And we're back! Tune in as Professors Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck discuss and debate:

ICC jurisdiction over war crimes on Ukraine's territory

Limits on sharing tactical intel and arms?

The Neutrality Act and its implications for those interested in going to Ukraine to fight

The Supreme Court's twin State Secrets Privilege rulings last week (Zubayda, Fazaga)

Qhatani transferred out of GTMO

A pair of recent rulings against the Navy on its COVID vaccination policy

The House Foreign Affairs Committee's AUMF hearing

All that, plus. what can only be described as perfunctory frivolity :)

We are back with a fresh episode, hot on the heels of Russia's latest incursion into Ukraine. Tune in as we survey some of the legal dimensions to this latest development (including discussion of the impact of diplomatic recognition on UN Charter Article 2(4)), as well as the various sanctions frameworks that are now in play.  We also check in on an important district court ruling in the civil suit against former President Trump in relation to the January 6 insurrection, exploring its First Amendment/Brandenburg doctrine aspects.  As for frivolity?  A bit random this time, even for these guys: we've got the Juwan Howard situation following the Michigan-Wisconsin game, and reviews of some of the key rides at Disneyland. Because...well, it's the frivolity segment, after all!

We are back, and even though one of us apparently cannot work this new tech called a "calendar," we're excited to bring a shorter-than-usual episode without having a whole month go by!

Tune in as co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney discuss and debate:

The Biden Administration's change of position on the availability of coerced statements for use in pre-trial proceedings in military commissions

The news of the capture, repatriation to the United States, and federal court prosecution of a woman from Kansas who apparently had traveled to Syria to take up arms on behalf of ISIS--and the questions this raises about how long she was held pre-transfer, and in whose custody

Civil suits against private military contractors, the varied legal obstacles they face, and updates on some current lawsuits in which Steve is involved--and interesting questions they raise, such as the precise scope of the "combat activities" limitation

All that, plus a grab-bag of frivolity including the new Netflix movie based on Robert Harris's Munich book, and of course NFL sportsball happenings!

Seeing as how 2022 is well underway, it's probably about time we produced a new episode!  Tune in for co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney as they discuss and debate:

The various international and domestic law questions that might arise in that Russia (further) invades Ukraine

The oral argument in Thompson v. Trump (especially the presidential immunity question)

The who-owns-the-privilege question in Trump v. Thompson (not a typo)

The seditious conspiracy indictment against Oath Keepers leaders

What federal statutes have to say about a scenario in which the President might confer authority on a private armed group to "enforce" the law

Believe it or not, a judicial change in a military commission

More GTMO detainees approved (by Periodic Review Board) for transfer out (though no one actually seems to be leaving)

All that plus the usual frivolity, this time featuring the classic combination of (1) Jim Carrey films and (2) NFL playoffs.

Welcome to our official Holiday Office Party, where we mainly just hope things will go smoother than they did for the good people of Nakatomi Corporation in 1988!

In this episode, co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney discuss:

The state of the criminal contempt of Congress proceedings against Steve Bannon and Mark Meadows

The D.C. Circuit's ruling refusing to assert post-presidential decision-making authority to Donald Trump in relation to the records of his presidency held by NARA

The SCOTUS cert. grant in Torres (does Congress under its power to raise and support the armed forces have authority to abrogate state sovereign immunity)

The SCOTUS cert. denial in Begani

The 10th Circuit's ruling in Muhtorov (upholding the Section 702 FISA framework against various challenges)

Passage of the NDAA for Fiscal Year '22

All that, plus book recommendations for your holiday shopping convenience, and a Q&A regarding the works of the great Mo Willems (you know: Pigeon, Elephant and Piggie, and Knuffle Bunny).

Ah, well, that took a bit longer than expected!  We promise we don't mean to let this become a quarterly show, or even a monthly.  Too much national security law for that!

In today's episode, we discuss:

Haroon Gul's victory in a GTMO habeas case (and what it may or may not mean for the bigger picture)

Majid Kahn's sentencing testimony (and the clemency letter that the majority of the panel subsequently issued)

The SCOTUS decision to deny cert. in ACLU's attempt to establish a constitutional right of public access to at least some FISC opinions (and the Gorsuch-Sotomayor dissent)

The SCOTUS oral argument in Fagaza, raising both statutory interpretation questions about FISA (and, possibly, constitutional questions about the State Secrets Privilege)

Today's DOJ announcement about Poland's arrest (and America's extradition request concerning) a Ukrainian national associated with the REvil ransomware Kaseya campaign

The conviction (for economic espionage) of a Chinese MSS official who attempted to get an American GE employee to spill secrets (and the extradition of the defendant from Belgium, where he thought he was going to take delivery of stolen information)

And, of course, some disorganized frivolity!

What's that?  A new episode?  What have these guys been doing all month...

Well, whatever they've been doing all September since Episode 209, Professors Vladeck and Chesney are back at last with a new episode.  Tune in as they discuss and debate:

The en banc D.C. Circuit oral argument in al Hela (asking, inter alia, whether the Due Process Clause applies at GTMO)

A preview of the upcoming SCOTUS arguments relating to the State Secrets Privilege

The Dorfman/Naylor/Isikoff article on CIA planning relating to Assange and Wikileaks

A National Security Division roundup noting the sudden wind-up of the Huawei CFO case and the new material support case against a Canadian Islamic State fighter previously held by the SDF in Syria

All that, plus no small amount of frivolity (including a much-too-long endorsement of the greatness that is Joe Abercrombie).

This week on the National Security Law Podcast, we mark 20 years since the 9/11 attacks.  Tune in as co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney share their views on the major legal developments unleashed by that awful day, in a broad retrospective on the era.

In this week's episode, we focus on the unfolding situation in Afghanistan.

It's been a long summer break for the podcast, but we're back! Tune in today as Professors Chesney and Vladeck discuss and debate:

AUMF reform prospects (2001 AUMF in particular)

Ongoing uncertainty as to the fate of the Presidential Policy Guidance re use of lethal force outside areas of active hostilities

Litigation exploring whether a unanimous panel should be required in courts-martial

A semi-deep dive into Jacobson, the 1905 Supreme Court case that upheld a local mandatory vaccination order (targeting smallpox) in the face of what we would today describe as a substantive due process fundamental rights/liberty claim.

How about that CDC rent-moratorium extension?

And, yes, we lament the apparent collapse of the Mets, while also recommending some good books and podcasts!