In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski spoke with Detective Jason Howe about the ongoing case surrounding the Gilgo Beach Killer, where fingers are pointed towards Rex Heuermann.

 

 Currently, Heuermann is isolated in a high-security housing unit, where he partakes in all activities, from eating to recreation, alone. Such treatment, though typical of high-profile cases, raises a pertinent question: would a more relaxed confinement strategy allow Heuermann to inadvertently volunteer information?

 

 "Well, I can tell you from experience that we monitor quite a bit of jail and prison communications. It's a very useful tool in some criminal investigations," remarked Detective Howe. However, he highlighted the need for the balance of security and the mental well-being of the inmates. Being locked down for 23 hours daily with limited social interaction can be mentally taxing.

 

 While Heuermann's solitary confinement may seem severe, it's based on the primary objective of ensuring his safety. Still, there are glimpses of interaction. For instance, Heuermann has been granted limited religious services. A representative from the Roman Catholic Church was allowed to see him, though it's not clear if a confession transpired during their conversation.

 

 This brings about another challenging dimension to the discussion: how monitored are interactions between inmates and priests? In most standard scenarios, conversations, especially confessions, with religious figures remain confidential. However, the lines get blurred within the prison walls.

 

 "And absolutely there is some contact there for religious reasons and that wouldn't be monitored necessarily. There is some kind of privilege there when it comes to confession," Detective Howe explained. Such privileges, akin to attorney-client privileges, signify that if Heuermann were to confess to a crime during such a religious interaction, the priest isn't obliged to disclose it. In some states, the only exception is if the confession relates to child abuse.

 

 Brueski further probed, "But would a priest, is it up to the priest to decide whether or not they want to share that information?" Howe replied, "By any means he could share the information that he heard, but he would probably run afoul of the church and find himself in some predicament there." This means that while legally, a priest might be able to come forward with such information, doing so could have significant ramifications for their standing within the church.

 

 Essentially, while the privileges of confession are designed to protect sensitive information, they also present a unique challenge within the criminal justice system. Especially in a case as high profile as the Gilgo Beach Killer, where every shred of information is vital.

 

 The discourse between Brueski and Detective Howe offers a comprehensive look into the complexities of the criminal justice system, especially when it intersects with other societal institutions like the church. As the case unfolds, it remains to be seen if such interactions will play any role in the overall investigation.

 

 The bigger picture, however, remains. While Rex Heuermann's confinement is typical of high-profile suspects, the delicate balance between security, mental well-being, and the potential for extracting information is a dance the authorities must navigate carefully. It's a situation that underscores the intricacies of the justice system, especially when pursuing the truth behind some of its most challenging cases.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com