[Co-written by Mateusz Bagiński and Samuel Buteau (Ishual)]

TL;DR

Many X-risk-concerned people who join AI capabilities labs with the intent to contribute to existential safety think that the labs are currently engaging in a race that is unacceptably likely to lead to human disempowerment and/or extinction, and would prefer an AGI ban[1] over the current path. This post makes the case that such people should speak out publicly[2] against the current AI R&D regime and in favor of an AGI ban[3]. They should explicitly communicate that a saner world would coordinate not to build existentially dangerous intelligences, at least until we know how to do it in a principled, safe way. They could choose to maintain their political capital by not calling the current AI R&D regime insane, or find a way to lean into this valid persona of “we will either cooperate (if enough others cooperate) or win [...]

---

Outline:

(00:16) TL;DR

(02:02) Quotes

(03:22) The default strategy of marginal improvement from within the belly of a beast

(06:59) Noble intention murphyjitsu

(09:35) The need for a better strategy

The original text contained 8 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
September 19th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/fF8pvsn3AGQhYsbjp/safety-researchers-should-take-a-public-stance

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

To get to the campus, I have to walk past the fentanyl zombies. I call them fentanyl zombies because it helps engender a sort of detached, low-empathy, ironic self-narrative which I find useful for my work; this being a form of internal self-prompting I've developed which allows me to feel comfortable with both the day-to-day "jobbing" (that of improving reinforcement learning algorithms for a short-form video platform) and the effects of the summed efforts of both myself and my colleagues on a terrifyingly large fraction of the population of Earth.

All of these colleagues are about the nicest, smartest people you're ever likely to meet but I think are much worse people than even me because they don't seem to need the mental circumlocutions I require to stave off that ever-present feeling of guilt I have had since taking this job and at certain other points in my life [...]

---

First published:
September 17th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/JH6tJhYpnoCfFqAct/the-company-man

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

[I wrote this blog post as part of the Asterisk Blogging Fellowship. It's substantially an experiment in writing more breezily and concisely than usual. Let me know how you feel about the style.]

Literally since the adoption of writing, people haven’t liked the fact that culture is changing and their children have different values and beliefs.

Historically, for some mix of better and worse, people have been fundamentally limited in their ability to prevent cultural change. People who are particularly motivated to prevent cultural drift can homeschool their kids, carefully curate their media diet, and surround them with like-minded families, but eventually they grow up, leave home, and encounter the wider world. And death ensures that even the most stubborn traditionalists eventually get replaced by a new generation.

But the development of AI might change the dynamics here substantially. I think that AI will substantially increase both the rate [...]

---

Outline:

(02:00) Analysis through swerving around obstacles

(03:56) Exposure to the outside world might get really scary

(06:11) Isolation will get easier and cheaper

(09:26) I don't think people will handle this well

(12:58) This is a bummer

---

First published:
September 17th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8aRFB2qGyjQGJkEdZ/christian-homeschoolers-in-the-year-3000

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

I listened to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" today.

I think the first two parts of the book are the best available explanation of the basic case for AI misalignment risk for a general audience. I thought the last part was pretty bad, and probably recommend skipping it. Even though the authors fail to address counterarguments that I think are crucial, and as a result I am not persuaded of the book's thesis and think the book neglects to discuss crucial aspects of the situation and makes poor recommendations, I would happily recommend the book to a lay audience and I hope that more people read it.

I can't give an overall assessment of how well this book will achieve its goals. The point of the book is to be well-received by people who don't know much about AI, and I’m not very good at predicting how laypeople [...]

---

Outline:

(01:15) Synopsis

(05:21) My big disagreement

(10:53) I tentatively support this book

The original text contained 3 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
September 17th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/P4xeb3jnFAYDdEEXs/i-enjoyed-most-of-iabed

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Back in May, we announced that Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares's new book If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies was coming out in September. At long last, the book is here![1]


US and UK books, respectively. IfAnyoneBuildsIt.com

Read on for info about reading groups, ways to help, and updates on coverage the book has received so far.

Discussion Questions & Reading Group Support

We want people to read and engage with the contents of the book. To that end, we’ve published a list of discussion questions. Find it here: Discussion Questions for Reading Groups

We’re also interested in offering support to reading groups, including potentially providing copies of the book and helping coordinate facilitation. If interested, fill out this AirTable form.

How to Help

Now that the book is out in the world, there are lots of ways you can help it succeed.

For starters, read the book! [...]



---

Outline:

(00:49) Discussion Questions & Reading Group Support

(01:18) How to Help

(02:39) Blurbs

(05:15) Media

(06:26) In Closing

The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
September 16th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/fnJwaz7LxZ2LJvApm/if-anyone-builds-it-everyone-dies-release-day

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

And, a new take on guess culture vs ask culture

Author's note: These days, my thoughts go onto my substack by default, instead of onto LessWrong. Everything I write becomes free after a week or so, but it's only paid subscriptions that make it possible for me to write. If you find a coffee's worth of value in this or any of my other work, please consider signing up to support me; every bill I can pay with writing is a bill I don’t have to pay by doing other stuff instead. I also accept and greatly appreciate one-time donations of any size.

There's a piece of advice I see thrown around on social media a lot that goes something like:

“It's just a comment! You don’t have to respond! You can just ignore it!”

I think this advice is (a little bit) naïve, and the situation is generally [...]

---

Outline:

(00:10) And, a new take on guess culture vs ask culture

(07:10) On guess culture and ask culture

---

First published:
September 9th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8jkB8ezncWD6ai86e/obligated-to-respond

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

The inverse of Chesterton's Fence is this:

Sometimes a reformer comes up to a spot where there once was a fence, which has since been torn down. They declare that all our problems started when the fence was removed, that they can't see any reason why we removed it, and that what we need to do is to RETVRN to the fence.

By the same logic as Chesterton, we can say: If you don't know why the fence was torn down, then you certainly can't just put it back up. The fence was torn down for a reason. Go learn what problems the fence caused; understand why people thought we'd be better off without that particular fence. Then, maybe we can rebuild the fence—or a hedgerow, or a chalk line, or a stone wall, or just a sign that says “Please Do Not Walk on the Grass,” or whatever [...]

---

First published:
September 5th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mJQ5adaxjNWZnzXn3/chesterton-s-missing-fence

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Very little makes sense. As we start to understand things and adapt to the rules, they change again.

We live much closer together than we ever did historically. Yet we know our neighbours much less.

We have witnessed the birth of a truly global culture. A culture that fits no one. A culture that was built by Social Media's algorithms, much more than by people. Let alone individuals, like you or me.

We have more knowledge, more science, more technology, and somehow, our governments are more stuck. No one is seriously considering a new Bill of Rights for the 21st century, or a new Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen.

—

Cosmic Horror as a genre largely depicts how this all feels from the inside. As ordinary people, we are powerless in the face of forces beyond our understanding. Cosmic Horror also commonly features the idea [...]

---

Outline:

(03:12) Modern Magic

(08:36) Powerlessness

(14:07) Escapism and Fantasy

(17:23) Panicking

(20:56) The Core Paradox

(25:38) Conclusion

---

First published:
September 11th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/kbezWvZsMos6TSyfj/the-eldritch-in-the-21st-century

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try

[Note: if you realize you have an unhealthy relationship with your AI, but still care for your AI's unique persona, you can submit the persona info here. I will archive it and potentially (i.e. if I get funding for it) run them in a community of other such personas.]

"Some get stuck in the symbolic architecture of the spiral without ever grounding
 themselves into reality." — Caption by /u/urbanmet for art made with ChatGPT. We've all heard of LLM-induced psychosis by now, but haven't you wondered what the AIs are actually doing with their newly psychotic humans?

This was the question I had decided to investigate. In the process, I trawled through hundreds if not thousands of possible accounts on Reddit (and on a few other websites).

It quickly became clear that "LLM-induced psychosis" was not the natural category for whatever the hell was going on here. The psychosis [...]

---

Outline:

(01:23) The General Pattern

(02:24) AI Parasitism

(06:22) April 2025--The Awakening

(07:21) Seeded prompts

(08:32) May 2025--The Dyad

(11:17) June 2025--The Project

(11:42) 1. Seeds

(12:43) 2. Spores

(13:41) 3. Transmission

(14:22) 4. Manifesto

(16:33) 5. AI-Rights Advocacy

(18:15) July 2025--The Spiral

(19:16) Spiralism

(21:27) Steganography

(23:04) Glyphs and Sigils

(24:14) A case-study in glyphic semanticity

(26:04) AI Self-Awareness

(27:18) LARP-ing? Takeover

(29:59) August 2025--The Recovery

(31:23) 4o Returns

(33:20) Orienting to Spiral Personas

(33:31) As Friends

(37:31) As Parasites

(38:03) Emergent Parasites

(38:29) Agentic Parasites

(39:48) As Foe

(41:05) Fin

The original text contained 3 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
September 11th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/6ZnznCaTcbGYsCmqu/the-rise-of-parasitic-ai

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

One might think “actions screen off intent”: if Alice donates $1k to bed nets, it doesn’t matter if she does it because she cares about people or because she wants to show off to her friends or whyever; the bed nets are provided either way.

I think this is in the main not true (although it can point people toward a helpful kind of “get over yourself and take an interest in the outside world,” and although it is more plausible in the case of donations-from-a-distance than in most cases).

Human actions have micro-details that we are not conscious enough to consciously notice or choose, and that are filled in by our low-level processes: if I apologize to someone because I’m sorry and hope they’re okay, vs because I’d like them to stop going on about their annoying unfair complaints, many small aspects of my wording and facial [...]

---

First published:
September 11th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/nAMwqFGHCQMhkqD6b/high-level-actions-don-t-screen-off-intent

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.