Wealth On Main Street

The short answer is no.

The longer answer requires understanding why, because the question is being asked more than ever, and the misinformation circulating on social media around this topic is causing real financial harm to real people.

Right now, social media is full of content promoting Indexed Universal Life insurance as “infinite banking 2.0,” an upgraded, modern version of the concept that Nelson Nash created. It is not. And the man who created IBC said so directly, in writing, on page 39 of Becoming Your Own Banker.

“I never sold one when I was in the business, and I surely wouldn’t buy one. I would not recommend it nor use it for the infinite banking concept.” – Nelson Nash

Nelson Nash spent 35 years in the life insurance industry. He won lifetime achievement awards. He was a member of the Million Dollar Roundtable. He sat on every major committee in the industry. And in all of that time, he never sold a single Indexed Universal Life, variable life or traditional universal life policy.

That statement should do a lot of your thinking for you.

There are three reasons this question keeps coming up.

First, social media marketing. IUL products are heavily marketed online. They illustrate well, meaning the projected numbers look impressive on paper. And they are being marketed aggressively by people who are either uninformed about IBC or who are deliberately misusing the trademark.

Second, the trademark is being violated. The Infinite Banking Concept is a registered trademark of the Nelson Nash Institute. Authorized practitioners — like the advisors at Ascendant Financial have signed an agreement to use the concept and its trademarks correctly. Many people promoting IUL as an IBC vehicle are not authorized and are not following the trademark policy.

Third, people genuinely do not know the difference. And that is not their fault. The distinction between a product and a process is not obvious. If the first content you encounter about IBC is promoting an IUL, it is entirely reasonable to assume that it is the right vehicle.

It is not.

To understand why IUL does not work for IBC, you need to understand what universal life actually is and where it came from.

Nelson Nash was direct about this on page 39:

“It was invented in the early 1980s by E.F. Hutton, a stock brokerage firm, in my opinion, that knew nothing about life insurance.”

That matters. How we think about something is shaped by what created it. The insurance industry did not invent universal life to serve policyholders. It was invented by a stock brokerage firm to compete with whole life insurance during a period of high interest rates by unbundling the savings and insurance components of a whole life policy and putting them in a single package under a different structure.

The original format was simple: one-year term insurance with a side fund of an interest-bearing account. In the 1980s, when interest rates were running at 10 to 12 percent, that side fund looked attractive. When interest rates came down, the product evolved, the interest-bearing account became an investment account, then an indexed account tied to market performance.

That is the product being called “infinite banking 2.0” today. A one-year term chassis with an investment element attached to it.

This is the most important thing to understand about why IUL does not work for IBC.

Most IUL policies are structured with what is called Annual Renewable Term insurance ART, also known as Yearly Renewable Term (YRT). This means the cost of insurance inside the policy is recalculated every single year based on your age.

Here is the logic:

At age 35, the probability that an insurance company will need to pay out your death benefit this year is very low. The cost is low.

At age 55, you are 20 years closer to death. The probability is higher. The cost is higher.

At age 75, the probability is significantly higher. The cost is exponentially higher.

This creates what Richard Canfield calls a hockey stick a cost curve that looks flat and manageable in the early years, then bends upward steeply as you age. And the critical problem is this: the point at which the hockey stick reaches its steepest and most expensive trajectory is exactly the point at which most people want to stop working, stop contributing, and start accessing their policy for income.

You have an inverse relationship. At the moment, the cost is highest, and your ability and willingness to fund the policy is lowest. And something has to give.

When you stop funding an IUL and start drawing from it, two things happen simultaneously that create what Richard Canfield calls compound decline.

First, the cost of insurance must still be paid. It is not optional. If you are not depositing money from outside the policy, the insurance company takes it from the internal cash value. The policy eats itself to pay for its own insurance costs.

Second, if you are also taking policy loans or withdrawals for retirement income, you are reducing the cash value further at the same time.

Compound growth works in your favour when you are depositing. Compound decline works against you when you are withdrawing, and the effect accelerates as the cost of insurance increases with age.

The result, in the most severe cases, is an implosion. The cash value is depleted to the point where the policy cannot sustain itself. The insurance company sends a letter. It might say you owe $72,000 or $125,000 in premiums this year to keep the policy in force at age 83, terminally ill, with no ability to pay.

This is not a hypothetical. This is what is causing the IUL lawsuits that have been all over the news in 2026. Policyholders, many of them elderly and unwell, are receiving letters telling them the insurance they thought they had, funded by decades of premiums, is about to lapse at the moment they need it most.

Garrett Gastil put it clearly in this episode: IUL illustrations assume a consistent market return, often eight percent compounding every year across a multi-decade horizon.

The moment that illustration is printed, it is a fiction.

Not primarily because the market may not perform as projected, though that is also true. The bigger problem is human behaviour. As Nelson Nash wrote, Becoming Your Own Banker is approximately 30 percent about human behaviour. Behaviour matters.

Most people do not fund their policies as projected. Life gets in the way: the kids, the unexpected expenses, a year where cash flow is tight. Miss a year of funding in the early years of an IUL, and the compounding effect that was supposed to carry the policy forward is delayed. Miss a few years, and you are off track in a way that is very difficult to recover from.

In a whole life policy, the contractual guarantees mean the policy continues growing regardless of whether you maximize your optional paid-up addition premium in any given year. In an IUL, the investment return assumed in the illustration and the consistency of your funding are both variables, and both have to go right for decades for the result to look anything like the illustration you were shown.

Garrett Gastil raises one of the most powerful points in the entire episode, one that gets to the heart of why IUL fundamentally cannot be used for IBC.

In a participating whole life policy from a mutual insurance company, you are an owner. Every premium you pay increases your share of the divisible surplus of a company you co-own. You benefit from the company’s performance as an owner. And when you take a policy loan, you are borrowing the insurance company’s money, not your own, while your cash value continues compounding uninterrupted.

In an IUL, you are not an owner. The insurance company is a stock company. The participating policyholders who own the company are the whole life holders; they are the ones to whom the company is responsible. IUL policyholders are customers, not owners. They have no ownership stake. They do not participate in the divisible surplus.

And when you borrow from an IUL because of what is called direct recognition in the US, you often do not even earn the same indexing rate on the borrowed funds. You may have to liquidate your investment units and transfer them to a savings-style account before the company will lend against them. The compounding is interrupted, not preserved.

The entire premise of IBC is becoming your own banker. You cannot be the banker if you do not own the bank.

This is one of the most important practical questions in the episode, and the answer is nuanced.

First: do not panic. Your advisor may have been doing their best with the knowledge they had. Most insurance advisors are caring, well-intentioned people who were not trained on these distinctions. That does not make what you have right for IBC, but it does not make you a victim either.

Second: get a proper review. Book a clarity call with an authorized IBC practitioner. Link in the description below. Come prepared: bring your statement, write down your key questions, and let the advisor understand your situation before the call.

Third: understand the triage approach. Before having an IBC conversation, you may need to have an insurance conversation first. What coverage do you have? Is it good coverage? What were your original objectives? Are there surrender charges? How long have you been funding it? These questions come before the IBC discussion.

Fourth: not all UL contracts need to be cancelled. Some people have universal life contracts, not index that were sold on a level cost basis. These may still serve a legitimate purpose as pure protection coverage. The goal is not to eliminate everything and start from scratch. The goal is clarity, proper coverage, and then a genuine IBC conversation built on the right foundation.

Page 39 of Becoming Your Own Banker closes with this:

“No, you cannot do infinite banking with a universal life contract of any type. And it is not infinite banking 2.0.”

There is no ambiguity there. The originator of the concept, who held the copyright and trademark, was explicit. If you see content online promoting IUL as a version of infinite banking, you are seeing something that is either uninformed or deliberately misleading.

You have a squishy mass between your ears that can compute that.

Go talk to an authorized practitioner about the concept.

In the full episode, you will also hear:

Visit ibcfaq.com for straight answers to over 100 of the most common questions about the Infinite Banking Concept, including questions about IUL, policy loans, creditor protection, Canadian vs US differences, and how to get started properly.

7 Simple Steps: the fastest way to evaluate whether IBC is right for your situation → 7steps.ca

Don’t Spread the Wealth free digital copy with 15-page family banking guide → dontspreadwealth.com

Cash Follows the Leader free copy with 91-year IBC family case study → cashfollows.com

Keep Taxes Away From Your Wealth: Five Strategies to reduce your tax burden → keeptaxesaway.com

It is one of the most common questions people ask when they first explore the Infinite Banking Concept, and one of the least talked about in mainstream financial planning.

What happens to your dividend-paying whole life insurance policy if you actually live to age 100? Or past it?

The short answer is this: the contract becomes more valuable the longer you live. It was literally engineered with extraordinary longevity in mind.

But the full answer requires understanding a few key concepts: what happens at maturity, what the risks are if you have been borrowing against your policy, and why longevity planning changes everything about how you structure your financial life.

Most financial plans are built around a retirement window, a period between roughly age 65 and an assumed endpoint. Save enough to cover that window, and you are done.

The problem is that the window keeps getting longer.

Medical advances, improved nutrition, and AI-assisted healthcare are all pushing life expectancy further than actuarial tables predicted even a decade ago. A 65-year-old couple today has a very high probability of at least one spouse living well into their 90s. Living to age 100 is no longer a statistical anomaly.

“Living to age 100, that’s not a freak statistical accident anymore. And if medicine keeps advancing the way that it is, I think that age 100, even age 121, could eventually feel like today’s age 85.” – Jayson, Wealth on Main Street

And yet most financial planning conversations are still built around the assumption that you will not live that long.

IBC addresses this directly, not by accident, but by design.

Here is the core mechanic that most people do not understand about dividend-paying whole life insurance.

On the day you take out a policy, the insurance company makes a contractual commitment to pay a death benefit, let’s say one million dollars. You might put in fifty thousand dollars in the first year. The insurer is immediately on the hook for the full million.

Every single day the policy is in force, the cash value inside the contract grows, accumulating toward the point where it eventually equals the death benefit. This is not a feature. It is a contractual obligation built into the design of every whole life policy.

By the time the policy reaches its maturity point age 100 in Canada, age 121 in the United States), the total cash value and the total death benefit are identical. They converge. And at that point, the insurance company’s risk has been fully resolved.

“The contract was designed recognizing longevity. The total cash value and the total death benefit at age 100 must be identical. That is a contractual guarantee.” — Richard Canfield, Wealth on Main Street

This is not a bug. It is the whole point. The policy was always going to get there; the longer you live, the further along that journey you travel, and the more the asset has grown.

In Canada, whole life policies are calculated to an actuarial maturity point of age 100.

In the United States, this changed around 2009. Before that, American policies were also calculated to age 100. After 2009, new policies issued in the US moved to an age-121 mortality table reflecting the growing reality of longer lifespans. Any policy issued in the US in roughly the last 15 years is likely a 121-based contract.

What does this mean practically? The theoretical lifespan used to calculate the contract determines how the premium is spread across the payment period. A longer theoretical lifespan means the insurer has more time to grow the cash value to meet the death benefit obligation, which affects how premiums and illustrated values are structured.

It does not change what happens when you actually reach or exceed that age. The policy continues. The death benefit remains in force. Dividends continue to earn paid-up additions. The asset keeps growing.

This is where most people’s understanding gets fuzzy and where the episode delivers its most important clarity.

When a whole life policy reaches its maturity age of 100 in Canada or 121 in the US, a few things happen:

Cash value and death benefit converge. At maturity, total cash value equals total death benefit. They are the same number.

Premium payments stop. If you have a life-pay structure, you can no longer make scheduled premium payments after maturity. The policy is fully funded. The insurer will not accept additional scheduled premiums at this stage.

The policy does not end. This is the critical point. Whole life is whole life for your whole life, regardless of how long that life is. The policy does not lapse at 100 or 121. It continues.

Dividends keep earning. If the policy is still earning dividends, which a properly structured participating whole life policy should be those dividends continue buying paid-up additions. The asset continues growing. Cash value and death benefit grow together in lockstep.

Policy loans still work. Your ability to access capital through policy loans continues beyond maturity. Nothing changes there. You can still borrow against the cash value, still use the policy as a banking tool, still deploy capital.

Listen on SPOTIFY!

The episode is direct about one scenario that can create problems in later life: an overloan condition.

If you have been drawing heavily on policy loans over many decades and have not been repaying them diligently, the loan balance can grow to a point where it begins approaching or exceeding the acceptable limits of the policy.

When a loan balance gets too large relative to the cash value, particularly at advanced ages when the margin for error is smaller, it can create what is called an overloan situation. In a worst-case scenario, the policy could lapse due to this condition, which would trigger a taxable event on the outstanding loan balance.

The solution is proactive planning:

“If you’re outliving what you expected and you’ve also been outspending your living capacity, you might run a risk where your loan arrangement is accelerating to a point where it begins to approach or exceed the acceptable limits of the policy.”– Jayson, Wealth on Main Street

This is not a reason to avoid IBC. It is a reason to implement it carefully, with a qualified practitioner, and to think proactively about the long game.

Not all “permanent” insurance is actually permanent in the same way. The episode draws a clear distinction between three types of contracts:

Whole life insurance: A whole life policy is for your whole life period. It cannot implode, cannot be cancelled by the insurer for performance reasons, and grows guaranteed every day regardless of market conditions. It was always permanent and remains so.

Term-to-100 A term-to-100 policy is technically a term policy that runs to age 100. It is not the same as whole life. There is typically no cash value accumulation, no dividend potential, and no banking function. It was historically classified as “permanent” only because nobody thought people would regularly live past 100.

Universal life is designed on paper to be permanent, but can and often does implode well before maturity. The cost of insurance inside a universal life contract increases with age. If the policy’s internal investments underperform and the cost of insurance erodes the account, the policy can collapse before the insured reaches 100, often without adequate warning to the policyholder.

“A whole life policy is a whole life policy. It’s for your whole life, regardless of how long that life is. That’s the key distinction and differentiator here.” – Richard Canfield, Wealth on Main Street

If you are evaluating life insurance products as part of an IBC strategy, this distinction is critical. The contractual guarantees of dividend-paying whole life are fundamentally different from either of the alternatives above.

Beyond the mechanics, the episode raises a question worth sitting with.

What is the emotional value of knowing a pool of capital exists, guaranteed, growing, accessible, no matter how long you live?

At age 35, a market decline feels manageable. You have decades of potential recoveries ahead of you. At age 85, the calculus is different. How many recoveries do you realistically have left? How do you feel about the volatility when you no longer have time on your side?

A dividend-paying whole life policy is not correlated to markets. It cannot go backward. Its net realizable value grows on a daily basis quietly, reliably, without drama.

“There’s a point in your life where boring becomes beautiful. Emotional peace has value. Certainty has value. Uninterrupted access has value. Contractual guarantees have value.” — Jayson Lowe, Wealth on Main Street

No client has ever called to complain that their cash value keeps rising every day. The stability that feels unremarkable at 40 becomes profoundly valuable at 80 and 90.

One of the most underappreciated benefits of IBC in later life is what it solves for people who are asset-rich and cash poor.

Many people spend their working lives paying off debt, accumulating real estate, and building equity. They arrive at retirement with a significant net worth on paper and very little liquidity in practice. Their assets are trapped. To access them, they have to sell, or qualify for financing they may no longer qualify for, or navigate a lengthy process.

A properly funded whole life policy solves this directly. The capital is always accessible. No income qualification required. No credit check. No gatekeeper. The money is available on demand through a policy loan regardless of your age or employment status.

“If you’ve got a net worth of a million dollars but it’s trapped somewhere, and it’s inaccessible, that doesn’t help you during a real-life emergency. Whereas if you’ve got ready access to capital from the life insurance company, that’s control.”

The episode closes with a perspective that reframes the entire longevity conversation.

Getting to age 100 with a thriving IBC system is not just a financial story. It is a life story. It means you are around with your children, your grandchildren, perhaps your great-grandchildren. You have time to impart wisdom, to prepare the next generation for the stewardship of what you have built, to watch the system you created compound across decades of family life.

This is why the episode suggests a checklist question to ask every single time you add a policy to your system: How is this contract treated if the life insured lives to age 100 in Canada or 121 in the United States? Ask your advisor. Get the answer in writing. Know exactly what happens at maturity before you ever get there.

Because the people who ask that question early are the ones who arrive at the far end of the timeline without surprises and with a system intact and ready to serve the generation that comes after them.

Tap on this LINK

In the full episode, Jayson and Richard also cover:

Visit ibcfaq.com for straight answers to the most common questions Canadians ask about IBC, including how policies work at advanced ages, the Canadian tax implications of policy loans, and what to ask before you get started.

7 Simple Steps | fastest way to find out if IBC is right for your situation, with four bonus books included → 7steps.ca

Don’t Spread the Wealth |free digital copy with 15-page family banking guide → dontspreadwealth.com

Cash Follows the Leader | free copy with 91-year IBC family case study → cashfollows.com

• The Problem Nobody Talks About in Entrepreneurship
• What Is the Infinite Banking Concept? (And Why Entrepreneurs Are Asking About It)
• "I Didn't Know What to Call It, But I Knew Something Else Existed"
• The Real Reasons People Hesitate and What's Actually Going On
• What Tara Actually Used IBC For (The Honest Answer)
• The Mindset Shift That Actually Makes IBC Click
• What Les Corbett Observes Across Hundreds of Conversations
• Raising Kids Who Already Think This Way
• The Quote That Stayed with Us
• Listen, Watch, and Connect

You built the business. You’re generating revenue. From the outside, things look successful.

But inside? You’re quietly dealing with limited financing options, unpredictable cash flow, credit lines that cost you, and a banking system that wasn’t designed with entrepreneurs in mind.

That’s not a personal failure. That’s the system working exactly as intended, just not for you.

In this episode of Wealth on Main Street, hosts Jayson Lowe and Richard Canfield sit down with IBC practitioner and Ascendant Financial teammate Leslie Corbett and his client Tara, a mindset coach, entrepreneur, and former realtor, for a candid conversation about what it actually looks and feels like to implement the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC) in real life.

The Infinite Banking Concept (IBC) is a financial strategy that uses a specially structured dividend-paying whole life insurance policy as a personal banking system. Rather than routing your money through traditional banks and paying them interest, you build your own pool of capital called cash value that you can borrow against, repay on your own terms, and grow simultaneously.

For entrepreneurs, this matters because:

Nelson Nash, who popularized the concept in his book Becoming Your Own Banker, framed it simply: you are already allocating 100% of your financial resources to something. The question is whether you’re doing it consciously, and whether those dollars are serving you or someone else.

Tara’s story will resonate with a lot of entrepreneurially-minded people.

She had been a realtor for nearly a decade, a world where, as she describes it, “here’s your license, go figure it out.” Not a lot of financial education. A lot of pressure. Ups, downs, and debt accumulated along the way.

When she started looking for insurance options to protect her family (she and her husband have two young boys), she kept hearing snippets on social media that suggested insurance could do more than she’d been taught. That there was some extra dimension to it.

“I’m like, my money can do six different things. I’m not going to pay money here that can serve these other purposes.”

She wouldn’t commit to working with any advisor she met until she connected with Les Corbett, someone she already trusted. Once he explained IBC, the response was immediate: That’s what I was looking for. I just didn’t know what to call it.

One of the most valuable parts of this conversation is the honest breakdown of why so many people resist or dismiss IBC before they understand it.

1. The word “insurance” triggers a defensive response.

Richard Canfield describes it well: the word insurance carries emotional baggage. A bad claim experience, a sense of being sold something, a friend’s story about a denied policy and suddenly an entire industry gets filtered through that single lens. IBC lives in that industry, so it inherits the baggage even though it operates nothing like what most people picture.

2. People don’t see the problem with the current system.

Tara articulates this clearly: most people think the conventional banking system is fine, because it’s the only option they’ve ever known. They’re not looking for a solution to a problem they don’t know they have.

“They don’t think the bank system is a problem. But it’s not built to help us. It’s built to help them.”

3. The environment hasn’t changed yet.

As Nelson Nash wrote in Becoming Your Own Banker and as the hosts reference directly in this episode, “no one elevates himself or herself much above the environment in which they operate.” If the five people you talk to most don’t know what IBC is, and they respond to your curiosity with skepticism, you’re fighting your own ecosystem.

This is exactly why community matters: Ascendant Financial’s Wealth Builders Club meets every Saturday morning in an open forum for practitioners, clients, and the curious, all in the same room, sharing experiences.

This is where the episode gets real.

Tara didn’t start using IBC to make investments or optimize capital deployment. She started using it to clean up.

“It was a lot of debt. A lot of bills. A lot of wrong decisions and not a lot of guidance… IBC helped us really clean up the debt and organize it so that we were paying ourselves back instead of the credit card.”

That’s the part people don’t often talk about: IBC isn’t just a wealth-building strategy for people who already have everything figured out. It’s a reorganization tool. It shifts who receives the interest payments, from the bank to you.

The surprise she didn’t expect? The freedom of it.

“I didn’t expect that much freedom and opportunity with it. But I also wanted to make sure I was learning enough so that I wasn’t shooting myself in the foot.”

Because here’s the thing: policy loans are unstructured. There’s no external repayment schedule forcing discipline. That makes the policy owner’s behaviour the most critical variable, which Jayson and Richard had literally just finished recording an episode about the day before this conversation.

IBC rewards the intentional. It requires consciousness.

Tara is a mindset coach. She works with people who are stuck in beliefs they inherited, about money, about what’s possible, about what “people like them” are allowed to do.

Her observation about IBC? It’s not complicated. It’s just unfamiliar.

“If it feels unfamiliar, go learn to the point that you understand it enough, because if you’re not at the understanding level, you’re not making an educated decision. Dig in and learn enough so that you can consciously choose what you want to do. Not a default no because it’s uncomfortable.”

She also describes what it feels like to learn about generational wealth when nobody in your family has ever talked about it:

“‘Who the hell do I think I am thinking about generational wealth?’ Says who? Who’s making these rules?”

And that question, Says who? is maybe the most important one in this entire episode.

As an IBC practitioner, Les sees a consistent pattern: people come in focused on the tool rather than the problem.

They’re talking about rates of return, GICs, investment trusts, noise. What they often haven’t examined is the silent leak in their financial system: the fact that every dollar they send to a bank, a lender, or a credit card is working harder for that institution than it is for them.

“It’s almost like walking past dollars to pick up dimes.”

Les’s most effective clients, like Tara, weren’t the ones who came in already knowing about IBC. They were the ones who came in knowing that something was off, even if they couldn’t name it.

One of the most unexpected and meaningful moments in this conversation is when Tara talks about the book Beaver Bankers written by Becca Wilhite, which Les gave her as a resource.

She read it with her seven-year-old son Leo. He loved it. He read it again on his own. Then he decided to write his own book.

“I don’t even have to push this on you or rewire your thoughts about this. You’ve already got an open mind for this.”

Richard shares a similar experience with his eight-year-old daughter, who brings up lessons from the book when they’re out hiking and spot actual beavers in Fish Creek Park.

The point isn’t just heartwarming. It’s strategic: the families who implement IBC now are raising children for whom this is simply the normal way of thinking about money. That changes the generational math entirely.

There are a lot of quotable moments in this episode. But the one that keeps coming back:

“Nobody’s coming to save you. But nobody’s coming to stop you either. So what do you want to do with that?”

That’s the invitation. Not a sales pitch. Not a product brochure. Just a question about what you actually want and whether the financial structure around your life is built to get you there.

Watch the full episode on the Wealth on Main Street YouTube channel.

Listen on Spotify and Apple Podcasts; search Wealth on Main Street.

Download the free 7 Steps guide at 7steps.ca to evaluate whether IBC is right for your family.

Get the free digital copy of Don’t Spread the Wealth, a proven framework for keeping wealth inside your family.

Want to work with Leslie Corbett or another IBC practitioner on the Ascendant Financial team? Contact us.

Many entrepreneurs are good at making money. The harder part is keeping control of it.

In this episode of Wealth on Main Street, Ravi Kainth shares a powerful insight from more than 25 years of building businesses across different parts of the world, including Hong Kong and Canada: most business owners focus on income, but not enough on where their money goes after it arrives.

Taxes, debt payments, operating costs, expansion, family needs, and lifestyle expenses can create a constant cycle where money comes in and quickly leaves. For many entrepreneurs, the issue is not a lack of effort. It is the absence of a financial system.

Entrepreneurs are usually trained to grow revenue, serve clients, and build the business. But very few are taught how to control cash flow in a way that allows their money to continue working for them.

Ravi explains that one of his biggest realizations came from seeing successful business owners with strong revenue still feeling trapped because so much of their money was flowing back to banks and lenders.

That is where the Infinite Banking Concept becomes part of the conversation.

The Infinite Banking Concept, introduced by R. Nelson Nash in Becoming Your Own Banker, is built around the idea of using a properly designed participating whole life insurance policy as a personal banking system.

Instead of sending every dollar away forever, entrepreneurs can build cash value, access that capital through policy loans, and use it strategically for business needs, debt repayment, opportunities, or family planning.

The goal is not simply to buy life insurance. The goal is to create a system that supports liquidity, control, and long-term wealth building.

Business owners often face unpredictable cash flow. Some months are strong. Others require damage control. Without a system, those swings can create pressure and dependence on banks.

Infinite Banking can help entrepreneurs think differently about capital. It encourages them to ask:

Ravi’s story is a reminder that financial education changes everything. Making money matters, but controlling capital is what creates long-term impact.

If you are an entrepreneur, advisor, or business owner wondering how to create more financial control, this episode is worth watching.

Listen on SPOTIFY!

• Q1: Am I Too Old to Start?
• Q2: Is It Too Late for Me?
• Q3: Does Age Matter?
• Q4: What If I'm Uninsurable?
• Q5: When Should I Start?
• Q6: How Do Policy Loans Work?
• Q7: How Do You Pay Back Policy Loans?
• Q8: What Does It Mean to Be Well Diversified in Lives Insured?
• The Two Rules Worth Memorizing

Short answer: probably not.

As long as you still need to use money, and most of us do until our last breath, the process of becoming your own banker is available to you. The concept itself is not age-dependent.

What is age-dependent is the insurance tool used to implement it. If you want to be the life insured on the policy, there is a cap at around age 85. But here’s what most people don’t realize: the policy owner and the life insured don’t have to be the same person. You can own a policy on a child, grandchild, or any insurable family member and still implement the full process yourself.

Nelson Nash himself became uninsurable after a quadruple bypass in 1987, yet he continued acquiring policies on other family members for decades. Just four or five months before he passed away at age 88, he took out a brand-new, $2,000-a-year policy on a great-grandchild. He knew he wasn’t long for the world, and he still did it.

If Nelson at 88 wasn’t too late, the question is worth asking yourself honestly.

It might be, but probably not for the reason you think.

The only scenario where it’s truly too late is if you have what Nelson called the “arrival syndrome”: the belief that you’ve already learned everything you need to know and there’s nothing left to consider. A frozen mind is the only real barrier.

If you’re coachable, willing to do some research, read a book, and meet with a coach to go over your specific circumstances, it’s not too late.

One important caveat: if you’re starting later in life with no existing savings and limited cash flow, this process is not a magic pill. It won’t solve decades of financial habits overnight. But if you have cash flow, some asset resources, and the mindset to build something that lasts beyond you, there is absolutely a conversation worth having.

Yes, but only in one specific way.

Two people putting the same $20,000 per year into their system will get different results based solely on age. A 60-year-old and a 20-year-old committing the same annual premium will both build cash value, but the 20-year-old will receive significantly more death benefit for the same dollars. The cash flow is identical; what changes is the death benefit created and how the policy is structured internally.

The older you are when you start, the more the focus tends to shift from personal retirement income to legacy, estate efficiency, and creating a financial structure your family can continue using for generations. Both are valid reasons. Both are worth exploring.

This is directly addressed in Nelson Nash’s book Becoming Your Own Banker on page 82.

Nelson uses the example of an uninsurable 50-year-old father who funds a policy on his daughter for 20 years, then uses policy loans to effectively recapture everything he put in as passive income while the daughter continues to use the same policy as her own financial tool after he’s gone. Both benefit from the same policy across two generations.

Being uninsurable yourself is not the end of the road. It’s an invitation to think more creatively about who in your family can serve as the life insured while you remain the policy owner and the one directing the capital.

The best time to start was yesterday. The second-best time is now, but with one important condition: start before you need it.

Policy loans are available up to approximately 90% of your available cash value. If you don’t have cash value built up yet, you have nothing to borrow against. The system needs time to be capitalized before it can be deployed.

There’s also an insurability factor. People who are insurable today may not be insurable tomorrow. Health can change quickly and without warning. Starting while you are insurable and insuring other lives in your family while they are insurable protects your ability to expand the system in the future. Don’t wait for the perfect moment. Plant the fence posts of protection now.

This is where the mechanics become genuinely remarkable.

When you have a dividend-paying whole life insurance policy with a reputable mutual insurance carrier, you have access to a policy loan provision. Here’s how it works:

You request a loan for up to 90% of your available cash value minus any existing loan balance. The insurance carrier processes the request with no income verification, no credit check, no report to TransUnion or Equifax. They ask you two questions: do you want a cheque or a direct deposit?

That’s it.

Here’s the part that surprises most people: the loan does not reduce your cash value. Your cash value continues to grow daily, uninterrupted, as if the loan never happened. A lien is placed against the death benefit, not against the cash value itself. The day after you receive $90,000 in loan proceeds, your total cash value is actually higher than it was the day before, because it continues compounding.

Cash value, as Jayson explains it, is not money; it is the net present value of the future payment of a death benefit. It is contractually guaranteed to equal the total death benefit by age 100 of the life insured in Canada (age 121 in the US). Every day you age, every premium you pay, every dividend you reinvest as paid-up additions all of it increases that death benefit and the corresponding cash value. A policy loan doesn’t interrupt any of that.

Ready access to capital, on demand, on your terms, without reducing your assets’ value or triggering a taxable event. As Jayson put it: “Logic knocks on your door and says, how much of your capital do you not want residing here?”

On your own schedule, which is both the greatest advantage and the greatest responsibility of this system.

To bring this to life: Richard recently sat with a client in her early 20s, a great saver who had purchased a truck and spent the first year paying a conventional bank to build her credit. When it was time to pay off the $40,000 remaining balance, she had $62,000 available in her policy. She logged in, clicked a button, completed a DocuSign, and the funds were deposited within the week. She then set up automatic monthly bill payments from her online banking directly to her policy, one email to the insurance company with clear instructions on how to apply them, and the repayment process ran on autopilot.

The entire process, from requesting the loan to setting up repayment, took about 15 to 25 minutes on her phone.

But this flexibility comes with a serious responsibility. Nelson Nash’s two hard-and-fast rules for implementing this concept, from page 44 of Becoming Your Own Banker, are:

Build the repayment plan before you request the loan. Not after. The sequence matters. Your coach is responsible to you, not for you; the ongoing management and discipline belong to you.

Most people think of diversification in terms of stocks, bonds, and asset classes. Nelson Nash introduced a different kind: diversification in lives insured.

Rather than concentrating all your policy capital on a single life insured, a well-built system spreads policies across multiple family members. Over 19 years, Jayson’s family has built 77 policies across 27 individual lives insured. That’s a system — not a single policy.

The practical reason is simple: if health changes make one person uninsurable, the rest of the system continues to grow and can still be expanded through other insurable lives. The earlier you start insuring the people you love, the more options you protect for the future.

Everything in this episode comes back to Nelson’s two rules. Capitalize the system aggressively. Repay your loans responsibly. That’s it. The tool is reliable, the process is proven, but the behaviour of the policy owner matters more than anything the insurance company will ever do.

As Jayson and Richard have said many times: “The policy owner’s behaviour is far more critical than the behaviour of the insurance company.”

Want to find out if this is the right fit for your family?

Download the free 7 Steps Guide at 7steps.ca, a clear, time-saving roadmap to evaluate the process with confidence.

Get a free copy of Don’t Spread the Wealth at dontspreadwealth.com and learn how to keep your money in your family, on your terms, for generations.

• Q1: What Interest Rate Is Charged on Policy Loans?
• Q2: What Happens If You Don't Repay a Policy Loan?
• Q3: What Is the Difference Between Whole Life and Universal Life?
• Q4: Is the Death Benefit Tax-Free?
• Q5: Are Dividends Taxable? Is a Dividend Considered Income?
• Q6: Why Isn't Everyone Doing This?
• The Core Idea

If you’ve ever gone down the rabbit hole of the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC) online, you know the experience well: half the comments say it’s the most brilliant financial strategy they’ve ever encountered, and the other half insist it’s an elaborate scam usually from someone named “Crypto Wolf 1978” with a cartoon profile picture who has suddenly become a leading actuarial expert.

In this episode, Jayson and Richard tackle the questions they hear most often plainly, honestly, and without the noise. Here’s a breakdown of everything covered in Part 2 of their Infinite Banking FAQ series.

This is one of the first questions people ask, and while it’s a valid one, it’s also one of the last things you should be evaluating when choosing a carrier.

Policy loan interest rates vary by carrier and typically range from 5% to 9%, depending on the company and the current rate environment. Some carriers tie their loan rate to the prime rate; others base it on long-term internal assumptions about their participating account performance. At the time of recording (May 2026), rates in the range of 5.5%–7% are common depending on the policy vintage.

But here’s the more important framing: one Nelson Nash made brilliantly in Becoming Your Own Banker: IBC is not a function of interest rates. The real question is not “what rate am I paying?” it’s “where is the money flowing, and who is it working for?”

When you borrow from a conventional bank, your principal and your interest permanently leave your ecosystem. The bank’s shareholders benefit. When you borrow from your life insurance company, one you co-own as a participating policyholder and you repay that loan on your own schedule, both the principal and interest flow back to an entity that works for you. That’s a fundamentally different relationship with money.

Rate shopping before understanding that distinction is like staring at the cost of fertilizer while ignoring the growth of the entire orchard.

What should you be evaluating in a carrier? Dividend history, participating account management, loan process transparency, and ease of doing business. Loan rate is somewhere near the bottom of that list.

Policy loans are unlike any other type of borrowing. There’s no credit check, no income verification, and no one calling you demanding monthly payments. The capital is available on demand, on your terms, and repayment is entirely unstructured.

That flexibility is one of IBC’s most powerful features. It’s also one of its greatest responsibilities.

If you don’t repay a policy loan, the outstanding balance continues to accrue simple interest. If the loan balance grows too large relative to the policy’s cash value, the policy can eventually lapse, and if it lapses with gains inside it, there can be tax consequences.

The key principle here: flexibility is not the same as irresponsibility. If you’re already financially disciplined, if you have a track record of repaying conventional lenders on time, you’ll likely do just fine with the responsibility that comes with policy loans. If you wouldn’t, that’s worth examining honestly before implementing this strategy.

As we often say: wisdom matters more than enthusiasm. Never take a policy loan without a repayment plan already in place.

This question matters enormously, because they are not interchangeable, especially for IBC purposes.

Dividend-paying participating whole life is a unilateral contract. 100% of the risk sits with the insurance carrier, not with you. You receive contractually guaranteed daily growth, contractually guaranteed access to capital, a guaranteed (and typically increasing) death benefit, tax-sheltered accumulation, and dividends as a co-owner of a mutual insurance company. The insurance company manages the investment function, and they’re far better at it than most of us would be. It’s as close to “set it and forget it” as financial tools get.

Universal life, by contrast, is what one of us described as “term insurance with a slot machine attached.” It’s flexible, has more moving parts, depends on market performance and investment selections, and requires ongoing active management. Costs can increase significantly as you age, particularly with a yearly renewable term (YRT) structure, where the cost of insurance spikes exponentially as you approach natural mortality. If you stop paying premiums at precisely the moment when the cost of insurance is climbing most steeply, the policy can implode, pulling from internal cash value to survive, or lapse altogether.

We’ve had a lawyer on our platform whose primary job is managing class-action lawsuits against companies and advisors who sold universal life policies that were never designed to perform as promised. We meet clients regularly who have these structures; they looked great on paper at the time of sale, but the market changed, the behaviour wasn’t maintained, and the coverage they needed most is now at risk.

Their position: They have never illustrated, sold, or purchased a universal life policy for IBC implementation. If you’re evaluating this concept, make sure you’re working with participating dividend-paying whole life.

Listen on SPOTIFY!

Generally, yes, and it’s one of the most meaningful wealth transfer advantages available.

Death benefits paid to named beneficiaries from a properly structured participating whole life policy are received income tax-free in both Canada and the United States. The capital transfers immediately and privately, outside of probate, to your beneficiaries.

This is a significant reason why dividend-paying whole life plays such a central role in estate planning, business succession, and family legacy planning. Jayson and Richard have delivered a substantial number of death benefit claims over the years. Not once has a family said, “I wish this cheque were taxable and I hoped it would be less money.”

A couple of nuances: the policy must be in force at the time of death, and ownership and beneficiary structure matters particularly in Canada when dealing with corporately owned life insurance and capital dividend accounts.

The broader observation: the two certainties in life are death and taxes. The properly structured whole life insurance contract is one of the few tools designed to address both simultaneously.

This is where people often confuse insurance dividends with stock dividends. They use the same word. They are not the same thing.

Insurance dividends, declared and paid by a participating mutual life insurance company, are treated as a return of premium. When those dividends are directed into paid-up additions (PUAs), they are used to purchase more insurance coverage. They stay within the ecosystem of the insurance contract, and they are not taxable. In fact, because PUAs purchase more death benefit than the dividend itself is worth, they create an increasing tax-free outcome. You’re not paying tax; you’re compounding tax-free.

The taxable scenario only arises if you elect to receive dividends in cash or use them to reduce premiums to the point where they begin flowing out to you personally. The election you make when structuring your policy determines the outcome. For IBC purposes, the paid-up additions election is widely recognized as the most efficient.

Honestly? A combination of four things: knowledge, aptitude, decision fatigue, and about 60 years of the conventional financial machine doing what it was built to do.

For decades, the financial industry’s entire marketing infrastructure has been built around one message: give your money to someone else to invest. RRSPs, 401(k)s, mutual funds the boiled frog has been sitting in lukewarm water for so long that most people don’t even notice the temperature rising. They’ve been trained to outsource financial thinking.

Add to that the visceral reaction many people have to the word insurance. A bad experience with travel insurance, a friend’s car accident claim that didn’t pay out, a general distrust of insurance salespeople these emotional associations create a kind of mental freeze that shuts down rational thought before a conversation can even begin. As Nelson Nash called it: the arrival syndrome. The feeling that you’ve already learned enough, that there’s nothing new to consider. That feeling, when it’s attached to an emotional charge, actively prevents people from absorbing information that could change their financial lives.

The reaction we hear most often, once someone genuinely understands the mechanics, is: “Why did nobody explain this to me sooner?”

The answer is simple: explaining money properly is much harder than selling debt. And debt sells itself.

Financial frustration, for the overwhelming majority of people the Ascendant Financial team speaks with, comes from one root cause: giving away control of their money their entire lives without stopping to question it. They finance everything through conventional lenders. They transfer interest away permanently. They park money in places they can’t access efficiently. And then they wonder why they feel financially squeezed despite earning a solid income.

IBC is not a get-rich-quick scheme. It’s not a secret loophole discovered by a guy on YouTube wearing sunglasses indoors. It’s a disciplined financial behaviour paired with a reliable, time-tested financial tool. That’s it.

Once you understand the mechanics, the decision becomes obvious. The question is just whether you’re ready to have the conversation.

Ready to find out if this is the right fit for your family?

Download our free 7 Steps Guide at 7steps.ca, a smart, time-saving roadmap that helps you evaluate the process quickly so you can move forward with total confidence.

Or visit dontspreadwealth.com for a free digital copy of Don’t Spread the Wealth, a proven process to keep your money in your family forever, finance life on your terms, and pass on real control.

Until next time, keep asking great clarifying questions.

• The Allure of the 'Dream Job' And Its Hidden Costs
• The Unseen Side of Success: A Quest for Impact
• The Serendipitous Introduction to Infinite Banking
• The Pivot Point: From Personal Application to Professional Mission
• Rethinking Financial Responsibility: The Power of Ownership
• The New Game: Recapturing Capital vs. Accumulating More
• A New Chapter: Impact Over Commission
• Conclusion: Listen to the Uncomfortable Feeling

What if the financial doctrines you’ve been taught are meticulously designed to keep you tethered, preventing you from ever truly reaching financial independence and personal fulfillment? This provocative question lies at the heart of Josh’s remarkable journey. This story challenges conventional notions of success and reveals how a different approach to money can unlock profound life choices.

Josh, a key member of our team, candidly shares his experience of walking away from a lucrative, secure career, a position many aspire to, in pursuit of something more meaningful. His narrative is a testament to the idea that true success isn’t merely about accumulating wealth, but about cultivating impact and value.

Imagine dedicating 23 years to building a career that culminates in an income exceeding $200,000 annually, with full benefits, unlimited vacation, and equity in the business. On paper, it was the quintessential American dream. Yet, for Josh, an insidious feeling of misalignment gnawed at him.

“It’s kind of like leaving a perfectly good steak dinner because you think there might be sushi somewhere else. It’s a pretty risky move, but… our teammate Josh… he actually did it.”

This wasn’t a forced departure; it was a conscious choice driven by a hunger for meaning. Josh had achieved success and stability but found himself adrift in a sea of unfulfillment. Many people fear making such a leap, not due to inability, but reluctance. The prospect of trading something ‘good’ for the chance of something ‘better’ can be daunting. Yet, for Josh, the missing piece wasn’t financial; it was existential.

From an outsider’s perspective, Josh’s career trajectory was enviable. His initial foray into the insurance business as an agency owner brought him immense satisfaction. He loved the entrepreneurial spirit, the act of building something from the ground up.

“I loved being a business owner, and I loved building something… That changed my title. That changed my role. And I didn’t realize it at the time how it would change the feeling of doing the same thing I was doing, but taking out that ownership that that builder component of it.”

This shift from owner to employee, while offering expansion, subtly eroded his sense of purpose. A poignant conversation with his wife, whose career revolved around helping others, highlighted this disparity. While she found deep gratification in changing lives, Josh, despite his financial success, felt a void in his own impact.

Josh’s path to Infinite Banking was far from straightforward, marked by unexpected turns and a disarming humility. After years in the insurance industry, believing he knew it all, a series of failed certification exams served as a crucial wake-up call.

It was during a mandatory life and health insurance class, a subject he initially tried to avoid, that he encountered Charlie, an instructor whose passionate advocacy for life insurance left an indelible mark. Charlie’s fervour and a gifted book, Tax-Free Retirement, ignited a deep dive into alternative financial strategies.

This exploration wasn’t a rapid conversion. Josh spent months scrutinizing different tools, even initially investing in an Index Universal Life (IUL) policy. A podcast by Joe Rogan discussing longevity research sparked a revelation: the IUL’s structure, with its increasing cost of insurance, was fundamentally misaligned with an expanding lifespan. This realization prompted a pivot, driving him towards finding a solution that prioritized certainty and eliminated inherent risks. He eventually landed on Whole Life insurance as the core tool for implementing the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC).

Josh’s journey with Infinite Banking transcended personal application to become a professional mission. The watershed moment arrived in January 2020, after selling his insurance agency. Advised to let his significant proceeds sit for six months, the unforeseen arrival of COVID-19 and the subsequent market crash created an ideal environment for his deeper research into IBC.

His unique position as a licensed life insurance agent allowed him to directly implement IBC for himself, then his wife, and eventually his son. However, despite having the tools, he lacked a guide to navigate the intricacies of the process. This realization became a driving force.

“Every year when my premiums would come due for about 3 years, I would waver and… I would have to go back to, you know, Nelson’s book or a podcast or or do something to get my head straight because nobody else was doing this.”

This personal struggle underscored the critical need for education and guidance in a world where traditional financial advice often leads people down a path of abdication of responsibility.

Josh emphasizes a core principle: true financial empowerment comes from owning your financial decisions, not abdicating them to advisors, no matter how reputable.

“The problem is when it doesn’t work out, it’s not always and often not even very often the the person helping them’s fault. And when it does work out, well, sometimes it’s not because that person really did much of anything anyway… The reality is that it’s no one’s going to care about your money and your capital and your legacy and your value and your family more than you can.”

His conversations with retirees on the pickleball court further reinforce this. Many express regret, wishing they had approached their finances differently, often having relied on others for critical decisions. This sentiment catalyzed his commitment to guide others toward self-banking, offering resources and the space needed for individuals to reach their own informed conclusions.

Implementing Infinite Banking fundamentally shifted Josh’s financial perspective. He realized that the focus shouldn’t be solely on accumulating more, but on recapturing and controlling existing capital. This reframe alters the entire financial game.

“It’s not about accumulating more and trying to add to the pile of money. The celebration for me now is the light bulb went off. Like this person gets it. Like it’s clicking with them.”

This approach delivers a sense of ‘enoughness’ that eludes many financially successful individuals. Instead of perpetual chasing, there’s a calm confidence derived from a strategic, controlled financial process that doesn’t rely on market speculation or hope-based investing.

Josh’s transition to a role rooted in Infinite Banking marks a profound shift from his previous career. The celebrations are no longer tied to landing accounts or calculating commissions. Instead, they are measured by the ‘light bulb moments’ he witnesses in clients the genuine understanding and actionable insights they gain.

This new path allows him to leverage his strengths as a high fact-finder and his futuristic outlook, fulfilling his college-era dad’s wisdom: the purpose of life is to serve others. He’s moved from simply helping clients with property claims to having impactful, life-altering financial conversations.

Josh’s story is a compelling invitation to introspection. If you find yourself in a similar position, feeling a disparity between your external success and internal fulfillment, or questioning traditional financial advice, his journey offers a beacon.

As the popular saying goes, “If you follow the herd, you will be slaughtered.” Sometimes, the uncomfortable feeling is precisely what points you toward the right direction. There is always more to learn, more ways to expand your thinking about money and what’s truly possible for your life. By daring to question, to educate yourself, and to take ownership, you too can forge a path towards genuine financial freedom and profound personal meaning.

Ready to explore a different way of thinking about your money?

Watch the full interview with Josh and delve deeper into his transformative journey. Subscribe to our channel for more conversations that challenge the status quo and empower you to take control of your financial destiny.