
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


On Thursday’s Mark Levin show, we bring you the best of Mark Levin! The reporting on the Trump campaign's legal challenges is just as bad as the reporting on the Russia hoax. CNN and MSNBC don't care about the facts at all. America deserves better. There are two types of challenges being brought: Constitutional challenges citing the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause as referenced by SCOTUS in Bush v. Gore; if there's disparate treatment of votes it's unfair. Period. Also, regarding election evidence and those ignorant of civil litigation, expedited discovery can be ordered by the court as an immediate remedy. Discovery has not even occurred in this case. Affidavits from credible individuals that raise a reasonable question are enough to establish a need for expedited discovery per the rules of civil procedure. Concerning the Constitutional challenges, per Article II Section II Clause II, each state's legislature has the power over election laws. State courts, County officials, Governors, or their appointees do not. Moreover, all voters must be treated the same under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. How will history remember us during this time? Will history say that we are judicious and wise or that we abdicated our responsibility to protect our republic? Finally, Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig joins the program to discuss Lessig's column critiquing this program's comments on Article II of the Constitution. Lessig agreed with Mark Levin's point that Article II grants the state legislatures the power over the manner of the selection of electors.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Cumulus Podcast Network4.6
2205422,054 ratings
On Thursday’s Mark Levin show, we bring you the best of Mark Levin! The reporting on the Trump campaign's legal challenges is just as bad as the reporting on the Russia hoax. CNN and MSNBC don't care about the facts at all. America deserves better. There are two types of challenges being brought: Constitutional challenges citing the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause as referenced by SCOTUS in Bush v. Gore; if there's disparate treatment of votes it's unfair. Period. Also, regarding election evidence and those ignorant of civil litigation, expedited discovery can be ordered by the court as an immediate remedy. Discovery has not even occurred in this case. Affidavits from credible individuals that raise a reasonable question are enough to establish a need for expedited discovery per the rules of civil procedure. Concerning the Constitutional challenges, per Article II Section II Clause II, each state's legislature has the power over election laws. State courts, County officials, Governors, or their appointees do not. Moreover, all voters must be treated the same under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. How will history remember us during this time? Will history say that we are judicious and wise or that we abdicated our responsibility to protect our republic? Finally, Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig joins the program to discuss Lessig's column critiquing this program's comments on Article II of the Constitution. Lessig agreed with Mark Levin's point that Article II grants the state legislatures the power over the manner of the selection of electors.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

3,562 Listeners

26,031 Listeners

11,981 Listeners

153,303 Listeners

1,259 Listeners

63,995 Listeners

1,992 Listeners

1,172 Listeners

10,155 Listeners

978 Listeners

12,733 Listeners

1,785 Listeners

10,188 Listeners

2,965 Listeners

6,467 Listeners

5,621 Listeners

730 Listeners

6,544 Listeners

6,500 Listeners

43,870 Listeners

11,812 Listeners

6,885 Listeners

8,402 Listeners

2,228 Listeners

2,944 Listeners

85 Listeners

223 Listeners

18 Listeners

62 Listeners

793 Listeners

3 Listeners

2 Listeners

7 Listeners