True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

He said not guilty for nearly three years. Seven women. Seven charges. Not guilty, every single time. Now, according to multiple sources confirmed by the Associated Press, NBC, CNN, and Fox News, Rex Heuermann — the Long Island architect at the center of the Gilgo Beach murders — is expected to change that plea on April 8. Life without parole. No trial. The families have been notified.

I want to take you inside the evidence that made this moment inevitable — and into the details that most coverage is skipping over.

The defense filed a 178-page legal challenge in January and was publicly saying as recently as early March that they were planning for trial, not a plea. Weeks later, the phone calls went out to the families. Something broke. And when you look at what prosecutors had built, it's not hard to understand why.

A pizza crust DNA match pulled from a Manhattan trash can. A murder manual recovered from his basement — written in all capitals, sections titled "Body Prep" and "Post Event," created in 2000 and updated for years before he tried to delete it. More than 350 electronic devices seized from his home. Burner phones registered under "Andrew Roberts" and "Thomas Hawk" used to contact at least 60 sex workers more than 500 times. And from that same Gmail account used to reach those women: more than 100 searches about the Gilgo Beach investigation — including, per court documents, "Why hasn't the Long Island serial killer been caught."

His daughter says she believes he most likely did it. His ex-wife called him her hero in a documentary. DNA from both of them was found on five of the seven victims — transferred through household objects, without their knowledge, without their consent. Every defense motion denied. Every off-ramp closed.

What a guilty plea gives the families of seven women who waited decades for this moment — and what it still leaves open — that's what this episode ends on.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #TrueCrimeToday #LongIslandSerialKiller #TrueCrime #GuiltyPlea #SerialKiller #GilgoFour #ColdCase #LISKcase

Patrick Clancy came home with dinner on January 24th, 2023. His wife was injured in the backyard. His three children were in the basement. Cora was five. Dawson was three. Callan was eight months old. Within 72 hours, all three were gone.

Lindsay Clancy — a devoted mother and labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General Hospital — allegedly strangled all three children with exercise bands before attempting to take her own life by jumping from a second-story window. She survived. She is now paralyzed from the chest down, held at Tewksbury State Hospital, awaiting a trial currently scheduled for July 2026.

She has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors allege premeditation — that she calculated Patrick's absence, sent him on a deliberate errand, and created the window intentionally. Her defense maintains she was in active psychosis at the time, hearing a commanding voice she could not resist, the result of a serious illness the medical system allegedly failed to diagnose or treat.

In the days after the deaths, Patrick released a public statement of forgiveness that divided the country. The debate it sparked has never stopped.

Part 1 of our five-part deep-dive into the Lindsay Clancy case, presented in partnership with Hidden Killers, establishes the foundation: who was lost, who Lindsay was, and what it looks like when two opposing accounts of the same devastating night collide for the first time.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMassachusetts #PatrickClancy #MurderCase #MaternalMentalHealth #TrueCrimePodcast #CriminalJustice

The legal pressure surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos reached a significant threshold this week, with direct implications for the ongoing investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie. The Pima County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to invoke state law compelling Nanos to provide sworn reports regarding his department — with non-compliance creating a legal pathway to his removal from office.

The action follows a 241-0 no-confidence vote by the Pima County Deputies Organization, citing records from Nanos' tenure with the El Paso Police Department. According to reporting by the Arizona Republic and AZPM, those documents describe approximately 26 disciplinary allegations over six years — including excessive force, discharge of a firearm, insubordination, illegal gambling, and threatening behavior — before Nanos resigned in 1982 in lieu of termination. His deputies contend those records were never disclosed to Pima County.

Of particular legal significance: reporting by the Arizona Republic and AZPM indicated that in a December 2025 deposition, Nanos was asked under oath whether he had ever been suspended and reportedly testified that he had not — a statement that appears inconsistent with the documented record. Pima County Supervisor Matt Heinz has described Nanos' 42-year career as potentially "based on fraud."

Against this backdrop, questions persist about critical investigative decisions in the Guthrie case: the early release of the crime scene, the routing of DNA evidence to a private Florida lab rather than through federal channels, and reported early friction with FBI evidence access. Federal prosecutors have publicly affirmed their continued involvement regardless of what occurs at the sheriff's office level.

Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer provides legal and procedural analysis on the sworn testimony questions, the investigative implications of the Nanos crisis, and what a potential leadership transition means for the integrity of this case.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #FBIInvestigation #SwornTestimony #MissingPerson #BringNancyHome

The investigative picture in the Nancy Guthrie disappearance grew significantly more complex this week following Savannah Guthrie's first public interview since her mother was reported missing from her Tucson-area home. Key details confirmed: the suspect made two separate visits to the residence prior to the night of the alleged abduction. Investigators are actively pursuing the theory that the armed individual visible on doorbell camera footage was functioning as a lookout — and that at least one additional person may have been present inside the home at the time.

Nancy Guthrie, 84, was living with significant physical limitations and could not have been moved without assistance. She was taken without shoes or medication. The logistics of the alleged abduction point to a coordinated operation built on prior surveillance of the victim — her address, her living situation, her physical condition.

FBI canvassing activity has moved from broad neighborhood sweeps to targeted questioning about specific categories of people: former residents who recently relocated, and construction workers active at a nearby property. That level of focus in a canvassing operation reflects a working theory, not a search for leads.

Savannah also addressed the family's public responses to potential ransom communications — including video statements directed at possible abductors — and stated her belief that certain ransom notes may be legitimate while others likely are not. The investigative and legal implications of a family publicly engaging with potential ransom demands, including the effect on negotiation posture and evidentiary value, are examined directly in this episode.

Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer provides procedural analysis on the surveillance profile, the ransom communication dynamics, and the significance of the continued absence of any confirmed proof of life.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #MissingPerson #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #PimaCounty #FBIInvestigation #KidnappingInvestigation #BringNancyHome

The Kelsey Fitzsimmons bench trial has concluded its evidentiary phase. Both sides have rested. Closing arguments are pending, with a verdict potentially to follow the same day. A single judge will determine whether the single count — assault with a dangerous weapon — is supported beyond a reasonable doubt.

The central factual dispute: the prosecution contends that Fitzsimmons, a former North Andover police officer, raised her service weapon and directed it at Officer Patrick Noonan's face, pulled the trigger on an unchambered round, and racked the slide before Noonan discharged his weapon. The defense contends the weapon was raised to Fitzsimmons's own temple throughout — that this was a mental health crisis and suicide attempt, not an assault — and that Fitzsimmons was shot while in crisis, not while threatening another officer.

Fitzsimmons testified in her own defense on day three, providing her account of the sequence directly. Her testimony included statements made in the ambulance following the shooting. A neighbor of Noonan's also testified on day three. Fitzsimmons's mother testified that she was present in the home, heard two shots, and did not hear her daughter speak. A defense-requested site visit, litigated over two days, was cancelled without explanation following Fitzsimmons's testimony.

Of legal significance: the grand jury declined to indict on armed assault with intent to murder prior to trial — the top charge the prosecution originally pursued. The case proceeded on the lesser assault count. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta examines what that pre-trial grand jury outcome signals about the evidentiary posture, the strategic calculus behind the bench trial election, and the legal architecture of a mental health defense that incorporates postpartum depression, prior on-duty trauma, and post-incident clinical findings without becoming a prosecution narrative. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke addresses the evidentiary weight of behavioral testimony and what officer statements on scene — including the words spoken immediately before the shot was fired — communicate about real-time perception under stress. Martha Coakley, former Massachusetts Attorney General, leads the defense.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#KelseyFitzsimmons #NorthAndoverPolice #BenchTrial #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #MarthaCoakley #MentalHealthCrisis #MassachusettsTrial

The legal and institutional framework surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos now involves three simultaneous tracks: a 241-0 no-confidence vote from the deputies' union, a unanimous Board of Supervisors invocation of a territorial statute requiring sworn statements under threat of removal, and an active recall campaign. Supervisor Matt Heinz publicly characterized Nanos's 42-year Pima County tenure as "fruit of a poison tree" and stated that Nanos's answer in a December 2025 deposition is "disqualifying for any county employee, but especially one in law enforcement."

The critical procedural development: Nanos has stated he will comply with the board's order. The statute invoked ties its removal mechanism to non-compliance — refusal to submit sworn statements — not to the adequacy or content of those statements. Whether compliance, even if the board finds the substance deficient, provides a legal basis for removal under this specific statute is a question county attorneys are currently working to resolve. The board's next scheduled meeting is April 7, at which point outside counsel is expected to present draft language and the board will determine next steps.

This episode provides a full procedural breakdown of the statute's scope, the December deposition at issue and its legal implications, the recall campaign's procedural threshold and timeline, and what each possible outcome means for the active kidnapping investigation.

Former FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke then addresses listener questions on the operational and behavioral dimensions: what command-level instability does to active investigators, what the sustained pattern of Nanos's public communications signals from a behavioral analysis standpoint, and how the FBI's involvement functions — or is complicated — under conditions of jurisdictional friction at the sheriff level.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #ChrisNanos #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #MissingPersons #HiddenKillers #PimaCounty #FBI #BringNancyHome #RobinDreeke

The conviction of Kouri Richins closed the criminal case. The behavioral and psychological record it produced is worth examining on its own terms — because it maps precisely onto a pattern that shows up in case after case, and understanding that pattern is what makes prosecution and prevention possible.

This week on True Crime Today, Tony Brueski, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine the Richins case through the clinical and behavioral lens — using the documented record of the Denise Williams case as the parallel that demonstrates how these cases always resolve.

Denise Williams' husband Mike Williams disappeared in December 2000. The official determination: accidental drowning. Denise collected $1.75 million in insurance and married Brian Winchester — the man who shot Mike and buried him approximately five miles from Mike's mother's home. The con held for seventeen years. It broke when Winchester's own legal exposure made silence a worse option than cooperation. He confessed. Led investigators to the body. Denise Williams was convicted.

The structural mechanism is the same in every case. The long con holds only as long as every participant's silence serves their own interest. The moment that calculation shifts — for a co-conspirator, a witness, a friend, a housekeeper — the evidentiary foundation collapses.

Shavaun Scott examines the coercive control framework documented in the Richins case — the financial manipulation, the isolation, the escalation pattern that prosecutors allege preceded Eric Richins' death as he moved quietly toward restructuring his estate and protecting his children. She addresses what the clinical literature establishes about the specific danger point in controlling relationships when the controlled party moves toward exit — and what the Richins case adds to that record.

The verdict is rendered. The pattern it documents deserves full examination.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#KouriRichins #EricRichins #DeniseWilliams #TrueCrimeLaw #CoerciveControl #ShavaunScott #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #PerfectWife

The criminal cases involving members of the Duggar family do not exist in a vacuum. They exist inside a documented institutional framework — and understanding that framework is essential to understanding how these cases developed, why disclosure took years, and why accountability has been so difficult to reach at every level.

This week on True Crime Today, Tony Brueski examines the Institute in Basic Life Principles — the organization whose doctrine shaped the Duggar household — alongside psychotherapist Shavaun Scott and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke.

The IBLP's Umbrella of Authority doctrine assigns absolute authority to fathers within the family unit, submission to wives, and unquestioning obedience to children. The organization's own published materials describe questioning that authority structure as spiritual rebellion and characterize leaving it as witchcraft. Sex education was systematically excluded from the IBLP homeschool curriculum. Published IBLP guidance characterized fear of dying in pregnancy as satanic. These are documented positions from the organization's own materials.

The institutional record of IBLP's founder, Bill Gothard, is directly relevant. More than 34 women have accused Gothard of harassment and sexual assault. At 91 years old, he has never faced criminal charges. The organization he founded continues to operate. Shavaun Scott and Robin Dreeke examine what it means procedurally and behaviorally when an institution is specifically structured to prevent accountability from reaching its leadership — and what that structure produces in the families living inside it.

The delayed disclosures in the Joseph Duggar case — a victim who waited years before coming forward — are examined through the specific lens of what the IBLP curriculum did and did not teach children about recognizing and reporting harm. The absence of that framework is not incidental. Former members and clinicians who have worked with survivors consistently identify it as structural and intentional.

This is Part 1 of 3. The institutional record is the foundation.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#IBLP #BillGothard #DuggarFamily #TrueCrimeLaw #ReligiousAbuse #ShavaunScott #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #19KidsAndCounting

In December 2025 — six weeks before Nancy Guthrie disappeared from her Tucson home — Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos gave a sworn deposition. Asked directly whether he had ever been suspended during his law enforcement career, he answered no. El Paso Police Department employment records obtained by the Arizona Republic show eight suspensions and 37 days without pay between 1977 and 1982, including a 15-day suspension following an arrest in which a robbery suspect named Carlos Urias allegedly ended up in intensive care. Nanos resigned from the El Paso department in 1982 — two years earlier than his publicly posted résumé stated.

This week on True Crime Today, Tony Brueski examines the full legal and institutional record and what it means for an unsolved investigation.

The institutional response to the surfaced records has been formal and significant. The Pima County deputies' union — representing 300 of Nanos' own officers — passed a unanimous no-confidence vote and called for his immediate resignation. The Pima County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to compel sworn reports from Nanos under oath, directing outside counsel to draft the legal language. Non-compliance with that order carries a specific consequence: the board can vote to vacate his seat after ten days of non-compliance. Supervisor Matt Heinz said publicly that Nanos' 42-year record in Pima County "seems to be based on fraud." The board is set to review draft removal language at an April 7 meeting.

Against this backdrop, the investigation into Nancy Guthrie's disappearance continues with no arrest and no publicly named suspect. The FBI is reportedly conducting targeted inquiries with neighbors specifically about people who moved out of the area before she disappeared — a departure from standard canvas procedure that carries procedural implications Robin Dreeke addresses in the companion episode. January 11th has been flagged by the family as a date of significance weeks before Nancy vanished. Law enforcement has made no public statement about it.

Every sworn statement Nanos has made in connection with this investigation now carries the weight of a deposition record that the documentary evidence directly contradicts.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #ChrisNanos #TrueCrimeLaw #PimaCounty #SheriffRecall #TrueCrimeToday #FindNancyGuthrie #LawEnforcementAccountability #MissingPerson

Two arrests. Two states. Two distinct charging frameworks. The Duggar family is now navigating simultaneous criminal exposure in Florida and Arkansas — and the legal specifics of each case matter in ways that most coverage failed to separate.

This week on True Crime Today, Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta break down the precise legal architecture of both cases.

Joseph Duggar faces two Florida life felony charges — molestation of a victim under 12 and lewd and lascivious behavior by a person 18 or older. Each count carries either a life sentence or a minimum split sentence of 25 years followed by lifetime probation and community control. The charges originate from a forensic interview in which a now-14-year-old girl alleged repeated abuse during a 2020 family vacation in Panama City Beach when she was approximately 9 years old. Per the Bay County Sheriff's Office arrest affidavit, Joseph allegedly admitted his conduct to the victim's father, and then again to a Tontitown police detective who was placed on the same call. Joseph has waived extradition and is awaiting transfer to Florida where the alleged offenses occurred.

Kendra Duggar was separately arrested in Arkansas on misdemeanor charges — four counts each of endangering the welfare of a minor and false imprisonment — tied to the four Duggar children currently in the home. These charges are legally distinct from the Florida case and originated in the mandatory home study that Joseph's arrest triggered under Arkansas law. The Tontitown investigation is confirmed to be ongoing.

The two cases share a family but not a charging theory, not a jurisdiction, and not a legal standard. Bob Motta walks through how defense counsel manages simultaneous multi-state exposure, what the extradition waiver signals procedurally, and how the alleged pre-arrest admissions — made without counsel present — factor into the evidentiary picture going forward.

Josh Duggar's statement through counsel characterizing the allegations as sensationalized fiction — issued while Joseph had allegedly already made documented admissions — is addressed in full. As is the fact that Josh Duggar has now retained new high-profile legal counsel to challenge his own conviction, a detail that speaks directly to the behavioral pattern Robin Dreeke identifies running through this entire family system.

Two cases. One legal breakdown. All of it here.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#JosephDuggar #KendraDuggar #DuggarCase #TrueCrimeLaw #FloridaFelony #BobMotta #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #ChildAbuseCases #DuggarFamily