Arts

Books

Fashion & Beauty

Performing Arts

Food

Visual Arts

Design

Business

Entrepreneurship

Investing

Marketing

Careers

Management

Non-Profit

Comedy

Stand-Up

Comedy Interviews

Improv

Education

Self-Improvement

How To

Courses

Language Learning

Fiction

Comedy Fiction

Drama

Science Fiction

Government

Health & Fitness

Medicine

Alternative Health

Nutrition

Mental Health

Fitness

Sexuality

History

Kids & Family

Parenting

Stories for Kids

Education for Kids

Pets & Animals

Leisure

Video Games

Games

Automotive

Animation & Manga

Hobbies

Aviation

Home & Garden

Crafts

Music

Music Commentary

Music Interviews

Music History

News

Sports News

Entertainment News

News Commentary

Politics

Daily News

Business News

Tech News

Religion & Spirituality

Christianity

Spirituality

Religion

Judaism

Islam

Buddhism

Hinduism

Science

Social Sciences

Life Sciences

Natural Sciences

Nature

Chemistry

Mathematics

Earth Sciences

Physics

Astronomy

Society & Culture

Documentary

Relationships

Philosophy

Personal Journals

Places & Travel

Sports

Golf

Soccer

Wrestling

Basketball

Football

Fantasy Sports

Baseball

Wilderness

Running

Hockey

Rugby

Cricket

Volleyball

Tennis

Swimming

Technology

True Crime

TV & Film

Film Interviews

TV Reviews

After Shows

Film Reviews

Film History

The Lowy Institute is a leading international think tank that looks at the world from Australia’s perspective.
This channel aggregates audio from across all of our event and podcast channels.

The Lowy Institute is a leading international think tank that looks at the world from Australia’s perspective. This channel aggregates audio from across all of our event and podcast channels.

Lowy Institute

Have you ever wanted to know the definition of a legal term? Do you find yourself wondering what your rights are when it comes to your property, marriage, or health? If you answered yes to one of those questions, In Legal Terms is the show for you. Tune in and learn more about your legal rights and how the law affects your day to day life. The show is set to consistently provide thought-provoking commentary and opinions on legal topics, whether local or national. Court trials, U.S. Supreme Court arguments, hearings, and other timely legal topics are all covered on In Legal Terms. In Legal Terms, hosted by attorney Adam Kilgore with some of Mississippi's top legal leaders and experts as guests, airs Thursday afternoon at 3pm CST on MPB Think Radio and on <a href="https://www.mpbonline.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.mpbonline.org/</a>. Email the show: legalterms@mpbonline.org Call the show: 1-877-MPB-RING (1-877-672-7464)<hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Have you ever wanted to know the definition of a legal term? Do you find yourself wondering what your rights are when it comes to your property, marriage, or health? If you answered yes to one of those questions, In Legal Terms is the show for you. Tune in and learn more about your legal rights and how the law affects your day to day life. The show is set to consistently provide thought-provoking commentary and opinions on legal topics, whether local or national. Court trials, U.S. Supreme Court arguments, hearings, and other timely legal topics are all covered on In Legal Terms. In Legal Terms, hosted by attorney Adam Kilgore with some of Mississippi's top legal leaders and experts as guests, airs Thursday afternoon at 3pm CST on MPB Think Radio and on www.mpbonline.org/. Email the show: legalterms@mpbonline.org Call the show: 1-877-MPB-RING (1-877-672-7464) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Have you ever wanted to know the definition of a legal term? Do you find yourself wondering what your rights are when it comes to your property, marriage, or health? If you answered yes to one of those questions, In Legal Terms is the show for you. Tune in and learn more about your legal rights and how the law affects your day to day life. The show is set to consistently provide thought-provoking commentary and opinions on legal topics, whether local or national. Court trials, U.S. Supreme Court arguments, hearings, and other timely legal topics are all covered on In Legal Terms. In Legal Terms, hosted by attorney Adam Kilgore with some of Mississippi's top legal leaders and experts as guests, airs Thursday afternoon at 3pm CST on MPB Think Radio and on <a href="https://www.mpbonline.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.mpbonline.org/</a>. Email the show: legalterms@mpbonline.org Call the show: 1-877-MPB-RING (1-877-672-7464) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

In Legal Terms

A show about human rights coming to you every week from the Cambridge Centre of Governance and Human Rights. 

Tune in each week as we explore how the concept and practice of human rights can remain fit-for-purpose and co-evolve with the changing world order, joined by fascinating guests from the University of Cambridge and around the world.

A show about human rights coming to you every week from the Cambridge Centre of Governance and Human Rights. Tune in each week as we explore how the concept and practice of human rights can remain fit-for-purpose and co-evolve with the changing world order, joined by fascinating guests from the University of Cambridge and around the world.

Declarations: The Human Rights Podcast

Eat the Airwaves!

The Hoosier Ag Today Podcast Network includes all your favorite Indiana agriculture podcasts, including the HAT Daily Podcast, the Purdue Crop Chat with Dan 'Corn' Quinn and 'Soybean Shaun' Casteel, the Indiana Ag Policy Podcast, and more!

Hoosier Ag Today Podcast Network

Bay Ridge, Brooklyn's own hyper-local progressive podcast!  Join us as we interview local progressive activists and politicians, analyze neighborhood politics and policy proposals, and keep you up-to-date on one of Brooklyn's fastest-growing progressive hotspots.

Bay Ridge, Brooklyn's own hyper-local progressive podcast! Join us as we interview local progressive activists and politicians, analyze neighborhood politics and policy proposals, and keep you up-to-date on one of Brooklyn's fastest-growing progressive hotspots.

Radio Free Bay Ridge

They're the "Click and Clack" of Wisconsin politics. <a href="https://madison.com/users/profile/scott%20milfred/">Scott Milfred</a>, editorial page editor for the Wisconsin State Journal, and&nbsp;<a href="https://madison.com/users/profile/phil%20hands/">Phil Hands</a>, the newspaper's political cartoonist, analyze the most important issues and debates from the Badger State with political independence and a sense of humor. Instead of tedious talking points from the left and the right, "Center Stage" broadcasts from the sensible center with audio clips from the Wisconsin Capitol, from State Journal editorial board meetings, and from political events across the state.

They're the "Click and Clack" of Wisconsin politics. Scott Milfred, editorial page editor for the Wisconsin State Journal, and Phil Hands, the newspaper's political cartoonist, analyze the most important issues and debates from the Badger State with political independence and a sense of humor. Instead of tedious talking points from the left and the right, "Center Stage" broadcasts from the sensible center with audio clips from the Wisconsin Capitol, from State Journal editorial board meetings, and from political events across the state.

They're the "Click and Clack" of Wisconsin politics. <a href="https://madison.com/users/profile/scott%20milfred/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Scott Milfred</a>, editorial page editor for the Wisconsin State Journal, and&nbsp;<a href="https://madison.com/users/profile/phil%20hands/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Phil Hands</a>, the newspaper's political cartoonist, analyze the most important issues and debates from the Badger State with political independence and a sense of humor. Instead of tedious talking points from the left and the right, "Center Stage" broadcasts from the sensible center with audio clips from the Wisconsin Capitol, from State Journal editorial board meetings, and from political events across the state.

Center Stage, with Milfred and Hands

On Thursday 22nd March 2012, the Institute of Criminology at the University of Cambridge held a special public seminar which comprised a panel discussion based on the central topic of "The English Riots in 2011: A Discussion from Different Criminological Perspectives".

The topics were:

Part 1: Friedrich Lösel: Introduction to the Topic;
Part 2: Ben Crewe: The Riots from a Socio-Cultural Perspective;
Part 3: Lawrence Sherman: The Riots and the Police;
Part 4: Alison Liebling: The Riots from Prisoners’ Perspectives;
Part 5: Loraine Gelsthorpe: The Riots and Criminal Justice/Sentencing;
Part 6: Dexter Dias: Commentary on the Film 'Riot Went Wrong';

More information about this seminar, and the Institute generally, can be found at the IOC website at http://www.crim.cam.ac.uk/

On Thursday 22nd March 2012, the Institute of Criminology at the University of Cambridge held a special public seminar which comprised a panel discussion based on the central topic of "The English Riots in 2011: A Discussion from Different Criminological Perspectives". The topics were: Part 1: Friedrich Lösel: Introduction to the Topic; Part 2: Ben Crewe: The Riots from a Socio-Cultural Perspective; Part 3: Lawrence Sherman: The Riots and the Police; Part 4: Alison Liebling: The Riots from Prisoners’ Perspectives; Part 5: Loraine Gelsthorpe: The Riots and Criminal Justice/Sentencing; Part 6: Dexter Dias: Commentary on the Film 'Riot Went Wrong'; More information about this seminar, and the Institute generally, can be found at the IOC website at http://www.crim.cam.ac.uk/

The English Riots in 2011: A Discussion from Different Criminological Perspectives

Conversations exploring China, technology, and US-China relations. Guests include a wide range of analysts, policymakers, and academics. Hosted by Jordan Schneider.
Check out the newsletter at https://www.chinatalk.media/

Conversations exploring China, technology, and US-China relations. Guests include a wide range of analysts, policymakers, and academics. Hosted by Jordan Schneider. Check out the newsletter at https://www.chinatalk.media/

ChinaTalk

Somos un medio de comunicación digital peruano e independiente.

Buscamos informar con rigor y neutralidad con el propósito de elevar la calidad del debate público, combatir la polarización y generar espacios de consenso en la sociedad peruana.

- El podcast de noticias de Augusto Townsend: de lunes a viernes
- Escena Internacional con Farid Kahhat: martes, jueves y sábado
- El podcast económico de Ale Costa: lunes, miércoles y viernes

Somos un medio de comunicación digital peruano e independiente. Buscamos informar con rigor y neutralidad con el propósito de elevar la calidad del debate público, combatir la polarización y generar espacios de consenso en la sociedad peruana. - El podcast de noticias de Augusto Townsend: de lunes a viernes - Escena Internacional con Farid Kahhat: martes, jueves y sábado - El podcast económico de Ale Costa: lunes, miércoles y viernes

Comité

Matt McNeil is a proud Minnesotan, on live weekdays from 3pm to 5pm. Matt has been living most of his life in the state of his birth. He’s a husband, a father of three, a veteran, and a broadcaster. He’s worked in radio for over 25 years, starting with Armed Forces Radio in Nuremberg, Germany. He currently lives in Hopkins.  On his show Matt talks politics from a Democrat/Progressive perspective, but he’ll also venture into parenting, religion, entertainment, sports, gardening, business, cooking, and many other subjects. He interviews politicians, political insiders, authors, pundits, entertainers, and artists, and loves talking to the listeners.  Besides being on air, you can read his thoughts at the ‘Progressive Citizen X’ blog.

Matt McNeil is a proud Minnesotan, on live weekdays from 3pm to 5pm. Matt has been living most of his life in the state of his birth. He’s a husband, a father of three, a veteran, and a broadcaster. He’s worked in radio for over 25 years, starting with Armed Forces Radio in Nuremberg, Germany. He currently lives in Hopkins. On his show Matt talks politics from a Democrat/Progressive perspective, but he’ll also venture into parenting, religion, entertainment, sports, gardening, business, cooking, and many other subjects. He interviews politicians, political insiders, authors, pundits, entertainers, and artists, and loves talking to the listeners. Besides being on air, you can read his thoughts at the ‘Progressive Citizen X’ blog.

The Matt McNeil Show

Stephane H. Maillet's sessions on Faith based lifestyles and information. <a href="https://addedsouls.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast">addedsouls.substack.com</a>

Stephane H. Maillet's sessions on Faith based lifestyles and information. addedsouls.substack.com

Stephane H. Maillet's sessions on Faith based lifestyles and information. <a href="https://addedsouls.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer">addedsouls.substack.com</a>

addedSOULS

Türkiye'de gündemi takip etmek zor iş. Trend Topic işte tam da bunun için var. Ozan Gündoğdu Trend Topic'te haftanın en trend haberlerini, Trend Ekonomi'de de ekonomi gündemini ele alıyor. Gündeme dair daha derinlikli bir bakış yakalamaya hazırsanız başlayalım.

Trend Topic

Welcome to the EPPiC Broadcast: Empowering Parents and Protecting Children. Featuring personal stories, breaking news, and insightful commentary, we’ll encourage and inform you on the issue of family and parental rights as you guide and protect that child who is your world. From the Parental Rights Foundation. The EPPiC Broadcast welcomes discussion on a variety of viewpoints regarding parental rights issues; however, the views and opinions expressed by guests are solely their own.

EPPiC Broadcast

World Review is the global affairs podcast from the New Statesman, hosted by Jeremy Cliffe in Berlin and Emily Tamkin in Washington D.C. <hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

World Review is the global affairs podcast from the New Statesman, hosted by Jeremy Cliffe in Berlin and Emily Tamkin in Washington D.C. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

World Review is the global affairs podcast from the New Statesman, hosted by Jeremy Cliffe in Berlin and Emily Tamkin in Washington D.C. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

World Review from the New Statesman

Political figures and influencers are often heard in brief bites that don't capture the context of the whole story. "Central Florida: Beyond the Soundbite" expands the conversation with these newsmakers along the I-4 corridor and beyond. Join award-winning Spectrum News 13 anchor and Orlando Woman of the Year Ybeth Bruzual, political reporter Greg Angel, and veteran producer Gary Darling for a must-hear interview each week and learn about the issues affecting Central Florida.

Central Florida: Beyond The Soundbite

WEISSOLOGY

“I promise to always focus on ideology, not personality” ~ Jason Weisberg

Weissology Podcast was created by 25 year Wall Street veteran Jason Weisberg as a platform to have open and honest conversations on finance, politics, and his passion for food/pizza. He brings unfiltered, factual, and educated thought together with solid financial advice at a much needed time in our country.


JASON WEISBERG ~ Creator and Host


Jason Weisberg is first and foremost a proud Jewish father of two great young men. Born and raised in New York, Jason Weisberg is driven instinctively by passion and determination. He is a 4 time Ironman, a former professional sailor on the international stage including the 95 America's Cup.  A lover of all things ocean, including fishing, sailing, Kiteboarding, and SUP. He is a foodie at heart but distinctively a pizza geek. In his professional life, Weisberg is a Wall Street Veteran with 25 years experience. His tenure gives him unparalleled experience and  insight into trading the financial markets, making him a favorite on-air contributor and financial expert for multiple media outlets such as ABC, FOX News, FOX Business, CNN, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal to name a few. As money and politics go hand in hand, Jason’s understanding of finance and politics led him to becoming a top tier political consultant and macroeconomic forecaster. Currently Jason is living in Miami, FL and sporadically falls off the grid road tripping throughout the US finding the best food spots while studying the financial and social climate. Check out what’s happening in  finance, politics, food, sports, and even sex on his new raw and unfiltered podcast ‘Weissology.’

WEISSOLOGY “I promise to always focus on ideology, not personality” ~ Jason Weisberg Weissology Podcast was created by 25 year Wall Street veteran Jason Weisberg as a platform to have open and honest conversations on finance, politics, and his passion for food/pizza. He brings unfiltered, factual, and educated thought together with solid financial advice at a much needed time in our country. JASON WEISBERG ~ Creator and Host Jason Weisberg is first and foremost a proud Jewish father of two great young men. Born and raised in New York, Jason Weisberg is driven instinctively by passion and determination. He is a 4 time Ironman, a former professional sailor on the international stage including the 95 America's Cup. A lover of all things ocean, including fishing, sailing, Kiteboarding, and SUP. He is a foodie at heart but distinctively a pizza geek. In his professional life, Weisberg is a Wall Street Veteran with 25 years experience. His tenure gives him unparalleled experience and insight into trading the financial markets, making him a favorite on-air contributor and financial expert for multiple media outlets such as ABC, FOX News, FOX Business, CNN, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal to name a few. As money and politics go hand in hand, Jason’s understanding of finance and politics led him to becoming a top tier political consultant and macroeconomic forecaster. Currently Jason is living in Miami, FL and sporadically falls off the grid road tripping throughout the US finding the best food spots while studying the financial and social climate. Check out what’s happening in finance, politics, food, sports, and even sex on his new raw and unfiltered podcast ‘Weissology.’

WEISSOLOGY

The New Hampshire Journal podcast is hosted by Michael Graham, managing editor of NHJournal.&nbsp;

The New Hampshire Journal podcast is hosted by Michael Graham, managing editor of NHJournal. 

New Hampshire Journal

The DUM Show (The Don't Unfriend Me Show) explores a broad range of political themes, from satire to serious topics, with Matt Speer, a Navy Intel veteran, husband, and father, leading the show. Matt shares his views to stimulate constructive discussions. The show aims to provide a balanced perspective on complex issues, welcoming participants of all political affiliations to share their unique viewpoints. Social Media @<a href="https://thedumshow.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">thedumshow.</a> Visit us: thedumshow.com Watch the Don't Unfriend Me Show Live Weeknights at 7pm Eastern. Follow us here: https://www.linktapgo.com/thedumshow Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-dum-show--6012883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-dum-show--6012883/support</a>.

The DUM Show (The Don't Unfriend Me Show) explores a broad range of political themes, from satire to serious topics, with Matt Speer, a Navy Intel veteran, husband, and father, leading the show. Matt shares his views to stimulate constructive discussions. The show aims to provide a balanced perspective on complex issues, welcoming participants of all political affiliations to share their unique viewpoints.Social Media @thedumshow.Visit us: thedumshow.comWatch the Don't Unfriend Me Show Live Weeknights at 7pm Eastern.Follow us here: https://www.linktapgo.com/thedumshowBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-dum-show--6012883/support.

The DUM Show (The Don't Unfriend Me Show) explores a broad range of political themes, from satire to serious topics, with Matt Speer, a Navy Intel veteran, husband, and father, leading the show. Matt shares his views to stimulate constructive discussions. The show aims to provide a balanced perspective on complex issues, welcoming participants of all political affiliations to share their unique viewpoints. Social Media @<a href="https://thedumshow.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">thedumshow.</a> Visit us: thedumshow.com Watch the Don't Unfriend Me Show Live Weeknights at 7pm Eastern. Follow us here: https://www.linktapgo.com/thedumshow Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-dum-show--6012883/support?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-dum-show--6012883/support</a>.

The DUM Show

Join your host Spencer Stokes as he sits down with folks from many different backgrounds to discuss a variety of different things! Spencer Stokes is the President of Stokes Strategies, a lobbying firm in Salt Lake City, Utah. He brings a wealth of experience and knowledge, having worked in politics for over thirty years. The topics will be diverse, and the folks will be numerous. We are sure there will be something everyone loves about Spencer Stokes and his folks.&nbsp;

Join your host Spencer Stokes as he sits down with folks from many different backgrounds to discuss a variety of different things! Spencer Stokes is the President of Stokes Strategies, a lobbying firm in Salt Lake City, Utah. He brings a wealth of experience and knowledge, having worked in politics for over thirty years. The topics will be diverse, and the folks will be numerous. We are sure there will be something everyone loves about Spencer Stokes and his folks. 

Stokes and Folks

The Sisters of the Night Caucus began as a Slack group of exhausted PA politics friends that has grown into a true sisterhood of women who are absolutely f***ing over it. Not content to hide in the shadows, we’re taking the coven public to highlight the most badass women we know in PA politics.

Sisters of the Night Caucus

Lever Reruns is a series of one-off interviews and live chats recorded during the old Daily Poster days. We probably won't add any new episodes, but please enjoy these in perpetuity. 
﻿The Lever is reader-supported investigative news outlet that holds accountable the people and corporations manipulating the levers of power.

Lever Reruns is a series of one-off interviews and live chats recorded during the old Daily Poster days. We probably won't add any new episodes, but please enjoy these in perpetuity. ﻿The Lever is reader-supported investigative news outlet that holds accountable the people and corporations manipulating the levers of power.

Lever Reruns is a series of one-off interviews and live chats recorded during the old Daily Poster days. We probably won't add any new episodes, but please enjoy these in perpetuity.&nbsp;
﻿The Lever is reader-supported investigative news outlet that holds accountable the people and corporations manipulating the levers of power.

Lever Reruns

A podcast about theology, politics, music, and everything else. Join us as we learn, enjoy, and reason.

Everything Else with Nick Steward

“The Madigan Rule” is a BGA podcast that takes listeners inside the story of how Speaker Mike Madigan ran Illinois--for good and for ill.  Hosted by Justin Kaufmann, a veteran radio host who covered Madigan, Kaufmann talks with people who witnessed Madigan’s exercise of power: governors, lawmakers, journalists and politicos. They feared him and revered him and had no choice but to reckon with his rules. It’s the Madigan Rule: a podcast about Illinois’ most powerful politician, featuring those who knew him well.

“The Madigan Rule” is a BGA podcast that takes listeners inside the story of how Speaker Mike Madigan ran Illinois--for good and for ill. Hosted by Justin Kaufmann, a veteran radio host who covered Madigan, Kaufmann talks with people who witnessed Madigan’s exercise of power: governors, lawmakers, journalists and politicos. They feared him and revered him and had no choice but to reckon with his rules. It’s the Madigan Rule: a podcast about Illinois’ most powerful politician, featuring those who knew him well.

The Madigan Rule

Los fines de semana son mucho más interesantes con "La Trinchera de Llamas", un programa que nos mantiene al tanto de la economía, la política, la cultura y todo lo que está sucediendo en el mundo, con grandes debates y colaboradores. Te esperamos los sábados y domingos de ocho a once.

La Trinchera de Llamas

The KOSU Daily is a weekday news podcast from KOSU. Get the latest on what's happening in the state of Oklahoma and how it affects you and your family.

The KOSU Daily

<div>While the TV show is on break, this pod brings you a tasty edit of the news items that would have made it onto the programme – as a quartet of some of the creatives behind the scenes at the show discuss what makes each item Have I Got News For You worthy. 
 
Hosted by Jack Harris, Queenie Miller, Emerald Paston and Mike Rayment. 
 
A Hat Trick Podcast</div>

While the TV show is on break, this pod brings you a tasty edit of the news items that would have made it onto the programme – as a quartet of some of the creatives behind the scenes at the show discuss what makes each item Have I Got News For You worthy. Hosted by Jack Harris, Queenie Miller, Emerald Paston and Mike Rayment. A Hat Trick Podcast

While the TV show is on break, this pod brings you a tasty edit of the news items that would have made it onto the programme – as a quartet of some of the creatives behind the scenes at the show discuss what makes each item Have I Got News For You worthy. 
 
Hosted by Jack Harris, Queenie Miller, Emerald Paston and Mike Rayment. 
 
A Hat Trick Podcast

In The News This Week (the Have I Got News For You podcast)

Project 2025: The Ominous Specter Ladies and gentlemen, we find ourselves standing at the precipice of a dark and foreboding future, one in which the very foundations of our democracy are under siege. The threat we face is not an external one, but rather a cancer that has metastasized within the body politic itself. I speak, of course, of the insidious manifesto known as Project 2025 – a blueprint for authoritarian rule that masquerades as a conservative vision for the United States. As we delve into the depths of this pernicious document, crafted in the shadowy halls of the Heritage Foundation, it becomes abundantly clear that we are witnessing nothing less than a frontal assault on the principles that have long sustained our republic. Project 2025 is not merely a misguided set of policy proposals; it is a calculated attempt to dismantle the very fabric of our democratic institutions, to concentrate power in the hands of a few, and to impose a rigid ideological orthodoxy on a nation that has always prided itself on its diversity and its commitment to individual liberty. At its core, Project 2025 seeks to reshape the federal government in the image of a conservative dystopia. Its proponents, consumed by an insatiable hunger for power and an unwavering commitment to their ideological agenda, have meticulously crafted a roadmap for the systematic erosion of checks and balances, the suppression of dissent, and the consolidation of executive authority. It is a vision that should send a shiver down the spine of every freedom-loving American, for it represents nothing less than a repudiation of the very principles upon which this nation was founded. The architects of Project 2025 argue, with a level of audacity that borders on the delusional, that the federal bureaucracy is overrun with unaccountable liberals who impede their agenda. Their solution? A purge of Stalinist proportions, reclassifying tens of thousands of civil servants as political appointees, effectively transforming the machinery of government into an apparatus of ideological conformity. The implications of this proposal alone are staggering – the eradication of expertise, the subversion of meritocracy, and the creation of a loyalty-based system that would make even the most fervent authoritarian blush. But the assault on democratic institutions does not end there. Project 2025's disdain for the separation of powers is as blatant as it is dangerous. Its vision of a "unitary executive theory" is nothing short of a repudiation of the very principles enshrined in our Constitution. By seeking to exert control over independent agencies like the Department of Justice and the FBI, the project's architects aim to transform these bastions of impartiality into instruments of partisan enforcement. It is a move that would make Richard Nixon's transgressions seem like mere child's play, a power grab of such magnitude that it threatens to unravel the very fabric of our democracy. And yet, even as we recoil in horror at the prospect of such an overreach, we must also confront the deeper implications of Project 2025's vision for American society. For the social policies outlined in this document are equally troubling, reflecting a worldview that is as narrow-minded as it is oppressive. The imposition of conservative Christian values, the marginalization of LGBTQ+ individuals, and the draconian stance against abortion rights are all hallmarks of a regime that seeks to impose its moral strictures on an entire nation, regardless of the diversity of beliefs and values that have always been the hallmark of the American experience. Indeed, the notion that America needs to be "saved" from itself, and that only a radical overhaul of its institutions and values can achieve this salvation, is perhaps the most arrogant and dangerous conceit of all. It reflects a view of the world that is fundamentally at odds with the pluralism and the respect for individual liberty that have always been the bedrock of our democracy. And yet, this is precisely the vision that animates the architects of Project 2025 – a vision that is as antithetical to the American spirit as it is to the very notion of a free and open society. But perhaps the most insidious aspect of Project 2025 is the way in which it cloaks its authoritarian agenda in the language of reform and efficiency. Its proponents speak of restoring traditional American values, as if the very notion of tradition were not itself a malleable construct, subject to the whims of those in power. They invoke the specter of an overreaching federal government, conveniently ignoring the fact that their own vision of executive power is far more expansive and unconstrained than anything that has come before. It is a rhetorical sleight of hand that would be laughable if its consequences were not so dire. For what Project 2025 ultimately represents is a rejection of the very principles that have made America a beacon of freedom and democracy in the world. It is a repudiation of the idea that power should be dispersed rather than concentrated, that dissent should be protected rather than suppressed, and that the rule of law should be upheld rather than subverted. To fully grasp the dangers of Project 2025, one need only look to the historical precedents that have paved the way for the rise of authoritarianism. The erosion of democratic norms in the Weimar Republic, the centralization of power under Viktor Orbán in Hungary, and the stifling of free speech under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey – these are all cautionary tales that underscore the fragility of democracy in the face of those who would seek to undermine it. Indeed, the parallels between the tactics employed by these authoritarian regimes and the strategies outlined in Project 2025 are striking. The demonization of political opponents, the co-optation of the media, the erosion of institutional checks and balances – these are all hallmarks of a playbook that has been used time and again to consolidate power in the hands of a few. And yet, even as we acknowledge the magnitude of the threat before us, we must not succumb to despair. For the fight against the forces of authoritarianism is one that has been waged throughout history, and it is a fight that has always been won by those who refuse to surrender their principles in the face of adversity. It is a fight that will require the active engagement of every citizen who values the sanctity of our democratic institutions. It will require a sustained effort to raise public awareness, to mobilize opposition, and to hold those in power accountable for their actions. It will require a commitment to the principles of free speech, free press, and the rule of law, even in the face of those who would seek to undermine them. But perhaps most importantly, it will require a willingness to confront the uncomfortable truths about our own society – the inequalities, the injustices, and the divisions that have long simmered beneath the surface. For it is only by addressing these underlying issues that we can hope to build a more perfect union, one that is truly worthy of the ideals upon which it was founded. And so, my fellow citizens, let us not be lulled into complacency by the siren song of those who would promise us a return to some mythical past. Let us not be seduced by the false promises of those who would trade our freedoms for the illusion of security. Let us instead stand firm in our commitment to the principles that have made this nation great – the principles of liberty, equality, and justice for all. For in the end, the fight against Project 2025 is not simply a battle for the soul of our nation – it is a battle for the very future of democracy itself. It is a battle that will require all of us to summon the courage and the conviction to stand up for what we know to be right, even in the face of those who would seek to silence us. Let us draw strength from the examples of those who have gone before us – the patriots and the martyrs who have sacrificed everything in the name of freedom. Let us remember that the arc of history bends towards justice, but only if we have the courage to bend it ourselves. For as Thomas Jefferson once said, 'When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.' And as we stand here today, on the brink of an abyss that threatens to consume us all, let us be clear about where our loyalties lie. They lie not with those who seek to impose their will upon us through force and coercion, but with those who believe in the power of reason, of dialogue, and of democracy itself. They lie not with those who would trade our freedoms for the false promise of security, but with those who understand that our security lies in our freedoms themselves. And so, my friends, let us go forth from this place, armed with the knowledge that our cause is just, and our resolve unshakable. Let us go forth with the conviction that, no matter how dark the road ahead may seem, there is always a light at the end of the tunnel – a light that shines bright with the promise of a better tomorrow. For if we do not fight for that tomorrow, then who will? If we do not stand up for the principles that define us as a nation, then what will become of us? These are the questions that we must ask ourselves, as we confront the spectre of Project 2025 and all that it represents. And let us never forget, even in our darkest moments, that the power to shape our destiny lies not in the hands of those who would seek to control us, but in our own hands – the hands of a free people, united in the pursuit of justice, of equality, and of the democratic ideal. Thanks for listening and remember to like and share wherever you get your podcasts .

Project 2025: The Ominous Specter Ladies and gentlemen, we find ourselves standing at the precipice of a dark and foreboding future, one in which the very foundations of our democracy are under siege. The threat we face is not an external one, but rather a cancer that has metastasized within the body politic itself. I speak, of course, of the insidious manifesto known as Project 2025 – a blueprint for authoritarian rule that masquerades as a conservative vision for the United States. As we delve into the depths of this pernicious document, crafted in the shadowy halls of the Heritage Foundation, it becomes abundantly clear that we are witnessing nothing less than a frontal assault on the principles that have long sustained our republic. Project 2025 is not merely a misguided set of policy proposals; it is a calculated attempt to dismantle the very fabric of our democratic institutions, to concentrate power in the hands of a few, and to impose a rigid ideological orthodoxy on a nation that has always prided itself on its diversity and its commitment to individual liberty. At its core, Project 2025 seeks to reshape the federal government in the image of a conservative dystopia. Its proponents, consumed by an insatiable hunger for power and an unwavering commitment to their ideological agenda, have meticulously crafted a roadmap for the systematic erosion of checks and balances, the suppression of dissent, and the consolidation of executive authority. It is a vision that should send a shiver down the spine of every freedom-loving American, for it represents nothing less than a repudiation of the very principles upon which this nation was founded. The architects of Project 2025 argue, with a level of audacity that borders on the delusional, that the federal bureaucracy is overrun with unaccountable liberals who impede their agenda. Their solution? A purge of Stalinist proportions, reclassifying tens of thousands of civil servants as political appointees, effectively transforming the machinery of government into an apparatus of ideological conformity. The implications of this proposal alone are staggering – the eradication of expertise, the subversion of meritocracy, and the creation of a loyalty-based system that would make even the most fervent authoritarian blush. But the assault on democratic institutions does not end there. Project 2025's disdain for the separation of powers is as blatant as it is dangerous. Its vision of a "unitary executive theory" is nothing short of a repudiation of the very principles enshrined in our Constitution. By seeking to exert control over independent agencies like the Department of Justice and the FBI, the project's architects aim to transform these bastions of impartiality into instruments of partisan enforcement. It is a move that would make Richard Nixon's transgressions seem like mere child's play, a power grab of such magnitude that it threatens to unravel the very fabric of our democracy. And yet, even as we recoil in horror at the prospect of such an overreach, we must also confront the deeper implications of Project 2025's vision for American society. For the social policies outlined in this document are equally troubling, reflecting a worldview that is as narrow-minded as it is oppressive. The imposition of conservative Christian values, the marginalization of LGBTQ+ individuals, and the draconian stance against abortion rights are all hallmarks of a regime that seeks to impose its moral strictures on an entire nation, regardless of the diversity of beliefs and values that have always been the hallmark of the American experience. Indeed, the notion that America needs to be "saved" from itself, and that only a radical overhaul of its institutions and values can achieve this salvation, is perhaps the most arrogant and dangerous conceit of all. It reflects a view of the world that is fundamentally at odds with the pluralism and the respect for individual liberty that have always been the bedrock of our democracy. And yet, this is precisely the vision that animates the architects of Project 2025 – a vision that is as antithetical to the American spirit as it is to the very notion of a free and open society. But perhaps the most insidious aspect of Project 2025 is the way in which it cloaks its authoritarian agenda in the language of reform and efficiency. Its proponents speak of restoring traditional American values, as if the very notion of tradition were not itself a malleable construct, subject to the whims of those in power. They invoke the specter of an overreaching federal government, conveniently ignoring the fact that their own vision of executive power is far more expansive and unconstrained than anything that has come before. It is a rhetorical sleight of hand that would be laughable if its consequences were not so dire. For what Project 2025 ultimately represents is a rejection of the very principles that have made America a beacon of freedom and democracy in the world. It is a repudiation of the idea that power should be dispersed rather than concentrated, that dissent should be protected rather than suppressed, and that the rule of law should be upheld rather than subverted. To fully grasp the dangers of Project 2025, one need only look to the historical precedents that have paved the way for the rise of authoritarianism. The erosion of democratic norms in the Weimar Republic, the centralization of power under Viktor Orbán in Hungary, and the stifling of free speech under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey – these are all cautionary tales that underscore the fragility of democracy in the face of those who would seek to undermine it. Indeed, the parallels between the tactics employed by these authoritarian regimes and the strategies outlined in Project 2025 are striking. The demonization of political opponents, the co-optation of the media, the erosion of institutional checks and balances – these are all hallmarks of a playbook that has been used time and again to consolidate power in the hands of a few. And yet, even as we acknowledge the magnitude of the threat before us, we must not succumb to despair. For the fight against the forces of authoritarianism is one that has been waged throughout history, and it is a fight that has always been won by those who refuse to surrender their principles in the face of adversity. It is a fight that will require the active engagement of every citizen who values the sanctity of our democratic institutions. It will require a sustained effort to raise public awareness, to mobilize opposition, and to hold those in power accountable for their actions. It will require a commitment to the principles of free speech, free press, and the rule of law, even in the face of those who would seek to undermine them. But perhaps most importantly, it will require a willingness to confront the uncomfortable truths about our own society – the inequalities, the injustices, and the divisions that have long simmered beneath the surface. For it is only by addressing these underlying issues that we can hope to build a more perfect union, one that is truly worthy of the ideals upon which it was founded. And so, my fellow citizens, let us not be lulled into complacency by the siren song of those who would promise us a return to some mythical past. Let us not be seduced by the false promises of those who would trade our freedoms for the illusion of security. Let us instead stand firm in our commitment to the principles that have made this nation great – the principles of liberty, equality, and justice for all. For in the end, the fight against Project 2025 is not simply a battle for the soul of our nation – it is a battle for the very future of democracy itself. It is a battle that will require all of us to summon the courage and the conviction to stand up for what we know to be right, even in the face of those who would seek to silence us. Let us draw strength from the examples of those who have gone before us – the patriots and the martyrs who have sacrificed everything in the name of freedom. Let us remember that the arc of history bends towards justice, but only if we have the courage to bend it ourselves. For as Thomas Jefferson once said, 'When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.' And as we stand here today, on the brink of an abyss that threatens to consume us all, let us be clear about where our loyalties lie. They lie not with those who seek to impose their will upon us through force and coercion, but with those who believe in the power of reason, of dialogue, and of democracy itself. They lie not with those who would trade our freedoms for the false promise of security, but with those who understand that our security lies in our freedoms themselves. And so, my friends, let us go forth from this place, armed with the knowledge that our cause is just, and our resolve unshakable. Let us go forth with the conviction that, no matter how dark the road ahead may seem, there is always a light at the end of the tunnel – a light that shines bright with the promise of a better tomorrow. For if we do not fight for that tomorrow, then who will? If we do not stand up for the principles that define us as a nation, then what will become of us? These are the questions that we must ask ourselves, as we confront the spectre of Project 2025 and all that it represents. And let us never forget, even in our darkest moments, that the power to shape our destiny lies not in the hands of those who would seek to control us, but in our own hands – the hands of a free people, united in the pursuit of justice, of equality, and of the democratic ideal. Thanks for listening and remember to like and share wherever you get your podcasts .

Project 2025: The Ominous Specter Ladies and gentlemen, we find ourselves standing at the precipice of a dark and foreboding future, one in which the very foundations of our democracy are under siege. The threat we face is not an external one, but rather a cancer that has metastasized within the body politic itself. I speak, of course, of the insidious manifesto known as Project 2025 – a blueprint for authoritarian rule that masquerades as a conservative vision for the United States. As we delve into the depths of this pernicious document, crafted in the shadowy halls of the Heritage Foundation, it becomes abundantly clear that we are witnessing nothing less than a frontal assault on the principles that have long sustained our republic. Project 2025 is not merely a misguided set of policy proposals; it is a calculated attempt to dismantle the very fabric of our democratic institutions, to concentrate power in the hands of a few, and to impose a rigid ideological orthodoxy on a nation that has always prided itself on its diversity and its commitment to individual liberty. At its core, Project 2025 seeks to reshape the federal government in the image of a conservative dystopia. Its proponents, consumed by an insatiable hunger for power and an unwavering commitment to their ideological agenda, have meticulously crafted a roadmap for the systematic erosion of checks and balances, the suppression of dissent, and the consolidation of executive authority. It is a vision that should send a shiver down the spine of every freedom-loving American, for it represents nothing less than a repudiation of the very principles upon which this nation was founded. The architects of Project 2025 argue, with a level of audacity that borders on the delusional, that the federal bureaucracy is overrun with unaccountable liberals who impede their agenda. Their solution? A purge of Stalinist proportions, reclassifying tens of thousands of civil servants as political appointees, effectively transforming the machinery of government into an apparatus of ideological conformity. The implications of this proposal alone are staggering – the eradication of expertise, the subversion of meritocracy, and the creation of a loyalty-based system that would make even the most fervent authoritarian blush. But the assault on democratic institutions does not end there. Project 2025's disdain for the separation of powers is as blatant as it is dangerous. Its vision of a "unitary executive theory" is nothing short of a repudiation of the very principles enshrined in our Constitution. By seeking to exert control over independent agencies like the Department of Justice and the FBI, the project's architects aim to transform these bastions of impartiality into instruments of partisan enforcement. It is a move that would make Richard Nixon's transgressions seem like mere child's play, a power grab of such magnitude that it threatens to unravel the very fabric of our democracy. And yet, even as we recoil in horror at the prospect of such an overreach, we must also confront the deeper implications of Project 2025's vision for American society. For the social policies outlined in this document are equally troubling, reflecting a worldview that is as narrow-minded as it is oppressive. The imposition of conservative Christian values, the marginalization of LGBTQ+ individuals, and the draconian stance against abortion rights are all hallmarks of a regime that seeks to impose its moral strictures on an entire nation, regardless of the diversity of beliefs and values that have always been the hallmark of the American experience. Indeed, the notion that America needs to be "saved" from itself, and that only a radical overhaul of its institutions and values can achieve this salvation, is perhaps the most arrogant and dangerous conceit of all. It reflects a view of the world that is fundamentally at odds with the pluralism and the respect for individual liberty that have always been the bedrock of our democracy. And yet, this is precisely the vision that animates the architects of Project 2025 – a vision that is as antithetical to the American spirit as it is to the very notion of a free and open society. But perhaps the most insidious aspect of Project 2025 is the way in which it cloaks its authoritarian agenda in the language of reform and efficiency. Its proponents speak of restoring traditional American values, as if the very notion of tradition were not itself a malleable construct, subject to the whims of those in power. They invoke the specter of an overreaching federal government, conveniently ignoring the fact that their own vision of executive power is far more expansive and unconstrained than anything that has come before. It is a rhetorical sleight of hand that would be laughable if its consequences were not so dire. For what Project 2025 ultimately represents is a rejection of the very principles that have made America a beacon of freedom and democracy in the world. It is a repudiation of the idea that power should be dispersed rather than concentrated, that dissent should be protected rather than suppressed, and that the rule of law should be upheld rather than subverted. To fully grasp the dangers of Project 2025, one need only look to the historical precedents that have paved the way for the rise of authoritarianism. The erosion of democratic norms in the Weimar Republic, the centralization of power under Viktor Orbán in Hungary, and the stifling of free speech under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey – these are all cautionary tales that underscore the fragility of democracy in the face of those who would seek to undermine it. Indeed, the parallels between the tactics employed by these authoritarian regimes and the strategies outlined in Project 2025 are striking. The demonization of political opponents, the co-optation of the media, the erosion of institutional checks and balances – these are all hallmarks of a playbook that has been used time and again to consolidate power in the hands of a few. And yet, even as we acknowledge the magnitude of the threat before us, we must not succumb to despair. For the fight against the forces of authoritarianism is one that has been waged throughout history, and it is a fight that has always been won by those who refuse to surrender their principles in the face of adversity. It is a fight that will require the active engagement of every citizen who values the sanctity of our democratic institutions. It will require a sustained effort to raise public awareness, to mobilize opposition, and to hold those in power accountable for their actions. It will require a commitment to the principles of free speech, free press, and the rule of law, even in the face of those who would seek to undermine them. But perhaps most importantly, it will require a willingness to confront the uncomfortable truths about our own society – the inequalities, the injustices, and the divisions that have long simmered beneath the surface. For it is only by addressing these underlying issues that we can hope to build a more perfect union, one that is truly worthy of the ideals upon which it was founded. And so, my fellow citizens, let us not be lulled into complacency by the siren song of those who would promise us a return to some mythical past. Let us not be seduced by the false promises of those who would trade our freedoms for the illusion of security. Let us instead stand firm in our commitment to the principles that have made this nation great – the principles of liberty, equality, and justice for all. For in the end, the fight against Project 2025 is not simply a battle for the soul of our nation – it is a battle for the very future of democracy itself. It is a battle that will require all of us to summon the courage and the conviction to stand up for what we know to be right, even in the face of those who would seek to silence us. Let us draw strength from the examples of those who have gone before us – the patriots and the martyrs who have sacrificed everything in the name of freedom. Let us remember that the arc of history bends towards justice, but only if we have the courage to bend it ourselves. For as Thomas Jefferson once said, 'When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.' And as we stand here today, on the brink of an abyss that threatens to consume us all, let us be clear about where our loyalties lie. They lie not with those who seek to impose their will upon us through force and coercion, but with those who believe in the power of reason, of dialogue, and of democracy itself. They lie not with those who would trade our freedoms for the false promise of security, but with those who understand that our security lies in our freedoms themselves. And so, my friends, let us go forth from this place, armed with the knowledge that our cause is just, and our resolve unshakable. Let us go forth with the conviction that, no matter how dark the road ahead may seem, there is always a light at the end of the tunnel – a light that shines bright with the promise of a better tomorrow. For if we do not fight for that tomorrow, then who will? If we do not stand up for the principles that define us as a nation, then what will become of us? These are the questions that we must ask ourselves, as we confront the spectre of Project 2025 and all that it represents. And let us never forget, even in our darkest moments, that the power to shape our destiny lies not in the hands of those who would seek to control us, but in our own hands – the hands of a free people, united in the pursuit of justice, of equality, and of the democratic ideal. Thanks for listening and remember to like and share wherever you get your podcasts .

Project 2025: The Ominous Specter

We used to be journalists, but now we mostly just bitch about them. (Kidding. Kind of.) We also break down broken news. This weekly podcast brings you honest and original media analysis from two insiders who’ve broken plenty of news and been broken by it, too.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Hosted by long-suffering journalists and even longer-suffering friends, Jan Fran and Antoinette Lattouf, We Used to Be Journos is your guide to the way the media works.&nbsp; Join us every Wednesday as we unpack the headlines you see, and the power you don’t. We’ll take you through the week’s sketchy editorial decisions, suspect sources and thinly veiled bigotry. We’ll show you how the media sausage is made —so you know what you’re being fed.&nbsp;&nbsp; Armed with a low tolerance for spin, zero patience for BS, and just enough humour (and delusion) to keep working in the media, We Used to Be Journos serves up hot, sharp, unapologetic media tea. Support Ette Media by becoming a subscriber <a href="https://www.ettemedia.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a>. If you want to see our mugs as we yap you can watch the episode in full <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDn2m-RFCy4" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here. </a> Thanks to <a href="https://www.instagram.com/jaidanielpyne/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@jaidanielpyne</a> for composing the music for our podcast.<hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

We used to be journalists, but now we mostly just bitch about them. (Kidding. Kind of.) We also break down broken news. This weekly podcast brings you honest and original media analysis from two insiders who’ve broken plenty of news and been broken by it, too.   Hosted by long-suffering journalists and even longer-suffering friends, Jan Fran and Antoinette Lattouf, We Used to Be Journos is your guide to the way the media works.  Join us every Wednesday as we unpack the headlines you see, and the power you don’t. We’ll take you through the week’s sketchy editorial decisions, suspect sources and thinly veiled bigotry. We’ll show you how the media sausage is made —so you know what you’re being fed.   Armed with a low tolerance for spin, zero patience for BS, and just enough humour (and delusion) to keep working in the media, We Used to Be Journos serves up hot, sharp, unapologetic media tea. Support Ette Media by becoming a subscriber here. If you want to see our mugs as we yap you can watch the episode in full here. Thanks to @jaidanielpyne for composing the music for our podcast. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We used to be journalists, but now we mostly just bitch about them. (Kidding. Kind of.) We also break down broken news. This weekly podcast brings you honest and original media analysis from two insiders who’ve broken plenty of news and been broken by it, too.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Hosted by long-suffering journalists and even longer-suffering friends, Jan Fran and Antoinette Lattouf, We Used to Be Journos is your guide to the way the media works.&nbsp; Join us every Wednesday as we unpack the headlines you see, and the power you don’t. We’ll take you through the week’s sketchy editorial decisions, suspect sources and thinly veiled bigotry. We’ll show you how the media sausage is made —so you know what you’re being fed.&nbsp;&nbsp; Armed with a low tolerance for spin, zero patience for BS, and just enough humour (and delusion) to keep working in the media, We Used to Be Journos serves up hot, sharp, unapologetic media tea. Support Ette Media by becoming a subscriber <a href="https://www.ettemedia.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>. If you want to see our mugs as we yap you can watch the episode in full <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDn2m-RFCy4" rel="noopener noreferrer">here. </a> Thanks to <a href="https://www.instagram.com/jaidanielpyne/" rel="noopener noreferrer">@jaidanielpyne</a> for composing the music for our podcast. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

We Used to be Journos

Bloomberg Politics Managing Editor John Heilemann and Culture Correspondent Will Leitch discuss the intersection of politics and popular culture with guests from the worlds of politics, entertainment, tech, sports, business, and beyond.

Culture Caucus

Hora 20 es el espacio de la información y la opinión política en Colombia, conduce Diana Calderón.

Hora 20

Join Cap Times politics reporters Jessie Opoien and Jack Kelly as they catch up with the movers and shakers of Wisconsin politics for thorough discussions about the people and policies making waves in America's Dairyland.

Join Cap Times politics reporters Jessie Opoien and Jack Kelly as they catch up with the movers and shakers of Wisconsin politics for thorough discussions about the people and policies making waves in America's Dairyland.

Politics Podcasts / Page 56

Lowy Institute

In Legal Terms

Declarations: The Human Rights Podcast

Eat the Airwaves!

Hoosier Ag Today Podcast Network

Radio Free Bay Ridge

Center Stage, with Milfred and Hands

The English Riots in 2011: A Discussion from Different Criminological Perspectiv...

ChinaTalk

Comité

The Matt McNeil Show

addedSOULS

Trend Topic

EPPiC Broadcast

World Review from the New Statesman

Central Florida: Beyond The Soundbite

WEISSOLOGY

New Hampshire Journal

The DUM Show

Stokes and Folks

Sisters of the Night Caucus

Lever Reruns

Everything Else with Nick Steward

The Madigan Rule

La Trinchera de Llamas

The KOSU Daily

In The News This Week (the Have I Got News For You podcast)

Project 2025: The Ominous Specter

We Used to be Journos

Culture Caucus

Hora 20

Wedge Issues

The City Club of Cleveland Podcast

The Blue Falcon Podcast

Women With Balls

Junction City Podcast

Legally Bound

MVRed Podcast | Ohio's Political Podcast

The State of Working America Podcast

Good Weekend Talks

Derek O'Shea Show | Comedy News Politics and Culture Show

Political Economy Forum

Black Girl Politics Podcast

Global Security Briefing

Latin America Review

Grey Dynamics

Facts First with Christian Esguerra

War in Ukraine: Update from Kyiv

Newsweek Radio

NRC Wereldzaken