True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

The Cascio family is the latest. They won’t be the last. And the pattern they represent — decades of public defense followed by allegations, followed by money, followed by more allegations — is the pattern that defines the entire Michael Jackson saga.

This episode covers the Cascios in full: the Oprah appearance, the memoir, the twenty-five years of vocal defense, the reported sixteen million dollar settlement, and the federal lawsuit alleging Jackson assaulted every one of their children. The estate’s attorney called it a desperate money grab and pointed to the decades of public defense as evidence the claims are fabricated. The family says they were groomed and brainwashed and didn’t understand what happened to them until they watched other accusers describe identical experiences. Both positions have weight. And neither has been tested in a courtroom.

Then I step back and look at every case together. Every accuser since 1993. Every settlement. Every reversal. Every financial transaction. Every debunked claim and every verified detail. The evidence doesn’t support the clean version Jackson’s defenders want. It also doesn’t support the clean version his accusers need. What it supports is ambiguity — the deeply uncomfortable reality that the truth about a person can be too complicated for a verdict, a documentary, or a biopic to contain. This is the final episode. It’s not an answer. It’s the question you take with you. All accusations are attributed to their sources.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#MichaelJackson #CascioFamily #MJEstate #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Neverland #MJAccusations #LeavingNeverland #MichaelBiopic #KingOfPop

Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty on July 2, 2025, to the stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students. He received four consecutive life sentences with no possibility of parole and waived his right to appeal. The legal proceedings are concluded.

A book titled "Broken Plea" by Christopher Whitcomb has introduced claims from former defense expert Brent Turvey regarding alleged chain of custody irregularities with the Ka-Bar knife sheath recovered at the crime scene — the prosecution's primary physical evidence linking Kohberger through DNA found under the snap. The evidence bag was reportedly documented inconsistently, with entries on a label appearing in similar handwriting with the same pen across multiple dates spanning November 2022.

Kohberger's defense team, led by attorney Anne Taylor, issued their first public statement outside court proceedings since his December 2022 arrest. The statement accuses Turvey of violating a confidentiality agreement that they say has not been rescinded, and of speaking outside his areas of expertise on material that remains confidential. Turvey has characterized the statement as a deflection, stating he disclosed nothing confidential and alleging that Taylor's office had been investigated over a separate leak.

The chain of custody allegation was not included in Turvey's filed expert report. He claims the discovery came after his filing deadline. Retired NYPD Inspector Paul Mauro has characterized the claim as a procedural attack rather than a substantive evidentiary challenge. Whitcomb has acknowledged there is no wrongful conviction claim and had no investigative role in the case.

Former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis provides a procedural analysis of the confidentiality dispute, the evidentiary weight of post-plea forensic claims, and the ethical framework governing expert conduct in concluded criminal cases.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #BrentTurvey #AnneTaylor #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #ChainOfCustody #LegalAnalysis

A new book on the Murdaugh case makes the most disturbing claim anyone has put in print about Alex Murdaugh: that he factored the genuineness of his own grief into the murder plan. That he understood his devastation would be so real, so obviously authentic, that it would function as proof of his innocence. And that he was right — the deputies reached forward to squeeze his shoulder in the patrol car because his pain didn't look performed. It wasn't. That was the point.

James Lasdun's The Family Man is built on years of original reporting — including two in-person visits with Cousin Eddie, who told the author that Alex described what happened at Moselle with a phrase that sounds nothing like a denial and everything like a man describing a plan that went wrong. Lasdun built a theory around those words: that the murders may have been a staged attack designed to fail — the same play Alex ran three months later on the roadside — but something went sideways in the darkness at the kennels.

The book also reveals evidence that was kept from the jury. Phone calls between Alex and men with criminal records on the day of the murders — removed from the prosecution's timeline. A deleted call log. Texts from Eddie and unknown individuals referencing locations and meetings. Three months before SLED searched the property Alex drove to that night. A blue jacket placed in two different locations by investigators. Unidentified tire tracks near the bodies. A $5,000 backdated check from Alex to a police chief who was at the crime scene.

The evidence gaps are documented. The psychology goes beyond anything previously published on this case. And the overarching message of this book is something most people don't want to hear: the warmth was real, the murders were real, and both ran simultaneously inside the same person.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #TheFamilyMan #CousinEddie #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeToday #FamilyAnnihilator #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #MurdaughEvidence

At Washington State University, Bryan Kohberger's classmates kept a tally board tracking his disturbing behavior. A faculty member told a student to email "911" if she needed help around him. Women were afraid to walk home alone because of him. He was described as a narcissist who never displayed empathy toward another person. In the courtroom, he sat expressionless through everything — victim impact statements, a surviving roommate confronting him, families breaking down — and said nothing. Then from prison, he picked up a pen, and a different person appeared on the page entirely.

Kohberger's jail letters have surfaced, and they read like they were written by someone who's never been inside a courtroom, let alone convicted of four murders. He writes about telepathy with his dog. He uses language like "entropic" and "intuitive capacities." He tells his family about ascending to new peaks and finding "clarity and serenity." He signs letters to his sister "Bernnzz" and calls his dog "Brother." Same man at every stage — WSU, the courtroom, the letters — wearing a completely different mask each time.

This episode tracks that pattern across every context Kohberger has existed in and uses his own words to map how this mind actually works. The dominance, the performance, the retreat into language nobody can challenge. And at the center of it all — a void where accountability should be. He writes about hearts and green pastures. He doesn't write about Kaylee, Maddie, Xana, or Ethan. Not once. That absence is the loudest thing in every letter.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#BryanKohberger #KohbergerPrison #IdahoMurders #TrueCrimeToday #KohbergerPsychology #KingRoad #KayleeGoncalves #EthanChapin #CriminalPsychology #TrueCrime

The preliminary hearing in the D4VD case is set for May 26 after the defense's motion to delay was denied and a motion to seal the People's Brief was rejected by the court. The prosecution's filing — the most detailed evidentiary document produced in this case — lays out the framework for charges of first-degree murder with special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen, and unlawful mutilation of human remains against David Anthony Burke. He has pleaded not guilty.

The special circumstances alleged include murder of a witness, murder for financial gain, and lying in wait. Prosecutors have indicated the death penalty is under consideration. The filing details an alleged sexual relationship beginning when the victim was thirteen and the defendant was eighteen, an alleged motive rooted in the victim's reported threats to disclose the relationship, an alleged stabbing, an alleged months-long concealment period involving disposal materials reportedly ordered under a false name, and communications allegedly sent to the victim's phone after her reported death.

Prosecutors have announced the alleged discovery of a significant amount of child sexual abuse material on Burke's phone, with terabytes of iCloud data reportedly still being downloaded and analyzed. This introduces potential additional charges and carries implications for jury perception and the defense's ability to present character evidence.

Former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis provides a procedural analysis of the defense's complete strategic reversal on timing, the evidentiary framework of the People's Brief, the legal weight of alleged consciousness-of-guilt evidence, the implications of the alleged CSAM discovery, and the defense's argument that media saturation has allegedly contaminated the jury pool.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidBurke #BlairBerk #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #SpecialCircumstances #PreliminaryHearing #LegalAnalysis

The crime scene was allegedly released early. A sergeant with no homicide experience was reportedly assigned to lead. The FBI Director stated publicly that his agency was excluded for four days during the most critical window of the investigation. And DNA evidence collected from the home has reportedly been difficult to interpret, with mixed samples that haven't yielded a match in the FBI's CODIS database.

Nancy Guthrie, an 84-year-old woman, has been missing from her Tucson-area home for over three months. Blood confirmed as hers was found on the front porch. A masked, armed individual was captured on doorbell camera footage that investigators reportedly recovered from residual backend data after the family's camera subscription had lapsed. No arrest has been made. No suspect has been publicly identified.

The Pima County Sheriff disputes the FBI Director's timeline, stating federal agents were notified and present from the outset. The investigation remains a joint effort, though the public dispute over its handling has raised questions about whether the alleged procedural choices made in the first days may have created lasting evidentiary consequences.

Former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis provides a detailed procedural analysis of the alleged investigative decisions — the early scene release, the personnel assignments, the evidence processing timeline — and examines the legal thresholds the Guthrie family would allegedly need to meet to establish that these decisions caused actionable harm. He also addresses the mechanisms available for petitioning alternative investigative oversight, Arizona's statutory victim rights framework, and the legal exposure of media outlets that published unverified ransom material.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #MissingPerson #FBI #PimaCounty #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #VictimsRights #LegalAnalysis

A ghostwritten children’s book. A television appearance with a promo code. A six-page letter from jail scripting false testimony. And an anonymous package from her mother to the sheriff. Kouri Richins didn’t just commit murder — she produced, directed, and starred in a fourteen-month campaign to cover it up. In part four of our definitive series, we examine the digital evidence and public performances that became the prosecution’s most powerful exhibits. 

The Google searches alone read like a confession: lethal fentanyl dosages, poisoning on death certificates, luxury prisons, FBI jurisdiction, life insurance timelines. She deleted 800 messages and switched phones, but her new device became the prosecution’s greatest gift. Meanwhile, she was promoting a $2,500 ghostwritten picture book about her dead husband on morning television and telling her brother it was practice “for the big one.” This is the story of a cover-up so brazen it became its own evidence.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #EricRichins #GhostwrittenBook #FentanylEvidence #DigitalForensics #CoverUpTimeline #UtahMurder #TrueCrimeCommunity #JailLetter

Two landmark cases examined through the lens of criminal psychology by psychotherapist Shavaun Scott — one resolved by guilty plea, one in early proceedings.

Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to four counts of first-degree murder for the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. He received four consecutive life sentences with no possibility of parole and waived all appellate rights. Newly published letters from his time in the Latah County Jail — written in October 2023 to his dog, his sister, and his family — contain no reference to the victims, the charges, or his legal situation, raising significant questions about psychological detachment.

David Anthony Burke, known as D4vd, faces first-degree murder charges with special circumstances of lying in wait, financial gain, and witness elimination, along with continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen and mutilation of human remains. He has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors allege a pattern of conduct beginning with reported contact when Celeste Rivas Hernandez was eleven, an alleged sexual relationship beginning at thirteen, and an alleged killing to prevent disclosure. Three grand juries heard testimony from the defendant's friends, management, and family members. Scott provides clinical analysis of the alleged behavioral patterns, psychological detachment, and bystander dynamics across both cases.

Burke maintains his innocence through counsel.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#BryanKohberger #D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #IdahoMurders #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology #JusticeForCeleste #KayleeGoncalves

Wade Robson told a jury under oath that Michael Jackson never touched him. He was twenty-two years old, a professional choreographer, and by every measure a credible witness. His testimony helped acquit Jackson. Then he suffered two nervous breakdowns, filed a lawsuit, and said he’d been abused since the age of seven. James Safechuck told a nearly identical story — same pattern, same defense of Jackson, same reversal after his death, same lawsuit.

This is part four, and it’s the episode where this series confronts the most divisive question in the Michael Jackson saga: what do you do with accusers who lied under oath for years and then changed their story?

Trauma experts say delayed disclosure is consistent with grooming. Compartmentalization, loyalty to the abuser, and the normalization of boundary violations during childhood can keep victims silent for decades. But the same behavioral pattern that experts describe as consistent with abuse could also be reverse-engineered by someone who wants to construct a convincing allegation. The pattern validates the possibility without confirming the reality. This episode presents the psychology, the evidence, the factual problems with the accusers’ accounts, and the financial stakes of the upcoming trial — and lets you sit with the tension.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#MichaelJackson #WadeRobson #JamesSafechuck #LeavingNeverland #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Neverland #Grooming #MJAccusations #KingOfPop

Prosecutors convened three separate grand juries in the investigation of David Anthony Burke, known as D4vd, before securing an indictment on charges of first-degree murder with special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen, and mutilation of human remains. Burke has pleaded not guilty to all counts. His attorneys say the evidence will show he is innocent.

The scope of grand jury testimony included friends, business associates, and family members — a breadth that raises significant questions about the reported proximity of multiple individuals to the alleged conduct. Burke's manager Robert Morgenroth was reportedly overheard stating that contacting law enforcement after learning about the discovery of remains was not his responsibility. Burke's parents and brother were all subpoenaed. Court records indicate his mother reportedly managed business finances. Friends reportedly believed the fourteen-year-old victim was a nineteen-year-old based on what Burke allegedly told them.

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the psychological mechanisms that may explain how a reported network of individuals allegedly close to the defendant may have failed to recognize or act on warning signs — and what the unprecedented number of grand jury witnesses suggests about the reported scope of proximity to the alleged crimes.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #JusticeForCeleste #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology #CelesteRivas #ChildPredator #LosAngeles