True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Judge Penney Azcarate wants answers. She's ordered prosecutors to turn over all communications related to the transfer of Officer Brendan Miller — the digital forensics expert whose findings contradicted the prosecution's theory in the Brendan Banfield murder case.

Miller analyzed 60 devices connected to the case. His conclusion: Christine Banfield — not her husband — appeared to control the FetLife account prosecutors claim was used to lure Joseph Ryan to his death. The University of Alabama peer-reviewed his analysis and confirmed it. Then, according to court testimony, Miller was told he'd never work another digital forensics case. He was transferred out. The lead homicide detective who disagreed with command staff was also reassigned.

On February 24, 2023, Christine Banfield, 37, was stabbed to death in her Herndon, Virginia home. Joseph Ryan, 39, lay feet away, shot twice by two different guns. Their 4-year-old daughter was in the basement waiting to go to the zoo.

Prosecutors allege Brendan Banfield and au pair Juliana Peres Magalhaes were having an affair and staged the murders to look like self-defense. Juliana faced murder charges for a year before changing her story and taking a plea deal that lets her walk free if she testifies against Banfield.

Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down what she calls "a theory in search of facts." The original prosecutor was removed after being cited for drinking at 8 a.m. Key evidence was excluded. It took 19 months to charge Banfield. There were 24 competing theories before the au pair flipped.

This case had serious problems before a single witness took the stand. Now a jury has to decide who's telling the truth.

#BrendanBanfield #ChristineBanfield #JulianaPeresMagalhaes #TrueCrimeToday #FetLife #JudgeAzcarate #JenniferCoffindaffer #DigitalForensics #MurderTrial #TrueCrime

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Six months before Monique and Spencer Tepe were shot dead, court records show contact between Monique and her ex-husband Dr. Michael McKee. We don't know yet what that filing contained. But experts believe it may have been a form of legal stalking — McKee forcing Monique to respond after years of silence.

McKee, a 39-year-old vascular surgeon, is now charged with two counts of aggravated murder. On December 30, 2025, at 3:52 AM, Spencer and Monique Tepe were killed in their Columbus, Ohio home while their two young children slept nearby. Emilia is 4. Beckham isn't yet 2. Both were found unharmed.

The timeline leading to that night is damning. June 2025: court contact with Monique and McKee's Nevada medical license expires. September 2025: he purchases a Chicago condo. October 2025: a former colleague tells a process server that McKee has "disappeared." December 30: double murder.

McKee and Monique divorced in 2017 after a seven-month marriage. The paperwork reveals the dynamic: she bought her own engagement and wedding rings, never took his name, and was required to reimburse him $1,281.59 with a 23% interest penalty. Her family told reporters they'd been waiting eight years for this arrest.

Retired FBI agent Maureen O'Connell calls McKee a "grievance collector." Therapist Darby Fox believes he started planning when Monique filed for divorce. Retired LAPD Lieutenant Jeff Weninger says McKee likely sees himself as the victim in all of this.

McKee maintains his innocence. He faces death penalty-eligible charges. Police tracked him through surveillance footage showing a vehicle arriving before the murders and leaving after. His neighbor's summary: "I used to talk with him by the pool — and then he turns out to be a killer."

#TeepeMurders #MichaelMcKee #MoniqueTepe #SpencerTepe #TrueCrimeToday #ColumbusOhio #GrievanceCollector #FBI #AggravatedMurder #TrueCrime

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Habib Balian is leading the prosecution against Nick Reiner. If that name sounds familiar, it should. He prosecuted the Menendez brothers. He prosecuted Robert Durst. Now he's handling the case of a man who reportedly admits killing his parents but allegedly doesn't understand why he's in jail.

According to TMZ sources, Nick Reiner believes his incarceration is part of a conspiracy against him. That could be textbook psychosis from his documented schizoaffective disorder. It could also be the groundwork for an insanity defense being laid in public consciousness before trial. His own father admitted that experts repeatedly told the family Nick was "lying or manipulating them." Eighteen rehab stays. A fortune spent on treatment. And still, his parents couldn't determine when to believe him.

The TMZ documentary revealed that Nick's medication was changed approximately one month before the murders because he complained about weight gain. Sources say the medication still isn't stabilized in jail. His family paid for dual-diagnosis facilities, but Nick would only stay 30 days — long enough to detox, never long enough to treat the underlying condition.

Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines Nick's post-offense behavior: a Santa Monica hotel the night of the alleged killings, wandering near USC the next night. She breaks down what the sealed autopsy reports might contain, why the murder weapon hasn't been found, and what years of wellness checks at the Reiner home tell us about the escalation pattern.

The surviving Reiner siblings reportedly don't support seeking the death penalty. The case won't reach a courtroom for at least two years. And twelve jurors will eventually have to answer the question Nick's own parents never could: is he genuinely ill, or has he spent a lifetime learning exactly how to appear that way?

#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #TrueCrimeToday #HabibBalian #MenendezBrothers #InsanityDefense #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #Schizoaffective

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The defense in the Adrian Gonzales trial is spreading the blame. Attorney Nico LaHood pressed surviving teacher Arnulfo Reyes about the unlocked doors at Robb Elementary — including the door to his own classroom where eleven children died. Whose responsibility was it to lock that door? Reyes admitted it was his.

That exchange came after the most devastating testimony of the trial so far. Reyes, the only surviving teacher from Room 111, described seeing a "black shadow" in his doorway on May 24, 2022. He watched fire come from the gun. He was shot in the arm and fell. Then he lay on the floor and listened as the shooter executed every one of his students. The gunman taunted him, splashed blood on his face, shot him again in the back. He pretended to be dead for 77 minutes waiting for help.

When asked if any of his students survived: "No, sir."

Crime scene evidence presented earlier showed jurors the aftermath. Former Texas Ranger Juan Torrez displayed photographs of Room 111 — pools of blood, drag marks, bloodstains on desks, a child's tennis shoe soaked red. Trajectory rods placed into bullet cavities demonstrated the shooter fired downward, through the desks, at children sheltering underneath. Judge Harle warned the gallery before showing the images. No family members left.

Texas Rangers testified about a "fatal funnel" — a hallway with no cover that complicated tactical approach. The defense argues the failures that day extended far beyond one officer.

Adrian Gonzales faces 29 counts of child endangerment. Prosecutors say he knew where the shooter was and failed to act. The defense says only the gunman bears responsibility. This trial is testing whether an officer can be criminally liable for inaction. Sixty witnesses remain.

#UvaldeTrial #AdrianGonzales #ArnulfoReyes #TrueCrimeToday #RobbElementary #Uvalde #TexasTrial #WeekInReview #TrueCrime #Justice

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Thirty seconds. That's how long Deputy Public Defender Kimberly Greene had to meet Nick Reiner before his court hearing began. She was informed the night before that Alan Jackson was withdrawing. She told reporters she'd never spoken to the Reiner family. She didn't believe they even knew Jackson was leaving.

Jackson spent three weeks on the case. Every waking hour. Ten subpoenas, now sealed. Then he stood outside the courthouse and declared Nick "not guilty of murder" under California law — a statement that sounded less like a goodbye and more like the opening of an insanity defense he won't get to argue.

Greene has nineteen years of experience. The LA County Public Defender's Office has a strong track record in capital cases — between 2006 and 2015, only one of their clients was sentenced to death out of thirty capital appeals. But she's inheriting a case mid-investigation, with sealed documents and a defense strategy she didn't design.

Rob and Michele Reiner spent seventeen years funding their son's treatment. Eighteen rehab stints. Seventy thousand dollars monthly. A ten-thousand-dollar allowance. A rent-free guest house. When Nick was arrested for allegedly stabbing them to death, the question became whether those resources would continue protecting him. That question now has an answer.

Nick's arraignment is February 23rd. No plea entered. No bail granted. Alan Jackson laid the groundwork for insanity from the courthouse steps. Whether Kimberly Greene builds on that foundation is entirely her decision now.

#NickReiner #RobReiner #AlanJackson #TrueCrimeToday #PublicDefender #MicheleReiner #ReinerCase #InsanityDefense #MurderTrial #TrueCrime

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Barry Morphew stood in an Alamosa County courtroom Monday and pleaded not guilty to murdering his wife Suzanne Morphew for the second time. Suzanne vanished Mother's Day 2020 from their Colorado home. Her body wasn't found until September 2023 — discovered by accident while investigators searched for someone else entirely. The autopsy changed everything: forensic testing found BAM, an animal tranquilizer, in Suzanne's bone marrow. According to the grand jury indictment, Barry Morphew was the only private citizen in that part of Colorado with a prescription for BAM. He admitted using it on a deer at their property just weeks before his wife disappeared. 

The first prosecution fell apart spectacularly. DA Linda Stanley's office bungled discovery so badly that a judge barred 14 of their expert witnesses. She was disbarred in 2024 for misconduct — including appearing on a YouTube true crime show during the active case and launching an investigation into the presiding judge based on online conspiracy theories. The Colorado Supreme Court upheld her disbarment last year. Now a new prosecutor has secured a fresh indictment. Barry waived his right to a speedy trial; his defense says they need time to review the evidence. Trial begins October 13, 2026. Today we cover the full case — the marriage, the secret affair, the damning text messages, and whether this second prosecution can finish what the first one started.

#BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #TrueCrimeToday #MorphewTrial #ColoradoMurder #LindaStanley #DisbarredDA #ColdCase #MurderCase #BreakingNews

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Two major cases. One attorney breaking down the evidence, the strategy, and where the legal system fails. Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today for a comprehensive analysis.

On the Reiner case: Alan Jackson withdrew under circumstances he's "legally prohibited" from explaining — but declared Nick "not guilty of murder" on his way out. There's a sealed medical order. Ten sealed subpoenas. Nick appeared in a suicide prevention smock and reportedly isn't medically stabilized. Eric examines the competency question, what the gas station footage means, and whether losing Jackson fundamentally changes Nick's chances.

On the McKee prosecution: Police announced a preliminary ballistic link through NIBIN connecting a weapon from McKee's property to the Tepe murders. Surveillance footage traced a vehicle to him — arriving before the killings, leaving after. Charges were upgraded to premeditated aggravated murder, death penalty eligible. Eric breaks down what evidence prosecutors need, how ballistics can be challenged, and what defense strategies remain for someone pleading not guilty.

On domestic violence: The Tepe divorce records show no abuse allegations — just "incompatibility." But Monique's family says she was emotionally abused and "just had to get away from him." Eight years after the divorce, court activity brought McKee and Monique back together. Six months later, she was dead. Eric examines why victims don't document abuse, how the system treats emotional abuse differently, and whether this was a threat that could ever have been legally prevented.

For anyone recognizing their situation in Monique's story, Eric offers legal advice on protection — and where the system's limits are.

#EricFaddis #NickReiner #MichaelMcKee #MoniqueTepe #SpencerTepe #TrueCrimeToday #InsanityDefense #Ballistics #DomesticViolence #TrueCrime

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

True Crime Today brings you exclusive analysis of the relationship at the heart of the Brendan Banfield murder trial. Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke — former head of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program and author of books on trust and manipulation — examines who was really in control between Brendan and Juliana Peres Magalhaes.

The prosecution says Brendan manipulated a young au pair into participating in double murder. They claim he expressed his desire to "be rid of" his wife, told Juliana it was "too late to back out," and handed her a gun the morning of the killings. But Juliana isn't a passive victim in this story. She allegedly helped plan and execute the murders, then spent a year telling police the same story Brendan did — before flipping to get a plea deal that sends her home to Brazil.

From jail, Juliana wrote to her mother that she was "heartbroken for doing this to Brendan" and that she loved him. But she wanted to come home.

Dreeke analyzes what that letter reveals about her psychology and her relationship with Brendan. He examines the behavioral markers that separate someone who was genuinely coerced from someone who willingly participated. He explains what causes someone to maintain a lie for a year and what causes them to flip.

The affair started six months before the killings. Juliana was living in the home, caring for Christine's daughter. Dreeke breaks down what that arrangement reveals about power dynamics — and what it takes for two people to form the kind of criminal partnership prosecutors allege.

#BrendanBanfield #JulianaPeresMagalhaes #TrueCrimeToday #RobinDreeke #FBI #Trust #Manipulation #AuPairMurder #StarWitness #Psychology

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISDOES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Monique Tepe filed for divorce rather than dissolution. She hired a private judge to expedite the process. From a legal standpoint, what do those choices typically indicate?

Attorney Eric Faddis says this is a pattern he sees with clients trying to exit difficult or dangerous marriages. In this interview, he breaks down what the Tepe divorce documents reveal — and what they hide.

The 2017 paperwork shows no domestic violence allegations, no protection orders, no restraining orders. Just "incompatibility." But Monique's family tells a different story. Her relative Rob Misleh said McKee was "emotionally abusive." He said she "just had to get away from him."

Why do so many victims choose not to document abuse? Eric explains the risks of documenting versus staying silent — and how the legal system treats emotional abuse compared to physical abuse.

Eight years after the divorce, something brought McKee and Monique back into the court system in June 2025. Six months later, she was dead. Eric examines whether court filings can be used as a tool to force contact with an ex-spouse — and whether courts can prevent it.

If Monique was being harassed, what legal options did she have? Could she have sought a protection order based on emotional abuse without documented physical violence? Eric breaks down what victims can do — and where the system's limits are.

McKee had no criminal record. No documented allegations. Nothing that would have flagged him as a threat. Eric examines whether the legal system could realistically have protected Monique — or whether some threats simply can't be prevented until it's too late.

#MoniqueTepe #MichaelMcKee #SpencerTepe #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeToday #DomesticViolence #DivorceRecords #TeepeMurders #TrueCrime #ProtectionOrders

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

A week after Alan Jackson's dramatic exit from the Nick Reiner case, the real story isn't what he said on those courthouse steps. It's what's locked inside the court file that nobody can access.

Sealed psychiatric evaluations. A confidential medical order. Ten subpoenas hidden from prosecutors. Sources confirming Nick was being treated for schizophrenia—but no details on what his doctors actually found. A medication change that reportedly preceded the killings by weeks—but no explanation of what went wrong or who made the call.

Jackson investigated for three weeks. He saw things we haven't seen. He read evaluations we can't read. And whatever he found was significant enough to make him declare—on camera, for the record—that Nick Reiner is not guilty of murder under California law.

But here's what's strange: if the evidence is that strong, why is it being kept under seal? If the insanity defense is that solid, why isn't the defense team shouting it from the rooftops? And if Jackson truly believes Nick isn't legally responsible, why did he walk away instead of seeing it through?

There's a gap between what we're being told and what we're being allowed to know. That gap is where the real story lives.

Today we examine what's actually in those sealed documents, why the judge agreed to keep them hidden, what the outstanding subpoenas might reveal about the defense strategy, and the one question nobody in the mainstream press seems to be asking: who benefits from keeping this evidence out of public view?

#NickReiner #RobReiner #SealedDocuments #TrueCrimeToday #WhatAreTheyHiding #InsanityDefense #CourtSecrets #MentalHealthDefense #CaliforniaLaw #HiddenEvidence

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.