
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The U.S. election could change the legislative, supervisory and regulatory framework for the banking industry. In the episode, we discuss what different election outcomes could mean for banks with three guests focused on policy, regulation and rulemaking: Paul Merski, executive vice president, congressional relations and strategy at the Independent Community Bankers of America; Naomi Camper, chief policy officer at the American Bankers Association; and Isaac Boltansky, managing director and director of policy research at BTIG. The group outlined the current regulatory framework under the Biden administration and how it has differed from the Trump administration. The panelists agreed that a Harris presidency could be seen as a continuation of the existing regulatory framework and noted that a Trump victory could lead to significant regulatory shifts, particularly around consumer issues, fintech and bank M&A activity. But, they also noted that both candidates have shared populist views, creating a horseshoe effect of the ideological specturm.
5
3838 ratings
The U.S. election could change the legislative, supervisory and regulatory framework for the banking industry. In the episode, we discuss what different election outcomes could mean for banks with three guests focused on policy, regulation and rulemaking: Paul Merski, executive vice president, congressional relations and strategy at the Independent Community Bankers of America; Naomi Camper, chief policy officer at the American Bankers Association; and Isaac Boltansky, managing director and director of policy research at BTIG. The group outlined the current regulatory framework under the Biden administration and how it has differed from the Trump administration. The panelists agreed that a Harris presidency could be seen as a continuation of the existing regulatory framework and noted that a Trump victory could lead to significant regulatory shifts, particularly around consumer issues, fintech and bank M&A activity. But, they also noted that both candidates have shared populist views, creating a horseshoe effect of the ideological specturm.
2,189 Listeners
1,729 Listeners
388 Listeners
30 Listeners
29 Listeners
8 Listeners
667 Listeners
271 Listeners
11 Listeners
13 Listeners
4 Listeners
59 Listeners
27 Listeners
11 Listeners
112 Listeners
4 Listeners
395 Listeners
100 Listeners
792 Listeners
29 Listeners
344 Listeners
283 Listeners
1 Listeners
278 Listeners
5 Listeners
5 Listeners
2 Listeners
5 Listeners
19 Listeners
0 Listeners
5 Listeners
362 Listeners
4 Listeners
99 Listeners