How does one "do" history, and can an AI do it? The answers:1. You don't "do" history, you feel it.2. AI can do the actions of history, but it can't feel it.Bonus rant: I never liked the idea that the point of history is to learn from the past. Yes, there is learning to be done, that can be both useful and fun, but I feel that this reduces history to something less than it is in practice. And indeed, think about your own consumption of history, how often are you learning valuable lessons compared to how often you are simply experiencing the unique feeling of exploring the wider cosmos and seeing both your place within it and your connection with ancestors and the web of human connection? My bet is that the majority of it is the latter. And, indeed, I would suggest that much of the satisfaction of fiction, particularly world-exploring fiction like sci-fi and fantasy, is an artificially heightened version of the satisfaction you would have gotten from studying real history, the way hentai girlfriends are artificially heightened versions of real women with the unpleasant bits shaved off - those unpleasant bits are often the parts that are most meaningful. If history is a feeling, it is one we don't have much vocabulary for. But it is not one that can be replicated by robots, because it intrinsically resists optimization and completeness. It isn't just a push on the dopamine lever like a gatcha game. It is a textured thing, a feeling that encompasses more than the experience of experiencing it.