
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Based on Podcast App listening data
Cameras everywhere. GPS in every phone. Digital footprints on every transaction. We're told it's impossible to disappear in the modern world. Nancy Guthrie's case says otherwise. Twelve days missing. More than a hundred investigators. Eighteen thousand tips. And still — no vehicle of interest, no named suspects, no confirmed sighting since she was last inside her own home in Catalina Foothills.
Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke — twenty-one-year Bureau veteran who served as Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — breaks down what this case reveals about the gap between the surveillance world we think we live in and the one we actually live in. He explains what a successful extraction from a residential property would require, why the blind spots in our security infrastructure are wider than most people realize, what the absence of a vehicle of interest actually signals to investigators, and why Nancy's doorbell camera, pacemaker app, and family proximity didn't prevent what happened.
Then Dreeke addresses the human element that may ultimately determine whether this case is solved. Eighteen thousand tips have flooded the investigation, but the one that matters most hasn't come in. Dreeke explains the psychology behind witness silence — why people who have relevant information don't come forward, how loyalty and denial create barriers even when someone knows they should call, the difference between a witness who hasn't connected the dots and one who is actively shielding someone, and what finally tips that balance. He speaks directly to whoever out there has been sitting on a piece of this story, explaining what it would take to get them to pick up the phone today. Because someone knows something. They just haven't said it yet.
All individuals discussed are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #FBIExpert #HowToDisappear #WitnessPsychology #SavannahGuthrie #MissingPerson #TipLine #TrueCrimeToday #CatalinaFoothills
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
The South Carolina Supreme Court heard Alex Murdaugh's double murder appeal today. The justices asked sharp, pointed questions — and nearly all of them were aimed at the prosecution. The hearing covered both tracks of the appeal: Becky Hill's alleged jury tampering and whether the trial court committed reversible evidentiary errors. On both, the state was on its heels. Justice James opened by raising the egg juror affidavit Justice Toal excluded. Chief Justice Kittredge pointed out that Toal's written order never addressed the allegation that Hill instructed jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh's testimony. He called the corroboration between juror accounts and independent witnesses "striking." Hill has since been convicted of perjury, obstruction, and misconduct — a development that wasn't part of the record when Toal ruled. Justice Few challenged Waters: how do you characterize someone as "not completely credible" when her own guilty plea proves she's a perjurer? The defense argued Toal used the wrong legal standard entirely.
Harpootlian told the court the question isn't whether Hill changed the verdict — it's whether she violated Murdaugh's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury. That distinction changes everything about how the court evaluates the evidence. On the trial record, Kittredge told Waters that 404(b) is a rule of exclusion and said the gate was left wide open — he couldn't find a single financial evidence ruling that went the defense's way. He questioned why emotionally charged victim testimony from Murdaugh's financial crimes was admitted in a murder trial. Waters tried a Fargo reference. Justice Few ended it. Jim Griffin argued the state's underlying case has no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, and no biological transfer evidence from a close-range shotgun blast. If the financial testimony is stripped, the case changes shape. Eric Faddis, criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, dissects the hearing moment by moment — what each justice's questions signal, where the state failed to hold ground, and which of the three possible outcomes the arguments most strongly pointed toward. He also addresses whether a federal Sixth Amendment challenge is viable regardless of how this court rules. Decision expected within sixty days.
#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #BeckyHill #SupremeCourtSC #EricFaddis #CreightonWaters #Rule404b #JuryTampering #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
Surveillance footage released. Multiple suspects sought. A man detained in Rio Rico and released after eight hours. An imposter ransom arrest in California. Roadside searches eleven days out. And eighteen thousand tips competing with millions of self-appointed body language experts judging the Guthrie family from their phones. The Nancy Guthrie case is being squeezed from every direction — and this episode puts a former prosecutor and a former FBI behavioral analyst on both pressure points. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis starts with what the prosecution actually has. The forty-one-minute gap between the Nest camera going offline at 1:47 a.m. and Nancy's pacemaker losing Bluetooth at 2:28 a.m. is the case's forensic foundation. It proves something happened in that house during that window. But a timeline isn't a defendant. Faddis explains what evidence is still needed to make a charge survive a courtroom. He addresses FBI Director Kash Patel releasing surveillance footage through his personal X account rather than a Bureau press briefing — and whether that gives a defense attorney anything real to work with. At least three ransom notes included specific details about the interior of the Guthrie home. The FBI confirmed no proof of life and no known ongoing communication between the family and suspected kidnappers. With one imposter demand already resulting in an arrest, Faddis breaks down the legal problem of separating real kidnapper communications from fraud — and how defense teams exploit every crack in that distinction.
The Rio Rico detention is another exposure point. A man held, questioned, and released. If charges eventually fall on someone else, that eight-hour interrogation becomes a defense exhibit. Evidence recovered from roadways eleven days after the disappearance faces degradation, contamination, and custody questions that limit its prosecutorial value. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, who led the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, confronts the damage coming from outside the investigation. Millions of untrained observers have turned the Guthrie family's public statements into verdict machines — interpreting pauses and gestures as proof of guilt or innocence. Dreeke explains why mass scrutiny distorts how people behave on camera, how investigators manage the flood of amateur theories alongside legitimate tips, and why there is a vast difference between watching a clip online and the years of professional training behind real behavioral assessment. The legal case has gaps. The public is filling them with guesswork. This episode explains why both problems matter.
#NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #RobinDreeke #FBIFootage #RansomNotes #GuthriePacemaker #RioRico #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
Robin Dreeke joins Hidden Killers Live to decode what Kouri Richins' behavior after Eric's death reveals through his FBI deception-detection lens—the 911 call, the book tour, and the letter allegedly scripting witness testimony from jail.
Fourteen months between Eric's death and Kouri's arrest. During that window, she maintained public innocence through media interviews, investigator conversations, and a children's book promotional tour featuring Eric as an angel watching over their sons. Robin's "Tempo Tells" framework is built to read exactly this: the verbal and nonverbal deviations that reveal performance under stress.
The 911 call is where analysis begins. "He's not breathing, he's cold, he doesn't have a pulse." Robin explains the tempo patterns, detail calibration, and authenticity markers investigators are trained to identify. Emergency calls are high-pressure environments where control is hardest to maintain.
The children's book raises different questions. Are You With Me? launched in March 2023 with television appearances—one year after Eric's death, two months before Kouri's arrest. What does choosing public grief performance at that scale reveal about confidence in deception? And what compounding risks does extended exposure create?
Then came the "Walk the Dog" letter. Found in Kouri's jail cell, prosecutors allege it outlines specific false testimony for her mother and brother. Robin breaks down what continued manipulation from behind bars reveals about someone's relationship with truth—and how juries typically respond to that kind of evidence.
Live conversation. Real-time analysis. Trial begins February 23rd.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillersLive #DeceptionAnalysis #911Call #BookTour #JailLetter #FBI #TrueCrimeLive
Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today for a deep dive into two of the most significant criminal trials happening in the country — the Kouri Richins fentanyl murder case and the Colin Gray parental accountability trial.
The Richins case begins February 23rd with the defense riding pretrial wins: a recanting drug source, excluded prosecution experts, and severed financial charges. But the state has an alleged prior poisoning attempt, Carmen Lauber's expected testimony that Kouri requested fentanyl and "the Michael Jackson stuff," Google searches allegedly about lethal doses and luxury prisons, forged insurance documents, a jail cell letter allegedly coaching family testimony, and five times the lethal dose in Eric's system.
In Georgia, Colin Gray faces 29 felony counts including second-degree murder. Prosecutors say he gave his 14-year-old son an AR-15 despite alleged FBI warnings, school shooting threats, and a text from Colt allegedly saying "the blood is on your hands." Prosecutors allege a Parkland shrine sat in the bedroom. When officers arrived, Colin allegedly said, "I knew it."
Faddis analyzes every angle of both cases — defense strategy, prosecution evidence, legal theories, and his honest assessment of where each is headed.
#KouriRichins #ColinGray #EricRichins #ColtGray #FentanylMurder #SchoolShooting #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
The insurance policies started in 2015. By 2017, prosecutors say Kouri Richins had positioned nearly $2 million on her husband Eric's life—without his knowledge. When he discovered her alleged financial fraud in 2020, he met with a divorce attorney. Eighteen months later, he was dead.
Robin Dreeke spent his FBI career reading the behavioral patterns that precede violence. His "Life Arc" framework asks not just what someone did, but what made them capable of it. In this Hidden Killers conversation, we apply that framework to the Kouri Richins case—examining the prosecution's timeline through the eyes of someone trained to assess threats before they materialize.
The compressed timeline is what stands out. Prosecutors allege Kouri obtained fentanyl on February 11, 2022. On Valentine's Day, they say she left a poisoned sandwich in Eric's truck—he survived. On February 26th, she allegedly went back to her supplier asking for "something stronger." By March 4th, Eric was gone. Robin explains what that escalation pattern reveals about psychological state—and why a failed attempt typically increases rather than decreases risk.
But the foundation was laid years before. Financial fraud. Falsified documents. A Power of Attorney Eric never signed. When he confronted her in 2020, something shifted. Robin breaks down what happens to someone's behavioral baseline when their deception is exposed and divorce becomes a real threat.
Trial begins February 23rd. Five weeks. Twelve jurors. This conversation provides the behavioral lens for understanding the patterns they'll see—the years of positioning, the escalation, and the trajectory that allegedly led to a Moscow Mule laced with five times the lethal dose of fentanyl.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RobinDreeke #FBIProfiler #LifeInsuranceFraud #FentanylPoisoning #UtahMurder #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #BehavioralAnalysis
Colin Gray is on trial for second-degree murder because prosecutors say he armed a child he allegedly knew was dangerous. Former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the state's case against the father of the Apalachee High School shooter — and explains why the defense may be fighting an unwinnable battle.
The prosecution's timeline spans years of alleged warning signs. An alleged 2021 search for "how to kill your dad." An FBI visit in 2023 over school shooting threats, with investigators reportedly instructing Colin to restrict gun access. A Christmas gift of an AR-15-style rifle seven months after that visit, according to prosecutors. And in August 2024, Colt allegedly texted his father, "Whenever something happens, just know the blood is on your hands," and asked him to buy 150 rounds of ammunition.
The defense claims Colt led a double life. But prosecutors allege the evidence was inside the home — a reported shrine to the Parkland shooter, reported voices, alleged violence toward his mother, and prescription medication without medical oversight. When officers arrived at the Gray home, Colin allegedly said two words the prosecution may never let the jury forget: "I knew it."
With 29 felony counts, up to 180 years exposure, roughly 20 juvenile victims testifying about being shot, and a legal theory that goes beyond what convicted the Crumbleys, Faddis gives his honest take on where this is headed.
#ColinGray #ColtGray #ApalacheeHighSchool #SchoolShooting #SecondDegreeMurder #ParentAccountability #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
You're waiting for an ending that isn't coming.
The apology. The acknowledgment. The trial that delivers justice. The moment where everything finally makes sense. You've built years around the hope that someday there would be resolution.
There won't be.
Jake and Romy Reiner will spend years in courtrooms. Motions. Hearings. Their brother's face while lawyers argue his mental state. And at the end — whatever the verdict — their parents are still gone. The brother they grew up with is either a murderer or something even more tragic. The trial gives an outcome. It doesn't give peace.
Justice doesn't equal peace. Families who've been through this describe the anticipation of "guilty" — the belief that the word will finally shift something inside them. Then it comes. And they feel emptiness. Because the verdict addressed what was done. It didn't undo what it cost.
Apologies don't rewrite history. Even when they come, the damage stays. And most of the time, with people like Nick, the apology never arrives. Or it arrives wrapped in conditions and deflection.
Understanding doesn't mean acceptance. You can have every clinical detail — the illness, the trauma, the disorder — and still not be okay with what they destroyed. Knowing why someone hurt you doesn't obligate you to forgive them.
Time doesn't heal. It just passes. Healing is something you build. Actively. Painfully. With or without resolution. With or without justice. With or without the ending you deserved.
The shift: closure isn't something that happens to you. It's something you construct. Peace isn't waiting for external validation. It's deciding that their chaos doesn't get to determine your future anymore.
The survivors who find peace aren't the ones who got answers. They're the ones who stopped waiting for them.
Your next chapter is yours. Write it.
#RobReiner #NickReiner #MicheleSingerReiner #ReinerCase #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #HealingWithoutClosure #FindingPeace #MovingForward #SurvivorRecovery
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
The defense drew blood pretrial. Now the prosecution gets to show the jury what four years of investigation produced — and former prosecutor Eric Faddis says some of this evidence may be unexplainable for the defense.
The state's case reportedly begins with Valentine's Day 2022 — an alleged prior poisoning attempt where Kouri Richins is accused of lacing Eric's sandwich with fentanyl. Two friends say he called them saying his wife tried to poison him. A life insurance policy had allegedly gone into effect ten days before. Then came Eric's death months later — more than five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in his system, allegedly mixed into a Moscow Mule Kouri made him.
Carmen Lauber, the housekeeper, is expected to testify that Kouri directly asked her to source fentanyl twice and allegedly requested "the Michael Jackson stuff" after the Valentine's Day incident. Unsealed warrants reportedly show Kouri also asked a handyman to procure fentanyl and propofol. Google searches allegedly found on her phone include queries about lethal fentanyl doses, luxury prisons, insurance payout timelines, and deleting digital records.
Prosecutors also have a letter allegedly found in her jail cell coaching family on testimony, an orange notebook with her account of the day Eric died that allegedly contradicts other evidence, and a handwriting expert prepared to testify that insurance document signatures were forged. Faddis breaks down how the prosecution ties all of it together — and whether the defense has any answer.
#KouriRichins #RichinsTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #CarmenLauber #ProsecutionCase #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
Kouri Richins goes to trial for the alleged fentanyl murder of her husband Eric in less than a week — and the prosecution's case may not be as airtight as it looked a year ago. The man who was supposed to prove the fentanyl supply chain has recanted. The lead detective faces witness intimidation allegations. Two prosecution experts were excluded. And 26 financial crime charges were severed from the case entirely.
Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today to break down what the defense gained before the jury ever sat down. Robert Crozier now says under oath that he sold OxyContin, not fentanyl — and the pills were never recovered or forensically tested. Prosecutors dropped the drug distribution charges after that sworn affidavit. Faddis explains why that gap matters, how Detective O'Driscoll's alleged threats to a witness could undermine the investigation's credibility, and what it means that Judge Mrazik blocked the state's domestic violence expert and limited FBI profiler Molly Amman's role.
The defense lost two venue change requests in a county where 85 percent of residents had heard of the case. Jury selection wrapped in two days. Faddis walks through whether that rapid process helps or hurts Kouri — and identifies the single biggest card the defense holds heading into opening statements on February 23rd.
#KouriRichins #RichinsTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #TrueCrimeToday #SummitCounty #DefenseStrategy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
From the publisher's feed
Ranked by our users in the last 21 days

8,561 Listeners

860 Listeners

1,258 Listeners

46,879 Listeners

1,070 Listeners

1,559 Listeners

10,402 Listeners

2,459 Listeners

136 Listeners

1,168 Listeners

2,175 Listeners

491 Listeners

95 Listeners

902 Listeners

23 Listeners

94 Listeners

10 Listeners

62 Listeners

225 Listeners

608 Listeners

7 Listeners

8 Listeners

7 Listeners

17 Listeners

5 Listeners

12 Listeners

6 Listeners

6 Listeners

8 Listeners

824 Listeners

6 Listeners

91 Listeners