

Championing Innovation Within Earlier Cancer Detection With Gabe Otte

ByteDance, TikTok, and China’s Growing Influence in Global Tech with Matthew Brennan

The FYI - For Your Innovation Podcast offers an intellectual discussion on recent developments across disruptive innovation—driven by research, news, controversies, companies, and technological breakthroughs. Hosted by ARK Invest, ARK and guests provide a unique perspective on how to best understand disruptive innovation.

Share FYI - For Your Innovation

Sign up to save your podcasts

FYI - For Your Innovation

FYI - For Your Innovation episodes

About FYI - For Your Innovation

Best of FYI - For Your Innovation

More shows like FYI - For Your Innovation

The Investor's Podcast (We Study Billionaires) - The Investor’s Podcast Network

This Week in Startups

Odd Lots

The a16z Show

The Meb Faber Show - Better Investing

Azeem Azhar's Exponential View

Real Vision: Finance & Investing

Bankless

All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

The Memo by Howard Marks

Business Breakdowns

Raoul Pal: The Journey Man

Moonshots with Peter Diamandis

BG2Pod with Brad Gerstner and Bill Gurley

The Master Investor Podcast with Wilfred Frost