
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
(This is the video and transcript of a public talk I gave at Mox in San Francisco in July 2025, on long-term equilibria post-AGI. It's a longer version of the talk I gave at this workshop. The slides are also available here.)
Introduction
Thank you. Okay. Hi. Thanks for coming.
Aims for this talk
So: can goodness compete? It's a classic question, and it crops up constantly in a certain strand of futurism, so I'm going to try to analyze it and understand it more precisely. And in particular I want to distinguish between a few different variants, some of which are more fundamental problems than others. And then I want to try to hone in on what I see as the hardest version of the problem – and in particular, possible ways good values can have inherent disadvantages and competition with other value systems. For [...]
---
Outline:
(00:30) Introduction
(00:50) Aims for this talk
(01:54) Basic vibe
(03:28) Lineage of concern
(04:31) What I mean by goodness
(07:23) What I mean by competition
(09:27) Can \*humans\* compete?
(11:21) Some distinctions
(14:17) Alignment taxes
(16:52) More fundamental variants
(18:24) Negative sum dynamics
(20:36) The strategy stealing assumption
(21:59) Locust-like value systems
(25:47) Other ways the strategy stealing assumption might fail
(28:43) Addressing failures of the strategy stealing assumption
(32:05) Is preventing/constraining competition in this way even possible?
(34:11) Is preventing/constraining competition in this way desirable?
(36:36) What is a locust world actually like?
(38:03) Might a locust world be less bleak than this?
(44:15) Current overall take
(45:33) Poem: Witchgrass
(47:51) Q&A
---
First published:
Source:
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
(This is the video and transcript of a public talk I gave at Mox in San Francisco in July 2025, on long-term equilibria post-AGI. It's a longer version of the talk I gave at this workshop. The slides are also available here.)
Introduction
Thank you. Okay. Hi. Thanks for coming.
Aims for this talk
So: can goodness compete? It's a classic question, and it crops up constantly in a certain strand of futurism, so I'm going to try to analyze it and understand it more precisely. And in particular I want to distinguish between a few different variants, some of which are more fundamental problems than others. And then I want to try to hone in on what I see as the hardest version of the problem – and in particular, possible ways good values can have inherent disadvantages and competition with other value systems. For [...]
---
Outline:
(00:30) Introduction
(00:50) Aims for this talk
(01:54) Basic vibe
(03:28) Lineage of concern
(04:31) What I mean by goodness
(07:23) What I mean by competition
(09:27) Can \*humans\* compete?
(11:21) Some distinctions
(14:17) Alignment taxes
(16:52) More fundamental variants
(18:24) Negative sum dynamics
(20:36) The strategy stealing assumption
(21:59) Locust-like value systems
(25:47) Other ways the strategy stealing assumption might fail
(28:43) Addressing failures of the strategy stealing assumption
(32:05) Is preventing/constraining competition in this way even possible?
(34:11) Is preventing/constraining competition in this way desirable?
(36:36) What is a locust world actually like?
(38:03) Might a locust world be less bleak than this?
(44:15) Current overall take
(45:33) Poem: Witchgrass
(47:51) Q&A
---
First published:
Source:
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
26,469 Listeners
2,395 Listeners
7,928 Listeners
4,142 Listeners
89 Listeners
1,472 Listeners
9,207 Listeners
88 Listeners
417 Listeners
5,448 Listeners
15,237 Listeners
481 Listeners
121 Listeners
75 Listeners
461 Listeners