True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Two threads on the Murdaugh case worth examining — the legal architecture of a potential retrial, and the behavioral context the original prosecution couldn't formally introduce.

The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled the prosecution exceeded permissible bounds at the original trial. Twelve and a half hours of financial crimes testimony was deemed disproportionate, and any retrial must be significantly narrowed. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the evidentiary boundary lines. The court explicitly flagged testimony concerning individual theft victims as lacking probative value on motive — prejudicial without sufficient legal justification. The State's motive theory survives in narrowed form: the firm's CFO allegedly confronting Alex Murdaugh about missing fees the morning of June 7, 2021, and an opposing attorney's hearing scheduled three days later that would have compelled financial disclosure. The exposure timeline remains admissible. The emotional cascade of theft victims likely does not.

Faddis also addresses the unresolved evidentiary questions — the firearm analysis testimony, the blue raincoat, the gunshot residue evidence, and the iPhone demonstration — identifying which gives the defense its strongest argument under appellate scrutiny. Plus the foundational strategic decision the defense has to make: contest admission of the financial evidence entirely, or permit it and attack the causal link between alleged theft and alleged homicide.

On the human side, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott analyzes the months preceding June 7 through the lens of separation danger. Maggie Murdaugh had reportedly retained divorce counsel and was living apart from Alex. Two witnesses testified she did not want to go to Moselle that day. Scott explains why the window between decision and departure is statistically the most dangerous period in a controlling relationship — and what makes compliance override instinct.

FOOTER LINKS
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

DISCLAIMER
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS
#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #MurdaughRetrial #SCSupremeCourt #EricFaddis #ShavaunScott #Moselle #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Three years of sealed records. Denied FOIA requests. A state investigation that found nothing — followed by a Supreme Court ruling that found everything. Something doesn’t add up in the Murdaugh jury tampering case, and the files that could explain it are locked behind a protective order that may have just lost its justification.In this episode, I trace the full arc from Becky Hill’s pre-trial book deal planning to the fabricated Facebook post that allegedly got the one undecided juror removed on the morning of deliberations — swinging the verdict from a likely hung jury to a unanimous conviction in three hours. I follow the anonymous email that started the chain of events to its alleged source, and I look at who had financial incentives aligned with a guilty verdict beyond just one clerk who wanted a lake house.The defense now has subpoena power through a federal civil rights lawsuit against Hill. The egg juror’s attorney filed a new motion the same afternoon demanding the sealed investigative records be released. And Murdaugh’s attorneys are publicly asking the question that prosecutors apparently never pursued: was Hill acting alone, or was she the part of this that was too obvious to keep hidden? The sealed files may hold the answer — and that might be exactly why they’re still sealed.

Links:

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

Disclaimer:

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Hashtags:

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #EggJuror #MyraCrosby #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #SouthCarolina #MurdaughRetrial

Two post-conviction legal battles are testing different pressure points in the American criminal justice system.

In Utah, Kouri Richins — sentenced to life without parole for the aggravated murder of her husband Eric Richins — has secured a twenty-eight-day extension to file a motion for a new trial and faces twenty-six additional pending felony charges in a separate financial crimes prosecution. Her pre-sentencing communications stating she intended to "expose" everyone involved in her conviction raise substantive questions about post-conviction conduct and the adequacy of existing protective mechanisms.

In South Carolina, Alex Murdaugh's defense team filed a Section 1983 civil rights complaint against former Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill in federal court — five days after the state Supreme Court unanimously overturned his murder convictions based on Hill's "shocking jury interference." The complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages totaling six hundred thousand dollars, but the defense has publicly stated the primary objective is civil discovery authority.

Eric Faddis evaluates the appellate posture of the Richins case, the legal protections available to those identified in her communications, the mechanics and strategic purpose of the Murdaugh federal lawsuit, and the parallel-track implications of civil discovery running alongside a criminal retrial in which the Attorney General has publicly stated the death penalty is under consideration.

Footer Links:

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

Disclaimer:

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Hashtags:

#KouriRichins #AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #EricRichins #TrueCrime #LifeWithoutParole #MurdaughRetrial #JuryTampering #FentanylMurder #HiddenKillers

How does an industry avoid accountability for decades while carrying tens of millions of passengers a year? It spends $70 million lobbying Congress. It hires former FBI and Coast Guard officials. It registers ships abroad to dodge U.S. taxes and jurisdiction. It fights reform legislation and wins. It settles lawsuits behind NDAs. And it issues identical zero-tolerance statements every time a crew member is caught. This final episode of Cruising with Predators names the machine. The money trail, the revolving door, the CVSSA’s limitations, and the foreign-flag shield are all laid bare. Then the reforms: device screening, an international registry, prosecution before deportation, independent investigations, ending NDAs in cases involving minors, and licensing standards for youth programs. Each tied to a case from this series. The industry built this system. Families can demand it be rebuilt. A Hidden Killers investigation.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#CruiseLobby #CLIA #CruiseReform #NDA #CruisingWithPredators #CruiseSafety #ChildProtection #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MandatoryScreening

Five days after the South Carolina Supreme Court's unanimous ruling overturning Alex Murdaugh's double murder convictions, his defense team filed a seventeen-page Section 1983 civil rights complaint against former Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in Charleston.

The complaint alleges Hill, acting under color of state law in her capacity as elected clerk, deprived Murdaugh of his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights through deliberate jury interference — conduct the Supreme Court characterized as "shocking" and described as Hill placing "her fingers on the scales of justice."

Eric Faddis examines the legal architecture of the federal civil action, including the evidentiary standard Murdaugh must meet, the scope of civil discovery available under federal rules, and the strategic implications of Jim Griffin's public statement that none of the six hundred thousand dollars in requested damages would go to Murdaugh personally.

He addresses the prosecutorial gap — Hill's guilty pleas to misconduct, obstruction, and perjury alongside the absence of a jury tampering charge from state prosecutors, followed by the Supreme Court's effective finding of exactly that conduct. He evaluates Attorney General Alan Wilson's public consideration of the death penalty for the retrial and the potential legal friction created by vindictive prosecution doctrine.

Footer Links:

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

Disclaimer:

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Hashtags:

#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #MurdaughTrial #SouthCarolina #JuryTampering #Section1983 #TrueCrime #DeathPenalty #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers

People are saying it across social media and comment sections: Murdaugh is already locked up, why bother retrying? True Crime Today takes on that argument directly — and explains why the answer is as simple as it is non-negotiable.

Maggie Murdaugh was 52. Paul Murdaugh was 22. They were shot to death at close range on their family’s property. The Supreme Court erased the murder convictions and life sentences. The legal record says the question of who killed them is open. That’s not because the evidence was insufficient. It’s because an elected clerk tampered with the jury. The state’s obligation to answer that question didn’t disappear when the verdict was vacated. It was reset.

Murdaugh is serving 40 years for financial crimes. That’s punishment for stealing. It is not accountability for two deaths. Calling a financial sentence close enough to a murder conviction tells the families that how Maggie and Paul died doesn’t deserve its own answer. It tells the public that the system has a price ceiling on justice.

The constitutional argument is clear. The state brought murder charges. The Supreme Court said the trial was unfair, not that the evidence was inadequate. You don’t charge double murder, get a conviction, lose it to corruption, and then decide the defendant’s other sentence is sufficient. That’s not how the system works and it’s not a precedent any state wants to set.

Financial crime victims who were personally harmed by Murdaugh have said publicly they’ll go through the process again. If the people Murdaugh stole from can commit to a retrial, the state of South Carolina can do the same. Maggie and Paul deserve a verdict that holds. A verdict no one can challenge. That’s the only acceptable outcome, and the retrial is the only way to get there.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.


HASHTAGS

#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #JusticeForMaggieAndPaul #TrueCrime #SCSupremeCourt #MurderTrial #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers

For over four decades, former members of the Word of Faith Fellowship have tried to hold the church accountable through every available channel — journalists, law enforcement, social services, federal prosecutors, the courts. According to those who lived it, the system failed at every turn. Jane Whaley’s 2004 assault conviction was overturned after five years of appeals. More than forty former members gave testimony to the SBI in the 1990s. No charges resulted. Inside Edition investigated in 1995. The church survived. DSS opened child abuse investigations. The church sued the department and won. Former members told the AP that the church orchestrated a cover-up strategy in which congregants were pressured into lying to investigators and recanting prior statements. Church leaders and followers reportedly gave at least eighty-five thousand dollars to state politicians, according to WRAL’s analysis. Members volunteered at campaign events for Donald Trump, according to the New York Times. The local Republican Party in Rutherford County was allegedly taken over by people connected to the fellowship. Matthew Fenner’s criminal case stalled for over eight years following a 2017 mistrial. A special prosecutor took over the case in 2026. The only convictions secured: unemployment fraud. Tony Brueski closes a five-part investigation with the systems that were supposed to protect victims — and reportedly failed them for more than forty years.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#WordOfFaith #JaneWhaley #SystemFailed #Cult #TrueCrime #Spindale #PoliticalInfluence #HiddenKillers #MatthewFenner #ReligiousAbuse

The prosecution's sentencing memorandum in the Kouri Richins case included pre-sentencing communications in which the defendant stated she intended to "expose this county, the prosecution, the judge, the Richins, the investigation." The language — "they picked the wrong one" and "they haven't seen anything yet" — preceded a life-without-parole sentence and raises substantive questions about post-conviction conduct from within the Utah correctional system.

Eric Faddis examines the legal instruments available to those identified in the defendant's communications: protective orders, no-contact orders, Department of Corrections communication restrictions, and the procedural differences between guardian-directed contact cessation and court-ordered prohibitions.

He addresses the legal complexities of third-party proxy contact — a scenario where individuals acting on behalf of a convicted person may not technically be subject to the same restrictions.

The defendant faces twenty-six additional pending felony charges in a separate financial crimes prosecution, including mortgage fraud, money laundering, forgery, and communications fraud. Faddis evaluates whether that pending caseload provides any additional legal leverage for those seeking protection. The three minor children are currently in the custody of the victim's sister, with all contact terminated since April 2024.

Footer Links:

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

Disclaimer:

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Hashtags:

#KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #TrueCrime #LifeWithoutParole #UtahMurderTrial #ParkCity #WitnessIntimidation #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeToday

Following her life-without-parole sentence for the aggravated murder of Eric Richins, Kouri Richins' defense team has secured a twenty-eight-day extension to file a motion for a new trial and indicated they intend to retain additional expert consultation.

The appellate posture presents several potential issues for review: alleged prosecutorial access to attorney-client privileged communications via monitored jail calls, the timeliness of the Crozier recantation disclosure, the denied change-of-venue motion seeking Salt Lake County jurors, and the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence in a case where the precise mechanism of fentanyl administration was never established by the prosecution.

Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor and current defense attorney, evaluates each lane on its appellate merits. He examines the implications of a defense that presented no witnesses and a defendant who did not testify — strategic choices that may limit the scope of appellate arguments available.

The jury returned guilty verdicts on all counts, including aggravated murder, attempted aggravated murder, insurance fraud, and forgery, following less than three hours of deliberation. Judge Richard Mrazik characterized the defendant as "simply too dangerous to ever be free." Faddis provides a candid assessment of the realistic probability of appellate relief.

Footer Links:

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

Disclaimer:

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Hashtags:

#KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #TrueCrime #LifeWithoutParole #UtahMurderTrial #ParkCity #AppealDenied #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeToday

The D4vd case has produced something ugly that nobody likes to name. In the death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, with David Anthony Burke charged and pleading not guilty, the internet has turned a child's killing into a scavenger hunt — decoded interludes, frame-by-frame video breakdowns, side-by-side theories, a hashtag for every fragment.

Tony Brueski sits in that discomfort on purpose. He walks through why people keep reaching for the Bryan Kohberger comparison, why the manga theory refuses to die even though no one credible has tied Burke to it, and why the recognition so many people felt when the filing dropped says more about us than about him.

Then he makes the turn that gives this episode its spine. By the prosecution's own account, some of what was allegedly done was meant to erase the simplest, most human thing about Celeste. And now, online, a second kind of erasure is underway — she's becoming a footnote in a debate about his art, his influences, what he might have been watching late at night. He gets to be the fascinating case study. She gets to be the plot device. Tony refuses that trade.

This isn't a recap and it isn't a verdict. A preliminary hearing is coming, and a court — not a forum — will weigh the real evidence. What this episode offers is an honest reckoning with influence, audience, and the cost of treating a real girl's death like content. Press play, stay to the end, and bring the part that bothers you into the comments. It should bother you.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS

#D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #D4vdCase #RomanticHomicide #CrimeNews #JusticeForCeleste