Civilisation mésopotamienne
Dominique Charpin
Collège de France
Année 2022-2023
Colloque - Archives paléo-babyloniennes : 140 ans de publications et d'études (1882-2022) : To Be or Not to Be in Susa. Networks of Witnesses as a Tool in the Study of Archival Texts
Intervenant(s)
Katrien De Graef, Ghent University, Gand
A great part of the Old Babylonian archival texts kept nowadays in museum collections come from illicit excavations, and therefore lack archaeological and archival context. By studying these texts, and specifically the persons playing an active role in them, they can be grouped into dossiers around key figures to whose archives they once belonged and of whose deeds they attest. One group usually gets less attention, namely the witnesses listed at the end of agreement, especially as they are often mentioned without patronymic and/or title and are therefore not always easy to identify.
However, witnesses can give us interesting information, not only on the social network of the parties involved in the agreements, but also on how these documents came about: where were they written and who was present? Witnesses were not listed randomly: their presence and hierarchy can help us disambiguate them and as such also reconstruct ancient archives.
This will be elaborated by means of a case-study from Sukkalmah Susa.
View all episodes
By Collège de FranceCivilisation mésopotamienne
Dominique Charpin
Collège de France
Année 2022-2023
Colloque - Archives paléo-babyloniennes : 140 ans de publications et d'études (1882-2022) : To Be or Not to Be in Susa. Networks of Witnesses as a Tool in the Study of Archival Texts
Intervenant(s)
Katrien De Graef, Ghent University, Gand
A great part of the Old Babylonian archival texts kept nowadays in museum collections come from illicit excavations, and therefore lack archaeological and archival context. By studying these texts, and specifically the persons playing an active role in them, they can be grouped into dossiers around key figures to whose archives they once belonged and of whose deeds they attest. One group usually gets less attention, namely the witnesses listed at the end of agreement, especially as they are often mentioned without patronymic and/or title and are therefore not always easy to identify.
However, witnesses can give us interesting information, not only on the social network of the parties involved in the agreements, but also on how these documents came about: where were they written and who was present? Witnesses were not listed randomly: their presence and hierarchy can help us disambiguate them and as such also reconstruct ancient archives.
This will be elaborated by means of a case-study from Sukkalmah Susa.
25 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
5 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
1 Listeners
242 Listeners
69 Listeners
116 Listeners
39 Listeners
75 Listeners
114 Listeners
43 Listeners
77 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
31 Listeners
40 Listeners
10 Listeners
0 Listeners
1 Listeners
105 Listeners
1 Listeners
0 Listeners
3 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners