True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

The first jury heard twelve hours of financial crimes testimony before they ever weighed the physical evidence. Three-hour conviction. The Supreme Court just said that can’t happen again. Round two is a fundamentally different trial.

Creighton Waters has to convict on what SLED actually found — and what they didn’t find. No weapon. No DNA on Alex Murdaugh. A crime scene degraded by weather and contaminated by family access. And a housekeeper who says she reported an unidentified vehicle near the property, close to Paul’s firearm storage, and SLED let it slide.

Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke don’t mince words about what that means. They spent decades running investigations at the highest levels, and they walk through exactly how the defense will use SLED’s own gaps against the prosecution at retrial.

Harpootlian already tipped his hand. He told reporters the reversal will bring reluctant witnesses out, and he’ll subpoena the ones who don’t come voluntarily. Coffindaffer and Dreeke assess whether that’s strategy or theater, examine Blanca Simpson’s evolving accounts across multiple settings, and tackle the two-shooter theory that SLED admitted it couldn’t eliminate. The prosecution’s case just got a lot harder. Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Jennifer Coffindaffer.

LINKS & DISCLAIMER

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #MurdaughTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #CreightonWaters

He was the loyal son. He sat in the courtroom, testified for the defense, told a jury his father wasn’t the man prosecutors claimed. Then Alex Murdaugh got convicted, and Buster disappeared. Three years of near-silence, almost no prison visits, and a life rebuilt at arm’s length from the Murdaugh name.

Now the conviction is gone, the retrial is coming, and Buster reportedly isn’t relieved. He’s furious. He called Alex a “selfish old man.” That’s a very different Buster than the one who took the stand the first time.

Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke sit down with Tony Brueski to unpack what Buster’s anger means for both legal teams. If the defense can’t count on him, they lose the emotional anchor that made Alex look human to the first jury. If the prosecution can get him talking, they may have the most devastating witness imaginable — a surviving son who no longer believes his father.

Coffindaffer and Dreeke also dismantle the state’s family annihilation theory from an angle no one’s pushed: Buster’s survival. They walk through the insurance fraud staging, the Murdaugh family’s long history of self-protection, and the critical unanswered question — what does Buster actually know about the weeks after Maggie and Paul were killed? Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Jennifer Coffindaffer.

LINKS & DISCLAIMER

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS

#AlexMurdaugh #BusterMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughTrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #MurdaughCase

Former Chief Justice Jean Toal sat individual jurors down and asked them whether Becky Hill's comments changed their votes. The South Carolina Supreme Court said she had no right to do that. Rule 606(b) protects the privacy of jury deliberations — you can ask whether external contact happened, but you cannot ask jurors how they voted or why. Toal crossed that line, and the Supreme Court corrected it by overruling one of its own prior decisions that had allowed broader inquiry.

Defense attorney Eric Faddis walks through the legal mechanics of the reversal with Tony Brueski. The court adopted the Fourth Circuit's Cheek test as binding law in South Carolina. Once the defense demonstrated that Hill's comments were more than innocuous — telling jurors not to be fooled by the defense, to watch Murdaugh's body language, that deliberations shouldn't take long — prejudice was presumed automatically. The burden shifted to the State to prove no reasonable possibility the verdict was influenced. The State couldn't do it. Hill pled guilty to perjury in December 2025 and the court found she was driven by a book deal.

But the ruling does more than reverse. It restructures the retrial. The prosecution spent twelve and a half hours on financial crimes the first time. The court flagged specific testimony as having zero probative value on motive and ordered any retrial to limit that evidence to material directly supporting the exposure timeline — the CFO confrontation the morning of the killings, the hearing three days later. The emotional weight that helped convict Murdaugh in the first trial is now subject to exclusion.

Faddis addresses which unresolved evidentiary issues — the firearm analysis, the raincoat, the gunshot residue, the iPhone demonstration — give the defense its strongest ground at retrial.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #JeanToal #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JuryTampering #MurdaughTrial

Former Chief Justice Jean Toal denied Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial by requiring him to prove the Clerk's comments actually harmed his case. The South Carolina Supreme Court just ruled unanimously that she had it backwards. Under federal law, the burden falls on the State to prove there is no reasonable possibility the verdict was influenced. All five justices found the State couldn't meet that standard. Toal also improperly questioned jurors about whether the comments changed their individual votes — violating the protections around jury deliberation privacy.

The Clerk in question is Becky Hill, who the court found made unprecedented improper statements to jurors during the trial. She told them not to be fooled by the defense evidence, to watch Murdaugh's body language closely, and that deliberations shouldn't take long. The court determined her conduct was driven by a book deal that depended on a guilty verdict. Hill pled guilty to perjury in December 2025 for lying under oath about what she did.

With retrial confirmed by AG Alan Wilson, the Supreme Court also drew a line: prosecutors presented over twelve hours of financial crimes evidence at the first trial. The court called that excessive and restricted any retrial to financial evidence directly supporting the motive theory. Murdaugh remains incarcerated on financial convictions.

And while the courts sort through the wreckage, Blanca Simpson — the Murdaughs' housekeeper for fifteen years — is detailing what she found inside the house after the murders. Staged pajamas. A misplaced wedding ring. An unidentified truck at the property. Alex trying to establish a false detail about his clothing. And an investigator who allegedly told her to stop obsessing when she tried to report it. The system failed at more than one level in this case.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #JeanToal #SCSupremeCourt #BlancaSimpson #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughTrial #ColletonCounty

Kouri Richins stood up in a Park City courtroom and spoke for forty minutes. She looked at her three sons and told them to "be like your dad." Eric Richins. The man she was convicted of poisoning with a lethal dose of fentanyl. The man whose forty-fourth birthday fell on the same day the judge sentenced her to life without the possibility of parole. She told her boys to emulate the father she took from them — and in the same breath, told them their memories of what happened in that house were "an absolute lie."

Those boys couldn't speak for themselves. They're too young. Therapists read their words. One described waking up to sirens and feeling helpless. Another described making food for his younger brother and walking him to the bus stop because nobody else would. The youngest described being locked in his room so often his sibling brought him meals. He's nine. He told the judge: "Once she is gone, I will feel happy."

Kouri's reaction while those statements were read was caught on camera. She scoffed. She rolled her eyes. She looked irritated. Then her own family took the podium, called her innocent and devoted, and the tears appeared on cue — instant, performative, reserved for her own suffering.

Tony Brueski breaks down the sentencing hearing that exposed the full psychological architecture the jury saw through in under three hours. Kouri told her sons to "ignore the noise" and distrust the people keeping them safe. She never acknowledged a single thing her children described. After sentencing, she messaged an admirer with a winking emoji: "They haven't seen anything yet."

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RichinsSentencing #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #LifeWithoutParole #ParkCityUtah #FentanylCase #JusticeForEric #ImpactStatements

The person on Nancy Guthrie's porch allegedly tried to conceal the doorbell camera using foliage ripped from her own yard. Not professional equipment. Not a signal jammer. Weeds from the garden. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer says that detail tells you more about who this person is than almost anything else in the case — someone who understood enough to try, but not enough to succeed. The cloud backup apparently survived. The footage allegedly persists. And the behavioral gap between the attempt and the execution points toward someone operating well below the level of sophistication they were trying to project.

Coffindaffer and Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to examine what the full behavioral picture looks like once the ransom noise is stripped away. The ransom notes went to media outlets, not to the family. The Bitcoin demands were reportedly never followed through. Both analysts treat the ransom communications as opportunistic fraud from people entirely unconnected to whoever took Nancy — but those notes successfully anchored the public narrative to "kidnapping for profit" and it hasn't let go.

Remove that frame and the remaining behavior looks different. The approach was calm, unhurried, comfortable in the neighborhood. Coffindaffer says that points to familiarity. The visor and gloves allegedly didn't fit properly. Robin raises the question of whether Nancy allegedly recognized the person — a behavioral question with massive implications for motive, because an 84-year-old woman with medical needs is not a rational target for a stranger operation.

The FBI was allegedly locked out for four critical days. Coffindaffer says the chaos may actually be providing cover. The person who took Nancy may not be hiding behind skill. They may be hiding behind the noise.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #TucsonMissing #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #FBI #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PimaCounty #MissingPerson

Maggie Murdaugh’s pajamas were laid out in the laundry room doorway when Blanca Simpson walked into the house twelve hours after the murders. Underclothes were set out with them. Blanca knew immediately — Maggie never wore underclothes to bed. In fifteen years of cleaning that home, washing those clothes, knowing that routine inside and out, Blanca says she recognized the setup for what it was. Someone who didn’t know Maggie’s habits tried to make the scene look normal and got it wrong.

In this segment of her interview with Tony Brueski, Blanca walks through everything she noticed that morning. Pots in the refrigerator with lids on, something completely out of character for anyone in the household. Maggie’s Mercedes parked in a spot she’d never use, as if someone unfamiliar with the routine had moved it. One of Maggie’s three wedding bands under the driver’s seat — Blanca says if Maggie removed one ring, she removed all three, and she always placed them in the same spots. A beach towel from the laundry room found inside Alex’s Suburban, which told Blanca he had been in the room where the pajamas were staged and where the shirt in question came from.

Then Alex arrived at the guest house, pacing and disheveled, and asked Blanca to confirm he’d been wearing a specific Vineyard Vines shirt. She knew that wasn’t what he had on. She didn’t know he’d just returned from a SLED interview.

Blanca also describes a white truck and a tractor with a digging bucket on the property the day of the murders — details she says SLED showed no interest in when she tried to report them. An investigator allegedly told her to stop obsessing and get professional help.

LINKS & LEGAL

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #SLED #MurdaughFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughMurders

In a recorded jailhouse call, Richard Allen asked his own father how much longer he could stay lucid. That call was excluded from trial. The jury that convicted him on a 130-year sentence never heard it. But three judges at the Indiana Court of Appeals are now reading the full record — including the calls the jury didn't get and the confessions that don't match the forensic evidence.

Allen told a prison psychiatrist he shot Abby Williams and Libby German. The medical examiner determined they were killed with a blade. The State played one jailhouse call for the jury and excluded two others. The voluntariness of Allen's statements is now a question three judges have to answer, and the excluded calls speak directly to his mental state when those statements were made.

Defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski to walk through what the selective admission of Allen's calls means at the appellate level. He also addresses the alternative suspect whose interview was allegedly recorded over by investigators — weapon never collected, phone never searched — and the van timeline the defense says FBI cell data and surveillance footage contradict.

Indiana's response brief met most of these challenges with procedural objections rather than factual engagement. Filed wrong. Argued too late. Harmless error. The defense has formally requested oral arguments. Indiana has not. Meanwhile, the search warrant that produced the .40-caliber pistol faces de novo review — no deference owed to the trial judge. If it fails, the weapon is gone from any future proceeding.

Allen sits in an Oklahoma prison more than a thousand miles from Indiana. Three judges are reading. A decision is coming.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JailhouseCalls #HarmlessError

Researchers have identified a type of family annihilator called "anomic" — men who see their families as symbols of their own success and destroy them when the facade collapses. James Lasdun's new book The Family Man places Alex Murdaugh alongside documented cases that mirror his almost exactly. The most disturbing constant: in every single one, the people closest to the killer described him as a loving family man. Nobody saw it coming. Nobody believed it was possible.

The book profiles Jean-Claude Romand, a Frenchman who faked being a doctor for eighteen years, stole money from everyone who trusted him, and killed his wife, both children, and his parents when the lies started to fall apart. The financial fraud, the decades of deception, the moment of exposure — the parallels to the Murdaugh case are specific and documented.

Co-prosecutor John Meadors went off-script during closing arguments and suggested maybe Alex "just lost it" — that the murders weren't calculated. The book argues both could be true. The research on psychopathy lists planning and impulsivity as traits of the same condition. The first officer at Moselle described Alex's eyes as wrong — low blink rate, staring off as if reading from a script. Hours later, Alex was sobbing in a SLED agent's car and it looked completely real. The book suggests the grief and the deception were happening simultaneously. That both were genuine.

But the manipulation went back years. Morgan Doughty's first statement allegedly said someone else was driving the boat the night Mallory Beach was killed. The story changed after Alex showed up at the hospital. He sat with a sketch artist and drew a composite of his "attacker" after the staged shooting — it allegedly looked like a boat crash survivor. He wrote a $5,000 backdated check to a police chief who was at the murder scene. The pattern didn't start at the kennels. It started years before.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#AlexMurdaugh #FamilyAnnihilator #TheFamilyMan #JamesLasdun #CriminalPsychology #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurdaughTrial #MaggieMurdaugh #MalloryBeach

Anna Duggar used the monitored jail system to send Josh private photos and messages while he served a federal sentence for possessing child sexual abuse material a Homeland Security agent described as among the worst he'd examined. He asked for more. She engaged. Days before sentencing, he was allegedly writing about "taking things up a notch." She never left. She never confronted anyone publicly. She vented in private messages and performed in public. And when Joseph Duggar was arrested on felony charges involving a minor in Florida — charges he has pleaded not guilty to — Anna was the one who emailed him within days, put money on his books, told him which pod was safer, and warned him not to discuss anything legal because everything gets turned over. Her message about Kendra: "She loves you so much."

Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke break down how the Anna model is now allegedly being applied to Kendra. The recorded jail calls show Kendra asking Joseph one thing: do you still love me? Not asking about the nine-year-old girl. Not asking about the allegations. The IBLP framework, the homeschooling system, the forgiveness-over-justice approach — the structure is designed to keep wives in formation. Anna is the proof that it works.

But there's a crack. Kendra's own parents allegedly broke from the Duggars and stood with the alleged victim. According to reports, they lost their home and their livelihood for it. That's the price this system allegedly extracts from anyone who chooses accountability over loyalty.

Jim Bob's email allegedly called the charges "terrible decisions" and pivoted to getting Kendra's charges dropped. Anna forwarded Josh a message calling his conviction a "victimless crime." She told Josh privately that Jim Bob was a "dead-end road." She saw the machine clearly. She never left it. The question is whether Kendra will.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#AnnaDuggar #KendraDuggar #JosephDuggar #JoshDuggar #DuggarFamily #DuggarWives #IBLP #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke