To Be Seen Is to Be Suspect

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

A meditation on diagnosis, distress, and the politics of visibility.

What happens when care becomes a performance, and diagnosis the only form of public belief? This episode explores how mental health recognition is tethered to systems that demand collapse before offering aid. It asks what’s at stake when distress must be translated into medical language just to be acknowledged—and what gets lost when structural grief is mislabeled as clinical excess.

The notion of “overdiagnosis” seems, at first, like a caution against excess. But in a world where suffering is often unseen unless it is named in clinical terms, the real issue may not be inflation—but compression. As Susan McPherson and Lauren Berlant suggest, what we frame as psychiatric surplus may instead be the slow surfacing of deferred, systemic pain. And Judith Butler’s concept of grievability reminds us that some lives—and some pains—are never granted the same access to recognition.

The question, then, is not whether we name too much—but why naming is required at all. Drawing from Frantz Fanon’s insight into translation under power, and Achille Mbembe’s theory of necropolitics, we examine how welfare systems discipline visibility and control affective legitimacy. This episode does not reject diagnosis—it reframes it. Not as falsehood, but as a narrow vessel overflowing with meanings it was never built to hold.

Reflections

Some of the questions that surfaced along the way:

Why Listen?

Listen On:

Support This Work

If you'd like to support the ongoing work, you can visit buymeacoffee.com/thedeeperthinkingpodcast or leave a kind review on Apple Podcasts.

Bibliography

To be named is not always to be known. And to be seen is not always to be safe.

#MentalHealth #Overdiagnosis #JudithButler #LaurenBerlant #SusanMcPherson #FrantzFanon #AchilleMbembe #Recognition #Visibility #StructuralGrief #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #Suffering #PoliticsOfCare #AffectTheory