Remember the $1 trillion infrastructure bill, which caused considerable backlash from the crypto community due to the language regarding “brokers?” Abe Sutherland, an adjunct professor at University of Virginia School of Law, believes another provision tucked inside the bill could end up being a far more significant issue for anyone transacting in digital assets. Show highlights:
how Abe fell down the crypto rabbit holewhat provision 6050I is and how it could affect anyone transacting with digital assetshow 6050I works and when it would applywhy violating 6050I would be a felonyhow 6050I discourages digital asset transactionshow 6050I would apply to different transaction types, like peer-to-peer trades, NFT sales, and smart contract escrow accountswhat information recipients of digital assets must verify from the senderhow the government came up with the $10,000 reporting threshold and why Abe believes this number is outdatedwhy Abe thinks proposing 6050I within the infrastructure bill is inappropriatewhat reasons the government has to want to put such stringent reporting requirements on digital asset transactions how 6050I fits under the financial laws of the Bank Secrecy Actwhy Abe believes the amendment should be struck from the infrastructure billwhat Abe thinks of the constitutionality of 6050Ihow Abe views 6050I as less about generating tax revenue and more about tracking people’s digital asset transactionswhat action steps he says the crypto community can take to fix the bill
Thank you to our sponsors!
Crypto.com: https://crypto.onelink.me/J9Lg/unconfirmedcardearnfeb2021
Nodle: http://nodle.io/unchained
Episode links
Abe Sutherland
- https://twitter.com/abesutherland
Medium Post: https://medium.com/@laurashin/why-not-reporting-info-on-your-crypto-trading-partner-could-become-a-felony-c6399998f113
Information on 6050I
Abe’s research report https://www.proofofstakealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Research-Report-on-Tax-Code-6050I-and-Digital-Assets-printable.pdfTweet thread from Abe https://twitter.com/abesutherland/status/1438881314871156736 https://twitter.com/abesutherland/status/14430822053836963846050I article Abe wrote for Bitcoin Magazine https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/the-proposal-to-regulate-digital-asset-transactions-should-be-struck
Abe’s appearance on What Bitcoin Did to discuss 6050I https://www.whatbitcoindid.com/podcast/hidden-danger-in-the-infrastructure-billTwitter spaces with Congressman Warren Davidson, Peter McCormack, and others regarding the infrastructure billhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCq6BVLzF44Miscellaneous 6050I links https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-crypto-industry-could-take-tax-fight-all-the-way-to-the-supreme-court-11632509009 https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/09/29/infrastructure-bills-crypto-surveillance-criticized-unconstitutional/ https://fortune.com/2021/09/21/crypto-transactions-report-to-government/ https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2021/09/17/crypto-lobbying-group-warns-of-another-tax-provision-in-senate-infrastructure-bill https://www.coincenter.org/an-unworkable-and-arguably-unconstitutional-tax-change-tucked-away-in-the-infrastructure-bill/ https://decrypt.co/81236/overlooked-part-senate-infrastructure-bill-renews-worries-crypto-lobby https://nickanthony.substack.com/p/last-minute-cryptocurrency-taxation https://www.cato.org/blog/infrastructure-bill-hangs-balance-so-does-crypto https://ambcrypto.com/what-is-the-u-s-infra-bill-crypto-amendment-really-all-about
Unchained coverage of the infrastructure bill
How Congress Might Pass Laws Bad for Proof-of-Stake and DeFi https://unchainedpodcast.com/how-congress-might-pass-laws-bad-for-proof-of-stake-and-defi/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices