
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


“Optical rectennas” (or sometimes “nantennas”) are a technology that is sometimes advertised as a path towards converting solar energy to electricity with higher efficiency than normal solar cells. I looked into them extensively as a postdoc a decade ago, wound up concluding that they were extremely unpromising, and moved on to other things. Every year or two since then, I run into someone who is very enthusiastic about the potential of optical rectennas, and I try to talk them out of it. After this happened yet again yesterday, I figured I'd share my spiel publicly!
(For some relevant background context, check out my write-ups on the fundamental efficiency limit of single-junction solar cells, and on the thermodynamic efficiency limit of any solar energy conversion technology whatsoever.)
1. What is a rectenna?Rectenna is short for “rectifying antenna”, i.e. a combination of an antenna (a thing that can transfer electromagnetic [...]
---
Outline:
(00:58) 1. What is a rectenna?
(02:07) 2. If RF rectennas can turn RF electromagnetic waves into electrical energy, why can't optical rectennas turn sunlight into electrical energy?
(02:52) 3. The easy problem: antennas
(03:48) 4. The hard problem: diodes
(06:31) 5. But what if we combine the power collected by many antennas into a single waveguide, to increase the voltage?
(06:58) 6. But what if we track the sun?
(08:03) 7. But what if we track the sun virtually, with a phased array?
(08:15) 8. But what if we use an impedance converter?
(09:17) 9. But what if ... something else?
---
First published:
Source:
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
By LessWrong“Optical rectennas” (or sometimes “nantennas”) are a technology that is sometimes advertised as a path towards converting solar energy to electricity with higher efficiency than normal solar cells. I looked into them extensively as a postdoc a decade ago, wound up concluding that they were extremely unpromising, and moved on to other things. Every year or two since then, I run into someone who is very enthusiastic about the potential of optical rectennas, and I try to talk them out of it. After this happened yet again yesterday, I figured I'd share my spiel publicly!
(For some relevant background context, check out my write-ups on the fundamental efficiency limit of single-junction solar cells, and on the thermodynamic efficiency limit of any solar energy conversion technology whatsoever.)
1. What is a rectenna?Rectenna is short for “rectifying antenna”, i.e. a combination of an antenna (a thing that can transfer electromagnetic [...]
---
Outline:
(00:58) 1. What is a rectenna?
(02:07) 2. If RF rectennas can turn RF electromagnetic waves into electrical energy, why can't optical rectennas turn sunlight into electrical energy?
(02:52) 3. The easy problem: antennas
(03:48) 4. The hard problem: diodes
(06:31) 5. But what if we combine the power collected by many antennas into a single waveguide, to increase the voltage?
(06:58) 6. But what if we track the sun?
(08:03) 7. But what if we track the sun virtually, with a phased array?
(08:15) 8. But what if we use an impedance converter?
(09:17) 9. But what if ... something else?
---
First published:
Source:
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

26,388 Listeners

2,424 Listeners

8,267 Listeners

4,145 Listeners

92 Listeners

1,565 Listeners

9,826 Listeners

89 Listeners

488 Listeners

5,475 Listeners

16,083 Listeners

534 Listeners

133 Listeners

96 Listeners

509 Listeners