
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Philosophy Didn’t Just Eat AI. It Wrote Its Code — and It’s Hungry for Meaning
An epistemic meditation on artificial intelligence as a philosophical actor—and the urgency of restoring meaning, not just function, to systems that now decide for us.
What does your AI system believe? In this episode, we expand on Michael Schrage and David Kiron’s MIT Sloan thesis, Philosophy Eats AI. We trace how systems built on machine logic inevitably encode assumptions about purpose, knowledge, and reality. This episode reframes AI not as infrastructure—but as worldview. A tool that doesn’t just compute, but commits.
This is a quiet engagement with how leadership itself must evolve. With reflections drawn from Gregory Bateson, Karen Barad, Michel Foucault, and Heinz von Foerster, we introduce the idea of synthetic judgment: the emerging ability to interpret, audit, and question what our systems silently believe on our behalf.
Reflections
Why Listen?
Listen On:
Support This Work
Support future episodes by visiting buymeacoffee.com/thedeeperthinkingpodcast or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts. Thank you.
Bibliography
To design AI is to author a worldview. To lead with it is to be answerable for what it sees—and what it cannot.
#PhilosophyEatsAI #SyntheticJudgment #Ontology #GregoryBateson #MichaelSchrage #David Kiron #KarenBarad #Foucault #vonFoerster #AIethics #MITSMR #Leadership #AIphilosophy #DeeperThinkingPodcast
By The Deeper Thinking Podcast4
9292 ratings
Philosophy Didn’t Just Eat AI. It Wrote Its Code — and It’s Hungry for Meaning
An epistemic meditation on artificial intelligence as a philosophical actor—and the urgency of restoring meaning, not just function, to systems that now decide for us.
What does your AI system believe? In this episode, we expand on Michael Schrage and David Kiron’s MIT Sloan thesis, Philosophy Eats AI. We trace how systems built on machine logic inevitably encode assumptions about purpose, knowledge, and reality. This episode reframes AI not as infrastructure—but as worldview. A tool that doesn’t just compute, but commits.
This is a quiet engagement with how leadership itself must evolve. With reflections drawn from Gregory Bateson, Karen Barad, Michel Foucault, and Heinz von Foerster, we introduce the idea of synthetic judgment: the emerging ability to interpret, audit, and question what our systems silently believe on our behalf.
Reflections
Why Listen?
Listen On:
Support This Work
Support future episodes by visiting buymeacoffee.com/thedeeperthinkingpodcast or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts. Thank you.
Bibliography
To design AI is to author a worldview. To lead with it is to be answerable for what it sees—and what it cannot.
#PhilosophyEatsAI #SyntheticJudgment #Ontology #GregoryBateson #MichaelSchrage #David Kiron #KarenBarad #Foucault #vonFoerster #AIethics #MITSMR #Leadership #AIphilosophy #DeeperThinkingPodcast

91,163 Listeners

43,854 Listeners

32,246 Listeners

43,586 Listeners

15,266 Listeners

10,724 Listeners

1,543 Listeners

316 Listeners

113,323 Listeners

9,563 Listeners

462 Listeners

16,490 Listeners

1,647 Listeners

8,889 Listeners

594 Listeners