True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

In this pivotal moment from the Trial of Donna Adelson, the defense introduced testimony from digital forensics expert Kelsey Guay, a former investigator with the Portland Police Bureau who has logged more than 400 hours of training in digital analysis, including 100 hours on cell-site location evidence. Her role was to take jurors deep into the world of call logs, data records, and phone analysis, giving the courtroom a technical yet critical perspective on Donna’s communications with her son, Charlie Adelson.

The heart of her testimony revolved around Donna’s call patterns with Charlie, the son already convicted of orchestrating Dan Markel’s murder-for-hire. Prosecutors have long argued that suspicious timing and frequency of calls between mother and son reflect coordination, while the defense countered with Guay’s expert lens to suggest alternative explanations or reasonable doubt.

Why does this testimony matter? Because in the absence of a smoking gun, the state leans heavily on circumstantial evidence—particularly Donna’s phone activity. Guay’s testimony potentially reshapes how jurors interpret that digital trail: were Donna’s calls a sign of conspiracy, or the normal communication of a worried mother deeply entangled in family stress?

Her credentials lent weight to her analysis, but the cross-examination loomed large, pressing the question of whether forensics can truly capture intent. The result: a layered and technical testimony that left jurors with more to consider about the role Donna’s conversations with Charlie played in this tragic saga.

This raw courtroom footage captures Guay’s testimony in full—watch closely as the digital breadcrumbs of the case are laid bare for the jury, piece by piece, in a trial where every call, text, and connection could sway the final verdict.

#DonnaAdelsonTrial #DigitalForensics #CallRecords #CharlieAdelson #DanMarkelCase #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #ExpertWitness #MurderForHire #JusticeForDan

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial: Judge Denies Motion for Acquittal, Case Moves Forward

In a critical moment in the Trial of Donna Adelson, defense attorney Josh Zelman filed a motion for judgment of acquittal, arguing that prosecutors had failed to provide direct evidence linking Donna Adelson to the murder-for-hire plot that took the life of law professor Dan Markel. It was a bold move—one that, if granted, would have ended the trial immediately and cleared Donna of the charges.

But Judge Stephen Everett was quick to shut that door, ruling that the state had provided enough evidence for a reasonable jury to consider. In courtroom terms, this was a decisive victory for the prosecution, ensuring the trial would move into the defense’s case rather than collapsing midstream.

Why does this moment matter? Motions for acquittal are standard procedure, but they often signal the defense’s strategy and confidence in poking holes in the state’s case. The denial reinforces the fact that prosecutors have laid enough groundwork—through wiretaps, financial records, and family dynamics—to justify moving forward. For jurors, it underscores that the evidence, though circumstantial, is still strong enough to be weighed carefully.

The clip captures the judge’s ruling in real time, marking a turning point in the trial. The defense may continue to argue that the evidence is too thin, but as of now, the jury will hear their side fully—and Donna Adelson will remain squarely in the hot seat as her fate hangs in the balance.

#DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkelCase #JudgeEverett #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrime #AdelsonFamily #MurderForHire #TrialUpdates #JusticeForDan #LegalDrama

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

FBI Behavioral Expert Analyzes Donna Adelson’s “Bump” Reaction — The Moment It All Cracked

What really happened during the infamous undercover “bump” that exposed Donna Adelson’s alleged involvement in the murder of Dan Markel? In this gripping breakdown, retired FBI Special Agent and behavioral expert Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski to analyze the red flags that lit up the moment Donna was confronted with a flyer implying someone knew everything—and her reaction was nothing short of chilling.

She didn’t panic. She didn’t call her husband. She didn’t lawyer up. Twenty-two minutes later, she was on the phone with her son Charlie—controlled, calm, and calculated. That single call—and the abrupt stop in money flow to the alleged go-between—told investigators everything they needed to know.

Robin explains how law enforcement uses “bumps” to trigger psychological reactions, and how Donna’s lack of one may have spoken louder than anything she could’ve said. This isn’t just courtroom evidence—it’s a behavioral autopsy of a moment that shattered the illusion of innocence.

Was Donna already mentally prepared to be exposed? Did she know the walls were closing in? And why did everything suddenly stop the minute that flyer hit her lap?

This segment lays the foundation for everything else to come—and you won’t look at Donna Adelson the same way again.

Subscribe for more expert breakdowns, true crime deep dives, and exclusive interviews only on Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski.

#DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #FBIExpert #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #BehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #FamilyCrime #CriminalPsychology

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

In this sobering clip from the Trial of Donna Adelson, longtime family friend Ron Gutterson takes the stand as a key defense witness. His testimony deepens the emotional landscape of the case by portraying Donna not as a calculated mastermind, but as a devastated mother reacting to tragedy.

Gutterson’s words paint a vivid picture: he called Donna “inconsolable” following her son Charlie's conviction—a reaction he described as “off the wall,” in line with how most parents might respond to such crushing news. This humanizing testimony helps shape the defense’s narrative, supporting their claim that Donna’s subsequent actions were driven by grief, not guilt.

He also called Harvey and Donna a “very loving couple,” reaffirming the family-focused, emotionally fracturing environment around her.

The Vietnam trip—even though booked one‑way—was described by Gutterson as a temporary escape to clear one’s mind, not an attempt to flee justice. Yet under cross‑examination by the prosecution, he admitted that Donna might have had second thoughts if a warrant had been active. This nuanced back‑and‑forth introduces a layer of complexity, raising questions about intent and context.

This courtroom moment underscores the defense’s strategy: evoke empathy, stress grief, and cast suspicion on the prosecution’s “flee narrative.” It's a powerful, emotional pivot that may resonate with jurors beyond the cold logic of evidence.

Watch this video to catch Gutterson’s full testimony—see firsthand how emotional testimony and factual precision intersect in a high-stakes true-crime trial.

 #DonnaAdelsonTrial #RonGutterson #TrueCrime #CourtroomTestimony #DanMarkelCase #DefenseWitness #FamilyDrama #EmotionalTestimony #VietnamTrip #LegalStrategy

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Bryan Kohberger is cracking under the weight of his own alleged crimes. In this Big Breakdown, we’re diving deep into the psychological unraveling of the man at the center of one of the most disturbing murder cases in recent memory—the brutal killings of four University of Idaho students.

Since his arrest, Kohberger has tried to project calmness and control, but insiders suggest that behind bars, his behavior is anything but composed. From obsessive complaints about jail conditions to alleged attempts to manipulate prison staff and control his environment, what we’re seeing now is a complete collapse of the persona he once projected.

In this episode, we expose new details about Kohberger’s current mental state, daily behavior, and what experts are calling signs of deep psychological stress and possible deterioration. With insight from retired FBI agents, legal analysts, and forensic psychologists, we’re pulling back the curtain on what life is really like for Kohberger inside jail walls—and how these developments might affect his upcoming trial.

Is Kohberger just trying to exert control the only way he can? Or are we witnessing the genuine psychological breakdown of an accused killer who’s no longer able to maintain the mask?

Don’t miss this eye-opening analysis that goes beyond the headlines to break down how a criminology student became the subject of a criminal investigation—and how the pressure may finally be breaking him.

Subscribe for more true crime updates, expert commentary, and exclusive trial coverage from Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski.

#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrimePodcast #CriminalPsychology #KohbergerPrison #UniversityOfIdaho #ForensicAnalysis #FBIProfiling #TonyBrueski #HiddenKillersPodcast

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Step inside the courtroom with this riveting clip from the Trial of Donna Adelson, where Tallahassee Police Sergeant Chris Corbitt, supervisor of the Technical Operations Unit, takes the stand in front of the jury—and methodically breaks down critical cell phone evidence tied to the alleged murder-for-hire conspiracy.

Corbitt, a seasoned digital forensics expert, presents a clear, step-by-step walk-through of how investigators extracted call logs, texts, and cell-site location data from Donna Adelson’s and related phones. With precision, he lays the groundwork for understanding how digital footprints can connect one person to another—and possibly to orchestrating deadly events. His expertise frames the cell phone not as a personal item, but as a piece of evidence that can either link someone to a crime or raise reasonable doubt.

Why this matters? The prosecution leans heavily on communications patterns and synced login details to show that Donna Adelson could have coordinated or supported plans related to Dan Markel’s tragic death. Corbitt’s testimony gives jurors a tangible way to visualize that electronic evidence—whether it firmly holds up or becomes a pivot point for the defense to challenge.

In this raw courtroom footage, you'll hear Corbitt’s authoritative explanations of how data was collected, preserved, and interpreted. It’s a high-stakes moment that bridges digital forensics and courtroom drama, placing real-time technical clarity at the heart of a sensational true-crime narrative.

Watch, listen closely, and draw your own conclusions—because in today’s world, your phone might just be your most revealing alibi—or your greatest liability.

#DonnaAdelsonTrial #ChrisCorbitt #DigitalForensics #CellPhoneEvidence #TrueCrime #CourtroomTestimony #DanMarkelCase #MurderForHire #TrialCoverage #JusticeForDan

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

In this gripping installment of the Donna Adelson Trial, forensic document examiner Kate Butler, a senior crime laboratory analyst with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), takes center stage—bringing exceptional expertise to the stand as she compares handwriting samples connected to the case.

Her match? She identified the handwriting in the infamous “script” and a day planner as belonging to Donna Adelson with the highest level of confidence. This isn’t just a technicality—this finding strikes at the core of the prosecution’s argument and has major implications for how the jury perceives Donna’s actions and intentions behind the scenes.

In this raw courtroom clip, viewers will hear Kate Butler describe her methodology, show how handwriting idiosyncrasies line up, and explain why her analysis matters:

What was compared and why it’s relevant: The “Day Planner,” where Dan Markel’s car info was noted, and “The Script,” allegedly written by Donna for an inmate to recite, were both compared to known samples of Donna’s handwriting.

Why this matters: For the prosecution, Butler’s confident identification strengthens their case that Donna may have been orchestrating the narrative—even in jail. For the defense, this might be a point of heavy cross-examination, perhaps highlighting margin for error or context of what was written and why.

Viewer takeaway: A rare, behind-the-scenes look at the forensic scrutiny behind the handwritten evidence—an essential piece of the puzzle in this true-crime courtroom drama.

Turn on captions, take notes, and watch closely—because handwriting isn’t just about pen and paper. It's about intent, influence, and showing the jury how much—or how little—control Donna had over the story being presented in court.

 #DonnaAdelsonTrial #HandwritingAnalysis #KateButler #TrueCrime #CourtroomEvidence #ForensicDocumentExaminer #DanMarkelCase #MurderForHire #TrialCoverage #JusticeForDan

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial: Friend Testifies Donna Was “Hysterical” After Dan Markel’s Murder

In the Trial of Donna Adelson, the defense called their very first witness to the stand: longtime family friend Anne Elizabeth Cunningham. With roots tracing back to her friendship with Donna and Harvey Adelson since 2009, Cunningham painted a picture of Donna not as a criminal mastermind, but as a distraught mother and grandmother in shock after Dan Markel’s murder.

Cunningham testified that Donna was “quite hysterical” in the aftermath of Markel’s killing. Her words aimed to humanize Donna, showing her in a state of emotional unraveling rather than cold calculation. For jurors, this testimony matters because it’s the first real glimpse into how the defense plans to counter the prosecution’s theory that Donna orchestrated the murder-for-hire plot. By emphasizing Donna’s grief and confusion, the defense is trying to suggest she was blindsided by the events just like everyone else.

But there’s more here than just emotion. Every word is carefully chosen to influence perception. Cunningham’s testimony isn’t just about character—it’s about planting seeds of doubt in jurors’ minds. Was Donna truly the matriarch pulling strings, or was she just another family member swept up in tragedy?

This clip captures Cunningham’s full testimony, a pivotal moment marking the official start of the defense case in one of Florida’s most closely watched trials.

#DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #CourtroomTestimony #MurderForHire #AdelsonFamily #DefenseWitness #TrialCoverage #JusticeForDan #LegalDrama

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

It was the moment Donna Adelson feared most: her own children stepping into the courtroom and turning the spotlight directly on her. Robert and Wendy Adelson both testified — and together, they may have just delivered the most devastating blow to their mother’s defense.

Robert’s words were blunt and powerful. He described Donna as controlling, manipulative, the one who dictated family life. Wendy’s testimony was more complicated — evasive, cautious, full of “I don’t remembers.” Two siblings, two approaches, but both ultimately painted a picture of a mother whose influence stretched too far.

In this full expert breakdown, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott explains the psychology behind the Adelson family fracture: why Robert broke free, why Wendy clings to loyalty, and why jurors may see both paths as damning for Donna.

This isn’t just a trial about conspiracy. It’s the collapse of a family dynasty playing out in open court — and for Donna Adelson, her own children may be the witnesses that end it all.

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson’s Family Turns: Inside the Explosive Testimony from Her Own Children

In this gripping breakdown, we dive into the raw courtroom moments that could define the fate of Donna Adelson—testimony not from prosecutors or hired experts, but from her own children. Defense Attorney and Former Prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski to dissect the emotionally charged statements from Robert and Wendy Adelson, revealing a family dynamic that’s anything but united.

Robert came across as blunt, clinical, and disturbingly honest about his mother’s controlling nature, while Wendy played the “I don’t remember” card with an Olympic level of consistency. What does it mean when your own children don’t defend you—or worse, distance themselves entirely?

Eric breaks down how jurors digest this kind of testimony, and whether these cracks in the family’s public image translate into hard evidence in court. Is it character assassination… or a clear window into Donna’s true influence?

This episode pulls apart the psychology, strategy, and possible consequences of this damaging testimony—and what it could mean as the trial heads into even darker territory.

#DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #EricFaddis #TonyBrueski #CourtroomDrama #AdelsonFamily #HiddenKillers #WendyAdelson

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872