
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The New York Times calls it the $325,000 burger.
National Geographic calls it the petri-dish burger.
Impossible Foods calls their plant-based "meat" the Impossible Burger.
On this very special episode of the OPP, I chat with Chris Davis, Director of Research and Development at Impossible Foods to discuss their meat alternative - the Impossible Burger and it's impact (or lack thereof) on feeding the world, fixing the broken factory farming industry, and decreasing our massive food waste problem. As the Impossible Foods website states: "The world loves meat. But relying on cows to make meat is land-hungry, water-thirsty, and pollution-heavy. That's why we set out to do the impossible: make delicious meats that are good for people and the planet."
It's a great marketing message for the general public. It that all it is? Just an empty marketing message?
To the discerning Optimizer, or anyone who has given thought to the issue of feeding the world, there are gaps in the Impossible Foods mission (as you'll hear). I'm grateful for Rosie and Chris's willingness to set this up and allow me to press them deeper on this conversation about the future of the world's food supply.
It's clear to me that I'm at a different point on the purist-pragmatist spectrum than Chris and Impossible Foods.
I'd like to think I'm not a naive idealist...you be your own judge.
A taste of what we uncovered:
Chris and I do agree on few key points:
By Sean McCormick4.7
259259 ratings
The New York Times calls it the $325,000 burger.
National Geographic calls it the petri-dish burger.
Impossible Foods calls their plant-based "meat" the Impossible Burger.
On this very special episode of the OPP, I chat with Chris Davis, Director of Research and Development at Impossible Foods to discuss their meat alternative - the Impossible Burger and it's impact (or lack thereof) on feeding the world, fixing the broken factory farming industry, and decreasing our massive food waste problem. As the Impossible Foods website states: "The world loves meat. But relying on cows to make meat is land-hungry, water-thirsty, and pollution-heavy. That's why we set out to do the impossible: make delicious meats that are good for people and the planet."
It's a great marketing message for the general public. It that all it is? Just an empty marketing message?
To the discerning Optimizer, or anyone who has given thought to the issue of feeding the world, there are gaps in the Impossible Foods mission (as you'll hear). I'm grateful for Rosie and Chris's willingness to set this up and allow me to press them deeper on this conversation about the future of the world's food supply.
It's clear to me that I'm at a different point on the purist-pragmatist spectrum than Chris and Impossible Foods.
I'd like to think I'm not a naive idealist...you be your own judge.
A taste of what we uncovered:
Chris and I do agree on few key points:

553 Listeners

1,870 Listeners

7,248 Listeners

5,025 Listeners

1,545 Listeners

891 Listeners

1,926 Listeners

204 Listeners

4,917 Listeners

9,271 Listeners

11 Listeners

458 Listeners

2,566 Listeners

293 Listeners

1,183 Listeners