
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Join me for a summary of Dalia El Bokle’s lecture exploring finishing in orthodontics. Part 3 focuses on digital indirect bonding, from scan to tray production
Introduction
Straight wire appliance – based on bracket placement will correct tooth in 3 planes of space
· Not true – evidenced by finishing bends
Ideal bracket placement through indirect bonding IDB
· Level marginal ridges posteriorly
· Constant smile arc anteriorly
Digital indirect bonding time saving
· Brackets placed Layman 2019
o Time saving
§ 21 minutes – digital indirect bonding Vs manual direct bonding
§ 8 minutes – clinical time indirect Vs direct bonding
Different methods of making an indirect digital bonding tray
Method 1:
· Printed model
· VFR transfer tray
· Transfer tray made from the model
Method 2
· Printer tray (not model)
· Cost $105
· Tray biocompatible tray
· Cover occlusal half of the teeth and lingual aspect
· Insert bracket into model
· Advantage
o No model printing
o Clean base technique
Method 3 –
· Key pads – digitally planned material between bracket base and tooth
o Customises the bracket base
o Advantage
§ Less flash
§ Accuracy of bracket position in on the keypad
§ Torque + in and out can be customised per tooth
· Models printed
· Lab place the brackets manually with composite onto the model with jigs
· Transfer tray made from the model
Case submission for DIDB
· Send STL file to lab
· Prescription for set up, e.g.
o Bracket selection customisation: Standard Damon Brackets, low torque lower incisors, high torque LL4.
o Teeth bonded: 7-7 Upper and lower
o Bracket positioning customisation: Smile arc – 0.5mm incisal U1s Vs U2s
· Clinician approval of set up
o Library of brackets – specify which type of bracket
Digital indirect bonding workflow overview
1. Scan patients
2. Orthodontist prescription
3. CAD –Software system to place bracket and customise base / bracket
4. Print model
5. Brackets placed on model: allowing for bracket base customisation through either keypads or jigs, customising bracket base with composite
6. CAM - Lab design indirect bonding tray (IBT)
a. VFR
b. Silicone transfer tray / Memosil material
7. Process IBT
8. Post processing chemical and UV light
9. Insert bracket into tray with key holes as guides
Advantages of DIDB
· Full digital pathway with scanning
· Less working time
· Fewer appointments
· Can alter prescription
Disadvantage
· Cost
· Learning curve
· Production waste
5
77 ratings
Join me for a summary of Dalia El Bokle’s lecture exploring finishing in orthodontics. Part 3 focuses on digital indirect bonding, from scan to tray production
Introduction
Straight wire appliance – based on bracket placement will correct tooth in 3 planes of space
· Not true – evidenced by finishing bends
Ideal bracket placement through indirect bonding IDB
· Level marginal ridges posteriorly
· Constant smile arc anteriorly
Digital indirect bonding time saving
· Brackets placed Layman 2019
o Time saving
§ 21 minutes – digital indirect bonding Vs manual direct bonding
§ 8 minutes – clinical time indirect Vs direct bonding
Different methods of making an indirect digital bonding tray
Method 1:
· Printed model
· VFR transfer tray
· Transfer tray made from the model
Method 2
· Printer tray (not model)
· Cost $105
· Tray biocompatible tray
· Cover occlusal half of the teeth and lingual aspect
· Insert bracket into model
· Advantage
o No model printing
o Clean base technique
Method 3 –
· Key pads – digitally planned material between bracket base and tooth
o Customises the bracket base
o Advantage
§ Less flash
§ Accuracy of bracket position in on the keypad
§ Torque + in and out can be customised per tooth
· Models printed
· Lab place the brackets manually with composite onto the model with jigs
· Transfer tray made from the model
Case submission for DIDB
· Send STL file to lab
· Prescription for set up, e.g.
o Bracket selection customisation: Standard Damon Brackets, low torque lower incisors, high torque LL4.
o Teeth bonded: 7-7 Upper and lower
o Bracket positioning customisation: Smile arc – 0.5mm incisal U1s Vs U2s
· Clinician approval of set up
o Library of brackets – specify which type of bracket
Digital indirect bonding workflow overview
1. Scan patients
2. Orthodontist prescription
3. CAD –Software system to place bracket and customise base / bracket
4. Print model
5. Brackets placed on model: allowing for bracket base customisation through either keypads or jigs, customising bracket base with composite
6. CAM - Lab design indirect bonding tray (IBT)
a. VFR
b. Silicone transfer tray / Memosil material
7. Process IBT
8. Post processing chemical and UV light
9. Insert bracket into tray with key holes as guides
Advantages of DIDB
· Full digital pathway with scanning
· Less working time
· Fewer appointments
· Can alter prescription
Disadvantage
· Cost
· Learning curve
· Production waste