True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

According to Richard Allen's reply brief, Indiana investigators interviewed an alternative suspect in the Delphi murders, then allegedly recorded over the tape of that interview. His weapon was never collected. His phone was never searched. And at trial, the judge ruled that presenting him as an alternative suspect was speculative.

The defense's response to that ruling is a question. How is anything speculative if nobody bothered to investigate it?

That is one of three factual problems sitting inside the appellate record that Indiana's response brief refuses to engage with directly. The other two are a van timeline contradicted by FBI cell data and surveillance footage, and a confession in which Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot Abby Williams and Libby German — when the medical examiner concluded the girls were killed with a blade.

Defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski for Part One of a three-part panel on the procedural-versus-factual collision driving the Delphi appeal. They walk through why Indiana built its appellate strategy around harmless error and procedural waiver instead of disputing the underlying record. They explain why the recorded-over interview is more dangerous in an appeal than it was at trial. They get into the selective admission of Allen's jailhouse calls — one heard by the jury, two excluded, including the call in which Allen asks his own father how much longer he can stay lucid.

Three judges are reading the full record now. The State spent the appellate brief telling them not to look too closely. Whether three judges with the power to ask any question take that suggestion is the entire ballgame.

LINKS:

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

DISCLAIMER:


This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.


HASHTAGS:

#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AlternativeSuspect #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #TrueCrimeToday #BridgeGuy #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #TrueCrime

The jury convicted Alex Murdaugh. But they never saw the full picture. James Lasdun's The Family Man reveals evidence that prosecutors chose not to present — and it raises questions that still don't have answers.

The complete SLED timeline from June 7th shows Alex in phone contact with men with criminal records hours before the murders. He deleted his call log from that entire week. Cousin Eddie texted him the next morning with just three words. Prosecutors cut all of it from the version they showed the jury.

The book goes further. Defense attorney Jim Griffin revealed that they wanted to cross-examine Eddie about his failed polygraph and the fabricated story he told SLED about the murders. Eddie was their alternative theory. Prosecutors pulled him from the witness list.

Maggie's car was found with the driver's seat pushed all the way back. Unidentified tire tracks were noted near the bodies and never investigated. Alex picked up Paul's phone right after finding the bodies and started to do something with it before stopping himself.

And there's a phrase — "things just got all fucked up" — that Alex allegedly used to describe what happened at Moselle. The book builds a theory around it that no one else has explored.

Part 2 of three. The evidence gaps in this case are real, and they matter.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #TheFamilyMan #MurdaughEvidence #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeToday #MaggieMurdaugh #CousinEddie #MurdaughTrial #HiddenKillers

The procedural and legal questions across the D4VD, Nancy Guthrie, and Duggar cases reveal how alleged institutional failures compound regardless of the type of case. Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke address the legal complexity, the alleged investigative missteps, and the systemic patterns that connect all three.

The D4VD segment addresses federal jurisdiction questions — alleged interstate transport of a minor, the potential applicability of trafficking statutes, and why the Los Angeles County prosecution is proceeding on state charges including first-degree murder with special circumstances while alleged federal angles remain unaddressed. Robin provides context on parallel investigations and what the alleged evidence of premeditation means for the prosecution's theory of the case.

The Nancy Guthrie segment focuses on the alleged evidence processing failures between Pima County and FBI laboratories, the legal mechanisms available to compel transparency in an active investigation, and whether the cryptocurrency ransom demands carry independent criminal liability regardless of their alleged connection to the abduction. The FBI Director's public criticism of local handling adds an alleged inter-agency dimension with both legal and political implications.

The Duggar segment addresses Florida's lewd and lascivious statutes, the evidentiary implications of recorded jail calls, mandatory reporting obligations under both Arkansas and Florida law, and whether multi-state CPS investigations are viable when alleged abuse patterns cross jurisdictional lines within a single family. Robin connects the alleged IBLP institutional framework to how alleged reporting failures may perpetuate across generations — the same alleged cycle, the same alleged silence, different alleged victims.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #D4VD #NancyGuthrie #JosephDuggar 

More than a month after Lynette Hooker disappeared off a dinghy in the Bahamas, the U.S. Coast Guard Investigative Service has gone public with a request that tells you exactly where this case actually is. They are looking for the owner of a different sailboat — one that was moored near the Hookers’ yacht Soulmate in Aunt Pat’s Bay on the night Lynette vanished. They have grainy photographs. They want whoever was on that boat to come forward.

In other words: investigators are no longer just retracing the dinghy route Brian Hooker said he and his wife took. They are looking for somebody else who saw something.

This episode lays out the full case from April 4 to where it stands now. The 55-year-old Michigan woman who fell — by her husband’s account — into choppy water at dusk. The ex-Marine husband who paddled away for hours instead of dropping anchor. The daughter who went on national television and said her stepfather had a history of choking her mother and threatening to throw her overboard. The 2024 messages obtained by CBS News, in which Lynette told a friend named Marnee Stevenson, in her own words, that it was real bad and she couldn’t be out there with him — and the reconciliation that came a month later.

And the long marriage with police calls in both directions, including Brian’s 2006 acquittal on a child abuse charge and a 2015 mutual-assault incident in Michigan that ended without charges.

Brian Hooker is back in Michigan. He has not been charged. He denies any wrongdoing. The Royal Bahamas Police still consider him a suspect. The Coast Guard is still looking for that sailboat.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LynetteHooker #BrianHooker #TrueCrimeToday #BahamasInvestigation #CoastGuard #MysterySailboat #MissingWoman #ColdCase #ElbowCay #MissingMom

The legal dimensions of the Joseph Duggar case extend beyond the Florida charges into recorded communications that may carry evidentiary weight. Joseph faces charges of lewd and lascivious behavior on a child under twelve in Bay County, Florida. His bond was set at six hundred thousand dollars. He has pleaded not guilty and was ordered to have no unsupervised contact with minors. But the jail calls and emails obtained through FOIA requests allegedly reveal communications that defense attorneys typically advise against.

Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke address the legal and institutional dimensions. The IBLP — the Institute in Basic Life Principles founded by Bill Gothard, who himself faced allegations of sexual harassment — allegedly taught a framework where internal confession and forgiveness replaced law enforcement involvement. Joseph and Kendra allegedly discussed on recorded lines that case details should only be shared with attorneys. Yet other communications allegedly suggest a family focused on damage control rather than legal caution — Jim Bob's email referenced "terrible decisions" while expressing hope Kendra's charges would be dropped.

Kendra Duggar was reportedly charged with misdemeanor endangering the welfare of a child and false imprisonment. The legal implications of the recorded jail calls, mandatory reporting obligations under Arkansas and Florida law, whether Florida's lewd and lascivious statutes carry enhanced penalties for alleged patterns, and whether multi-state CPS investigations are legally viable when an alleged pattern crosses jurisdictional boundaries within a single family all factor into what may be the most consequential legal reckoning the Duggar family has faced since Josh's federal conviction.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#JosephDuggar #DuggarFamily #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #JimBobDuggar #KendraDuggar #JoshDuggar #IBLP #TonyBrueski

The Austin yogurt shop murders investigation was compromised from the start. The detective who ran early interrogations, Hector Polanco, was implicated in at least seven false confessions across multiple cases. His most notorious failure: extracting a false confession from Christopher Ochoa in the 1988 Nancy DePriest murder, leading to the wrongful conviction of both Ochoa and Richard Danziger. Danziger suffered permanent brain damage from a prison assault. Austin settled for $14.5 million.

Despite this documented track record, Polanco interrogated suspects in the yogurt shop case during the early 1990s. He was eventually removed from the task force, but the contamination was already embedded. Eight years of questioning dozens of teenagers had allowed confidential crime scene details to spread through the community, making it impossible to distinguish genuine suspect knowledge from ambient information. When new detectives re-arrested the same four men in 1999, they treated community gossip as evidence of guilt.

Part 2 of this series provides a forensic breakdown of how the investigation derailed — the institutional failures, the confirmation bias, and the psychology of how communities under sustained trauma create scapegoats from the people least equipped to defend themselves. Essential listening for anyone following wrongful conviction reform and interrogation accountability.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#YogurtShopMurders #TrueCrimeToday #FalseConfession #PoliceAccountability #WrongfulConviction #ColdCase #HiddenKillers #InterrogationReform #AustinTexas #TrueCrime

The Twelve Tribes — the group behind the Yellow Deli restaurant chain — has faced allegations of systematic child discipline across three continents and five decades. Former members describe a community where a rod was kept above every door, where children were allegedly struck for crying, and where a 267-page manual reportedly codified exactly how to deliver pain in the name of love.

The manual was written by founder Gene Spriggs. He and his wife had no children together. He reportedly never raised a child inside the community. But the instructions he allegedly wrote governed how thousands of parents treated their children for decades.

This episode traces the evidence from the 1984 Vermont raid — where one hundred and twelve children were seized and returned the same day — to the 2013 German intervention, where hidden camera footage led to the removal of forty children. The European Court of Human Rights upheld Germany’s decision, finding the group promoted institutionalized violence against minors.

Former members who grew up inside the Twelve Tribes in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s describe the same system their predecessors described in the 1980s. Police records from Colorado compounds as recently as 2020 document ongoing concerns. The group maintains that their approach is biblical parenting.

The allegations have not changed. The practices, according to former members, have not changed. And the doors have not closed.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#12Tribes #TwelveTribes #YellowDeli #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #CultExposed #ChildProtection #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #CultDocumentary

The procedural failures alleged in the Nancy Guthrie investigation reflect how institutional friction can compound across an active missing persons case. Three months after the eighty-four-year-old mother of NBC's Savannah Guthrie was reportedly abducted from her Tucson-area home, questions about evidence processing remain unanswered. DNA evidence from the scene was reportedly confirmed as Nancy's blood. A private forensics lab in Florida reportedly sent crime scene DNA samples to the FBI, and a Northern California forensics lab — the same one that reportedly helped identify the Gilgo Beach victims — is also allegedly now involved. But the alleged chain of custody between Pima County and FBI laboratories reportedly stalled critical analysis.

Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analysis chief Robin Dreeke address the forensic and procedural dimensions. FBI Director Kash Patel's public criticism of local handling adds an alleged layer of inter-agency tension with legal and political implications. The alleged friction over which lab processes evidence — and who controls the investigative timeline — reflects a jurisdictional dynamic Robin explains from the federal perspective.

The ransom notes demanding cryptocurrency raise specific legal questions. Were they allegedly legitimate demands or hoax communications designed to misdirect? The fact that no Bitcoin was allegedly ever withdrawn despite passed deadlines suggests a pattern Robin connects to alleged misdirection tactics in other high-profile cases. The family clearance timeline, the alleged refusal to release the 911 call, and the legal mechanisms available to force transparency in an active investigation all factor into what this case allegedly demands from the institutions responsible for solving it.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #Tucson #PimaCounty #FBI #MissingPerson #TonyBrueski

The alleged conduct described in court filings against David Burke, known as D4VD, crosses state lines and international borders — yet the prosecution is proceeding on state charges in Los Angeles County. He currently faces first-degree murder with special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen, and mutilation of human remains. The legal complexity runs deeper than one courtroom.

Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analysis chief Robin Dreeke address the procedural and legal dimensions. The alleged use of fake identification for a minor. The reported travel to Las Vegas, London, and Texas. The alleged Uber sent to pick up Celeste Rivas Hernandez from Lake Elsinore and bring her to a Hollywood Hills residence on April 23, 2025 — the night prosecutors allege she was stabbed to death. Whether the Mann Act or federal trafficking statutes could allegedly apply, and how federal investigations operate parallel to state prosecutions.

The evidence prosecutors have presented reveals something beyond one defendant — an alleged grooming operation that reportedly required infrastructure. Three missing persons reports in 2024 that allegedly changed nothing. Alleged matching tattoos with a child. An alleged sexual relationship that prosecutors say started when the victim was thirteen. An alleged thousand-dollar payment to a classmate to circumvent parental intervention. The legal framework for mandatory reporting, the potential for additional charges against other parties, and what the special circumstances allegations mean for sentencing all factor into what this case allegedly demands from the justice system.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #JusticeForCeleste #DavidBurke #ChildGrooming #HollywoodHillsMurder #TonyBrueski

A new book is reframing everything about the Murdaugh case — and it starts with the patterns nobody was paying attention to.

James Lasdun's The Family Man: Blood and Betrayal in the House of Murdaugh spent years tracing Alex's behavior through original interviews and evidence that never made it to trial. The picture it paints isn't of a man who snapped. It's of a man who had been rehearsing.

The book reveals that the night of the boat crash — years before the murders — Alex showed up at the hospital and immediately began trying to control the narrative. He tried to get into Morgan Doughty's room even after she told nurses to keep him out. He cornered Connor Cook and told him to keep his mouth shut. Morgan's first written statement that night said Connor was driving when the boat hit the bridge. That story was rewritten the next day.

After the staged roadside shooting months after the murders, Alex sat with a sketch artist and helped produce a composite that resembled Anthony Cook — a boat crash survivor. He had a bullet wound in his head and was still framing people.

Lasdun also uncovered a $5,000 backdated check to a police chief who was at the Moselle crime scene, connections to a business with drug-smuggling ties, and evidence the state agency investigating the case told conflicting stories about where key evidence was found.

Part 1 of a three-part interview. The blueprint was hiding in plain sight.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#AlexMurdaugh #TheFamilyMan #MurdaughMurders #MurdaughTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeToday #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers