Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Colloque - Syntactic Cartography and African Languages : The View from CiCewa (Bantu): Towards a Cartography of Passive Voice(s) and Developing Terraling
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Colloque - Syntactic Cartography and African Languages : The View from CiCewa (Bantu): Towards a Cartography of Passive Voice(s) and Developing Terraling
Luigi Rizzi
Linguistique générale
Collège de France
Année 2023-2024
Colloque - Syntactic Cartography and African Languages : The View from CiCewa (Bantu): Towards a Cartography of Passive Voice(s) and Developing Terraling
Colloque organisé par Luigi Rizzi, Professeur du Collège de France, chaire linguistique générale
Avec le soutien de la Fondation du Collège de France.
Hilda Koopman, UCLA
In this talk, I will establish a cartography of Passive (and passive-like) Voice(s) for Chichewa (Bantu), use it to explore the observed crosslinguistic variation in passive constructions across languages, and implement the findings in a (pilot) comparative Terraling dataset for passive constructions that can serve as the basis for further current or future theoretical investigations.
Like many Bantu languages, Chichewa has extensive verbal morphology, with both a postverbal applicative morpheme and two passive(-like) morphemes (Alsina & Mchombo (1990) [1], Alsina (1999) [2], Dubinsky & Simango (1996) [3]). The applicative morpheme -ir adds a variety of arguments/adjuncts to the verbal stem, not only goals or benefactives, but also instruments, or locative adjuncts. The stative morpheme (-ik) occurs in middles and potentials. The passive morpheme -idw occurs not only with canonical (agent-theme) and low oblique applicative passives, but also with non-canonical passive applicative constructions (instrumental, locative, ...). Applicative and statives/passive can co-ocur in different orders V-stat-Appl, but V-Appl-Pass, or V Pass Appl the latter restricted to Instrumental and locative applicatives.
Various interactions determine the cartography of Passive-(like) Voice(s) in Chichewa. Passive Voice(s) and Applicative interact with the argument structure ("little" vP) and the hierarchy of "obliques"/ PPs/applicatives (Schweikert (2005) [4]; morpheme orders reflect the syntactic derivation and give insight into the order of operations; stative and passives occur in different regions in Cinque's functional hierarchy (Cinque (1999) [5]) etc. Taken together, this leads to a general cartography of Passive Voice(s), and the conclusion that not only stative, but also passive voice(s) in Chichewa can be merged at different heights in the hierarchical structure. Because Passive can be merged above Locative, Locative can be passivized. Because Passive can be merged below APPL, passive voice can be merged below Instrumental and Locative, and only themes can be passivized in this order. This investigation provides important insights into some fundamental theoretical questions. What is the element that introduces the external argument a (light)verb: little v? ("yes") or (Kratzerian) Voice ("no"), and where is it located (above locative adjuncts or below) ("both are attested")? What are the formal properties of Passive Voice: is (Passive) Voice ever involved in argument structure (assigning or reducing argument structure?). Or is it simply a vehicle, devoid of any semantic properties, that serves to map arguments on their syntactic positions ? We briefly explore how variation in height of Merge further leads to a new typology of passive-like constructions crosslinguistically, and show how to concretely implement the findings in the open crosslinguistic Terraling-dataset for passive-like constructions https://terraling.com/groups/13.
Références
[1] Alsina, Alex & Sam Mchombo. 1990. The syntax of applicatives in Chichewa: problems for a theta theoretic asymmetry. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(4). 493–506.
[2] Alsina, Alex. 1999. Where's the Mirror Principle? The Linguistic Review 16(1). 1–42.
[3] Dubinsky, Stanley & Silvester Ron Simango. 1996. Passive and Stative in Chichewa: Evidence for Modular Distinctions in Grammar. Language 72(4). 749–793.
[4] Schweikert, Walter. 2005. The order of prepositional phrases in the structure of the clause, vol. 83. John Benjamins Publishing.
[5] Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
View all episodes
By Collège de FranceLuigi Rizzi
Linguistique générale
Collège de France
Année 2023-2024
Colloque - Syntactic Cartography and African Languages : The View from CiCewa (Bantu): Towards a Cartography of Passive Voice(s) and Developing Terraling
Colloque organisé par Luigi Rizzi, Professeur du Collège de France, chaire linguistique générale
Avec le soutien de la Fondation du Collège de France.
Hilda Koopman, UCLA
In this talk, I will establish a cartography of Passive (and passive-like) Voice(s) for Chichewa (Bantu), use it to explore the observed crosslinguistic variation in passive constructions across languages, and implement the findings in a (pilot) comparative Terraling dataset for passive constructions that can serve as the basis for further current or future theoretical investigations.
Like many Bantu languages, Chichewa has extensive verbal morphology, with both a postverbal applicative morpheme and two passive(-like) morphemes (Alsina & Mchombo (1990) [1], Alsina (1999) [2], Dubinsky & Simango (1996) [3]). The applicative morpheme -ir adds a variety of arguments/adjuncts to the verbal stem, not only goals or benefactives, but also instruments, or locative adjuncts. The stative morpheme (-ik) occurs in middles and potentials. The passive morpheme -idw occurs not only with canonical (agent-theme) and low oblique applicative passives, but also with non-canonical passive applicative constructions (instrumental, locative, ...). Applicative and statives/passive can co-ocur in different orders V-stat-Appl, but V-Appl-Pass, or V Pass Appl the latter restricted to Instrumental and locative applicatives.
Various interactions determine the cartography of Passive-(like) Voice(s) in Chichewa. Passive Voice(s) and Applicative interact with the argument structure ("little" vP) and the hierarchy of "obliques"/ PPs/applicatives (Schweikert (2005) [4]; morpheme orders reflect the syntactic derivation and give insight into the order of operations; stative and passives occur in different regions in Cinque's functional hierarchy (Cinque (1999) [5]) etc. Taken together, this leads to a general cartography of Passive Voice(s), and the conclusion that not only stative, but also passive voice(s) in Chichewa can be merged at different heights in the hierarchical structure. Because Passive can be merged above Locative, Locative can be passivized. Because Passive can be merged below APPL, passive voice can be merged below Instrumental and Locative, and only themes can be passivized in this order. This investigation provides important insights into some fundamental theoretical questions. What is the element that introduces the external argument a (light)verb: little v? ("yes") or (Kratzerian) Voice ("no"), and where is it located (above locative adjuncts or below) ("both are attested")? What are the formal properties of Passive Voice: is (Passive) Voice ever involved in argument structure (assigning or reducing argument structure?). Or is it simply a vehicle, devoid of any semantic properties, that serves to map arguments on their syntactic positions ? We briefly explore how variation in height of Merge further leads to a new typology of passive-like constructions crosslinguistically, and show how to concretely implement the findings in the open crosslinguistic Terraling-dataset for passive-like constructions https://terraling.com/groups/13.
Références
[1] Alsina, Alex & Sam Mchombo. 1990. The syntax of applicatives in Chichewa: problems for a theta theoretic asymmetry. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(4). 493–506.
[2] Alsina, Alex. 1999. Where's the Mirror Principle? The Linguistic Review 16(1). 1–42.
[3] Dubinsky, Stanley & Silvester Ron Simango. 1996. Passive and Stative in Chichewa: Evidence for Modular Distinctions in Grammar. Language 72(4). 749–793.
[4] Schweikert, Walter. 2005. The order of prepositional phrases in the structure of the clause, vol. 83. John Benjamins Publishing.
[5] Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
More shows like Linguistique générale - Luigi Rizzi
View all
Paléontologie humaine - Michel Brunet
0 Listeners
Philosophie du langage et de la connaissance - Jacques Bouveresse
0 Listeners
Milieux Bibliques - Thomas Römer
5 Listeners
Les Nuits de France Culture
40 Listeners
Histoire du Coran. Texte et transmission - François Déroche
0 Listeners
Économie des institutions, de l'innovation et de la croissance - Philippe Aghion
1 Listeners
Culture écrite de l'antiquité tardive et papyrologie byzantine - Jean-Luc Fournet
0 Listeners
Innovation technologique Liliane Bettencourt (2016-2017) - Didier Roux
0 Listeners
Chaire Européenne (2016-2017) - Alain Wijffels
0 Listeners
Philosophie du langage et de l'esprit - François Recanati
0 Listeners
Informatique et sciences numériques (2013-2014) - Nicholas Ayache
0 Listeners
Innovation technologique Liliane Bettencourt (2014-2015) - Bernard Meunier
0 Listeners
Innovation technologique Liliane Bettencourt (2018-2019) - Molly Przeworski
0 Listeners
Mondes Francophones (2018-2019) - Yanick Lahens
0 Listeners
L'invention de l'Europe par les langues et les cultures (2022-2023) - Mieke Bal
0 Listeners
Pauvreté et politiques publiques - Esther Duflo
1 Listeners
Histoire des Lumières, XVIIIe-XXIe siècle - Antoine Lilti
3 Listeners
Chaire internationale (2007-2008) - Pierre Magistretti
0 Listeners
Biodiversité et écosystèmes (2023-2024) - Emmanuelle Porcher
0 Listeners
Formation planétaire : de la Terre aux exoplanète - Alessandro Morbidelli
0 Listeners
Mondes francophones (2023-2024) - Salikoko S. Mufwene
0 Listeners