True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Nancy Guthrie is 84 years old, medically vulnerable, and requires medication. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer says she is not a rational target for a kidnapping-for-profit operation — the risk-to-reward math doesn't work. The ransom communications that surfaced after her disappearance from her Tucson home are what Hidden Killers has consistently called opportunistic noise: someone trying to capitalize on a crime they didn't commit. Which forces the question nobody has publicly answered — if money wasn't the motive, what was?

Coffindaffer breaks down the behavioral profile emerging from the evidence. Whoever allegedly took Nancy knew enough to target the surveillance camera at her home and conceal it with weeds. But they apparently didn't understand that cloud-based systems recover the footage anyway. That's not a professional. The approach was calm and unhurried — comfortable in a quiet residential neighborhood in a way that suggests the person had been there before. Coffindaffer says the profile points to familiarity, partial technical knowledge, and someone who overestimated their own ability to control the aftermath.

The institutional response adds another layer. The FBI director publicly criticized how this case was handled — a move that signals critical evidence and time were lost before agencies aligned. Coffindaffer explains what decays first when coordination fails: digital evidence, biological material, and witness memory. She says prolonged forensic ambiguity this far into a case raises the possibility that investigators lost their cleanest evidence in the earliest hours, when speed mattered most for a woman who needed medication to stay alive.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #TucsonMissing #JenniferCoffindaffer #FBI #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalProfiling #PimaCounty #JusticeForNancy

Paul Murdaugh kept Mallory Beach’s obituary tucked into the door frame of his truck. Every time he climbed in, it was right there. Blanca Simpson saw it because she’d been inside the Murdaugh home for fifteen years and knew things about that family the cameras and courtrooms never captured. In this interview with Tony Brueski, Blanca tells the story of who the Murdaughs actually were behind the front door — and why the public version doesn’t match what she witnessed.

She goes back to the beginning — meeting Alex in the late ’90s, translating for his cases, and eventually becoming the family’s housekeeper after the real estate crash left her between jobs. Over the years, the relationship deepened from cleaning to running the household, cashing checks, and becoming someone Maggie trusted enough to confide in when Alex wouldn’t give her the full truth about a $30 million lawsuit bearing down on the family.

Blanca challenges the public image of both Maggie and Paul. She describes Maggie as the opposite of the cold socialite in a fur coat — loud, funny, generous, and always shopping local to support the community. She remembers Paul’s humor and his arrogance in equal measure, but insists the version the media handed the public after the boating incident erased the person he actually was.

She reveals the private fractures: Maggie wanting to sell everything to make things right while Alex wouldn’t sit down long enough to explain the situation. The joke about Maggie divorcing Alex for Tom Brady that got twisted into a serious rumor. And the two months before the murders when Alex started retreating — staying in bed, showing up late, carrying something nobody around him could fully see.

LINKS & LEGAL

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

Her children begged a judge to keep her locked away forever. Kouri Richins responded by telling them she’s coming home — and everything she said in between is worse than you think.

Minutes after therapists read the handwritten words of three boys into the court record — words describing locked rooms, neglect, dead animals, and a childhood spent in fear — Kouri stood and delivered a fifteen-minute statement that never once acknowledged what those kids lived through. She didn’t mention the locked bedroom doors. She didn’t mention the brother who had to sneak food to his sibling. She didn’t mention the animals that starved and froze while she was in charge.

What she did talk about was herself. Her love story with Eric. How marriage is hard. How her love was “enough.” She told the boys their father “was in a lot of physical pain” — still nudging an alternate narrative even after a conviction. She told them to “be like your dad,” the man a jury says she killed. And she told children who described being scared for their lives to question the people who finally gave them safety.

Tony Brueski plays back her full courtroom speech and dismantles it in real time.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #FentanylMurder #UtahCrime #Sentencing #Justice

The South Carolina Supreme Court threw out Alex Murdaugh’s murder convictions, restricted the evidence that dominated his first trial, and rewrote the legal standard for jury tampering claims in the state. Eric Faddis — a former prosecutor who now practices defense — provides the full analysis.

The ruling: Toal placed the burden on Murdaugh, violated evidence rules by questioning jurors about their mental processes, and relied on testimony that was inadmissible. The court adopted the Cheek framework, making it the governing standard in South Carolina, and found the State could not prove the verdict was unaffected by Hill’s comments.

The evidence: twelve and a half hours of financial crimes testimony flagged as excessive. The motive timeline survives. The inflammatory details do not. The defense also has unresolved challenges to forensic evidence the court declined to address.

The retrial: Murdaugh’s prior testimony locked in as a prosecution asset. Hill’s conviction as a potential defense narrative. A venue fight with no obvious answer. And Faddis’ answer to the question every trial lawyer in the country is asking — which side would you rather be on?

LINKS

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

DISCLAIMER

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS

#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #EricFaddis #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #MurdaughEvidence #NewTrial

The courtroom heard from three boys who still can’t stand in front of Kouri Richins and speak. Their therapists did it for them — reading handwritten words about a childhood prosecutors say was defined by neglect, fear, locked doors, and a father taken by fentanyl.

One child wrote about being forced to parent his younger siblings while the woman in the house disappeared with neighbors or stayed incapacitated. Another described waking to emergency sirens, not knowing what was happening, and spending years afraid her relatives would show up and drag him away from safety. The youngest put it plainly: he was locked in his room, his brother snuck him meals, his animals died around him, and the woman prosecutors say orchestrated all of it threatened to kill his pet when he wouldn’t comply.

All three asked the judge for the same thing: keep her locked away. Forever. They said they finally feel safe — and that safety disappears the moment she walks free.

And while every one of those words was read aloud, Kouri Richins sat in that courtroom and scoffed. She rolled her eyes at her own children’s pain.

Tony Brueski breaks it all down — including what Kouri had to say for herself afterward. That part might make you angrier than everything the boys wrote.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrime

Three years between the verdict and the reversal. In that time, the defense picked up a perjury conviction against the clerk who tampered with the jury and a Supreme Court opinion restricting the financial evidence that dominated the first trial. The prosecution picked up a complete transcript of Murdaugh’s testimony and additional time to refine its forensic case.

Eric Faddis weighs the advantages from both sides. Murdaugh’s prior testimony is potentially the State’s most valuable asset — a locked-in record that constrains the defense whether Murdaugh testifies again or not. But the defense has something it never had before: an official judicial finding that the first trial was unfair, backed by the harshest language the Supreme Court could muster against a court officer.

Faddis addresses whether Hill’s misconduct can be put before the retrial jury as part of the defense narrative, whether the State has new evidence to bring, and the jury selection challenge that may define the entire proceeding — finding twelve people in South Carolina who haven’t already formed an opinion about this case.

LINKS

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

DISCLAIMER

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS

#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #EricFaddis #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #NewTrial #JurySelection #MurdaughTrial

In late September 2025, the Austin Police Department announced a forensic breakthrough in the 1991 yogurt shop murders. Cold case detective Dan Jackson, who took over the investigation in 2022, resubmitted a .380 shell casing recovered from a floor drain at the crime scene to the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network. Improved software produced a match to an unsolved 1998 homicide in Kentucky. A subsequent Y-STR DNA search across national laboratories returned a complete 27-allele match from the South Carolina State Lab, linking the crime scene profile to serial killer Robert Eugene Brashers through a 1990 murder in Greenville.

Retesting of biological material from victim Amy Ayers’ fingernail clippings confirmed the match to Brashers at a 2.5-million-to-one probability. Brashers, who committed at least eight murders across four states, died by self-inflicted gunshot wound during a 1999 police standoff in Missouri. He was never identified as a suspect in the yogurt shop case during his lifetime. In February 2026, Travis County Judge Dayna Blazey formally exonerated the four men wrongfully accused, declaring them factually innocent.

Part 5 provides a comprehensive account of the forensic methodology, Brashers’ criminal history, and the formal exoneration proceedings. Essential listening for anyone following cold case forensics and DNA identification advances.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#YogurtShopMurders #TrueCrimeToday #ColdCaseSolved #DNAForensics #RobertBrashers #NIBIN #Exoneration #SerialKiller #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice

There may be one in your town. A charming restaurant with handcrafted furniture, homemade bread, and staff who seem unusually warm and attentive. There are at least thirty-three Yellow Deli locations worldwide, and every one of them is reportedly run by unpaid members of the Twelve Tribes — a group the SPLC classifies as a Christian fundamentalist cult.

In this episode, Tony Brueski asks why the Twelve Tribes is still operating after fifty years of allegations spanning child discipline concerns, forced labor claims, racial doctrine documented as white supremacist, and survivor testimony from three continents.

The answer involves a legal framework that makes intervention in religious communities nearly impossible without immediate, provable harm to a specific individual. The 1984 Vermont raid was ruled unconstitutional. The public defender from the case later joined the group. Germany acted on hidden camera footage in 2013. The European Court of Human Rights upheld the decision. The United States has produced a different outcome on the same evidence.

The group’s financial model is self-sustaining. Its recruitment pipeline runs through its restaurants. Its members are reportedly trained not to cooperate with outside inquiries. And as recently as April 2026, the group closed one Yellow Deli location and opened another in a new community.

The Twelve Tribes is not a historical case. It is a present-tense reality operating in neighborhoods across America. The question is whether knowing what you now know changes what you do the next time you see the sign.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#YellowDeli #12Tribes #TwelveTribes #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #CultExposed #HiddenKillers #StillOperating #ReligiousFreedom #TonyBrueski

The Supreme Court said the prosecution went "far too long and far too deep" into Alex Murdaugh’s financial crimes at the first trial. They singled out testimony with "zero probative value" on motive that existed only to make Murdaugh look like someone who takes advantage of the helpless. Any retrial has to be leaner. The question is whether lean is enough.

Eric Fadds brings his prosecutorial experience to the problem. The State’s motive theory depends on a specific convergence of events in the days before the killings: the CFO’s confrontation about missing fees, the upcoming hearing that would have forced financial disclosure, the tightening noose around years of theft. The court said that timeline is fair game. But the detailed victim testimony, the emotional narratives, the hours of accounting — the court made clear that was propensity evidence dressed up as motive.

Fadds also tackles the evidentiary issues the court left open for the retrial judge to decide — the firearm analysis, the raincoat, the gunshot residue, the iPhone demonstration — and the defense strategy question that underlies everything: concede the financial conduct and attack the motive link, or try to keep all of it out.

LINKS

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

DISCLAIMER

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS

#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughEvidence #EricFadds #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #FinancialCrimes #Rule403 #MurdaughTrial

A former Chief Justice of South Carolina evaluated Becky Hill’s jury conduct and concluded Alex Murdaugh wasn’t prejudiced. Five sitting Supreme Court justices looked at the same record and said she applied the wrong legal standard entirely. The conviction is gone.

Eric Fadds brings his experience as both a former prosecutor and current defense attorney to the question of how that happened. The court found Toal committed multiple errors: she placed the burden of proof on Murdaugh instead of the State, she questioned jurors about whether Hill’s comments changed their votes in violation of Rule 606(b), and she relied on those improper answers to deny the new trial motion. The Supreme Court overruled one of its own prior decisions to reinforce that juror mental processes are off-limits.

Fadds breaks down the Remmer presumption the court formally adopted, explains how Toal’s handling of Juror Z’s contradictory testimony gave the Supreme Court an opening to reject her credibility findings, and addresses how unusual it is for an appellate court to credit witness testimony that the lower court tried to limit from the record.

LINKS

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

DISCLAIMER

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS

#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #BeckyHill #MurdaughRetrial #JuryTampering #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #EricFadds #JeanToal #MurdaughTrial