
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Philosophy Didn’t Just Eat AI. It Wrote Its Code — and It’s Hungry for Meaning
An epistemic meditation on artificial intelligence as a philosophical actor—and the urgency of restoring meaning, not just function, to systems that now decide for us.
What does your AI system believe? In this episode, we expand on Michael Schrage and David Kiron’s MIT Sloan thesis, Philosophy Eats AI. We trace how systems built on machine logic inevitably encode assumptions about purpose, knowledge, and reality. This episode reframes AI not as infrastructure—but as worldview. A tool that doesn’t just compute, but commits.
This is a quiet engagement with how leadership itself must evolve. With reflections drawn from Gregory Bateson, Karen Barad, Michel Foucault, and Heinz von Foerster, we introduce the idea of synthetic judgment: the emerging ability to interpret, audit, and question what our systems silently believe on our behalf.
Reflections
Why Listen?
Listen On:
Support This Work
Support future episodes by visiting buymeacoffee.com/thedeeperthinkingpodcast or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts. Thank you.
Bibliography
To design AI is to author a worldview. To lead with it is to be answerable for what it sees—and what it cannot.
#PhilosophyEatsAI #SyntheticJudgment #Ontology #GregoryBateson #MichaelSchrage #David Kiron #KarenBarad #Foucault #vonFoerster #AIethics #MITSMR #Leadership #AIphilosophy #DeeperThinkingPodcast
By The Deeper Thinking Podcast4.2
7171 ratings
Philosophy Didn’t Just Eat AI. It Wrote Its Code — and It’s Hungry for Meaning
An epistemic meditation on artificial intelligence as a philosophical actor—and the urgency of restoring meaning, not just function, to systems that now decide for us.
What does your AI system believe? In this episode, we expand on Michael Schrage and David Kiron’s MIT Sloan thesis, Philosophy Eats AI. We trace how systems built on machine logic inevitably encode assumptions about purpose, knowledge, and reality. This episode reframes AI not as infrastructure—but as worldview. A tool that doesn’t just compute, but commits.
This is a quiet engagement with how leadership itself must evolve. With reflections drawn from Gregory Bateson, Karen Barad, Michel Foucault, and Heinz von Foerster, we introduce the idea of synthetic judgment: the emerging ability to interpret, audit, and question what our systems silently believe on our behalf.
Reflections
Why Listen?
Listen On:
Support This Work
Support future episodes by visiting buymeacoffee.com/thedeeperthinkingpodcast or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts. Thank you.
Bibliography
To design AI is to author a worldview. To lead with it is to be answerable for what it sees—and what it cannot.
#PhilosophyEatsAI #SyntheticJudgment #Ontology #GregoryBateson #MichaelSchrage #David Kiron #KarenBarad #Foucault #vonFoerster #AIethics #MITSMR #Leadership #AIphilosophy #DeeperThinkingPodcast

2,548 Listeners

1,857 Listeners

1,273 Listeners

12,740 Listeners

985 Listeners

1,629 Listeners

264 Listeners

1,006 Listeners

321 Listeners

100 Listeners

860 Listeners

299 Listeners

616 Listeners

8,152 Listeners

145 Listeners