Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share “Sonnet 4.5’s eval gaming seriously undermines alignment evals, and this seems caused by training on alignment evals” by Alexa Pan, ryan_greenblatt
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
“Sonnet 4.5’s eval gaming seriously undermines alignment evals, and this seems caused by training on alignment evals” by Alexa Pan, ryan_greenblatt
According to the Sonnet 4.5 system card, Sonnet 4.5 is much more likely than Sonnet 4 to mention in its chain-of-thought that it thinks it is being evaluated; this seems to meaningfully cause it to appear to behave better in alignment evaluations. So, Sonnet 4.5's behavioral improvements in these evaluations may partly be driven by growing tendency to notice and game evaluations rather than genuine alignment. This is an early example of a phenomenon that is going to get increasingly problematic: as evaluation gaming increases, alignment evaluations become harder to trust.[1]
To elaborate on the above: Sonnet 4.5 seems far more aware of being evaluated than previous models. In some of Anthropic's evaluations, Sonnet 4.5 explicitly mentions being tested between 80% and 100% of the time, compared with under 10% for Sonnet 4. Internal representations associated with evaluation awareness also became notably stronger over training.[2]
In addition, Sonnet 4.5 seems substantially less likely to behave poorly once it has noticed that it might be tested. As seen in the figure below, when Anthropic inhibited internal representations related to evaluation awareness[3], its misaligned behavior rate on synthetic honeypot tests increased from 0% to between 1% and 9%. This effect was [...]
---
Outline:
(06:58) Sonnet 4.5 is much more evaluation-aware than prior models
(10:00) Evaluation awareness seems to suppress misaligned behavior
(14:52) Anthropic's training plausibly caused Sonnet 4.5 to game evaluations
(16:28) Evaluation gaming is plausibly a large fraction of the effect of training against misaligned behaviors
(22:57) Suppressing evidence of misalignment in evaluation gamers is concerning
(25:25) What AI companies should do
(30:02) Appendix
The original text contained 21 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
October 30th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qgehQxiTXj53X49mM/sonnet-4-5-s-eval-gaming-seriously-undermines-alignment
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
View all episodes
By LessWrongAccording to the Sonnet 4.5 system card, Sonnet 4.5 is much more likely than Sonnet 4 to mention in its chain-of-thought that it thinks it is being evaluated; this seems to meaningfully cause it to appear to behave better in alignment evaluations. So, Sonnet 4.5's behavioral improvements in these evaluations may partly be driven by growing tendency to notice and game evaluations rather than genuine alignment. This is an early example of a phenomenon that is going to get increasingly problematic: as evaluation gaming increases, alignment evaluations become harder to trust.[1]
To elaborate on the above: Sonnet 4.5 seems far more aware of being evaluated than previous models. In some of Anthropic's evaluations, Sonnet 4.5 explicitly mentions being tested between 80% and 100% of the time, compared with under 10% for Sonnet 4. Internal representations associated with evaluation awareness also became notably stronger over training.[2]
In addition, Sonnet 4.5 seems substantially less likely to behave poorly once it has noticed that it might be tested. As seen in the figure below, when Anthropic inhibited internal representations related to evaluation awareness[3], its misaligned behavior rate on synthetic honeypot tests increased from 0% to between 1% and 9%. This effect was [...]
---
Outline:
(06:58) Sonnet 4.5 is much more evaluation-aware than prior models
(10:00) Evaluation awareness seems to suppress misaligned behavior
(14:52) Anthropic's training plausibly caused Sonnet 4.5 to game evaluations
(16:28) Evaluation gaming is plausibly a large fraction of the effect of training against misaligned behaviors
(22:57) Suppressing evidence of misalignment in evaluation gamers is concerning
(25:25) What AI companies should do
(30:02) Appendix
The original text contained 21 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
October 30th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qgehQxiTXj53X49mM/sonnet-4-5-s-eval-gaming-seriously-undermines-alignment
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
More shows like LessWrong (30+ Karma)
View all
Making Sense with Sam Harris
26,320 Listeners
Conversations with Tyler
2,451 Listeners
The Peter Attia Drive
8,549 Listeners
Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas
4,178 Listeners
ManifoldOne
93 Listeners
Your Undivided Attention
1,601 Listeners
All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
9,922 Listeners
Machine Learning Street Talk (MLST)
95 Listeners
Dwarkesh Podcast
512 Listeners
Hard Fork
5,507 Listeners
The Ezra Klein Show
15,930 Listeners
Moonshots with Peter Diamandis
547 Listeners
No Priors: Artificial Intelligence | Technology | Startups
130 Listeners
Latent Space: The AI Engineer Podcast
93 Listeners
BG2Pod with Brad Gerstner and Bill Gurley
467 Listeners