How do you measure the quality of a scientist? Can quantifiable indicators such as impact factors and the number of publications in reputable journals determine the effort, inventiveness, and quality of a scientist? Rankings and reputation are considered important for scientists, research groups and universities as a whole. But does the focus on those quantifiable indicators stimulate or weaken the creativity and productivity of scientists?

Tuesday 20 November 2017 | 12. 45 – 13.30 hrs | Central Hall Huygens building (Noordstraat) Radboud University

Read the review: https://www.ru.nl/radboudreflects/terugblik/terugblik-2017-0/terugblik-2017/17-11-20-rankings-and-reputation-lunch-discussion/

Never want to miss a podcast again? Subscribe to this channel.

Radboud Reflects Organizes in-depth lectures about philosophy, religion, ethics, society and culture. www.ru.nl/radboudreflects

Wil je op de hoogte blijven van onze activiteiten? Schrijf je dan in voor de tweewekelijkse nieuwsbrief: https://www.ru.nl/radboudreflects/nieuwsbrief/aanmelden-mailnieuwsbrief-radboud-reflects/

Do you want to stay up to date about our activities? Please sign in for the English newsletter: https://www.ru.nl/radboudreflects/nieuwsbrief/subscribe-to-newsletter/