Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Every case covered here has an investigation that's failing somebody. The question is who — and what the law says can be done about it.

In the Nancy Guthrie case, the FBI and local law enforcement are publicly fighting over how the investigation was handled. Content creators have allegedly built platforms off defaming the cleared family. Media outlets ran hoax ransom demands. An 84-year-old woman has been missing for over three months with no arrest and no publicly identified suspect. Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis lays out the legal options the Guthrie family reportedly has — against every party that may have failed them.

The D4VD case shifted dramatically when prosecutors unsealed the People's Brief alleging David Burke sexually abused Celeste Rivas Hernandez beginning when she was thirteen, murdered her when she allegedly threatened to expose the relationship, and concealed her remains for months while reportedly launching a world tour. The defense reversed its timeline strategy. Alleged child sexual abuse material was reportedly found on Burke's phone. The preliminary hearing is set for May 26. Faddis dissects the prosecution's strategy and the defense's reversal.

Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty and is serving four consecutive life sentences. A book titled "Broken Plea" alleges chain of custody problems with the knife sheath — but the expert making the claim didn't include it in his own filed report, his former defense team publicly called him "appalling," and the author acknowledges there is no wrongful conviction. Faddis examines who's credible and what's left. Three cases. Every legal angle. Every accountability question answered.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #D4VD #BryanKohberger #CelesteRivasHernandez #IdahoMurders #EricFaddis #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #LegalAnalysis #JusticeMatters

Step back from any single case and look at the full picture. Chandler in 1993: settled for millions. Arvizo in 2005: acquitted, family destroyed on the stand. Francia: initially denied abuse, then changed his story, family settled. Robson and Safechuck: defended Jackson under oath, reversed after death, suing for hundreds of millions. Cascios: defended him publicly for decades, accepted millions in settlement payments, now suing for more. Every accusation has a financial transaction attached to it. Every defense has a reversal lurking behind it.

This final episode covers the Cascio siblings — the family that went from Oprah’s couch to a federal courthouse — and then pulls the camera back to examine what all five cases look like together. The money doesn’t prove fabrication. Settlements are common in abuse cases. But the reversals don’t automatically prove truth either, especially when they follow lawsuits. And underneath all of it is the fact Jackson himself put on camera: he shared his bed with other people’s children and defended the practice publicly.

This series was never going to answer the question. It was built to make sure you’re asking the right one. And the right one has never been “guilty or innocent.” The right one is: can you hold both possibilities without collapsing into certainty?

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#MichaelJackson #CascioFamily #MJEstate #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Neverland #MJAccusations #LeavingNeverland #MichaelBiopic #KingOfPop

The central allegation in "Broken Plea" is that the Ka-Bar knife sheath — the prosecution's key piece of physical evidence linking Bryan Kohberger to the murders through DNA — allegedly had chain of custody problems serious enough to be challenged at trial. It's the kind of claim that sounds explosive on a book jacket. There's one problem: the expert making it didn't include it in his own filed report.

Brent Turvey, a criminologist and forensic scientist hired by Kohberger's defense, says he discovered the alleged issue after he submitted his expert analysis to meet a court deadline. The evidence bag was reportedly filled out twice — once on the bag itself and again on a sticker affixed to the front — with entries that appeared to be written in similar handwriting with what appeared to be the same pen across dates spanning November 13 through November 16, 2022.

Retired NYPD Inspector Paul Mauro reviewed the same material and characterized it as a procedural challenge — the kind of technical attack you raise when there's no substantive defense available. The book's author, Christopher Whitcomb, is a former FBI Hostage Rescue Team member whose post-bureau career includes novel writing and screenwriting for Netflix and HBO. He had no investigative role in this case and acknowledges there is no wrongful conviction claim.

Kohberger pleaded guilty, received four consecutive life sentences, and waived his right to appeal. His former defense team, led by Anne Taylor, has publicly called Turvey's conduct "appalling" and accused him of violating a confidentiality agreement.

Former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis examines every claim in this book — its factual basis, its legal relevance, and whether any of it changes a single thing about where this case stands.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #BrentTurvey #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #ChainOfCustody #KnifeSheath #JusticeForTheIdahoFour

A Yemassee police chief named Greg Alexander was at the Moselle crime scene the night Maggie and Paul Murdaugh were killed. One month later, Alex Murdaugh wrote him a personal check for $5,000 and backdated it to March. The chief said it was a loan for his parents. He never explained the backdating. He did post on his reelection Facebook page: "I'm not a cat. I don't cover up no doo-doo." That's one of dozens of findings in James Lasdun's new book The Family Man that never made it into the trial — and nobody has been able to explain.

The book reveals that prosecutors edited SLED's full timeline before the jury saw it, removing calls Alex made on the day of the murders with men who had criminal records. Alex had wiped his call log from that entire week. Eddie texted him the next morning. An unknown individual sent messages referencing a prearranged meeting spot. None of it was put in front of jurors.

The murder weapons were never found — and SLED didn't search the property Alex drove to that night for three full months. Key physical evidence was placed in two different locations by the investigating agency. Unidentified tire tracks at the crime scene were never investigated. Maggie's car was found with the seat in the wrong position.

Eddie told the author — twice, in person — that Alex described the night at Moselle with a phrase that sounds less like a denial and more like a man describing a plan that went wrong. Lasdun built an original theory around those words — one that suggests the murders may have been a staged attack, the same play Alex ran on the roadside three months later, but at the kennels, something went sideways.

The most disturbing claim in the book: Alex knew his grief would be real, and counted on that pain being so genuine that nobody would believe he caused it. He weaponized his own future devastation as an alibi.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #TheFamilyMan #CousinEddie #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #SLED #MurdaughEvidence

For years, Bryan Kohberger gave the world nothing. He sat silent through court hearings. He showed zero emotion while the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin confronted him at sentencing. When the judge asked if he wanted to speak, he said three words — "I respectfully decline." Then, from a maximum security cell, he finally opened up. Not to a reporter. Not to a judge. To his dog.

Kohberger's prison letters have now surfaced, and for the first time since his arrest, we can see what's going on behind that blank stare. He tells his dog Scout they communicated telepathically. He writes to his sister Amanda about "Hearts promise unto the green pastures ahead" and signs it "Bernnzz." He writes to his family about ascending and finding serenity through a "Singular Heart." After years of calculated silence, his own handwriting cracked the mask wide open.

This episode is a psychological deep dive into those writings and what they tell us about the mind behind the King Road murders. We connect the patterns in these letters to the behavior his WSU classmates reported — the dominance, the inability to connect, the need to perform intellectual superiority in every room. The same engine that drove a PhD student to terrify the women around him is now driving a convicted killer to write pseudo-spiritual philosophy from a cell he'll never leave. And the most telling detail of all? Across every letter — not one victim's name. Not one acknowledgment. The silence didn't break. It just changed form.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#BryanKohberger #KohbergerMind #IdahoMurders #KohbergerLetters #KingRoad #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #KillerPsychology

Prosecutors announced they allegedly found a significant amount of child sexual abuse material on David Burke's phone — and terabytes of iCloud data are still reportedly being downloaded and analyzed. That discovery sits on top of charges of first-degree murder with special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen, and unlawful mutilation of human remains. And it introduces a dimension that could reshape everything about how a jury perceives this defendant.

The People's Brief in the D4VD case was unsealed after the judge denied the defense's motion to seal it. It lays out what prosecutors allege is a detailed timeline — a sexual relationship beginning when Celeste Rivas Hernandez was thirteen and Burke was eighteen, escalating through sustained contact and travel, and ending with an alleged stabbing when the fourteen-year-old reportedly threatened to expose the relationship and destroy Burke's career.

According to prosecutors, Burke then allegedly purchased disposal materials under a false name, sent communications to Celeste's phone after she was reportedly already dead, and kept her remains in the trunk of his Tesla while he reportedly launched a world tour and released an album. She was allegedly found one day after what would have been her fifteenth birthday.

Blair Berk, Burke's attorney, reversed her push for the fastest possible preliminary hearing after the filing dropped and asked for a delay. That was denied. The hearing is set for May 26.

Former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis dissects every layer — how the alleged CSAM changes jury dynamics, what the People's Brief reveals as a prosecution strategy, and whether the defense can recover from a complete reversal on timing.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidBurke #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #JusticeForCeleste #PeoplesBrief #MurderCharge #DeathPenalty

People with no involvement in the investigation have allegedly fabricated claims, implied motive, and named cleared Guthrie family members as suspects — turning an 84-year-old woman's disappearance into content. The family has been fully cleared by law enforcement. The accusations kept coming anyway.

Nancy Guthrie has been missing from her Tucson-area home for over three months. Blood confirmed as hers was found at the scene. A masked, armed individual was captured on recovered doorbell footage. No arrest has been made. No suspect has been publicly identified.

The investigation has been marked by public conflict between the FBI and the Pima County Sheriff's Department. FBI Director Kash Patel stated his agency was kept out of the case for four days during the most critical window. The sheriff disputes this timeline. A sergeant with no homicide experience was reportedly assigned to lead the case. The crime scene was allegedly released early. Media outlets published unverified ransom notes that turned out to be hoaxes — giving a platform to people who may have been exploiting the family's nightmare.

Former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis examines whether the Guthrie family can bring defamation claims against content creators who allegedly targeted them, what civil liability the county may face for alleged investigative failures, mechanisms to petition for alternative oversight or a federal takeover, Arizona's victim rights protections, and potential legal exposure for media outlets that ran unverified ransom material.

The family offered a million-dollar reward and begged the public for help. What the law allegedly owes them may be another matter entirely.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #MissingPerson #FBI #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #VictimsRights #InvestigativeFailure #JusticeForNancy

She Googled “luxury prisons for the rich in america” while the investigation into her husband’s death was still open. She searched her own name and net worth. She checked whether deleted texts could be recovered and whether the FBI gets involved in cases like hers. And then she published a children’s book about grief, went on local television to promote it, and performed the role of devastated widow for fourteen months straight. In part four of our definitive series, we dismantle every layer of Kouri Richins’ cover-up — from the 800 deleted messages to the “Walk the Dog” letter found in her jail cell that prosecutors said was a word-by-word script for coached testimony. Her mother mailed the sheriff’s office an anonymous copy of the book with a note calling Kouri a “devoted wife and adoring mother.” Investigators traced it through Amazon. The performance was audacious. The evidence trail was catastrophic. And the jury needed less than three hours to see through all of it.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#KouriRichins #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #DigitalEvidence #EricRichins #CoverUp #WalkTheDogLetter #GriefPerformance #UtahTrueCrime #ConvictedKiller

Two of the most psychologically complex cases in recent true crime converge in a single episode — with a psychotherapist who studies the minds behind extreme violence analyzing both.

Bryan Kohberger's guilty plea closed the Idaho murders case. But three never-before-published letters from jail have opened a window into his psychological state that the trial process never did. Written to his dog, his sister, and his family — with no mention of victims Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, or Ethan Chapin — the letters reveal a mind apparently disconnected from reality. Combined with his mother's FBI interview, inmate observations of severe compulsive behavior, and his emotionless plea, the portrait is deeply unsettling and demands clinical examination.

Then: the case prosecutors are building against David Anthony Burke, known as D4vd. Alleged first contact with Celeste Rivas Hernandez when she was eleven. An alleged sexual relationship beginning at thirteen. A fourteen-year-old allegedly killed to protect a music career. And an entire circle of friends, managers, and family members — three grand juries' worth — who prosecutors allege were close enough to be questioned under oath yet reportedly never acted on what was in front of them. A psychotherapist examines the alleged psychology of the accused and the bystander dynamics that prosecutors allege allowed a child to allegedly remain hidden in plain sight.

Burke has pleaded not guilty. His attorneys state the evidence will show his innocence.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#BryanKohberger #D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #IdahoMurders #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology #JusticeForCeleste #KayleeGoncalves

The mothers are the part nobody talks about enough. Joy Robson moved her family to Los Angeles because Michael Jackson told her to. She left her seven-year-old son alone with the most famous adult on earth and felt lucky about it. If Robson is telling the truth, that mother has to live with the knowledge that she handed her child to someone who was hurting him and smiled while she did it. That kind of guilt doesn’t need a lawsuit to be real.

This episode covers Wade Robson and James Safechuck — the two men at the center of Leaving Neverland and the upcoming civil trial. I go through the relationships from the beginning: how Jackson found them, how their families were drawn in, and how both men publicly defended him for decades before reversing everything. The documentary that won an Emmy and was then pulled from streaming. The factual challenges — including the train station timeline that doesn’t add up. The estate’s aggressive legal response. And the grooming psychology that either explains the decades of denial or provides a convenient template for fabrication.

The question this episode leaves you with: does a financial motive eliminate the possibility that abuse actually happened? Because those two things aren’t mutually exclusive. And sitting with that is deeply uncomfortable.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#MichaelJackson #WadeRobson #JamesSafechuck #LeavingNeverland #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Neverland #Grooming #MJAccusations #KingOfPop