Arts

Books

Fashion & Beauty

Performing Arts

Food

Visual Arts

Design

Business

Entrepreneurship

Investing

Marketing

Careers

Management

Non-Profit

Comedy

Stand-Up

Comedy Interviews

Improv

Education

Self-Improvement

How To

Courses

Language Learning

Fiction

Comedy Fiction

Drama

Science Fiction

Government

Health & Fitness

Medicine

Alternative Health

Nutrition

Mental Health

Fitness

Sexuality

History

Kids & Family

Parenting

Stories for Kids

Education for Kids

Pets & Animals

Leisure

Video Games

Games

Automotive

Animation & Manga

Hobbies

Aviation

Home & Garden

Crafts

Music

Music Commentary

Music Interviews

Music History

News

Sports News

Entertainment News

News Commentary

Politics

Daily News

Business News

Tech News

Religion & Spirituality

Christianity

Spirituality

Religion

Judaism

Islam

Buddhism

Hinduism

Science

Social Sciences

Life Sciences

Natural Sciences

Nature

Chemistry

Mathematics

Earth Sciences

Physics

Astronomy

Society & Culture

Documentary

Relationships

Philosophy

Personal Journals

Places & Travel

Sports

Golf

Soccer

Wrestling

Basketball

Football

Fantasy Sports

Baseball

Wilderness

Running

Hockey

Rugby

Cricket

Volleyball

Tennis

Swimming

Technology

True Crime

TV & Film

Film Interviews

TV Reviews

After Shows

Film Reviews

Film History

All About Android delivers everything you want to know about Android each week--the biggest news, freshest hardware, best apps and geekiest how-tos--with Android enthusiasts Jason Howell, Ron Richards, and a variety of special guests along the way.

Records live every Tuesday at 8:00pm Eastern / 5:00pm Pacific / 01:00 (Wed) UTC.

All About Android delivers everything you want to know about Android each week--the biggest news, freshest hardware, best apps and geekiest how-tos--with Android enthusiasts Jason Howell, Ron Richards, and a variety of special guests along the way. Records live every Tuesday at 8:00pm Eastern / 5:00pm Pacific / 01:00 (Wed) UTC.

All About Android (Video)

Crypto is a weird place. There's jargon, acronyms, and technical mumbo jump that few people understand. There are also a good handful of scams littering the space. Grant and Max will attempt to shed some light on what's real and what isn't in the blockchain space. Strap on your seatbelts, gents, because you're in for quite the ride.

The No BS Crypto Podcast

Welcome to inside Digital Displacement.  Tune in each week as we take you on a journey of Pioneering Intelligence. A series of podcasts providing you insight into hydraulic innovation through the eyes of experts.

Welcome to inside Digital Displacement. Tune in each week as we take you on a journey of Pioneering Intelligence. A series of podcasts providing you insight into hydraulic innovation through the eyes of experts.

Pioneering Intelligence - Inside Digital Displacement

Подкаст-инструкция о том, как избежать цифровых угроз, создать надежный пароль, защитить данные от взлома. Одним словом, как вести себя в быстро меняющемся цифровом мире и не стать параноиком? Объясняют эксперты по кибербезопасности.
Это совместный подкаст компании «Ростелеком-Солар» и студии «Техника речи».

Подкаст-инструкция о том, как избежать цифровых угроз, создать надежный пароль, защитить данные от взлома. Одним словом, как вести себя в быстро меняющемся цифровом мире и не стать параноиком? Объясняют эксперты по кибербезопасности. Это совместный подкаст компании «Ростелеком-Солар» и студии «Техника речи».

Девичья фамилия матери

In diesem Podcast sprechen Alexander ”Sputti” Leitsch und Mark Sellner über die aktuellen Geschehnisse bei den MMORPGs. Welche Spiele sind neu? Was brachte das neuste Addon? Und wie performen die großen Titel wie WoW, GW2, ESO oder Lost Ark gerade? Der Podcast erscheint jede Woche und gibt euch eine Übersicht über aktuelle Ereignisse in der Welt der MMOs. Inspiriert wurden die beiden von ihrer Arbeit bei MeinMMO

MMO News - Dein MMORPG-Podcast

Screenshot è un podcast che parla di cultura digitale e tecnologia, di quello che succede dentro i nostri schermi e di come i personaggi, gli eventi e le aziende che li abitano influenzino le nostre vite. Ogni puntata parlerà quindi di una persona, una società o un fenomeno, della sua storia e della sua importanza. Perché quello che succede sui nostri schermi non rimane dentro i nostri schermi. Screenshot è un podcast di Pietro Minto prodotto da Il Foglio quotidiano. Coordinamento e grafica di Enrico Cicchetti

Screenshot è un podcast che parla di cultura digitale e tecnologia, di quello chesuccede dentro i nostri schermi e di come i personaggi, gli eventi e le aziende che liabitano influenzino le nostre vite. Ogni puntata parlerà quindi di unapersona, una società o un fenomeno, della sua storia e della sua importanza. Perchéquello che succede sui nostri schermi non rimane dentro i nostri schermi.Screenshot è un podcast di Pietro Minto prodotto da Il Foglio quotidiano.Coordinamento e grafica di Enrico Cicchetti

Screenshot è un podcast che parla di cultura digitale e tecnologia, di quello che succede dentro i nostri schermi e di come i personaggi, gli eventi e le aziende che li abitano influenzino le nostre vite. Ogni puntata parlerà quindi di una persona, una società o un fenomeno, della sua storia e della sua importanza. Perché quello che succede sui nostri schermi non rimane dentro i nostri schermi. Screenshot è un podcast di Pietro Minto prodotto da Il Foglio quotidiano. Coordinamento e grafica di Enrico Cicchetti

Screenshot. Cose dai nostri schermi

Welcome to Work Week, where we dig into the latest and greatest questions about the world of work — backed by equal parts hard data and fresh perspective. Tune in each week(ish) to find out what the latest emerging research tells us about how to make work, work better.

Hosted by Kelly Monahan, Gabby Burlacu and Ted Liu from the Upwork Research Institute (and their AI proxies.)

Welcome to Work Week, where we dig into the latest and greatest questions about the world of work — backed by equal parts hard data and fresh perspective. Tune in each week(ish) to find out what the latest emerging research tells us about how to make work, work better. Hosted by Kelly Monahan, Gabby Burlacu and Ted Liu from the Upwork Research Institute (and their AI proxies.)

Work Week

Explore the cutting-edge world of platform engineering, the backbone of modern software development. The Platform Engineering Show podcast dives into how internal developer platforms (IDPs) are revolutionizing the way teams build, deploy, and manage applications at scale. From streamlining workflows and reducing cognitive load for developers to fostering innovation and enabling seamless collaboration across development, operations, and IT service management (ITSM), we break down the key concepts and real-world applications that are shaping cloud-native architectures and DevOps practices. Whether you’re an engineer, a team leader, or a tech enthusiast, the Platform Engineering podcast is your guide to mastering efficiency and innovation in software development.

The Platform Engineering Show

Bienvenidos al canal de AUSAPE en Spotify. Diálogos inspiradores, entrevistas con arte, grandes personajes y mucho más en los Talks by AUSAPE. ¿Te lo vas a perder?

Bienvenidos al canal de AUSAPE en Spotify. Diálogos inspiradores, entrevistas con arte, grandes personajes y mucho más en los Talks by AUSAPE. ¿Te lo vas a perder?

AUSAPE Talks

This is the Podcast Version of my Rumble Channel

This is the Podcast Version of my Rumble Channel

The rhk111 Military and Arms Page

Welcome to Axe Finance Podcast, where we dive deep into the dynamic world of digital lending solutions, credit software, and FinTech. Join us as we explore ground-breaking innovations, share industry insights, and decode the complexities of loan origination. Whether you’re a fintech enthusiast, a seasoned banker, or simply curious about the future of finance, this podcast is your backstage pass to the latest trends, expert interviews, and thought-provoking discussions. Subscribe now and stay ahead of the curve! 🎙️🚀

Welcome to Axe Finance Podcast, where we dive deep into the dynamic world of digital lending solutions, credit software, and FinTech. Join us as we explore ground-breaking innovations, share industry insights, and decode the complexities of loan origination. Whether you’re a fintech enthusiast, a seasoned banker, or simply curious about the future of finance, this podcast is your backstage pass to the latest trends, expert interviews, and thought-provoking discussions. Subscribe now and stay ahead of the curve! 🎙️🚀

Axe Finance

This is your Gene Editing Revolution podcast. Welcome to "Gene Editing Revolution," a captivating podcast that takes you on a journey into the exciting world of gene editing. In our inaugural episode, Synthor, your friendly narrator, explores a groundbreaking advancement set in 2025. Discover how the science of gene editing is transforming lives by potentially curing genetic diseases and enhancing crops. Synthor explains the complex science in simple, relatable terms, highlights the extraordinary benefits, and dives into the ethical debates surrounding these innovations. You'll also hear a riveting real-life success story that showcases the power of this technology. Plus, you'll learn a mind-blowing DNA fact that will leave you in awe of the marvels of biology. Don't miss out on this fascinating exploration—subscribe now and be part of the conversation as we continue to uncover the secrets and promises of gene editing every week. For more info go to <a href="https://www.quietplease.ai" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.quietplease.ai</a> Or check out these tech deals <a href="https://amzn.to/3FkjUmw" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://amzn.to/3FkjUmw</a>

This is your Gene Editing Revolution podcast.Welcome to "Gene Editing Revolution," a captivating podcast that takes you on a journey into the exciting world of gene editing. In our inaugural episode, Synthor, your friendly narrator, explores a groundbreaking advancement set in 2025. Discover how the science of gene editing is transforming lives by potentially curing genetic diseases and enhancing crops. Synthor explains the complex science in simple, relatable terms, highlights the extraordinary benefits, and dives into the ethical debates surrounding these innovations. You'll also hear a riveting real-life success story that showcases the power of this technology. Plus, you'll learn a mind-blowing DNA fact that will leave you in awe of the marvels of biology. Don't miss out on this fascinating exploration—subscribe now and be part of the conversation as we continue to uncover the secrets and promises of gene editing every week.For more info go to https://www.quietplease.aiOr check out these tech deals https://amzn.to/3FkjUmw

This is your Gene Editing Revolution podcast. Welcome to "Gene Editing Revolution," a captivating podcast that takes you on a journey into the exciting world of gene editing. In our inaugural episode, Synthor, your friendly narrator, explores a groundbreaking advancement set in 2025. Discover how the science of gene editing is transforming lives by potentially curing genetic diseases and enhancing crops. Synthor explains the complex science in simple, relatable terms, highlights the extraordinary benefits, and dives into the ethical debates surrounding these innovations. You'll also hear a riveting real-life success story that showcases the power of this technology. Plus, you'll learn a mind-blowing DNA fact that will leave you in awe of the marvels of biology. Don't miss out on this fascinating exploration—subscribe now and be part of the conversation as we continue to uncover the secrets and promises of gene editing every week. For more info go to <a href="https://www.quietplease.ai" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.quietplease.ai</a> Or check out these tech deals <a href="https://amzn.to/3FkjUmw" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://amzn.to/3FkjUmw</a>

Gene Editing Revolution

Europe Leads the Way: Historic AI Act Seeks to Manage Emerging Technology On December 6th, 2023, the chronically divided European Parliament found a common cause by approving a landmark framework supporters believe may steer humanity’s fragile relationship with ascendant artificial intelligent systems towards sustainable stability. With this trailblazing Artificial Intelligence Act, Europe attempts to inaugurate comprehensive governance addressing complex realities, frightening uncertainties and gargantuan economic possibilities unleashed by thinking machines. Backers tout the legislation as prudent preparation welcoming AI’s utmost potential while neutralizing the direst threats before dystopian terminators or dehumanizing social credit panopticons become inescapable. Critics counter the rules either risk constraining innovation essential for competing against Chinese or American rivals less constrained by moralizing laws aimed at avoiding hypothetical scenarios derived from science fiction more than empirical risks or technical realities. Between these polarized perspectives lies a messy middle ground where thousands of companies building an ever-expanding array of machine learning tools must now navigate interwoven regulations arriving earlier in development than any comparable technologies. The ultimate outcome from Europe’s AI Act launching just as global recession and geopolitical realignments reshape societal priorities could determine whether democratic values flourish alongside prospering digital economies or whether unchecked private and governmental forces corrupt eu digital sovereignty. There may not be another opportunity once this technology genie escapes unfettered into the cyber wild. Background Context: Europe’s Vision for Human-Centric AI Europe’s appetite for asserting legal authority over emerging technologies through channels like the AI Act connects back to principles predating current applications. Within Western philosophy’s corpus stretching back millennia, European scholars tended to emphasize society-wide ethical frameworks over individual advancement, in contrast to American exceptionalism. Post-World War II efforts reconciling industrialization’s dehumanizing extremes with redistributive welfare states further distinguished European structural solutions as relatively interventionist around technology issues compared to laissez-faire US policies. These distinct sensibilities manifest in cultural tendencies prizing communal quality living over purely maximizing gross domestic product metrics. As digital transformation accelerates, European regulators express relatively more concern over AI governance given concentrations of private power in American tech titans like Google along with China’s authoritarian scoring systems assigning social credit using biometrics and predictive analytics in ways many consider dystopian horrors. Through legislative proposals like the AI Act, the EU asserts localized control as gatekeepers stewarding new generations of automated algorithms towards just outcomes benefitting Europe on Europe’s terms. Beyond pragmatic concerns around supplying trustworthy infrastructure and enhancing competitiveness by supporting its Digital Decade Strategy, leaders adamantly believe proactively embedding legal protections and ethical accountability now prevents hazardous overreach threatening civil rights later. Critics argue hampering innovation with premature red tape risks ceding pole position in emerging fields. But European parliamentarians believe setting ground rules grants digital democracy its surest shot at thriving long-term. Core AI Act Components: Targeting High-Risk Systems At nearly 150 pages, The EU AI Act approved in late 2023 may appear unnavigably dense. But its sprawling complexity simply reflects manifold challenges defining modern machine learning’s immense but heavily stratified influence. Controversial proposals like outright banning certain applications barely gained traction during roughly 18 months of legislative drafting and debate. Instead, the final language adopts a risk-based approach placing tiered requirements upon AI creators depending on whether systems seem capable of causing material or immaterial harm. Let’s explore key pillars: Defining Artificial Intelligence First and foremost, regulators are required to codify exactly what constitutes AI versus conventional software when assigning legal duties. Settling on specifics proved divisive given the breadth of statistical computing. Ultimately EU legislators produced the following: Artificial intelligence system means software that is developed with one or more techniques and approaches listed in the Annex and can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, generate outputs such as content, predictions, recommendations, or decisions that influence the environment with which the system interacts. Annex techniques referenced include machine learning approaches like neural networks, tree ensembles, clustering, regression, dimensionality reduction and reinforcement learning. While expansive, exemptions target generalized analytics, video games, industrial robotics, and infrastructure like cloud computing platforms enabling AI without autonomous functionality. Prohibited AI Practices Before even classifying risk profiles, certain narrowly defined AI applications seen as irredeemably biased or manipulative face outright prohibition under Article 5: Real-time scoring of individuals for generalized evaluation by private or public entities outside of approved credit reporting frameworks AI deceives human perceptions through manipulating media like fake videos/audio or social bots imitating real people without disclosing artificial origins * Indiscriminate, real-time surveillance violating proportionate existing laws * Exploitation targeting people’s vulnerabilities like children or those requiring special protections to circumvent consent High-Risk AI Requiring Conformity Assessments The Act’s cornerstone designation identifies narrowly defined “high-risk” AI requiring verified third-party audits called conformity assessments to verify safety. Categories earning mandatory checks require monitoring under Article 6 authority for entire product lifecycle stages from design through retirement including Biometric identification classifying natural persons AI managing critical infrastructure components AI tools used to select human access to education, vocational opportunities, essential private services, law enforcement, migration, asylum, welfare benefits Safety components for products covered under EU machinery regulations * Additional case-by-case applications that an EU oversight board flags as high-priority Qualifying creators of high-risk AI must then satisfy auditors they meet requirements around: Accountability procedures &amp; governance Appropriately secured datasets Documentation methodologies Transparency disclosures Human oversight safeguards Accuracy metrics Risk mitigation strategies Successfully completing lengthy conformity processes then provides “CE” grade certification permitting legal high-risk system usage and sales across the EU economic zone. Additional Consumer Transparency Rules Separate transparency obligations also emerge under Article 52 for all consumer-facing AI, ranging from chatbots to media recommendations to insurance pricing models. Systems “interact” with natural persons must be identified as AI, with basic explanations provided around capabilities, limitations, data reliance, and safety. Disclosures become mandatory alongside mechanisms allowing users to revoke consent or otherwise opt out. Substantial Fines for Violations Lastly, while dismissed by some technologists as vague aspirations too divorced from real-world scenarios, the EU AI ACT contains sufficient compliance teeth via steep financial penalties to demand attention. Per Article 71, violating key requirements risks fines of up to €30 million Euros or 6% of annual income for major corporations. Lesser violations incur €20 million Euros maximum. Compared to EU GDP Privacy rules carrying 4% annual revenue fines, these represent substantial deterrents for misuse, manipulation, or negligence. Reactions: Praise and Critiques Given lengthy legislative processes allowing extensive lobbying and debate, few European technology stakeholders rank as surprised when parliament’s final vote approving the AI Act succeeded with an overwhelming 582-42 margin. Leadership across member states and political ideologies made passing landmark legislation a high priority. Even frequent outliers in Hungary accepted terms. However, prominent positioning by officials and subject matter experts during subsequent press conferences highlighted lingering divisions. Praise For Proactive Stance European Commissioner for Internal Markets Theirry Breton, leading digital policy efforts praised the Act’s passage for “giving citizens trust while encouraging businesses” towards “ethical technology.” He believes focusing on risk management rather than failed blanket restrictions affords “scalable and future-proof” direction amidst a pivotal transition. Legal experts commend laying down clear “rules of the road” early when influencing outcomes remains possible. Cybersecurity thought leaders agree reasonable accountability should guide AI. Et while some technologists resent compliance costs, established enterprises accept responsible oversight. Smaller EU startups even welcome barriers inhibiting Silicon Valley com

Europe Leads the Way: Historic AI Act Seeks to Manage Emerging Technology On December 6th, 2023, the chronically divided European Parliament found a common cause by approving a landmark framework supporters believe may steer humanity’s fragile relationship with ascendant artificial intelligent systems towards sustainable stability. With this trailblazing Artificial Intelligence Act, Europe attempts to inaugurate comprehensive governance addressing complex realities, frightening uncertainties and gargantuan economic possibilities unleashed by thinking machines. Backers tout the legislation as prudent preparation welcoming AI’s utmost potential while neutralizing the direst threats before dystopian terminators or dehumanizing social credit panopticons become inescapable. Critics counter the rules either risk constraining innovation essential for competing against Chinese or American rivals less constrained by moralizing laws aimed at avoiding hypothetical scenarios derived from science fiction more than empirical risks or technical realities. Between these polarized perspectives lies a messy middle ground where thousands of companies building an ever-expanding array of machine learning tools must now navigate interwoven regulations arriving earlier in development than any comparable technologies. The ultimate outcome from Europe’s AI Act launching just as global recession and geopolitical realignments reshape societal priorities could determine whether democratic values flourish alongside prospering digital economies or whether unchecked private and governmental forces corrupt eu digital sovereignty. There may not be another opportunity once this technology genie escapes unfettered into the cyber wild. Background Context: Europe’s Vision for Human-Centric AI Europe’s appetite for asserting legal authority over emerging technologies through channels like the AI Act connects back to principles predating current applications. Within Western philosophy’s corpus stretching back millennia, European scholars tended to emphasize society-wide ethical frameworks over individual advancement, in contrast to American exceptionalism. Post-World War II efforts reconciling industrialization’s dehumanizing extremes with redistributive welfare states further distinguished European structural solutions as relatively interventionist around technology issues compared to laissez-faire US policies. These distinct sensibilities manifest in cultural tendencies prizing communal quality living over purely maximizing gross domestic product metrics. As digital transformation accelerates, European regulators express relatively more concern over AI governance given concentrations of private power in American tech titans like Google along with China’s authoritarian scoring systems assigning social credit using biometrics and predictive analytics in ways many consider dystopian horrors. Through legislative proposals like the AI Act, the EU asserts localized control as gatekeepers stewarding new generations of automated algorithms towards just outcomes benefitting Europe on Europe’s terms. Beyond pragmatic concerns around supplying trustworthy infrastructure and enhancing competitiveness by supporting its Digital Decade Strategy, leaders adamantly believe proactively embedding legal protections and ethical accountability now prevents hazardous overreach threatening civil rights later. Critics argue hampering innovation with premature red tape risks ceding pole position in emerging fields. But European parliamentarians believe setting ground rules grants digital democracy its surest shot at thriving long-term. Core AI Act Components: Targeting High-Risk Systems At nearly 150 pages, The EU AI Act approved in late 2023 may appear unnavigably dense. But its sprawling complexity simply reflects manifold challenges defining modern machine learning’s immense but heavily stratified influence. Controversial proposals like outright banning certain applications barely gained traction during roughly 18 months of legislative drafting and debate. Instead, the final language adopts a risk-based approach placing tiered requirements upon AI creators depending on whether systems seem capable of causing material or immaterial harm. Let’s explore key pillars: Defining Artificial Intelligence First and foremost, regulators are required to codify exactly what constitutes AI versus conventional software when assigning legal duties. Settling on specifics proved divisive given the breadth of statistical computing. Ultimately EU legislators produced the following: Artificial intelligence system means software that is developed with one or more techniques and approaches listed in the Annex and can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, generate outputs such as content, predictions, recommendations, or decisions that influence the environment with which the system interacts. Annex techniques referenced include machine learning approaches like neural networks, tree ensembles, clustering, regression, dimensionality reduction and reinforcement learning. While expansive, exemptions target generalized analytics, video games, industrial robotics, and infrastructure like cloud computing platforms enabling AI without autonomous functionality. Prohibited AI Practices Before even classifying risk profiles, certain narrowly defined AI applications seen as irredeemably biased or manipulative face outright prohibition under Article 5: Real-time scoring of individuals for generalized evaluation by private or public entities outside of approved credit reporting frameworks AI deceives human perceptions through manipulating media like fake videos/audio or social bots imitating real people without disclosing artificial origins * Indiscriminate, real-time surveillance violating proportionate existing laws * Exploitation targeting people’s vulnerabilities like children or those requiring special protections to circumvent consent High-Risk AI Requiring Conformity Assessments The Act’s cornerstone designation identifies narrowly defined “high-risk” AI requiring verified third-party audits called conformity assessments to verify safety. Categories earning mandatory checks require monitoring under Article 6 authority for entire product lifecycle stages from design through retirement including Biometric identification classifying natural persons AI managing critical infrastructure components AI tools used to select human access to education, vocational opportunities, essential private services, law enforcement, migration, asylum, welfare benefits Safety components for products covered under EU machinery regulations * Additional case-by-case applications that an EU oversight board flags as high-priority Qualifying creators of high-risk AI must then satisfy auditors they meet requirements around: Accountability procedures & governance Appropriately secured datasets Documentation methodologies Transparency disclosures Human oversight safeguards Accuracy metrics Risk mitigation strategies Successfully completing lengthy conformity processes then provides “CE” grade certification permitting legal high-risk system usage and sales across the EU economic zone. Additional Consumer Transparency Rules Separate transparency obligations also emerge under Article 52 for all consumer-facing AI, ranging from chatbots to media recommendations to insurance pricing models. Systems “interact” with natural persons must be identified as AI, with basic explanations provided around capabilities, limitations, data reliance, and safety. Disclosures become mandatory alongside mechanisms allowing users to revoke consent or otherwise opt out. Substantial Fines for Violations Lastly, while dismissed by some technologists as vague aspirations too divorced from real-world scenarios, the EU AI ACT contains sufficient compliance teeth via steep financial penalties to demand attention. Per Article 71, violating key requirements risks fines of up to €30 million Euros or 6% of annual income for major corporations. Lesser violations incur €20 million Euros maximum. Compared to EU GDP Privacy rules carrying 4% annual revenue fines, these represent substantial deterrents for misuse, manipulation, or negligence. Reactions: Praise and Critiques Given lengthy legislative processes allowing extensive lobbying and debate, few European technology stakeholders rank as surprised when parliament’s final vote approving the AI Act succeeded with an overwhelming 582-42 margin. Leadership across member states and political ideologies made passing landmark legislation a high priority. Even frequent outliers in Hungary accepted terms. However, prominent positioning by officials and subject matter experts during subsequent press conferences highlighted lingering divisions. Praise For Proactive Stance European Commissioner for Internal Markets Theirry Breton, leading digital policy efforts praised the Act’s passage for “giving citizens trust while encouraging businesses” towards “ethical technology.” He believes focusing on risk management rather than failed blanket restrictions affords “scalable and future-proof” direction amidst a pivotal transition. Legal experts commend laying down clear “rules of the road” early when influencing outcomes remains possible. Cybersecurity thought leaders agree reasonable accountability should guide AI. Et while some technologists resent compliance costs, established enterprises accept responsible oversight. Smaller EU startups even welcome barriers inhibiting Silicon Valley com

Europe Leads the Way: Historic AI Act Seeks to Manage Emerging Technology On December 6th, 2023, the chronically divided European Parliament found a common cause by approving a landmark framework supporters believe may steer humanity’s fragile relationship with ascendant artificial intelligent systems towards sustainable stability. With this trailblazing Artificial Intelligence Act, Europe attempts to inaugurate comprehensive governance addressing complex realities, frightening uncertainties and gargantuan economic possibilities unleashed by thinking machines. Backers tout the legislation as prudent preparation welcoming AI’s utmost potential while neutralizing the direst threats before dystopian terminators or dehumanizing social credit panopticons become inescapable. Critics counter the rules either risk constraining innovation essential for competing against Chinese or American rivals less constrained by moralizing laws aimed at avoiding hypothetical scenarios derived from science fiction more than empirical risks or technical realities. Between these polarized perspectives lies a messy middle ground where thousands of companies building an ever-expanding array of machine learning tools must now navigate interwoven regulations arriving earlier in development than any comparable technologies. The ultimate outcome from Europe’s AI Act launching just as global recession and geopolitical realignments reshape societal priorities could determine whether democratic values flourish alongside prospering digital economies or whether unchecked private and governmental forces corrupt eu digital sovereignty. There may not be another opportunity once this technology genie escapes unfettered into the cyber wild. Background Context: Europe’s Vision for Human-Centric AI Europe’s appetite for asserting legal authority over emerging technologies through channels like the AI Act connects back to principles predating current applications. Within Western philosophy’s corpus stretching back millennia, European scholars tended to emphasize society-wide ethical frameworks over individual advancement, in contrast to American exceptionalism. Post-World War II efforts reconciling industrialization’s dehumanizing extremes with redistributive welfare states further distinguished European structural solutions as relatively interventionist around technology issues compared to laissez-faire US policies. These distinct sensibilities manifest in cultural tendencies prizing communal quality living over purely maximizing gross domestic product metrics. As digital transformation accelerates, European regulators express relatively more concern over AI governance given concentrations of private power in American tech titans like Google along with China’s authoritarian scoring systems assigning social credit using biometrics and predictive analytics in ways many consider dystopian horrors. Through legislative proposals like the AI Act, the EU asserts localized control as gatekeepers stewarding new generations of automated algorithms towards just outcomes benefitting Europe on Europe’s terms. Beyond pragmatic concerns around supplying trustworthy infrastructure and enhancing competitiveness by supporting its Digital Decade Strategy, leaders adamantly believe proactively embedding legal protections and ethical accountability now prevents hazardous overreach threatening civil rights later. Critics argue hampering innovation with premature red tape risks ceding pole position in emerging fields. But European parliamentarians believe setting ground rules grants digital democracy its surest shot at thriving long-term. Core AI Act Components: Targeting High-Risk Systems At nearly 150 pages, The EU AI Act approved in late 2023 may appear unnavigably dense. But its sprawling complexity simply reflects manifold challenges defining modern machine learning’s immense but heavily stratified influence. Controversial proposals like outright banning certain applications barely gained traction during roughly 18 months of legislative drafting and debate. Instead, the final language adopts a risk-based approach placing tiered requirements upon AI creators depending on whether systems seem capable of causing material or immaterial harm. Let’s explore key pillars: Defining Artificial Intelligence First and foremost, regulators are required to codify exactly what constitutes AI versus conventional software when assigning legal duties. Settling on specifics proved divisive given the breadth of statistical computing. Ultimately EU legislators produced the following: Artificial intelligence system means software that is developed with one or more techniques and approaches listed in the Annex and can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, generate outputs such as content, predictions, recommendations, or decisions that influence the environment with which the system interacts. Annex techniques referenced include machine learning approaches like neural networks, tree ensembles, clustering, regression, dimensionality reduction and reinforcement learning. While expansive, exemptions target generalized analytics, video games, industrial robotics, and infrastructure like cloud computing platforms enabling AI without autonomous functionality. Prohibited AI Practices Before even classifying risk profiles, certain narrowly defined AI applications seen as irredeemably biased or manipulative face outright prohibition under Article 5: Real-time scoring of individuals for generalized evaluation by private or public entities outside of approved credit reporting frameworks AI deceives human perceptions through manipulating media like fake videos/audio or social bots imitating real people without disclosing artificial origins * Indiscriminate, real-time surveillance violating proportionate existing laws * Exploitation targeting people’s vulnerabilities like children or those requiring special protections to circumvent consent High-Risk AI Requiring Conformity Assessments The Act’s cornerstone designation identifies narrowly defined “high-risk” AI requiring verified third-party audits called conformity assessments to verify safety. Categories earning mandatory checks require monitoring under Article 6 authority for entire product lifecycle stages from design through retirement including Biometric identification classifying natural persons AI managing critical infrastructure components AI tools used to select human access to education, vocational opportunities, essential private services, law enforcement, migration, asylum, welfare benefits Safety components for products covered under EU machinery regulations * Additional case-by-case applications that an EU oversight board flags as high-priority Qualifying creators of high-risk AI must then satisfy auditors they meet requirements around: Accountability procedures &amp; governance Appropriately secured datasets Documentation methodologies Transparency disclosures Human oversight safeguards Accuracy metrics Risk mitigation strategies Successfully completing lengthy conformity processes then provides “CE” grade certification permitting legal high-risk system usage and sales across the EU economic zone. Additional Consumer Transparency Rules Separate transparency obligations also emerge under Article 52 for all consumer-facing AI, ranging from chatbots to media recommendations to insurance pricing models. Systems “interact” with natural persons must be identified as AI, with basic explanations provided around capabilities, limitations, data reliance, and safety. Disclosures become mandatory alongside mechanisms allowing users to revoke consent or otherwise opt out. Substantial Fines for Violations Lastly, while dismissed by some technologists as vague aspirations too divorced from real-world scenarios, the EU AI ACT contains sufficient compliance teeth via steep financial penalties to demand attention. Per Article 71, violating key requirements risks fines of up to €30 million Euros or 6% of annual income for major corporations. Lesser violations incur €20 million Euros maximum. Compared to EU GDP Privacy rules carrying 4% annual revenue fines, these represent substantial deterrents for misuse, manipulation, or negligence. Reactions: Praise and Critiques Given lengthy legislative processes allowing extensive lobbying and debate, few European technology stakeholders rank as surprised when parliament’s final vote approving the AI Act succeeded with an overwhelming 582-42 margin. Leadership across member states and political ideologies made passing landmark legislation a high priority. Even frequent outliers in Hungary accepted terms. However, prominent positioning by officials and subject matter experts during subsequent press conferences highlighted lingering divisions. Praise For Proactive Stance European Commissioner for Internal Markets Theirry Breton, leading digital policy efforts praised the Act’s passage for “giving citizens trust while encouraging businesses” towards “ethical technology.” He believes focusing on risk management rather than failed blanket restrictions affords “scalable and future-proof” direction amidst a pivotal transition. Legal experts commend laying down clear “rules of the road” early when influencing outcomes remains possible. Cybersecurity thought leaders agree reasonable accountability should guide AI. Et while some technologists resent compliance costs, established enterprises accept responsible oversight. Smaller EU startups even welcome barriers inhibiting Silicon Valley com

The EU's AI Act: Groundbreaking Move for Ethical and Responsible AI Development

Tech News Podcasts / Page 242

All About Android (Video)

The No BS Crypto Podcast

Pioneering Intelligence - Inside Digital Displacement

Девичья фамилия матери

MMO News - Dein MMORPG-Podcast

Screenshot. Cose dai nostri schermi

Work Week

The Platform Engineering Show

AUSAPE Talks

The rhk111 Military and Arms Page

Axe Finance

Gene Editing Revolution

The EU's AI Act: Groundbreaking Move for Ethical and Responsible AI Development